Metrics

Boston CollegeEagles

Season

ACC

ACC, 2026

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Boston College110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 138 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 790 yards)#109 (of 138 teams · 21.5 pts/g · 43 points)#92 (of 138 teams · 361.5 yds/g allowed · 723 yards)#104 (of 138 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 55 points)#110 (of 138 teams · -6.0 /g · -12 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 4 taken, 5 given · -0.50 /g)#102 (of 138 teams · 28:24 /g · 0h 57m on the season)#109 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#108 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving production returning)#129 (of 138 teams · 8% of last season's rushing production returning)#71 (of 138 teams · 660.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#121 (of 138 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 138 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 138 teams · 38% of plays successful)#79 (of 138 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 138 teams · 1.285 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 138 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 17 ACC teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#134. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#65 (Scoring offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#128. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#66 (Total defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #9–#129. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #4–#128. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#59 (Point margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#126. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#43 (Turnover margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #10–#126. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#77 (Possession: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #3–#119. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#98 (Returning passing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #17–#127. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#91 (Returning receiving: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #17–#126. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#83 (Returning rushing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #11–#129. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Team talent: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #12–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #3–#136. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#128. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#137. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#70 (Defensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#132. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #21–#131. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#135. 4 of 17 in the top 10.)
2026California110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#111 (of 138 teams · 329.5 yds/g · 659 yards)#106 (of 138 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 45 points)#126 (of 138 teams · 448.5 yds/g allowed · 897 yards)#120 (of 138 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 63 points)#117 (of 138 teams · -9.0 /g · -18 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.50 /g)#71 (of 138 teams · 30:20 /g · 1h 01m on the season)#30 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's rushing production returning)#33 (of 138 teams · 751.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#128 (of 138 teams · -0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 138 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#129 (of 138 teams · 34% of plays successful)#94 (of 138 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 138 teams · 1.328 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 138 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Clemson112 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#134 (of 138 teams · 246.0 yds/g · 492 yards)#128 (of 138 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 32 points)#129 (of 138 teams · 455.0 yds/g allowed · 910 yards)#113 (of 138 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 58 points)#123 (of 138 teams · -13.0 /g · -26 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g)#109 (of 138 teams · 27:47 /g · 0h 56m on the season)#80 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's passing production returning)#17 (of 138 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#87 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 138 teams · 862.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#136 (of 138 teams · -0.187 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 138 teams · 0.180 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#137 (of 138 teams · 29% of plays successful)#101 (of 138 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#131 (of 138 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 138 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Duke200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 138 teams · 378.5 yds/g · 757 yards)#100 (of 138 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 48 points)#66 (of 138 teams · 320.0 yds/g allowed · 640 yards)#42 (of 138 teams · 15.0 pts/g allowed · 30 points)#76 (of 138 teams · +9.0 /g · +18 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g)#48 (of 138 teams · 31:41 /g · 1h 03m on the season)#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#59 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing production returning)#69 (of 138 teams · 668.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 138 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 138 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#122 (of 138 teams · 36% of plays successful)#86 (of 138 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 138 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 138 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Florida State110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 138 teams · 371.5 yds/g · 743 yards)#81 (of 138 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 58 points)#128 (of 138 teams · 452.0 yds/g allowed · 904 yards)#76 (of 138 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 44 points)#82 (of 138 teams · +7.0 /g · +14 on the season)#15 (of 138 teams · +3 on the season · 5 taken, 2 given · +1.50 /g)#45 (of 138 teams · 31:54 /g · 1h 04m on the season)#93 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's passing production returning)#29 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 138 teams · 800.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 138 teams · 0.204 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 138 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 138 teams · 41% of plays successful)#116 (of 138 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 138 teams · 1.374 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 138 teams · 1.421 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Georgia Tech020 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#118 (of 138 teams · 322.0 yds/g · 644 yards)#120 (of 138 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 37 points)#102 (of 138 teams · 377.0 yds/g allowed · 754 yards)#117 (of 138 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 59 points)#119 (of 138 teams · -11.0 /g · -22 on the season)#126 (of 138 teams · -3 on the season · 0 taken, 3 given · -1.50 /g)#99 (of 138 teams · 28:32 /g · 0h 57m on the season)#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#121 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's rushing production returning)#34 (of 138 teams · 751.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 138 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 138 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 138 teams · 42% of plays successful)#83 (of 138 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 138 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 138 teams · 1.247 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Louisville110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 552.0 yds/g · 1,104 yards)#17 (of 138 teams · 48.5 pts/g · 97 points)#97 (of 138 teams · 370.5 yds/g allowed · 741 yards)#100 (of 138 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 54 points)#39 (of 138 teams · +21.5 /g · +43 on the season)#15 (of 138 teams · +3 on the season · 3 taken, 0 given · +1.50 /g)#77 (of 138 teams · 30:04 /g · 1h 00m on the season)#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#103 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#37 (of 138 teams · 740.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 138 teams · 0.451 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 138 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 138 teams · 54% of plays successful)#62 (of 138 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 138 teams · 1.340 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 138 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Miami202 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 702.5 yds/g · 1,405 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 61.0 pts/g · 122 points)#11 (of 138 teams · 203.0 yds/g allowed · 406 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 6.5 pts/g allowed · 13 points)#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +54.5 /g · +109 on the season)#126 (of 138 teams · -3 on the season · 0 taken, 3 given · -1.50 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 36:47 /g · 1h 14m on the season)#98 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 138 teams · 90% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 138 teams · 885.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.549 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 138 teams · -0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 63% of plays successful)#19 (of 138 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 138 teams · 1.331 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.925 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026NC State110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 138 teams · 451.0 yds/g · 902 yards)#37 (of 138 teams · 40.5 pts/g · 81 points)#34 (of 138 teams · 261.5 yds/g allowed · 523 yards)#50 (of 138 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points)#36 (of 138 teams · +23.5 /g · +47 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g)#83 (of 138 teams · 29:50 /g · 1h 00m on the season)#29 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#91 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#48 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#32 (of 138 teams · 757.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 138 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 138 teams · 0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 138 teams · 52% of plays successful)#70 (of 138 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 138 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 138 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026North Carolina200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 138 teams · 374.5 yds/g · 749 yards)#93 (of 138 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 50 points)#40 (of 138 teams · 268.0 yds/g allowed · 536 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 6.5 pts/g allowed · 13 points)#48 (of 138 teams · +18.5 /g · +37 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g)#119 (of 138 teams · 26:37 /g · 0h 53m on the season)#95 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 138 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning)#50 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning)#28 (of 138 teams · 767.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 138 teams · 0.236 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 138 teams · -0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 138 teams · 51% of plays successful)#67 (of 138 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 138 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.878 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Pittsburgh300 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 138 teams · 443.0 yds/g · 1,329 yards)#61 (of 138 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 98 points)#46 (of 138 teams · 280.7 yds/g allowed · 842 yards)#20 (of 138 teams · 11.3 pts/g allowed · 34 points)#44 (of 138 teams · +21.3 /g · +64 on the season)#41 (of 138 teams · +2 on the season · 3 taken, 1 given · +0.67 /g)#37 (of 138 teams · 32:19 /g · 1h 37m on the season)#59 (of 138 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#99 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning)#49 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning)#64 (of 138 teams · 675.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 138 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 138 teams · -0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 138 teams · 46% of plays successful)#29 (of 138 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 138 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 138 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026SMU200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 566.0 yds/g · 1,132 yards)#30 (of 138 teams · 41.5 pts/g · 83 points)#44 (of 138 teams · 278.5 yds/g allowed · 557 yards)#50 (of 138 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points)#35 (of 138 teams · +24.5 /g · +49 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 3 taken, 4 given · -0.50 /g)#111 (of 138 teams · 27:32 /g · 0h 55m on the season)#17 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 138 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#88 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#31 (of 138 teams · 764.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 138 teams · 0.459 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 138 teams · -0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 56% of plays successful)#35 (of 138 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 138 teams · 1.428 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 138 teams · 1.284 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Stanford110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 138 teams · 391.0 yds/g · 782 yards)#109 (of 138 teams · 21.5 pts/g · 43 points)#122 (of 138 teams · 435.5 yds/g allowed · 871 yards)#128 (of 138 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 72 points)#126 (of 138 teams · -14.5 /g · -29 on the season)#15 (of 138 teams · +3 on the season · 3 taken, 0 given · +1.50 /g)#115 (of 138 teams · 27:10 /g · 0h 54m on the season)#103 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#81 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#34 (of 138 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning)#50 (of 138 teams · 705.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 138 teams · 0.165 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#128 (of 138 teams · 0.245 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 138 teams · 40% of plays successful)#117 (of 138 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 138 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 138 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Syracuse120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 138 teams · 432.0 yds/g · 1,296 yards)#65 (of 138 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 97 points)#33 (of 138 teams · 258.7 yds/g allowed · 776 yards)#50 (of 138 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 51 points)#59 (of 138 teams · +15.3 /g · +46 on the season)#89 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 4 taken, 5 given · -0.33 /g)#27 (of 138 teams · 33:19 /g · 1h 40m on the season)#63 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving production returning)#105 (of 138 teams · 20% of last season's rushing production returning)#35 (of 138 teams · 745.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 138 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 138 teams · -0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 138 teams · 40% of plays successful)#51 (of 138 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 138 teams · 1.330 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 138 teams · 1.087 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Virginia200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 138 teams · 439.5 yds/g · 879 yards)#21 (of 138 teams · 46.5 pts/g · 93 points)#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 195.5 yds/g allowed · 391 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 5.5 pts/g allowed · 11 points)#13 (of 138 teams · +41.0 /g · +82 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +4 on the season · 5 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g)#29 (of 138 teams · 33:09 /g · 1h 06m on the season)#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#109 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's rushing production returning)#53 (of 138 teams · 700.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 138 teams · 0.336 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · -0.367 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 138 teams · 54% of plays successful)#27 (of 138 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 138 teams · 1.134 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.643 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Virginia Tech200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 138 teams · 517.5 yds/g · 1,035 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 58.5 pts/g · 117 points)#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 196.5 yds/g allowed · 393 yards)#22 (of 138 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points)#6 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +46.5 /g · +93 on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · +0 on the season · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g)#25 (of 138 teams · 33:29 /g · 1h 07m on the season)#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning)#27 (of 138 teams · 769.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 138 teams · 0.325 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · -0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 138 teams · 50% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 20% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 138 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays)#135 (of 138 teams · 1.699 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Wake Forest200 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 138 teams · 485.0 yds/g · 970 yards)#41 (of 138 teams · 38.0 pts/g · 76 points)#103 (of 138 teams · 380.0 yds/g allowed · 760 yards)#97 (of 138 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 52 points)#68 (of 138 teams · +12.0 /g · +24 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 1 taken, 0 given · +0.50 /g)#98 (of 138 teams · 28:36 /g · 0h 57m on the season)#101 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#125 (of 138 teams · 10% of last season's rushing production returning)#63 (of 138 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 138 teams · 0.417 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 138 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 138 teams · 47% of plays successful)#132 (of 138 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 138 teams · 1.348 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20262026 Boston CollegeACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #1 of 138; 2026 SMU #7 of 138; 2026 Louisville #10 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #20 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #30 of 138; 2026 NC State #39 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #41 of 138; 2026 Virginia #46 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #53 of 138; 2026 Stanford #79 of 138; 2026 Duke #88 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #90 of 138; 2026 Florida State #94 of 138; 2026 California #111 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #118 of 138; 2026 Clemson #134 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 77 of 138. ACC median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #65
Scoring offense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #2 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #4 of 138; 2026 Louisville #17 of 138; 2026 Virginia #21 of 138; 2026 SMU #30 of 138; 2026 NC State #37 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #41 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #61 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #65 of 138; 2026 Florida State #81 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #93 of 138; 2026 Duke #100 of 138; 2026 California #106 of 138; 2026 Stanford #109 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #120 of 138; 2026 Clemson #128 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 109 of 138. ACC median rank 65.
Total defensemedian #66
Total defense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Virginia #9 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #10 of 138; 2026 Miami #11 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #33 of 138; 2026 NC State #34 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #40 of 138; 2026 SMU #44 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #46 of 138; 2026 Duke #66 of 138; 2026 Louisville #97 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #102 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #103 of 138; 2026 Stanford #122 of 138; 2026 California #126 of 138; 2026 Florida State #128 of 138; 2026 Clemson #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 92 of 138. ACC median rank 66.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Virginia #4 of 138; 2026 Miami #5 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #5 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #20 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #22 of 138; 2026 Duke #42 of 138; 2026 NC State #50 of 138; 2026 SMU #50 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #50 of 138; 2026 Florida State #76 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #97 of 138; 2026 Louisville #100 of 138; 2026 Clemson #113 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #117 of 138; 2026 California #120 of 138; 2026 Stanford #128 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 104 of 138. ACC median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #59
Point margin. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #2 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #6 of 138; 2026 Virginia #13 of 138; 2026 SMU #35 of 138; 2026 NC State #36 of 138; 2026 Louisville #39 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #44 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #48 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #59 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #68 of 138; 2026 Duke #76 of 138; 2026 Florida State #82 of 138; 2026 California #117 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #119 of 138; 2026 Clemson #123 of 138; 2026 Stanford #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 110 of 138. ACC median rank 59.
Turnover marginmedian #43
Turnover margin. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Virginia #10 of 138; 2026 Florida State #15 of 138; 2026 Louisville #15 of 138; 2026 Stanford #15 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #41 of 138; 2026 California #43 of 138; 2026 Duke #43 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #43 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #43 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #69 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #89 of 138; 2026 Clemson #91 of 138; 2026 NC State #91 of 138; 2026 SMU #91 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #126 of 138; 2026 Miami #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 91 of 138. ACC median rank 43.
Possessionmedian #77
Possession. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #3 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #27 of 138; 2026 Virginia #29 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #37 of 138; 2026 Florida State #45 of 138; 2026 Duke #48 of 138; 2026 California #71 of 138; 2026 Louisville #77 of 138; 2026 NC State #83 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #98 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #99 of 138; 2026 Clemson #109 of 138; 2026 SMU #111 of 138; 2026 Stanford #115 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #119 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 102 of 138. ACC median rank 77.
Returning passingmedian #98
Returning passing. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 SMU #17 of 138; 2026 NC State #29 of 138; 2026 California #30 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #59 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #63 of 138; 2026 Clemson #80 of 138; 2026 Florida State #93 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #95 of 138; 2026 Miami #98 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #101 of 138; 2026 Stanford #103 of 138; 2026 Duke #119 of 138; 2026 Virginia #119 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #127 of 138; 2026 Louisville #127 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #127 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 109 of 138. ACC median rank 98.
Returning receivingmedian #91
Returning receiving. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Clemson #17 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 Florida State #29 of 138; 2026 Miami #32 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #53 of 138; 2026 SMU #69 of 138; 2026 Stanford #81 of 138; 2026 California #83 of 138; 2026 NC State #91 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #94 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #99 of 138; 2026 Louisville #103 of 138; 2026 Duke #106 of 138; 2026 Virginia #109 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #121 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 108 of 138. ACC median rank 91.
Returning rushingmedian #83
Returning rushing. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #11 of 138; 2026 Stanford #34 of 138; 2026 Louisville #36 of 138; 2026 NC State #48 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #49 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #50 of 138; 2026 Duke #59 of 138; 2026 Florida State #82 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #83 of 138; 2026 Clemson #87 of 138; 2026 SMU #88 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #93 of 138; 2026 Virginia #104 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #105 of 138; 2026 California #119 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #125 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 129 of 138. ACC median rank 83.
Team talentmedian #34
Team talent. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #12 of 138; 2026 Clemson #16 of 138; 2026 Florida State #21 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #28 of 138; 2026 SMU #31 of 138; 2026 NC State #32 of 138; 2026 California #33 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #34 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #35 of 138; 2026 Louisville #37 of 138; 2026 Stanford #50 of 138; 2026 Virginia #53 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #63 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #64 of 138; 2026 Duke #69 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 71 of 138. ACC median rank 34.
Offensive EPAmedian #58
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #3 of 138; 2026 SMU #11 of 138; 2026 Louisville #12 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #16 of 138; 2026 Virginia #27 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #29 of 138; 2026 NC State #33 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #51 of 138; 2026 Florida State #58 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #64 of 138; 2026 Stanford #69 of 138; 2026 Duke #92 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #109 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #118 of 138; 2026 California #128 of 138; 2026 Clemson #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 121 of 138. ACC median rank 58.
Defensive EPAmedian #62
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Virginia #2 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #9 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #26 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #27 of 138; 2026 SMU #39 of 138; 2026 Miami #41 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #42 of 138; 2026 Duke #52 of 138; 2026 NC State #62 of 138; 2026 California #84 of 138; 2026 Louisville #105 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #109 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #113 of 138; 2026 Clemson #118 of 138; 2026 Florida State #126 of 138; 2026 Stanford #128 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 85 of 138. ACC median rank 62.
Offensive success ratemedian #60
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #1 of 138; 2026 SMU #10 of 138; 2026 Louisville #14 of 138; 2026 Virginia #18 of 138; 2026 NC State #26 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #31 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #41 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #53 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #60 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #86 of 138; 2026 Florida State #92 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #97 of 138; 2026 Stanford #101 of 138; 2026 Duke #122 of 138; 2026 California #129 of 138; 2026 Clemson #137 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 111 of 138. ACC median rank 60.
Defensive success ratemedian #70
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Virginia Tech #2 of 138; 2026 Miami #19 of 138; 2026 Virginia #27 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #29 of 138; 2026 SMU #35 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #51 of 138; 2026 Louisville #62 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #67 of 138; 2026 NC State #70 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #83 of 138; 2026 Duke #86 of 138; 2026 California #94 of 138; 2026 Clemson #101 of 138; 2026 Florida State #116 of 138; 2026 Stanford #117 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #132 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 79 of 138. ACC median rank 70.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #62
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 SMU #21 of 138; 2026 Florida State #28 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #34 of 138; 2026 Louisville #36 of 138; 2026 Miami #38 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #39 of 138; 2026 California #41 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #62 of 138; 2026 Duke #63 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #70 of 138; 2026 NC State #74 of 138; 2026 Stanford #93 of 138; 2026 Virginia #99 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #116 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #123 of 138; 2026 Clemson #131 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 54 of 138. ACC median rank 62.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #80
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Virginia #1 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #3 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #6 of 138; 2026 Miami #7 of 138; 2026 Duke #12 of 138; 2026 NC State #29 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #31 of 138; 2026 Louisville #78 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #80 of 138; 2026 SMU #94 of 138; 2026 Stanford #99 of 138; 2026 Clemson #104 of 138; 2026 California #107 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #118 of 138; 2026 Florida State #124 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #135 of 138. Marked: 2026 Boston College, ranked 101 of 138. ACC median rank 80.