THIRD AND DATA

Abilene Christian game log

2022: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 1vs Lamar28–14 W834445.344–18622–39–258259–180–108–6340:2037%23%
Sep 10vs Prairie View A&M21–13 W643355.230–11020–34–225197–140–035–4227:2139%36%
Sep 17at Missouri17–34 L593085.227–10919–32–199113–140–121–525:5032%39%
Sep 24vs Western New Mexico34–7 W914695.253–21822–38–251306–172–215–5239:5342%20%
Oct 1at Utah Tech26–10 W854405.250–20015–35–2402610–191–113–3036:0037%38%
Oct 8at Stephen F. Austin38–41 L905275.945–24424–45–2833012–190–013–2932:2146%50%
Oct 15vs Southern Utah21–18 W692804.142–11817–27–162174–151–204–5132:0829%35%
Oct 29at North Dakota31–34 L473617.715–12221–32–239145–90–0210–9321:5751%55%
Nov 5at Tarleton State28–23 W584577.922–6825–36–389178–130–027–6328:0943%46%
Nov 12at Sam Houston45–28 W863984.638–13630–48–262247–181–115–5038:4341%30%
Nov 19vs Stephen F. Austin21–24 L563646.516–4426–40–320141–101–307–7025:2039%38%
Season11 games7–47884,3835.6382–1555241–406–2,82822772–1666–111358–5485:48:0240%38%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: ACU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is ACU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:ACU offense 40% (301 of 761)Opponent offense / ACU defense 38% (267 of 703)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Lamar: opponent offense 23% of 47Lamar: ACU offense 37% of 83Prairie View A&M: opponent offense 36% of 73Prairie View A&M: ACU offense 39% of 64Missouri: opponent offense 39% of 75Missouri: ACU offense 32% of 59Western New Mexico: opponent offense 20% of 55Western New Mexico: ACU offense 42% of 91Utah Tech: opponent offense 38% of 40Utah Tech: ACU offense 37% of 60Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 50% of 64Stephen F. Austin: ACU offense 46% of 90Southern Utah: opponent offense 35% of 69Southern Utah: ACU offense 29% of 69North Dakota: opponent offense 55% of 69North Dakota: ACU offense 51% of 47Tarleton State: opponent offense 46% of 72Tarleton State: ACU offense 43% of 56Sam Houston: opponent offense 30% of 66Sam Houston: ACU offense 41% of 86Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 38% of 73Stephen F. Austin: ACU offense 39% of 56
LamarPrairie View A&M@ MissouriWestern New Mexico@ Utah Tech@ Stephen F. AustinSouthern Utah@ North Dakota@ Tarleton State@ Sam HoustonStephen F. Austin
ACU offenseOpponent offense (ACU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Lamar

28–14 W · 83 plays to 47
ACU offense 37% (31/83)Lamar offense 23% (11/47)

vs Prairie View A&M

21–13 W · 64 plays to 73
ACU offense 39% (25/64)Prairie View A&M offense 36% (26/73)

at Missouri

17–34 L · 59 plays to 75
ACU offense 32% (19/59)Missouri offense 39% (29/75)

vs Western New Mexico

34–7 W · 91 plays to 55
ACU offense 42% (38/91)Western N.M. offense 20% (11/55)

at Utah Tech

26–10 W · 60 plays to 40
ACU offense 37% (22/60)Utah Tech offense 38% (15/40)

at Stephen F. Austin

38–41 L · 90 plays to 64
ACU offense 46% (41/90)SFA offense 50% (32/64)

vs Southern Utah

21–18 W · 69 plays to 69
ACU offense 29% (20/69)Southern Utah offense 35% (24/69)

at North Dakota

31–34 L · 47 plays to 69
ACU offense 51% (24/47)North Dakota offense 55% (38/69)

at Tarleton State

28–23 W · 56 plays to 72
ACU offense 43% (24/56)Tarleton State offense 46% (33/72)

at Sam Houston

45–28 W · 86 plays to 66
ACU offense 41% (35/86)Sam Houston offense 30% (20/66)

vs Stephen F. Austin

21–24 L · 56 plays to 73
ACU offense 39% (22/56)SFA offense 38% (28/73)