Checked — 1 thing to know before you publish
What we can verify is that we ingested the provider faithfully and that our own arithmetic agrees with itself. We cannot verify the field.
- Integrity job ran recently — 710 checks, 336 minutes ago.
- 7 invariants failing site-wide — mart.drive_scoring_matches_result, game.final_but_incomplete, team_season.no_ties, …. These are not yet scoped to a team, so we cannot say whether they touch this one.
- Game is final — The provider has marked it complete.
- Box score complete — 58 team rows, 407 player rows, 20 drives, 166 plays.
- Mart is current — Rebuilt 2026-09-18 20:24Z.
These checks are site-wide, not yet scoped to one team. A per-team, per-metric verdict is what mart.product_readiness will carry; until it exists, treat a clean panel as “nothing known to be wrong” rather than “this team is confirmed clean”.
at TCU
08/29/2026 12:00 PMAviva StadiumNeutral site
Season record
2–0
2 games played
Points for / against
50–13
Season to date
Point margin
+37
Season to date
Opponent context: TCU — 1–1, Big 12 · Full matchup →
Team box score
Exactly as ingested — no derived column here.
Box score
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| TCU | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
General
| TOP | PLAYS | YDS | PEN-YDS | 1ST | 3RD | 4TH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 26:58 | 57 | 322 | 3-20 | 20 | 3-11 27.3% | 1-1 100.0% |
| TCU | 33:02 | 71 | 281 | 11-90 | 18 | 7-16 43.8% | 1-5 20.0% |
Passing
| C/ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | INT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 16-28 | 232 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 |
| TCU | 20-32 | 175 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| CAR | YDS | AVG | TD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 29 | 90 | 3.1 | 1 |
| TCU | 39 | 106 | 2.7 | 1 |
Turnovers
| TO | FUM | LOST | INT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| TCU | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Defense
| TCK | TFL | QB HUR | SACKS | PD | INT | INT YDS | DEF TD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 41 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | — | — | 0 |
| TCU | 28 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | — | — | 0 |
Returns
| KR | KR YDS | AVG | KR TD | PR | PR YDS | AVG | PR TD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 1 | 24 | 24 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| TCU | — | — | — | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 0 |
Advanced metrics
⚠ Ingested from the provider, not computed here — anyone with a CFBD key has the same numbers.
Every column is that team’s offense, which is also what the other team’s defense allowed — CFBD reports a defense as the opponent’s offense restated. Bold marks the better number in a row; a higher stuff rate is a worse offense, so it reads the other way.
What is not here yet
Stated so nobody publishes on the assumption that it is.
- Written storylines. The generator is not built; this is the evidence it will be written from.
- Per-team readiness. The checks above are site-wide until mart.product_readiness exists.
- Coverage boundaries as data — so “first ever” claims are not supported at any confidence yet.