THIRD AND DATA

Bowling Green game log

2010: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 4at Troy27–30 L———————————43%51%
Sep 11at #24 Tulsa20–33 L———————————34%49%
Sep 18vs Marshall44–28 W———————————51%46%
Sep 25at Michigan21–65 L———————————45%62%
Oct 2vs Buffalo26–28 L———————————23%42%
Oct 9at Ohio25–49 L—————————————
Oct 16at Temple27–28 L———————————39%36%
Oct 23vs Kent State6–30 L———————————20%43%
Oct 30at Central Michigan17–14 W———————————41%40%
Nov 10vs Miami (OH)21–24 L———————————28%60%
Nov 17at Toledo14–33 L———————————35%46%
Nov 26vs Western Michigan7–41 L———————————42%54%
Season12 games2–10—————–—–———————37%49%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Bowling Green on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Bowling Green's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Bowling Green offense 37% (262 of 706)Opponent offense / Bowling Green defense 49% (364 of 749)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Troy: opponent offense 51% of 82Troy: Bowling Green offense 43% of 67#24 Tulsa: opponent offense 49% of 51#24 Tulsa: Bowling Green offense 34% of 38Marshall: opponent offense 46% of 70Marshall: Bowling Green offense 51% of 76Michigan: opponent offense 62% of 84Michigan: Bowling Green offense 45% of 56Buffalo: opponent offense 42% of 88Buffalo: Bowling Green offense 23% of 62Temple: opponent offense 36% of 44Temple: Bowling Green offense 39% of 88Kent State: opponent offense 43% of 70Kent State: Bowling Green offense 20% of 61Central Michigan: opponent offense 40% of 58Central Michigan: Bowling Green offense 41% of 70Miami (OH): opponent offense 60% of 63Miami (OH): Bowling Green offense 28% of 54Toledo: opponent offense 46% of 72Toledo: Bowling Green offense 35% of 68Western Michigan: opponent offense 54% of 67Western Michigan: Bowling Green offense 42% of 66
@ Troy@ #24 TulsaMarshall@ MichiganBuffalo@ Ohio@ TempleKent State@ Central MichiganMiami (OH)@ ToledoWestern Michigan
Bowling Green offenseOpponent offense (Bowling Green defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Troy

27–30 L · 67 plays to 82
Bowling Green offense 43% (29/67)Troy offense 51% (42/82)

at #24 Tulsa

20–33 L · 38 plays to 51
Bowling Green offense 34% (13/38)Tulsa offense 49% (25/51)

vs Marshall

44–28 W · 76 plays to 70
Bowling Green offense 51% (39/76)Marshall offense 46% (32/70)

at Michigan

21–65 L · 56 plays to 84
Bowling Green offense 45% (25/56)Michigan offense 62% (52/84)

vs Buffalo

26–28 L · 62 plays to 88
Bowling Green offense 23% (14/62)Buffalo offense 42% (37/88)

at Temple

27–28 L · 88 plays to 44
Bowling Green offense 39% (34/88)Temple offense 36% (16/44)

vs Kent State

6–30 L · 61 plays to 70
Bowling Green offense 20% (12/61)Kent State offense 43% (30/70)

at Central Michigan

17–14 W · 70 plays to 58
Bowling Green offense 41% (29/70)Central Michigan offense 40% (23/58)

vs Miami (OH)

21–24 L · 54 plays to 63
Bowling Green offense 28% (15/54)Miami (OH) offense 60% (38/63)

at Toledo

14–33 L · 68 plays to 72
Bowling Green offense 35% (24/68)Toledo offense 46% (33/72)

vs Western Michigan

7–41 L · 66 plays to 67
Bowling Green offense 42% (28/66)Western Michigan offense 54% (36/67)