THIRD AND DATA

Army game log

2008: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Temple7–35 L———————————36%45%
Sep 6vs New Hampshire10–28 L———————————38%45%
Sep 20vs Akron3–22 L———————————39%56%
Sep 27at Texas A&M17–21 L———————————42%37%
Oct 4at Tulane44–13 W———————————30%46%
Oct 11vs Eastern Michigan17–13 W———————————39%32%
Oct 18at Buffalo24–27 L———————————50%35%
Oct 25vs Louisiana Tech14–7 W———————————38%32%
Nov 1vs Air Force7–16 L———————————28%27%
Nov 8at Rice31–38 L———————————45%54%
Nov 22at Rutgers3–30 L———————————29%50%
Dec 6vs Navy0–34 L———————————22%46%
Season12 games3–9—————–—–———————37%42%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Army on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Army's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Army offense 37% (273 of 741)Opponent offense / Army defense 42% (292 of 690)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Temple: opponent offense 45% of 51Temple: Army offense 36% of 72New Hampshire: opponent offense 45% of 53New Hampshire: Army offense 38% of 66Akron: opponent offense 56% of 61Akron: Army offense 39% of 61Texas A&M: opponent offense 37% of 43Texas A&M: Army offense 42% of 62Tulane: opponent offense 46% of 57Tulane: Army offense 30% of 40Eastern Michigan: opponent offense 32% of 59Eastern Michigan: Army offense 39% of 62Buffalo: opponent offense 35% of 65Buffalo: Army offense 50% of 60Louisiana Tech: opponent offense 32% of 57Louisiana Tech: Army offense 38% of 64Air Force: opponent offense 27% of 56Air Force: Army offense 28% of 72Rice: opponent offense 54% of 57Rice: Army offense 45% of 80Rutgers: opponent offense 50% of 64Rutgers: Army offense 29% of 51Navy: opponent offense 46% of 67Navy: Army offense 22% of 51
TempleNew HampshireAkron@ Texas A&M@ TulaneEastern Michigan@ BuffaloLouisiana TechAir Force@ Rice@ RutgersNavy *
Army offenseOpponent offense (Army defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Temple

7–35 L · 72 plays to 51
Army offense 36% (26/72)Temple offense 45% (23/51)

vs New Hampshire

10–28 L · 66 plays to 53
Army offense 38% (25/66)New Hampshire offense 45% (24/53)

vs Akron

3–22 L · 61 plays to 61
Army offense 39% (24/61)Akron offense 56% (34/61)

at Texas A&M

17–21 L · 62 plays to 43
Army offense 42% (26/62)Texas A&M offense 37% (16/43)

at Tulane

44–13 W · 40 plays to 57
Army offense 30% (12/40)Tulane offense 46% (26/57)

vs Eastern Michigan

17–13 W · 62 plays to 59
Army offense 39% (24/62)Eastern Michigan offense 32% (19/59)

at Buffalo

24–27 L · 60 plays to 65
Army offense 50% (30/60)Buffalo offense 35% (23/65)

vs Louisiana Tech

14–7 W · 64 plays to 57
Army offense 38% (24/64)Louisiana Tech offense 32% (18/57)

vs Air Force

7–16 L · 72 plays to 56
Army offense 28% (20/72)Air Force offense 27% (15/56)

at Rice

31–38 L · 80 plays to 57
Army offense 45% (36/80)Rice offense 54% (31/57)

at Rutgers

3–30 L · 51 plays to 64
Army offense 29% (15/51)Rutgers offense 50% (32/64)

vs Navy

0–34 L · 51 plays to 67
Army offense 22% (11/51)Navy offense 46% (31/67)