Week 2 · 2026 · weekly brief

Old Dominion

1–1 overallSun BeltTeam page →

OPEN

Checked — 1 thing to know before you publish

What we can verify is that we ingested the provider faithfully and that our own arithmetic agrees with itself. We cannot verify the field.

WITH CAVEATS

Integrity job ran recently — 710 checks, 334 minutes ago.
7 invariants failing site-wide — mart.drive_scoring_matches_result, game.final_but_incomplete, team_season.no_ties, …. These are not yet scoped to a team, so we cannot say whether they touch this one.
Game is final — The provider has marked it complete.
Box score complete — 58 team rows, 593 player rows, 24 drives, 190 plays.
Mart is current — Rebuilt 2026-09-18 20:24Z.

These checks are site-wide, not yet scoped to one team. A per-team, per-metric verdict is what mart.product_readiness will carry; until it exists, treat a clean panel as “nothing known to be wrong” rather than “this team is confirmed clean”.

at Virginia Tech

09/12/2026 12:00 PMLane Stadium

L 21–44

Season record

1–1

2 games played

Points for / against

52–54

Season to date

Point margin

-2

Season to date

Opponent context: Virginia Tech — 2–0, ACC · Full matchup →

Team box score

Exactly as ingested — no derived column here.

Box score

	1	2	3	4	T
ODU	3	3	7	8	21
VT	17	17	3	7	44

General

	TOP	PLAYS	YDS	PEN-YDS	1ST	3RD	4TH
ODU	21:36	52	310	6-45	11	4-13 30.8%	2-2 100.0%
VT	38:24	86	416	6-32	26	10-21 47.6%	3-3 100.0%

Passing

	C/ATT	YDS	AVG	TD	INT
ODU	13-21	187	8.9	1	0
VT	32-44	327	7.4	2	0

Rushing

	CAR	YDS	AVG	TD
ODU	31	123	4.0	1
VT	42	89	2.1	2

Turnovers

	TO	FUM	LOST	INT
ODU	3	4	3	0
VT	2	2	2	0

Defense

	TCK	TFL	QB HUR	SACKS	PD	INT	INT YDS	DEF TD
ODU	47	10	2	4	3	—	—	0
VT	24	14	4	7	1	—	—	1

Returns

	KR	KR YDS	AVG	KR TD	PR	PR YDS	AVG	PR TD
ODU	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
VT	1	4	4	0	2	78	39	0

Advanced metrics

⚠ Ingested from the provider, not computed here — anyone with a CFBD key has the same numbers.

Advanced stats	ODU	VT
Overall
Plays	49	89
Drives	12	11
PPA per play	0.12	0.21
Total PPA	5.9	18.5
Success rate	32.7%	37.1%
Explosiveness	1.65	1.53
Power success	33.3%	50.0%
Stuff rate	42.3%	33.3%
Line yards per rush	-0.65	2.10
Line yards	-17	82
Second-level yards per rush	1.31	0.72
Second-level yards	34	28
Open-field yards per rush	3.15	0.54
Open-field yards	82	21
Standard downs
PPA per play	0.09	-0.11
Success rate	32.1%	35.1%
Explosiveness	1.91	1.01
Passing downs
PPA per play	0.16	0.77
Success rate	33.3%	40.6%
Explosiveness	1.33	2.34
Rushing
PPA per rush	0.09	0.01
Total PPA	2.3	0.5
Success rate	30.8%	38.5%
Explosiveness	1.78	1.02
Passing
PPA per dropback	0.16	0.39
Total PPA	3.6	18.4
Success rate	34.8%	36.2%
Explosiveness	1.52	2.02

Every column is that team’s offense, which is also what the other team’s defense allowed — CFBD reports a defense as the opponent’s offense restated. Bold marks the better number in a row; a higher stuff rate is a worse offense, so it reads the other way.

What is not here yet

Stated so nobody publishes on the assumption that it is.

Written storylines. The generator is not built; this is the evidence it will be written from.
Per-team readiness. The checks above are site-wide until mart.product_readiness exists.
Coverage boundaries as data — so “first ever” claims are not supported at any confidence yet.