THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Arizona StateSun Devils

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Pac-12, 2012

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Arizona State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 124 teams · 464.5 yds/g · 6,039 yds)#14 (of 124 teams · 38.4 pts/g · 499 points)#28 (of 124 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,560 yds)#40 (of 124 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#15 (of 124 teams · +14.1 /g · +183 on the season)#40 (of 124 teams · +6 on the season · 30 taken, 24 given · +0.46 /g)#86 (of 124 teams · 29:32 /g · 6h 24m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 124 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 124 teams · -0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#21 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 124 teams · 0.970 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#43 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #5–#119. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #2–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #21–#122. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #11–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #10–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#60 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #7–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #8–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #10–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #8–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #10–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2012Oregon12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 537.4 yds/g · 6,986 yds)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 49.6 pts/g · 645 points)#45 (of 124 teams · 374.1 yds/g allowed · 4,864 yds)#25 (of 124 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +28.0 /g · +364 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +21 on the season · 40 taken, 19 given · +1.62 /g)#103 (of 124 teams · 28:27 /g · 6h 10m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 47% of plays successful)#67 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 124 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.747 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012USC7–65 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 124 teams · 432.9 yds/g · 5,628 yds)#40 (of 124 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#62 (of 124 teams · 394.0 yds/g allowed · 5,122 yds)#40 (of 124 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#37 (of 124 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)#71 (of 124 teams · -2 on the season · 32 taken, 34 given · -0.15 /g)#79 (of 124 teams · 29:46 /g · 6h 27m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 124 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 124 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#64 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#93 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 124 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.819 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Washington State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 124 teams · 359.5 yds/g · 4,314 yds)#108 (of 124 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 245 points)#85 (of 124 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 5,111 yds)#101 (of 124 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#113 (of 124 teams · -13.3 /g · -159 on the season)#104 (of 124 teams · -9 on the season · 21 taken, 30 given · -0.75 /g)#114 (of 124 teams · 27:39 /g · 5h 32m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 124 teams · 0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 124 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#114 (of 124 teams · 37% of plays successful)#94 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.006 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 124 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Oregon State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 124 teams · 431.5 yds/g · 5,609 yds)#37 (of 124 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 423 points)#31 (of 124 teams · 354.0 yds/g allowed · 4,602 yds)#22 (of 124 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#26 (of 124 teams · +11.9 /g · +155 on the season)#28 (of 124 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.62 /g)#16 (of 124 teams · 32:55 /g · 7h 08m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 124 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#56 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#37 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 124 teams · 0.943 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 124 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Stanford12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 124 teams · 374.4 yds/g · 5,242 yds)#72 (of 124 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 390 points)#21 (of 124 teams · 336.6 yds/g allowed · 4,712 yds)#11 (of 124 teams · 17.2 pts/g allowed · 241 points)#29 (of 124 teams · +10.6 /g · +149 on the season)#27 (of 124 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.64 /g)#41 (of 124 teams · 31:30 /g · 7h 21m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 124 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#76 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 124 teams · 0.900 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 124 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UCLA9–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 124 teams · 464.9 yds/g · 6,508 yds)#31 (of 124 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 482 points)#79 (of 124 teams · 415.9 yds/g allowed · 5,823 yds)#58 (of 124 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#44 (of 124 teams · +6.9 /g · +96 on the season)#37 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 32 taken, 25 given · +0.50 /g)#50 (of 124 teams · 31:04 /g · 7h 15m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 124 teams · 0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 124 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#57 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#41 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 124 teams · 0.953 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Utah5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 124 teams · 324.4 yds/g · 3,893 yds)#75 (of 124 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 320 points)#38 (of 124 teams · 362.9 yds/g allowed · 4,355 yds)#49 (of 124 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#66 (of 124 teams · +1.6 /g · +19 on the season)#44 (of 124 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.33 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 33:10 /g · 6h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 124 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 124 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 36% of plays successful)#46 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 124 teams · 0.920 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 124 teams · 0.931 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Washington7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 124 teams · 355.2 yds/g · 4,618 yds)#90 (of 124 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 312 points)#32 (of 124 teams · 357.4 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yds)#39 (of 124 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#72 (of 124 teams · -0.1 /g · -2 on the season)#41 (of 124 teams · +5 on the season · 33 taken, 28 given · +0.38 /g)#26 (of 124 teams · 32:08 /g · 6h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 124 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 124 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#88 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#33 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 124 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 124 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Arizona8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 526.1 yds/g · 6,840 yds)#15 (of 124 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#122 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 499.0 yds/g allowed · 6,487 yds)#105 (of 124 teams · 35.3 pts/g allowed · 459 points)#59 (of 124 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 27 taken, 28 given · -0.08 /g)#118 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 27:03 /g · 5h 52m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 124 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 124 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#15 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#104 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 124 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 124 teams · 0.918 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012California3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 (of 124 teams · 390.8 yds/g · 4,689 yds)#93 (of 124 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#95 (of 124 teams · 441.3 yds/g allowed · 5,295 yds)#98 (of 124 teams · 33.1 pts/g allowed · 397 points)#106 (of 124 teams · -10.1 /g · -121 on the season)#97 (of 124 teams · -7 on the season · 23 taken, 30 given · -0.58 /g)#116 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 27:27 /g · 5h 29m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 124 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 124 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#63 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#72 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 124 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 124 teams · 0.981 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Colorado1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 302.8 yds/g · 3,633 yds)#120 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 17.8 pts/g · 214 points)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 488.5 yds/g allowed · 5,862 yds)#124 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 46.0 pts/g allowed · 552 points)#124 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -28.2 /g · -338 on the season)#122 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -19 on the season · 15 taken, 34 given · -1.58 /g)#21 (of 124 teams · 32:36 /g · 6h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 35% of plays successful)#116 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 124 teams · 0.891 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 124 teams · 1.004 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20122012 Arizona StatePac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #43
Total offense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #5 of 124; 2012 Arizona #7 of 124; 2012 UCLA #24 of 124; 2012 USC #41 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #43 of 124; 2012 California #69 of 124; 2012 Stanford #86 of 124; 2012 Washington State #96 of 124; 2012 Washington #99 of 124; 2012 Utah #108 of 124; 2012 Colorado #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 25 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 43.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #2 of 124; 2012 Arizona #15 of 124; 2012 UCLA #31 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #37 of 124; 2012 USC #40 of 124; 2012 Stanford #72 of 124; 2012 Utah #75 of 124; 2012 Washington #90 of 124; 2012 California #93 of 124; 2012 Washington State #108 of 124; 2012 Colorado #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 14 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Stanford #21 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #31 of 124; 2012 Washington #32 of 124; 2012 Utah #38 of 124; 2012 Oregon #45 of 124; 2012 USC #62 of 124; 2012 UCLA #79 of 124; 2012 Washington State #85 of 124; 2012 California #95 of 124; 2012 Colorado #121 of 124; 2012 Arizona #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 28 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #40
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Stanford #11 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #22 of 124; 2012 Oregon #25 of 124; 2012 Washington #39 of 124; 2012 USC #40 of 124; 2012 Utah #49 of 124; 2012 UCLA #58 of 124; 2012 California #98 of 124; 2012 Washington State #101 of 124; 2012 Arizona #105 of 124; 2012 Colorado #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 40 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 40.
Point marginmedian #44
Point margin. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #1 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #26 of 124; 2012 Stanford #29 of 124; 2012 USC #37 of 124; 2012 UCLA #44 of 124; 2012 Arizona #59 of 124; 2012 Utah #66 of 124; 2012 Washington #72 of 124; 2012 California #106 of 124; 2012 Washington State #113 of 124; 2012 Colorado #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 15 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 44.
Turnover marginmedian #41
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #1 of 124; 2012 Stanford #27 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #28 of 124; 2012 UCLA #37 of 124; 2012 Washington #41 of 124; 2012 Utah #44 of 124; 2012 Arizona #65 of 124; 2012 USC #71 of 124; 2012 California #97 of 124; 2012 Washington State #104 of 124; 2012 Colorado #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 40 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 41.
Possessionmedian #50
Possession. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Utah #10 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #16 of 124; 2012 Colorado #21 of 124; 2012 Washington #26 of 124; 2012 Stanford #41 of 124; 2012 UCLA #50 of 124; 2012 USC #79 of 124; 2012 Oregon #103 of 124; 2012 Washington State #114 of 124; 2012 California #116 of 124; 2012 Arizona #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 86 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 50.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Arizona State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Arizona State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Arizona State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Arizona State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #60
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #7 of 124; 2012 Arizona #20 of 124; 2012 UCLA #47 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #59 of 124; 2012 California #60 of 124; 2012 Stanford #72 of 124; 2012 USC #80 of 124; 2012 Washington #90 of 124; 2012 Utah #98 of 124; 2012 Washington State #100 of 124; 2012 Colorado #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 48 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 60.
Defensive EPAmedian #48
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #8 of 124; 2012 Washington #21 of 124; 2012 Stanford #32 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #44 of 124; 2012 UCLA #48 of 124; 2012 Washington State #49 of 124; 2012 USC #56 of 124; 2012 California #64 of 124; 2012 Utah #76 of 124; 2012 Arizona #106 of 124; 2012 Colorado #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 13 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 48.
Offensive success ratemedian #63
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #10 of 124; 2012 Arizona #15 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #56 of 124; 2012 UCLA #57 of 124; 2012 California #63 of 124; 2012 USC #64 of 124; 2012 Stanford #76 of 124; 2012 Washington #88 of 124; 2012 Washington State #114 of 124; 2012 Utah #117 of 124; 2012 Colorado #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 21 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 63.
Defensive success ratemedian #46
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Stanford #18 of 124; 2012 Washington #33 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #37 of 124; 2012 UCLA #41 of 124; 2012 Utah #46 of 124; 2012 Oregon #67 of 124; 2012 California #72 of 124; 2012 USC #93 of 124; 2012 Washington State #94 of 124; 2012 Arizona #104 of 124; 2012 Colorado #116 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 8 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 46.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #68
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Washington State #10 of 124; 2012 USC #22 of 124; 2012 UCLA #42 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #50 of 124; 2012 Arizona #65 of 124; 2012 Utah #68 of 124; 2012 Oregon #74 of 124; 2012 California #82 of 124; 2012 Stanford #87 of 124; 2012 Washington #93 of 124; 2012 Colorado #94 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 115 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #50
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #1 of 124; 2012 USC #6 of 124; 2012 Washington State #11 of 124; 2012 Washington #13 of 124; 2012 UCLA #32 of 124; 2012 Arizona #50 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #54 of 124; 2012 Utah #62 of 124; 2012 California #98 of 124; 2012 Stanford #111 of 124; 2012 Colorado #112 of 124. Marked: 2012 Arizona State, ranked 93 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 50.