THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

ArmyBlack Knights

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Army played 1 such game.

FBS Independents, 2019

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Army5–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (243.0 yds/g · 243 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (340.0 yds/g allowed · 340 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3.0 /g · -3 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:35 /g · 0h 32m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 265.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.806 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#49 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#71. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#47 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #20–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #11–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #15–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#53 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #15–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #11–#71. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#61 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #42–#72. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning passing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#104. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#42 (Returning receiving: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #20–#98. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#82 (Returning rushing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#128. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#114 (Team talent: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #14–#129. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#55 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #27–#69. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #18–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #27–#65. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #25–#71. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #4–#73. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#5 — top 10 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #1–#73. 2 of 6 in the top 10.)
2019Notre Dame11–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 USC, #23 Navy, #24 Virginia)#31 (of 73 teams · 395.6 yds/g · 3,560 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 275 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 326.7 yds/g allowed · 2,940 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 190 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · +9.4 /g · +85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · +6 in these games · 17 taken, 11 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 843.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 73 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.138 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019BYU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Boise State, #22 USC)#49 (of 73 teams · 356.3 yds/g · 1,425 yds · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 90 points · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 428.8 yds/g allowed · 1,715 yds · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 32.0 pts/g allowed · 128 points · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · -9.5 /g · -38 in these games · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 6 taken, 6 given · +0.00 /g · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 25:45 /g · 1h 43m in these games · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 560.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 73 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 0.188 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 41% of plays successful · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Massachusetts1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (307.0 yds/g · 614 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.5 pts/g · 27 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (482.0 yds/g allowed · 964 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46.5 pts/g allowed · 93 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-33.0 /g · -66 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 6 taken, 3 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:01 /g · 0h 54m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#104 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 358.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.277 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.292 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.382 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Liberty8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 73 teams · 346.3 yds/g · 1,039 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 61 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 443.3 yds/g allowed · 1,330 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 41.0 pts/g allowed · 123 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -20.7 /g · -62 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 3 taken, 7 given · -1.33 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 24:04 /g · 1h 12m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 153.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 73 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 0.264 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 35% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.444 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019New Mexico State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 257.3 yds/g · 772 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 6.7 pts/g · 20 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 609.0 yds/g allowed · 1,827 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 53.7 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -47.0 /g · -141 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 1 taken, 6 given · -1.67 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 27:35 /g · 1h 23m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 269.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.473 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 35% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.082 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.553 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20192019 ArmyFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #49
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #31 of 73; 2019 BYU #49 of 73; 2019 Liberty #54 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 49.
Scoring offensemedian #47
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #20 of 73; 2019 BYU #47 of 73; 2019 Liberty #55 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 47.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #11 of 73; 2019 BYU #45 of 73; 2019 Liberty #51 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #15 of 73; 2019 BYU #48 of 73; 2019 Liberty #70 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #53
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #15 of 73; 2019 BYU #53 of 73; 2019 Liberty #66 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 53.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #11 of 73; 2019 BYU #34 of 73; 2019 Liberty #69 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #61
Possession. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #42 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #61 of 73; 2019 BYU #68 of 73; 2019 Liberty #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 61.
Returning passingmedian #38
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #31 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #34 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #68 of 130; 2019 BYU #79 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #104 of 130. Marked: 2019 Army, ranked 38 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning receivingmedian #42
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #20 of 130; 2019 BYU #31 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #42 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #75 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #98 of 130. Marked: 2019 Army, ranked 49 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 42.
Returning rushingmedian #82
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 New Mexico State #12 of 130; 2019 Liberty #22 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #82 of 130; 2019 BYU #100 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Army, ranked 94 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 82.
Team talentmedian #114
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #14 of 130; 2019 BYU #68 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #114 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #127 of 130; 2019 Liberty #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 Army, ranked 128 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 114.
Offensive EPAmedian #55
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #27 of 73; 2019 BYU #55 of 73; 2019 Liberty #58 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #69 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 55.
Defensive EPAmedian #40
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #18 of 73; 2019 BYU #40 of 73; 2019 Liberty #57 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 40.
Offensive success ratemedian #38
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #27 of 73; 2019 BYU #38 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #64 of 73; 2019 Liberty #65 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Defensive success ratemedian #45
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Notre Dame #25 of 73; 2019 BYU #45 of 73; 2019 Liberty #55 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 45.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #37
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #4 of 73; 2019 Notre Dame #37 of 73; 2019 BYU #57 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 37.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #5
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #1 of 73; 2019 Notre Dame #5 of 73; 2019 Liberty #22 of 73; 2019 New Mexico State #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Army, which has no value for this metric. FBS Independents median rank 5.