THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

BaylorBears

Season
‹
›Current

Big 12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big 12, 2001

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2001Baylor3–80 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#102 (of 117 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 205 points)— (— allowed · —)#91 (of 117 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#102 (of 117 teams · -13.8 /g · -152 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20010 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No team has a rank for this)#52 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range #6–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#26 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range #2–#107. 4 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range #3–#113. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)
2001Nebraska11–20 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#9 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 35.6 pts/g · 463 points)— (— allowed · —)#10 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#4 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +18.2 /g · +237 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Texas11–20 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#6 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 39.8 pts/g · 517 points)— (— allowed · —)#5 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 207 points)#3 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +23.9 /g · +310 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Oklahoma11–20 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#42 (of 117 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 366 points)— (— allowed · —)#2 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 10.9 pts/g allowed · 142 points)#5 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +17.2 /g · +224 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Kansas State6–60 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#52 (of 117 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 330 points)— (— allowed · —)#7 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 205 points)#22 (of 117 teams · +10.4 /g · +125 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Colorado10–30 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#26 (of 117 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points)— (— allowed · —)#52 (of 117 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#36 (of 117 teams · +7.2 /g · +94 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Iowa State7–50 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#66 (of 117 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 309 points)— (— allowed · —)#26 (of 117 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 245 points)#46 (of 117 teams · +5.3 /g · +64 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Missouri4–70 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#88 (of 117 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 240 points)— (— allowed · —)#83 (of 117 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#88 (of 117 teams · -8.2 /g · -90 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Oklahoma State4–70 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#87 (of 117 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 242 points)— (— allowed · —)#57 (of 117 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#80 (of 117 teams · -3.5 /g · -39 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Texas A&M8–40 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#97 (of 117 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 248 points)— (— allowed · —)#12 (of 117 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#52 (of 117 teams · +2.9 /g · +35 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Texas Tech7–50 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#22 (of 117 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 402 points)— (— allowed · —)#42 (of 117 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#23 (of 117 teams · +10.1 /g · +121 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Kansas3–80 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2001. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#114 — bottom 10 (of 117 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 182 points)— (— allowed · —)#107 (of 117 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 398 points)#113 — bottom 10 (of 117 teams · -19.6 /g · -216 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20012001 BaylorBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #52
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Texas #6 of 117; 2001 Nebraska #9 of 117; 2001 Texas Tech #22 of 117; 2001 Colorado #26 of 117; 2001 Oklahoma #42 of 117; 2001 Kansas State #52 of 117; 2001 Iowa State #66 of 117; 2001 Oklahoma State #87 of 117; 2001 Missouri #88 of 117; 2001 Texas A&M #97 of 117; 2001 Kansas #114 of 117. Marked: 2001 Baylor, ranked 102 of 117. Big 12 median rank 52.
Total defense
Total defense. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Oklahoma #2 of 117; 2001 Texas #5 of 117; 2001 Kansas State #7 of 117; 2001 Nebraska #10 of 117; 2001 Texas A&M #12 of 117; 2001 Iowa State #26 of 117; 2001 Texas Tech #42 of 117; 2001 Colorado #52 of 117; 2001 Oklahoma State #57 of 117; 2001 Missouri #83 of 117; 2001 Kansas #107 of 117. Marked: 2001 Baylor, ranked 91 of 117. Big 12 median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #36
Point margin. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Texas #3 of 117; 2001 Nebraska #4 of 117; 2001 Oklahoma #5 of 117; 2001 Kansas State #22 of 117; 2001 Texas Tech #23 of 117; 2001 Colorado #36 of 117; 2001 Iowa State #46 of 117; 2001 Texas A&M #52 of 117; 2001 Oklahoma State #80 of 117; 2001 Missouri #88 of 117; 2001 Kansas #113 of 117. Marked: 2001 Baylor, ranked 102 of 117. Big 12 median rank 36.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.