THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Ball StateCardinals

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Ball State played 2 such games.

Mid-American, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Ball State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (348.0 yds/g · 696 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.0 pts/g · 26 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (436.5 yds/g allowed · 873 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-18.0 /g · -36 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:49 /g · 1h 02m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 362.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.006 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.127 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#70 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #53–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #65–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #23–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #39–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #59–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #1–#65. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #8–#73. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#78 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #12–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #1–#128. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #6–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#104 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #80–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #60–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#22 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #3–#74. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #59–#74. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #15–#72. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #3–#71. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range #31–#73. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2018Miami (OH)6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (199.0 yds/g · 199 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 3 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (295.0 yds/g allowed · 295 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26.0 pts/g allowed · 26 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-23.0 /g · -23 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:29 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#62 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 421.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.412 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Toledo7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (334.0 yds/g · 334 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (473.0 yds/g allowed · 473 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49.0 pts/g allowed · 49 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-25.0 /g · -25 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24:31 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#115 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 464.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.204 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.337 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.422 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.366 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Buffalo10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (445.0 yds/g · 445 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42.0 pts/g · 42 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (284.0 yds/g allowed · 284 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.0 pts/g allowed · 13 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+29.0 /g · +29 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 0 taken, 2 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:27 /g · 0h 27m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 369.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (2.009 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Eastern Michigan7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (416.0 yds/g · 416 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.0 pts/g · 20 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (476.0 yds/g allowed · 476 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (19.0 pts/g allowed · 19 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1.0 /g · +1 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:59 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 344.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.712 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.108 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Ohio9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (364.0 yds/g · 364 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g · 31 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (552.0 yds/g allowed · 552 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45.0 pts/g allowed · 45 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-14.0 /g · -14 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 3 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:08 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 346.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.499 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.539 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.580 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Western Michigan7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (414.5 yds/g · 829 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.5 pts/g · 45 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (505.5 yds/g allowed · 1,011 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52.0 pts/g allowed · 104 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-29.5 /g · -59 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:09 /g · 1h 00m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#65 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 442.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.501 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.228 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.793 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Akron4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Northwestern)#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 290.3 yds/g · 871 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 55 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 413.3 yds/g allowed · 1,240 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 88 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -11.0 /g · -33 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +1.33 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 31:00 /g · 1h 33m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 361.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.034 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northern Illinois8–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 220.0 yds/g · 660 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 10.7 pts/g · 32 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 393.0 yds/g allowed · 1,179 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 87 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -18.3 /g · -55 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 7 taken, 4 given · +1.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:34 /g · 1h 20m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 432.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.132 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.295 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kent State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 74 teams · 354.7 yds/g · 1,064 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 51 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 595.7 yds/g allowed · 1,787 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 44.0 pts/g allowed · 132 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -27.0 /g · -81 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 3 taken, 4 given · -0.33 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 30:31 /g · 1h 32m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 351.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 74 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.394 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.493 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.397 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Central Michigan1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 260.0 yds/g · 780 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 47 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 377.7 yds/g allowed · 1,133 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 97 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -16.7 /g · -50 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 5 taken, 8 given · -1.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 25:59 /g · 1h 18m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#107 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 413.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 30% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.110 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.247 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Bowling Green3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 313.3 yds/g · 940 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 55 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 533.7 yds/g allowed · 1,601 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 55.3 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -37.0 /g · -111 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 4 taken, 7 given · -1.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:58 /g · 1h 39m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 375.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.497 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.203 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.464 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20182018 Ball StateMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #70
Total offense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Kent State #53 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #66 of 74; 2018 Akron #70 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #71 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 70.
Scoring offensemedian #68
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Akron #65 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #65 of 74; 2018 Kent State #68 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #70 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 68.
Total defensemedian #36
Total defense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Central Michigan #23 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #30 of 74; 2018 Akron #36 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #72 of 74; 2018 Kent State #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 36.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Northern Illinois #39 of 74; 2018 Akron #40 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #50 of 74; 2018 Kent State #70 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #64
Point margin. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Akron #59 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #62 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #64 of 74; 2018 Kent State #70 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 64.
Turnover marginmedian #48
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Akron #1 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #2 of 74; 2018 Kent State #48 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #65 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 48.
Possessionmedian #31
Possession. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Bowling Green #8 of 74; 2018 Akron #24 of 74; 2018 Kent State #31 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #69 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 31.
Returning passingmedian #78
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio #12 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #57 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #58 of 130; 2018 Miami (OH) #62 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #65 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #78 of 130; 2018 Akron #87 of 130; 2018 Kent State #94 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #107 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #108 of 130; 2018 Toledo #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Ball State, ranked 81 of 130. Mid-American median rank 78.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Toledo #9 of 130; 2018 Kent State #15 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #29 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #37 of 130; 2018 Ohio #55 of 130; 2018 Miami (OH) #76 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #89 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #117 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #118 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #123 of 130; 2018 Akron #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Ball State, ranked 1 of 130. Mid-American median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #43
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Miami (OH) #6 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #12 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #15 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #32 of 130; 2018 Ohio #43 of 130; 2018 Kent State #52 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #76 of 130; 2018 Akron #88 of 130; 2018 Toledo #93 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #95 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #111 of 130. Marked: 2018 Ball State, ranked 17 of 130. Mid-American median rank 43.
Team talentmedian #104
Team talent. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Toledo #80 of 130; 2018 Western Michigan #84 of 130; 2018 Northern Illinois #88 of 130; 2018 Miami (OH) #90 of 130; 2018 Central Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Bowling Green #104 of 130; 2018 Buffalo #106 of 130; 2018 Akron #110 of 130; 2018 Kent State #114 of 130; 2018 Ohio #117 of 130; 2018 Eastern Michigan #119 of 130. Marked: 2018 Ball State, ranked 109 of 130. Mid-American median rank 104.
Offensive EPAmedian #70
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Kent State #60 of 74; 2018 Akron #69 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #70 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #72 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 70.
Defensive EPAmedian #22
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Akron #3 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #17 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #22 of 74; 2018 Kent State #69 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 22.
Offensive success ratemedian #70
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Bowling Green #59 of 74; 2018 Kent State #69 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #70 of 74; 2018 Akron #72 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 70.
Defensive success ratemedian #34
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Northern Illinois #15 of 74; 2018 Akron #21 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #34 of 74; 2018 Kent State #71 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #72 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 34.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #53
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Kent State #3 of 74; 2018 Akron #43 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #53 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #67 of 74; 2018 Central Michigan #71 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 53.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #44
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Central Michigan #31 of 74; 2018 Akron #39 of 74; 2018 Northern Illinois #44 of 74; 2018 Kent State #67 of 74; 2018 Bowling Green #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Ball State, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 44.