Metrics

ArmyBlack Knights

Season
Current

FBS Independents

FBS Independents, 2017

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Army1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range 0–1.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 130 teams · 390.1 yds/g · 5,071 yards)#46 (of 130 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 399 points)#31 (of 130 teams · 349.2 yds/g allowed · 4,540 yards)#32 (of 130 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#30 (of 130 teams · +8.7 /g · +113 on the season)#30 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 15 taken, 10 given · +0.38 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:44 /g · 7h 31m on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#91 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#129 (of 130 teams · 88.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 130 teams · 0.280 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 130 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful)#116 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#126 (of 130 teams · 1.058 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 130 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 4 FBS Independents teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range 0–1.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#35 (Total offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #27–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #24–#124. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#47 (Total defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #31–#75. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#32 (Scoring defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #31–#94. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#30 (Point margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #20–#104. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #30–#118. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#86 (Possession: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #4–#113. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)#31 (Returning passing: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #16–#123. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#42 (Returning receiving: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #34–#91. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#34 (Returning rushing: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #31–#125. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#53 (Team talent: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #10–#129. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)#18 (Offensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #11–#113. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #33–#87. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#71 (Offensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #3–#103. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #28–#116. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#7 — top 10 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #3–#126. 2 of 4 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range #2–#103. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)
2017BYU490 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range 0–1.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#119 (of 130 teams · 325.1 yds/g · 4,227 yards)#124 (of 130 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 222 points)#51 (of 130 teams · 372.9 yds/g allowed · 4,847 yards)#46 (of 130 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#104 (of 130 teams · -7.6 /g · -99 on the season)#118 (of 130 teams · -10 on the season · 17 taken, 27 given · -0.77 /g)#109 (of 130 teams · 27:53 /g · 6h 03m on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#125 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)#53 (of 130 teams · 574.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 130 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 130 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#88 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 130 teams · 1.078 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.999 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Massachusetts480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range 0–1.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 130 teams · 433.0 yds/g · 5,196 yards)#47 (of 130 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 367 points)#75 (of 130 teams · 404.9 yds/g allowed · 4,859 yards)#94 (of 130 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#82 (of 130 teams · -1.3 /g · -15 on the season)#45 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.25 /g)#86 (of 130 teams · 29:09 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#42 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 367.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 130 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 130 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#42 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.349 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 130 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Notre Dame1031 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2017. Range 0–1.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 USC, #16 Michigan State, #24 NC State · postseason: #17 LSU)#27 (of 130 teams · 448.3 yds/g · 5,828 yards)#24 (of 130 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 445 points)#47 (of 130 teams · 369.1 yds/g allowed · 4,799 yards)#31 (of 130 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#20 (of 130 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#46 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.23 /g)#113 (of 130 teams · 27:34 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#123 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 837.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 130 teams · 0.254 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 130 teams · 0.066 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#28 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.418 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 130 teams · 1.164 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20172017 ArmyFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #35
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #27 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #35 of 130; 2017 BYU #119 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 76 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 35.
Scoring offensemedian #46
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #24 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #47 of 130; 2017 BYU #124 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 46 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 46.
Total defensemedian #47
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #47 of 130; 2017 BYU #51 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #75 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 31 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 47.
Scoring defensemedian #32
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #31 of 130; 2017 BYU #46 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #94 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 32 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 32.
Point marginmedian #30
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #20 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #82 of 130; 2017 BYU #104 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 30 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 30.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Massachusetts #45 of 130; 2017 Notre Dame #46 of 130; 2017 BYU #118 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 30 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #86
Possession. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Massachusetts #86 of 130; 2017 BYU #109 of 130; 2017 Notre Dame #113 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 4 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 86.
Returning passingmedian #31
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Massachusetts #16 of 130; 2017 BYU #103 of 130; 2017 Notre Dame #123 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 31 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 31.
Returning receivingmedian #42
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #34 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #42 of 130; 2017 BYU #79 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 91 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 42.
Returning rushingmedian #34
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Massachusetts #34 of 130; 2017 Notre Dame #84 of 130; 2017 BYU #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 31 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 34.
Team talentmedian #53
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #10 of 130; 2017 BYU #53 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #94 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 129 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 53.
Offensive EPAmedian #18
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #18 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #33 of 130; 2017 BYU #113 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 11 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 18.
Defensive EPAmedian #55
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #33 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #55 of 130; 2017 BYU #65 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 87 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 55.
Offensive success ratemedian #71
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #71 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #85 of 130; 2017 BYU #103 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 3 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 71.
Defensive success ratemedian #42
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #28 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #42 of 130; 2017 BYU #88 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 116 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 42.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #7
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Notre Dame #3 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #7 of 130; 2017 BYU #122 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 126 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 7.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #34
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2017, best rank first: 2017 BYU #2 of 130; 2017 Notre Dame #42 of 130; 2017 Massachusetts #103 of 130. Marked: 2017 Army, ranked 34 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 34.