Metrics

Ball StateCardinals

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2016

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Ball State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 128 teams · 449.2 yds/g · 5,390 yards)#75 (of 128 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 324 points)#116 (of 128 teams · 470.3 yds/g allowed · 5,643 yards)#78 (of 128 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 361 points)#83 (of 128 teams · -3.1 /g · -37 on the season)#120 (of 128 teams · -10 on the season · 14 taken, 24 given · -0.83 /g)#42 (of 128 teams · 31:03 /g · 6h 13m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#109 (of 128 teams · 365.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 128 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 128 teams · 0.209 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#84 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#125 (of 128 teams · 1.024 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 128 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #7–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #9–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #25–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #15–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#73 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #5–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #1–#126. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #4–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #1–#127. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #9–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#20 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #2–#115. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#98 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #77–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #4–#122. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #25–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #2–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #30–#121. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#71 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #10–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range #14–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2016Akron570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#83 (of 128 teams · 387.4 yds/g · 4,649 yards)#73 (of 128 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 329 points)#114 (of 128 teams · 466.0 yds/g allowed · 5,592 yards)#98 (of 128 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 403 points)#98 (of 128 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.67 /g)#123 (of 128 teams · 25:59 /g · 5h 12m on the season)#48 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#106 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 443.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 128 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#111 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.128 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Bowling Green480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 (of 128 teams · 406.9 yds/g · 4,883 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#113 (of 128 teams · 464.0 yds/g allowed · 5,568 yards)#118 (of 128 teams · 38.3 pts/g allowed · 460 points)#120 (of 128 teams · -13.5 /g · -162 on the season)#126 (of 128 teams · -16 on the season · 17 taken, 33 given · -1.33 /g)#89 (of 128 teams · 28:40 /g · 5h 44m on the season)#71 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#122 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#98 (of 128 teams · 392.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 128 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 128 teams · 0.268 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#93 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 128 teams · 1.087 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 128 teams · 1.294 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Buffalo2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 128 teams · 353.8 yds/g · 4,245 yards)#126 (of 128 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 198 points)#87 (of 128 teams · 435.2 yds/g allowed · 5,222 yards)#95 (of 128 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 388 points)#125 (of 128 teams · -15.8 /g · -190 on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.50 /g)#112 (of 128 teams · 26:59 /g · 5h 24m on the season)#127 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#116 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's rushing production returning)#116 (of 128 teams · 343.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 128 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#104 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Central Michigan670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Oklahoma State)#77 (of 128 teams · 392.0 yds/g · 5,096 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#54 (of 128 teams · 391.9 yds/g allowed · 5,095 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 394 points)#89 (of 128 teams · -4.0 /g · -52 on the season)#103 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 18 taken, 24 given · -0.46 /g)#23 (of 128 teams · 32:20 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#19 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 391.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 128 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 128 teams · 0.140 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#60 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 128 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 128 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Eastern Michigan760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 128 teams · 455.1 yds/g · 5,917 yards)#61 (of 128 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 385 points)#80 (of 128 teams · 429.5 yds/g allowed · 5,583 yards)#76 (of 128 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 388 points)#70 (of 128 teams · -0.2 /g · -3 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#51 (of 128 teams · 30:48 /g · 6h 40m on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's passing production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#114 (of 128 teams · 347.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 128 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 128 teams · 0.196 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#121 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.157 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Kent State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#125 (of 128 teams · 309.0 yds/g · 3,708 yards)#117 (of 128 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 247 points)#49 (of 128 teams · 386.5 yds/g allowed · 4,638 yards)#67 (of 128 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 344 points)#103 (of 128 teams · -8.1 /g · -97 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 24 taken, 13 given · +0.92 /g)#81 (of 128 teams · 28:58 /g · 5h 48m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 334.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 128 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 128 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#69 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 128 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 128 teams · 1.159 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Miami (OH)670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#104 (of 128 teams · 366.9 yds/g · 4,770 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 297 points)#25 (of 128 teams · 353.1 yds/g allowed · 4,590 yards)#31 (of 128 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#73 (of 128 teams · -0.9 /g · -12 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#21 (of 128 teams · 32:24 /g · 7h 01m on the season)#71 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 418.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 128 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 128 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#59 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 128 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 128 teams · 1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Northern Illinois570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 128 teams · 463.8 yds/g · 5,565 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 366 points)#98 (of 128 teams · 451.5 yds/g allowed · 5,418 yards)#80 (of 128 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 364 points)#66 (of 128 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 on the season)#76 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.08 /g)#104 (of 128 teams · 27:46 /g · 5h 33m on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's passing production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 403.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 128 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 128 teams · 0.205 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#79 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 128 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Ohio860 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 128 teams · 392.6 yds/g · 5,497 yards)#85 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 368 points)#27 (of 128 teams · 360.2 yds/g allowed · 5,043 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#57 (of 128 teams · +3.6 /g · +51 on the season)#64 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 26 taken, 25 given · +0.07 /g)#43 (of 128 teams · 31:02 /g · 7h 15m on the season)#103 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning)#107 (of 128 teams · 372.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 128 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 128 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#38 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 128 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 128 teams · 1.122 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Toledo940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 517.8 yds/g · 6,731 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 38.0 pts/g · 494 points)#57 (of 128 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,155 yards)#48 (of 128 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#18 (of 128 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#90 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 10 taken, 14 given · -0.31 /g)#58 (of 128 teams · 30:11 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#120 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#40 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#17 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#77 (of 128 teams · 460.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.339 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#30 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Western Michigan1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 128 teams · 480.5 yds/g · 6,727 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 41.6 pts/g · 582 points)#26 (of 128 teams · 353.6 yds/g allowed · 4,951 yards)#15 (of 128 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21.8 /g · +305 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18 on the season · 26 taken, 8 given · +1.29 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34:02 /g · 7h 57m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#81 (of 128 teams · 443.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.348 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 128 teams · 0.131 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 53% of plays successful)#48 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 128 teams · 1.102 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 128 teams · 1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20162016 Ball StateMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Toledo #7 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #19 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #27 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #35 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #68 of 128; 2016 Ohio #76 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #77 of 128; 2016 Akron #83 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #104 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #111 of 128; 2016 Kent State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 37 of 128. Mid-American median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #75
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #9 of 128; 2016 Toledo #19 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #55 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #61 of 128; 2016 Akron #73 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #83 of 128; 2016 Ohio #85 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #97 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #114 of 128; 2016 Kent State #117 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 75 of 128. Mid-American median rank 75.
Total defensemedian #57
Total defense. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Miami (OH) #25 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #26 of 128; 2016 Ohio #27 of 128; 2016 Kent State #49 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #54 of 128; 2016 Toledo #57 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #80 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #87 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #98 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #113 of 128; 2016 Akron #114 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 116 of 128. Mid-American median rank 57.
Scoring defensemedian #76
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #15 of 128; 2016 Ohio #26 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #31 of 128; 2016 Toledo #48 of 128; 2016 Kent State #67 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #76 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #79 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #80 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #95 of 128; 2016 Akron #98 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #118 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 78 of 128. Mid-American median rank 76.
Point marginmedian #73
Point margin. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #5 of 128; 2016 Toledo #18 of 128; 2016 Ohio #57 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #66 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #70 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #73 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #89 of 128; 2016 Akron #98 of 128; 2016 Kent State #103 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #120 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 83 of 128. Mid-American median rank 73.
Turnover marginmedian #76
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #1 of 128; 2016 Kent State #8 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #58 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #58 of 128; 2016 Ohio #64 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #76 of 128; 2016 Toledo #90 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #103 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #105 of 128; 2016 Akron #114 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 120 of 128. Mid-American median rank 76.
Possessionmedian #51
Possession. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #4 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #21 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #23 of 128; 2016 Ohio #43 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #51 of 128; 2016 Toledo #58 of 128; 2016 Kent State #81 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #89 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #104 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #112 of 128; 2016 Akron #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 42 of 128. Mid-American median rank 51.
Returning passingmedian #54
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Kent State #1 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #1 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #19 of 128; 2016 Akron #48 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #54 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #61 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #71 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #71 of 128; 2016 Ohio #103 of 128; 2016 Toledo #120 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 1 of 128. Mid-American median rank 54.
Returning receivingmedian #40
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Miami (OH) #9 of 128; 2016 Kent State #21 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #24 of 128; 2016 Ohio #37 of 128; 2016 Toledo #40 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #51 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #80 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #95 of 128; 2016 Akron #106 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #116 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #122 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 27 of 128. Mid-American median rank 40.
Returning rushingmedian #20
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #2 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #8 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #15 of 128; 2016 Toledo #17 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #20 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #68 of 128; 2016 Kent State #72 of 128; 2016 Ohio #90 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #100 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #112 of 128; 2016 Akron #115 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 2 of 128. Mid-American median rank 20.
Team talentmedian #98
Team talent. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Toledo #77 of 128; 2016 Akron #80 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #81 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #89 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #94 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #98 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #99 of 128; 2016 Ohio #107 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #114 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #116 of 128; 2016 Kent State #118 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 109 of 128. Mid-American median rank 98.
Offensive EPAmedian #73
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #4 of 128; 2016 Toledo #7 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #49 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #58 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #62 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #73 of 128; 2016 Akron #80 of 128; 2016 Ohio #84 of 128; 2016 Kent State #110 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #112 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #122 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 76 of 128. Mid-American median rank 73.
Defensive EPAmedian #75
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio #25 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #26 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #51 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #56 of 128; 2016 Toledo #61 of 128; 2016 Kent State #75 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #78 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #90 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #94 of 128; 2016 Akron #99 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #119 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 96 of 128. Mid-American median rank 75.
Offensive success ratemedian #73
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #2 of 128; 2016 Toledo #11 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #34 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #51 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #73 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #85 of 128; 2016 Ohio #91 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #92 of 128; 2016 Akron #103 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #114 of 128; 2016 Kent State #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 16 of 128. Mid-American median rank 73.
Defensive success ratemedian #69
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Toledo #30 of 128; 2016 Ohio #38 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #48 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #59 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #60 of 128; 2016 Kent State #69 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #79 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #93 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #104 of 128; 2016 Akron #111 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #121 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 84 of 128. Mid-American median rank 69.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #71
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Akron #10 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #19 of 128; 2016 Toledo #26 of 128; 2016 Miami (OH) #62 of 128; 2016 Kent State #64 of 128; 2016 Ohio #71 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #83 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #88 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #93 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #111 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #115 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 125 of 128. Mid-American median rank 71.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #45
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Miami (OH) #14 of 128; 2016 Eastern Michigan #15 of 128; 2016 Buffalo #18 of 128; 2016 Ohio #24 of 128; 2016 Akron #26 of 128; 2016 Kent State #45 of 128; 2016 Central Michigan #68 of 128; 2016 Northern Illinois #90 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Bowling Green #109 of 128; 2016 Toledo #114 of 128. Marked: 2016 Ball State, ranked 107 of 128. Mid-American median rank 45.