Metrics

BaylorBears

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005Baylor560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 119 teams · 317.9 yds/g · 3,497 yards)#92 (of 119 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 236 points)#70 (of 119 teams · 378.0 yds/g allowed · 4,158 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#85 (of 119 teams · -5.0 /g · -55 on the season)#41 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 29 taken, 25 given · +0.36 /g)#55 (of 119 teams · 18:02 /g · 3h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 119 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#69 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 119 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 119 teams · 1.002 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#73 (Total offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #3–#97. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #1–#97. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Total defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #15–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #8–#97. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #1–#102. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #8–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Possession: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #22–#80. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#69 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #2–#112. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #14–#103. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #2–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #7–#99. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #15–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range #8–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2005Colorado760 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#84 (of 119 teams · 332.1 yds/g · 4,318 yards)#78 (of 119 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 305 points)#49 (of 119 teams · 349.1 yds/g allowed · 4,539 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 307 points)#68 (of 119 teams · -0.1 /g · -2 on the season)#58 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.08 /g)#65 (of 119 teams · 17:47 /g · 3h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#25 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 119 teams · 1.012 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Iowa State750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 119 teams · 350.3 yds/g · 4,204 yards)#50 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 339 points)#44 (of 119 teams · 345.0 yds/g allowed · 4,140 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 230 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +9.1 /g · +109 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 36 taken, 22 given · +1.17 /g)#30 (of 119 teams · 18:47 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#65 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 119 teams · 0.878 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Kansas750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 119 teams · 329.7 yds/g · 3,956 yards)#84 (of 119 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 269 points)#16 (of 119 teams · 303.3 yds/g allowed · 3,639 yards)#28 (of 119 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 264 points)#61 (of 119 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#97 (of 119 teams · -8 on the season · 22 taken, 30 given · -0.67 /g)#56 (of 119 teams · 18:00 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 119 teams · -0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#16 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 119 teams · 1.092 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Kansas State560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 119 teams · 339.7 yds/g · 3,737 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 289 points)#54 (of 119 teams · 359.4 yds/g allowed · 3,954 yards)#74 (of 119 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#73 (of 119 teams · -1.4 /g · -16 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 25 taken, 29 given · -0.36 /g)#40 (of 119 teams · 18:26 /g · 3h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 119 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 119 teams · 31% of plays successful)#60 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 119 teams · 1.096 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.979 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Missouri750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 119 teams · 429.8 yds/g · 5,157 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 369 points)#58 (of 119 teams · 368.3 yds/g allowed · 4,420 yards)#81 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 350 points)#56 (of 119 teams · +1.6 /g · +19 on the season)#67 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 26 taken, 28 given · -0.17 /g)#69 (of 119 teams · 17:35 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 119 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 119 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#35 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 119 teams · 1.060 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 119 teams · 1.008 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Nebraska840 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 119 teams · 320.3 yds/g · 3,844 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#32 (of 119 teams · 332.2 yds/g allowed · 3,986 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 252 points)#47 (of 119 teams · +3.7 /g · +44 on the season)#67 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 24 taken, 26 given · -0.17 /g)#50 (of 119 teams · 18:13 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 119 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#11 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 119 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 119 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Oklahoma841 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 119 teams · 354.8 yds/g · 4,257 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 323 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 306.7 yds/g allowed · 3,680 yards)#37 (of 119 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#45 (of 119 teams · +3.8 /g · +46 on the season)#67 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 26 taken, 28 given · -0.17 /g)#22 (of 119 teams · 19:05 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 119 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 119 teams · 1.009 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 119 teams · 1.067 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Oklahoma State470 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 119 teams · 324.8 yds/g · 3,573 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 222 points)#100 (of 119 teams · 419.4 yds/g allowed · 4,613 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 344 points)#102 (of 119 teams · -11.1 /g · -122 on the season)#117 (of 119 teams · -19 on the season · 22 taken, 41 given · -1.73 /g)#80 (of 119 teams · 17:03 /g · 3h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#68 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.970 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 119 teams · 1.027 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas1301 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 512.1 yds/g · 6,657 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50.1 pts/g · 652 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 302.9 yds/g allowed · 3,938 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +33.8 /g · +439 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 31 taken, 21 given · +0.77 /g)#28 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#21 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 119 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas A&M561 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 442.3 yds/g · 4,865 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 352 points)#110 (of 119 teams · 443.8 yds/g allowed · 4,882 yards)#96 (of 119 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#60 (of 119 teams · +0.8 /g · +9 on the season)#27 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 28 taken, 22 given · +0.55 /g)#68 (of 119 teams · 17:39 /g · 3h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#99 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 119 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 1.016 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas Tech930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 495.8 yds/g · 5,950 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.4 pts/g · 473 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 335.8 yds/g allowed · 4,030 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.6 /g · +247 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 30 taken, 20 given · +0.83 /g)#67 (of 119 teams · 17:40 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.062 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20052005 BaylorBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #73
Total offense. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #5 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #15 of 119; 2005 Missouri #20 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #67 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #73 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #79 of 119; 2005 Colorado #84 of 119; 2005 Kansas #86 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #91 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #96 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 97 of 119. Big 12 median rank 73.
Scoring offensemedian #56
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #1 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #4 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #32 of 119; 2005 Missouri #34 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #50 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #56 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #62 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #67 of 119; 2005 Colorado #78 of 119; 2005 Kansas #84 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #97 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 92 of 119. Big 12 median rank 56.
Total defensemedian #44
Total defense. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #15 of 119; 2005 Kansas #16 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #32 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #38 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #44 of 119; 2005 Colorado #49 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #54 of 119; 2005 Missouri #58 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #100 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #110 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 70 of 119. Big 12 median rank 44.
Scoring defensemedian #37
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #8 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #18 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #20 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #25 of 119; 2005 Kansas #28 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #37 of 119; 2005 Colorado #45 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #74 of 119; 2005 Missouri #81 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #96 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #97 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 65 of 119. Big 12 median rank 37.
Point marginmedian #56
Point margin. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #1 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #4 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #28 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #45 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #47 of 119; 2005 Missouri #56 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #60 of 119; 2005 Kansas #61 of 119; 2005 Colorado #68 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #73 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #102 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 85 of 119. Big 12 median rank 56.
Turnover marginmedian #58
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Iowa State #8 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #17 of 119; 2005 Texas #20 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #27 of 119; 2005 Colorado #58 of 119; 2005 Missouri #67 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #67 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #67 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #82 of 119; 2005 Kansas #97 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 41 of 119. Big 12 median rank 58.
Possessionmedian #55
Possession. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oklahoma #22 of 119; 2005 Texas #28 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #30 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #40 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #50 of 119; 2005 Kansas #56 of 119; 2005 Colorado #65 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #67 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #68 of 119; 2005 Missouri #69 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #80 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 55 of 119. Big 12 median rank 55.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Baylor, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #69
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Texas #6 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #10 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #57 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #58 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #69 of 119; 2005 Colorado #77 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #97 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #106 of 119; 2005 Kansas #107 of 119; 2005 Missouri #112 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 88 of 119. Big 12 median rank 69.
Defensive EPAmedian #41
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Missouri #14 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #15 of 119; 2005 Kansas #25 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #34 of 119; 2005 Texas #37 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #41 of 119; 2005 Colorado #51 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #57 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #60 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #72 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #103 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 100 of 119. Big 12 median rank 41.
Offensive success ratemedian #67
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Texas #5 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #15 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #61 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #64 of 119; 2005 Colorado #67 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #86 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #88 of 119; 2005 Kansas #93 of 119; 2005 Missouri #106 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #112 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 89 of 119. Big 12 median rank 67.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oklahoma #7 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #11 of 119; 2005 Kansas #16 of 119; 2005 Texas #21 of 119; 2005 Colorado #25 of 119; 2005 Missouri #35 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #60 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #61 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #65 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #68 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #99 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 69 of 119. Big 12 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Kansas State #15 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #25 of 119; 2005 Missouri #29 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #55 of 119; 2005 Texas #67 of 119; 2005 Kansas #69 of 119; 2005 Colorado #74 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #83 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #97 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #105 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #112 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 58 of 119. Big 12 median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #68
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2005 Iowa State #32 of 119; 2005 Kansas State #41 of 119; 2005 Texas #54 of 119; 2005 Missouri #68 of 119; 2005 Colorado #70 of 119; 2005 Texas A&M #73 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma State #77 of 119; 2005 Oklahoma #94 of 119; 2005 Kansas #108 of 119; 2005 Nebraska #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 Baylor, ranked 61 of 119. Big 12 median rank 68.