THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

AkronZips

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Akron played 2 such games.

Mid-American, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Akron7–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (245.0 yds/g · 490 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 14 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (538.5 yds/g allowed · 1,077 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46.5 pts/g allowed · 93 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-39.5 /g · -79 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:19 /g · 0h 59m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#56 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 337.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.435 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.230 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.498 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#23 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #23–#23. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #51–#51. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #54–#54. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #47–#47. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #52–#52. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #33–#33. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#25 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #25–#25. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #16–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #10–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #12–#107. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#98 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #83–#120. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #51–#51. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#27 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #27–#27. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #37–#37. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #32–#32. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #29–#29. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#5 — top 10 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #5–#5. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2017Central Michigan8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 70 teams · 422.7 yds/g · 1,268 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 70 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 452.7 yds/g allowed · 1,358 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g allowed · 96 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · -8.7 /g · -26 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 7 taken, 7 given · +0.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 30:51 /g · 1h 33m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 130 teams · 387.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 70 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Eastern Michigan5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (343.0 yds/g · 686 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (18.0 pts/g · 36 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (277.0 yds/g allowed · 554 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (18.5 pts/g allowed · 37 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.5 /g · -1 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 3 taken, 4 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:46 /g · 1h 00m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#73 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 130 teams · 292.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.338 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.187 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Ball State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (375.0 yds/g · 375 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (216.0 yds/g allowed · 216 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3.0 /g · -3 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 1 taken, 2 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36:33 /g · 0h 37m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 318.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.186 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Bowling Green2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (282.0 yds/g · 564 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (8.5 pts/g · 17 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (571.5 yds/g allowed · 1,143 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42.0 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-33.5 /g · -67 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 5 taken, 2 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:57 /g · 0h 52m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#74 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 361.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.367 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Buffalo6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (262.0 yds/g · 262 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 7 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (408.0 yds/g allowed · 408 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g allowed · 17 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-10.0 /g · -10 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23:01 /g · 0h 23m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#69 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 294.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.210 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Kent State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (135.0 yds/g · 270 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 6 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (602.0 yds/g allowed · 1,204 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49.0 pts/g allowed · 98 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-46.0 /g · -92 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 5 taken, 3 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:54 /g · 1h 10m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#52 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 130 teams · 288.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.258 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.511 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (57% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.024 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Miami (OH)5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (377.0 yds/g · 377 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g · 17 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (503.0 yds/g allowed · 503 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52.0 pts/g allowed · 52 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-35.0 /g · -35 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 0 taken, 2 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:33 /g · 0h 36m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#63 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 413.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.504 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.672 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (2.143 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Northern Illinois8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (290.0 yds/g · 580 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.5 pts/g · 41 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (361.5 yds/g allowed · 723 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.0 pts/g allowed · 40 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0.5 /g · +1 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24:54 /g · 0h 50m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#88 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 130 teams · 374.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.048 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Ohio9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (423.0 yds/g · 846 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.5 pts/g · 63 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (504.5 yds/g allowed · 1,009 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37.0 pts/g allowed · 74 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-5.5 /g · -11 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:23 /g · 1h 01m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#89 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 326.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.293 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.321 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.435 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.390 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Toledo11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (429.0 yds/g · 429 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30.0 pts/g · 30 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (587.0 yds/g allowed · 587 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52.0 pts/g allowed · 52 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-22.0 /g · -22 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:31 /g · 0h 36m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#20 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 366.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.558 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.382 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.444 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2017Western Michigan6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (276.0 yds/g · 552 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.5 pts/g · 45 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (489.0 yds/g allowed · 978 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.5 pts/g allowed · 77 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-16.0 /g · -32 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:54 /g · 1h 02m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 414.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.321 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.274 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20172017 AkronMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #23
Total offense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #23 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 23.
Scoring offensemedian #51
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #51 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 51.
Total defensemedian #54
Total defense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #54 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 54.
Scoring defensemedian #47
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #47 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 47.
Point marginmedian #52
Point margin. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #52 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 52.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #33 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #25
Possession. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #25 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 25.
Returning passingmedian #69
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ball State #16 of 130; 2017 Toledo #20 of 130; 2017 Kent State #52 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #63 of 130; 2017 Buffalo #69 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #73 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #74 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #88 of 130; 2017 Ohio #89 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #117 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Akron, ranked 56 of 130. Mid-American median rank 69.
Returning receivingmedian #76
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Eastern Michigan #10 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #16 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #17 of 130; 2017 Kent State #23 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #45 of 130; 2017 Toledo #76 of 130; 2017 Buffalo #94 of 130; 2017 Ohio #100 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #104 of 130; 2017 Ball State #113 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Akron, ranked 90 of 130. Mid-American median rank 76.
Returning rushingmedian #37
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Kent State #12 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #22 of 130; 2017 Ball State #25 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #27 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #35 of 130; 2017 Ohio #56 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #78 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #83 of 130; 2017 Buffalo #94 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #102 of 130; 2017 Toledo #107 of 130. Marked: 2017 Akron, ranked 37 of 130. Mid-American median rank 37.
Team talentmedian #98
Team talent. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Western Michigan #83 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #84 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #89 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #93 of 130; 2017 Toledo #95 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #98 of 130; 2017 Ohio #113 of 130; 2017 Ball State #114 of 130; 2017 Buffalo #117 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #118 of 130; 2017 Kent State #120 of 130. Marked: 2017 Akron, ranked 104 of 130. Mid-American median rank 98.
Offensive EPAmedian #51
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #51 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 51.
Defensive EPAmedian #27
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #27 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 27.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #37 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #32 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #29
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #29 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 29.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #5
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #5 of 70. Marked: 2017 Akron, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 5.