THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

Bowling GreenFalcons

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2015, released in week 15.

CFP Top 25, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Bowling Green10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 546.8 yds/g · 7,655 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#87 (of 128 teams · 417.8 yds/g allowed · 5,849 yards)#84 (of 128 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#22 (of 128 teams · +13.3 /g · +186 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +12 on the season · 27 taken, 15 given · +0.86 /g)#104 (of 128 teams · 27:55 /g · 6h 31m on the season)#52 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 433.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.341 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 128 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#67 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.338 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 128 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll1 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#40 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#116. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#114. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#39 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #3–#117. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#116. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#74. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#102. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#45 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#79 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #7–#110. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #7–#124. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#120. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#121. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#22 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#117. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#102. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #3–#120. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#109. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #3–#122. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#74 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #13–#123. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)
2015Clemson14–11 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#11 (of 128 teams · 514.5 yds/g · 7,718 yards)#16 (of 128 teams · 38.5 pts/g · 577 points)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 313.0 yds/g allowed · 4,695 yards)#24 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +16.8 /g · +252 on the season)#83 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 25 taken, 27 given · -0.13 /g)#26 (of 128 teams · 31:56 /g · 7h 59m on the season)#84 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 807.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.268 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 128 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 128 teams · 1.401 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #19 Florida, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)#45 (of 128 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 6,406 yards)#30 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 526 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 276.3 yds/g allowed · 4,145 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 227 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.9 /g · +299 on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 27 taken, 17 given · +0.67 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:33 /g · 8h 23m on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 981.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 128 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Michigan State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State, #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#73 (of 128 teams · 385.5 yds/g · 5,397 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 417 points)#26 (of 128 teams · 349.9 yds/g allowed · 4,898 yards)#25 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#43 (of 128 teams · +8.1 /g · +113 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.00 /g)#14 (of 128 teams · 32:52 /g · 7h 40m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 715.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 128 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#56 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 128 teams · 1.255 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.219 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oklahoma11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU, #16 Oklahoma State, #17 Baylor, #23 Tennessee)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 530.2 yds/g · 6,893 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.5 pts/g · 566 points)#39 (of 128 teams · 364.5 yds/g allowed · 4,738 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21.5 /g · +280 on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.69 /g)#48 (of 128 teams · 30:42 /g · 6h 39m on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 128 teams · 775.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 128 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#36 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 128 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Iowa12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Northwestern)#72 (of 128 teams · 386.1 yds/g · 5,406 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 433 points)#22 (of 128 teams · 341.0 yds/g allowed · 4,774 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#31 (of 128 teams · +10.6 /g · +148 on the season)#11 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 27 taken, 16 given · +0.79 /g)#31 (of 128 teams · 31:38 /g · 7h 23m on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#108 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 573.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 128 teams · 0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 128 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#50 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 128 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 128 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Stanford12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame · postseason: #5 Iowa)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #25 USC, #25 USC · postseason: #5 Iowa)#40 (of 128 teams · 435.5 yds/g · 6,097 yards)#18 (of 128 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 529 points)#43 (of 128 teams · 368.3 yds/g allowed · 5,156 yards)#32 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#13 (of 128 teams · +15.2 /g · +213 on the season)#65 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.07 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34:48 /g · 8h 07m on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#52 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 766.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 128 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#66 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Ohio State12–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Notre Dame)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan · postseason: #8 Notre Dame)#41 (of 128 teams · 434.1 yds/g · 5,643 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 311.3 yds/g allowed · 4,047 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 196 points)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +20.6 /g · +268 on the season)#48 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 21 taken, 18 given · +0.23 /g)#77 (of 128 teams · 29:16 /g · 6h 20m on the season)#38 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 907.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.227 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 128 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 128 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 128 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Notre Dame10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Navy, #24 Temple, #25 USC)#27 (of 128 teams · 466.4 yds/g · 6,063 yards)#34 (of 128 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 445 points)#45 (of 128 teams · 372.7 yds/g allowed · 4,845 yards)#39 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points)#32 (of 128 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#102 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.46 /g)#67 (of 128 teams · 29:37 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#91 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 857.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 128 teams · 0.271 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 128 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#58 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 128 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 128 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#51 (of 128 teams · 424.0 yds/g · 5,512 yards)#47 (of 128 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points)#19 (of 128 teams · 336.9 yds/g allowed · 4,380 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 227 points)#20 (of 128 teams · +14.2 /g · +185 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g)#74 (of 128 teams · 29:25 /g · 6h 22m on the season)#103 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 128 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 128 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#23 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 128 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015North Carolina11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 128 teams · 486.9 yds/g · 6,817 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.7 pts/g · 570 points)#96 (of 128 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 6,103 yards)#42 (of 128 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#11 (of 128 teams · +16.2 /g · +227 on the season)#30 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g)#127 (of 128 teams · 25:16 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 683.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.341 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 128 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#109 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.313 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 128 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015TCU11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Baylor · postseason: #15 Oregon)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 562.9 yds/g · 7,317 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 547 points)#63 (of 128 teams · 398.4 yds/g allowed · 5,179 yards)#64 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#17 (of 128 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#35 (of 128 teams · 31:22 /g · 6h 48m on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving production returning)#45 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 128 teams · 630.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.270 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#17 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 128 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 128 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Ole Miss10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Alabama, #20 LSU · postseason: #16 Oklahoma State)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 517.8 yds/g · 6,731 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.9 pts/g · 531 points)#54 (of 128 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,016 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18.2 /g · +237 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 23 taken, 23 given · +0.00 /g)#120 (of 128 teams · 26:32 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#109 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#19 (of 128 teams · 764.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.299 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#31 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 128 teams · 1.225 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 128 teams · 1.138 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)#116 (of 128 teams · 327.1 yds/g · 4,252 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 19.5 pts/g · 254 points)#13 (of 128 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 4,146 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#74 (of 128 teams · +0.9 /g · +12 on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#64 (of 128 teams · 29:48 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#102 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 595.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#13 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 128 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #13 Northwestern · postseason: #19 Florida)#69 (of 128 teams · 395.9 yds/g · 5,147 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 408 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 280.7 yds/g allowed · 3,649 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#15 (of 128 teams · +15.0 /g · +195 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.31 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:28 /g · 7h 15m on the season)#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 128 teams · 1.138 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 128 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oregon9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford, #25 USC)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 538.2 yds/g · 6,997 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.0 pts/g · 559 points)#117 (of 128 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 6,309 yards)#116 (of 128 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 488 points)#51 (of 128 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#114 (of 128 teams · 27:15 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#106 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#20 (of 128 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.281 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 128 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#103 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU)#22 (of 128 teams · 480.0 yds/g · 6,240 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 39.5 pts/g · 514 points)#100 (of 128 teams · 439.1 yds/g allowed · 5,708 yards)#88 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#37 (of 128 teams · +9.1 /g · +118 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 28 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g)#72 (of 128 teams · 29:30 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#88 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning)#33 (of 128 teams · 651.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 128 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#63 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.346 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Baylor10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #16 Oklahoma State · postseason: #10 North Carolina)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 616.2 yds/g · 8,011 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 48.1 pts/g · 625 points)#62 (of 128 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,155 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.8 /g · +257 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#107 (of 128 teams · 27:52 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#94 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.360 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 128 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#48 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Houston13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #9 Florida State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #21 Navy, #24 Temple · postseason: #9 Florida State)#20 (of 128 teams · 484.1 yds/g · 6,778 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.4 pts/g · 566 points)#53 (of 128 teams · 383.6 yds/g allowed · 5,370 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.7 /g · +276 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#37 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 7h 19m on the season)#74 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's passing production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 511.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.249 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 128 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#32 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 128 teams · 1.265 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida10–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #23 Tennessee)#112 (of 128 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 4,676 yards)#100 (of 128 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 325 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 310.2 yds/g allowed · 4,343 yards)#11 (of 128 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#53 (of 128 teams · +4.9 /g · +69 on the season)#27 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.57 /g)#45 (of 128 teams · 30:58 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#82 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's passing production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 789.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 128 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#14 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 128 teams · 1.230 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015LSU9–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#39 (of 128 teams · 437.3 yds/g · 5,247 yards)#44 (of 128 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 394 points)#25 (of 128 teams · 347.2 yds/g allowed · 4,166 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#38 (of 128 teams · +8.6 /g · +103 on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 17 taken, 10 given · +0.58 /g)#36 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 6h 16m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.281 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#55 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Navy11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 128 teams · 425.1 yds/g · 5,527 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#40 (of 128 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 4,744 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#16 (of 128 teams · +14.9 /g · +194 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19 on the season · 27 taken, 8 given · +1.46 /g)#16 (of 128 teams · 32:48 /g · 7h 06m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 306.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.326 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 128 teams · 1.165 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Utah10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#97 (of 128 teams · 363.0 yds/g · 4,719 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#41 (of 128 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 4,768 yards)#31 (of 128 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#40 (of 128 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#17 (of 128 teams · 32:43 /g · 7h 05m on the season)#31 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#50 (of 128 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 128 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 128 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#46 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 128 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Northwestern)#52 (of 128 teams · 422.3 yds/g · 5,490 yards)#29 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 457 points)#36 (of 128 teams · 362.0 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yards)#16 (of 128 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#14 (of 128 teams · +15.2 /g · +197 on the season)#28 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.54 /g)#50 (of 128 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 810.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 128 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#16 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 128 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Temple10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#96 (of 128 teams · 366.7 yds/g · 5,134 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 417 points)#20 (of 128 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,718 yards)#17 (of 128 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#34 (of 128 teams · +9.7 /g · +136 on the season)#50 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 22 taken, 19 given · +0.21 /g)#12 (of 128 teams · 32:56 /g · 7h 41m on the season)#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 405.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 128 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 128 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 128 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015USC8–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#38 (of 128 teams · 437.9 yds/g · 6,131 yards)#37 (of 128 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 475 points)#65 (of 128 teams · 400.8 yds/g allowed · 5,611 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#42 (of 128 teams · +8.2 /g · +115 on the season)#11 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 23 taken, 12 given · +0.79 /g)#78 (of 128 teams · 29:13 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#33 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 926.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 128 teams · 0.240 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 128 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#81 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 128 teams · 1.221 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20152015 Bowling GreenCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #40
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 TCU #3 of 128; 2015 Oregon #5 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #7 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #10 of 128; 2015 Clemson #11 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #18 of 128; 2015 Houston #20 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #22 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #27 of 128; 2015 USC #38 of 128; 2015 LSU #39 of 128; 2015 Stanford #40 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #41 of 128; 2015 Alabama #45 of 128; 2015 Navy #48 of 128; 2015 Florida State #51 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #52 of 128; 2015 Michigan #69 of 128; 2015 Iowa #72 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #73 of 128; 2015 Temple #96 of 128; 2015 Utah #97 of 128; 2015 Florida #112 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 4 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 40.
Scoring offensemedian #29
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #4 of 128; 2015 Oregon #5 of 128; 2015 TCU #7 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #8 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #9 of 128; 2015 Houston #10 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #14 of 128; 2015 Clemson #16 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Navy #22 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #28 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #29 of 128; 2015 Alabama #30 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #34 of 128; 2015 USC #37 of 128; 2015 LSU #44 of 128; 2015 Florida State #47 of 128; 2015 Michigan #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #54 of 128; 2015 Utah #55 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #60 of 128; 2015 Temple #60 of 128; 2015 Florida #100 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 6 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Total defensemedian #39
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #4 of 128; 2015 Florida #8 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2015 Clemson #10 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 128; 2015 Florida State #19 of 128; 2015 Temple #20 of 128; 2015 Iowa #22 of 128; 2015 LSU #25 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #26 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #36 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #39 of 128; 2015 Navy #40 of 128; 2015 Utah #41 of 128; 2015 Stanford #43 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #45 of 128; 2015 Houston #53 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #54 of 128; 2015 Baylor #62 of 128; 2015 TCU #63 of 128; 2015 USC #65 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #96 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #100 of 128; 2015 Oregon #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 87 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 39.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #6 of 128; 2015 Florida State #9 of 128; 2015 Florida #11 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #12 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2015 Temple #17 of 128; 2015 Iowa #19 of 128; 2015 Houston #20 of 128; 2015 Clemson #24 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #25 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #28 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 Stanford #32 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #33 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #39 of 128; 2015 LSU #41 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #42 of 128; 2015 USC #50 of 128; 2015 TCU #64 of 128; 2015 Baylor #79 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 Oregon #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 84 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #17
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Baylor #4 of 128; 2015 Houston #5 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #8 of 128; 2015 Clemson #10 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #11 of 128; 2015 Stanford #13 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2015 Michigan #15 of 128; 2015 Navy #16 of 128; 2015 TCU #17 of 128; 2015 Florida State #20 of 128; 2015 Iowa #31 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #32 of 128; 2015 Temple #34 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #37 of 128; 2015 LSU #38 of 128; 2015 Utah #40 of 128; 2015 USC #42 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #43 of 128; 2015 Oregon #51 of 128; 2015 Florida #53 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #74 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 22 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Turnover marginmedian #30
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Houston #2 of 128; 2015 Navy #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #4 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #4 of 128; 2015 Utah #4 of 128; 2015 Iowa #11 of 128; 2015 USC #11 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 Alabama #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Florida #27 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #28 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #30 of 128; 2015 Oregon #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #48 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #61 of 128; 2015 Stanford #65 of 128; 2015 Florida State #66 of 128; 2015 TCU #66 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #66 of 128; 2015 Baylor #66 of 128; 2015 Clemson #83 of 128; 2015 Michigan #92 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #102 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 9 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 30.
Possessionmedian #45
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 128; 2015 Alabama #7 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Temple #12 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #14 of 128; 2015 Navy #16 of 128; 2015 Utah #17 of 128; 2015 Clemson #26 of 128; 2015 Iowa #31 of 128; 2015 TCU #35 of 128; 2015 LSU #36 of 128; 2015 Houston #37 of 128; 2015 Florida #45 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #48 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #64 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #67 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #72 of 128; 2015 Florida State #74 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #77 of 128; 2015 USC #78 of 128; 2015 Baylor #107 of 128; 2015 Oregon #114 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #120 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 104 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 45.
Returning passingmedian #79
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 USC #33 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #38 of 128; 2015 TCU #49 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Stanford #54 of 128; 2015 Houston #74 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #79 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Clemson #84 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 Iowa #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #94 of 128; 2015 Alabama #97 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #102 of 128; 2015 Florida State #103 of 128; 2015 Oregon #106 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #109 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #110 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 52 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 79.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tennessee #7 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Oregon #14 of 128; 2015 LSU #22 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #23 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 128; 2015 TCU #28 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #32 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #36 of 128; 2015 Stanford #52 of 128; 2015 Baylor #55 of 128; 2015 Florida State #69 of 128; 2015 Navy #74 of 128; 2015 Utah #79 of 128; 2015 Temple #80 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #84 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #86 of 128; 2015 Michigan #89 of 128; 2015 Iowa #94 of 128; 2015 Houston #103 of 128; 2015 Alabama #121 of 128; 2015 USC #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 8 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #68
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 128; 2015 Utah #6 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #15 of 128; 2015 Houston #26 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Baylor #37 of 128; 2015 TCU #45 of 128; 2015 Oregon #46 of 128; 2015 Clemson #52 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #55 of 128; 2015 Stanford #58 of 128; 2015 Michigan #67 of 128; 2015 Navy #68 of 128; 2015 LSU #71 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #76 of 128; 2015 Temple #84 of 128; 2015 Florida State #85 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #86 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #91 of 128; 2015 Florida #103 of 128; 2015 Iowa #108 of 128; 2015 USC #110 of 128; 2015 Alabama #111 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #118 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 77 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 68.
Team talentmedian #19
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #1 of 128; 2015 USC #2 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2015 Florida State #4 of 128; 2015 LSU #5 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #8 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Florida #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #16 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 128; 2015 Oregon #20 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #23 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #26 of 128; 2015 Baylor #31 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #33 of 128; 2015 TCU #39 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2015 Utah #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #51 of 128; 2015 Houston #65 of 128; 2015 Temple #85 of 128; 2015 Navy #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 78 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Offensive EPAmedian #22
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #3 of 128; 2015 Navy #5 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #9 of 128; 2015 Stanford #10 of 128; 2015 LSU #12 of 128; 2015 Oregon #13 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #15 of 128; 2015 TCU #16 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #17 of 128; 2015 Clemson #18 of 128; 2015 Houston #19 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #22 of 128; 2015 USC #24 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #31 of 128; 2015 Florida State #35 of 128; 2015 Iowa #40 of 128; 2015 Alabama #46 of 128; 2015 Michigan #47 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #52 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #72 of 128; 2015 Utah #90 of 128; 2015 Florida #91 of 128; 2015 Temple #99 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 2 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 22.
Defensive EPAmedian #33
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #2 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #3 of 128; 2015 Clemson #5 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Florida #13 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #14 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #18 of 128; 2015 Temple #19 of 128; 2015 Iowa #21 of 128; 2015 Utah #23 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #29 of 128; 2015 TCU #31 of 128; 2015 Houston #33 of 128; 2015 Florida State #34 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #43 of 128; 2015 USC #45 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #46 of 128; 2015 LSU #52 of 128; 2015 Baylor #53 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #67 of 128; 2015 Navy #69 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2015 Stanford #73 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #87 of 128; 2015 Oregon #102 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 57 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 33.
Offensive success ratemedian #32
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #3 of 128; 2015 Baylor #4 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #6 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 TCU #8 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2015 Navy #10 of 128; 2015 Oregon #14 of 128; 2015 Clemson #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #21 of 128; 2015 USC #27 of 128; 2015 LSU #32 of 128; 2015 Michigan #38 of 128; 2015 Florida State #39 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #41 of 128; 2015 Alabama #42 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #47 of 128; 2015 Houston #48 of 128; 2015 Iowa #52 of 128; 2015 Utah #59 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #74 of 128; 2015 Florida #100 of 128; 2015 Temple #102 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 11 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 32.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #2 of 128; 2015 Clemson #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #6 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #8 of 128; 2015 Temple #9 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 128; 2015 Florida #14 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2015 TCU #17 of 128; 2015 Florida State #23 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 128; 2015 Houston #32 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Utah #46 of 128; 2015 Baylor #48 of 128; 2015 Iowa #50 of 128; 2015 LSU #55 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #56 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #58 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #63 of 128; 2015 Stanford #66 of 128; 2015 USC #81 of 128; 2015 Navy #90 of 128; 2015 Oregon #103 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #109 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 67 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #53
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #3 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #8 of 128; 2015 Houston #9 of 128; 2015 Baylor #11 of 128; 2015 LSU #15 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #25 of 128; 2015 Temple #27 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #31 of 128; 2015 Florida State #34 of 128; 2015 Oregon #38 of 128; 2015 Florida #48 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #51 of 128; 2015 USC #53 of 128; 2015 Iowa #54 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #57 of 128; 2015 TCU #80 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #81 of 128; 2015 Navy #84 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #87 of 128; 2015 Stanford #90 of 128; 2015 Alabama #91 of 128; 2015 Clemson #95 of 128; 2015 Michigan #96 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #97 of 128; 2015 Utah #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 4 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 53.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #74
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #13 of 128; 2015 Florida #18 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #22 of 128; 2015 Iowa #25 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #34 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #36 of 128; 2015 USC #38 of 128; 2015 Florida State #40 of 128; 2015 Navy #45 of 128; 2015 Stanford #57 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #63 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #73 of 128; 2015 Temple #74 of 128; 2015 Oregon #77 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #79 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #84 of 128; 2015 LSU #88 of 128; 2015 TCU #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #93 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #95 of 128; 2015 Utah #98 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Houston #103 of 128; 2015 Alabama #114 of 128; 2015 Clemson #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Bowling Green, ranked 72 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 74.