Metrics

BuffaloBulls

Season
Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2008, released in week 15.

AP Top 25, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008Buffalo860 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 120 teams · 370.3 yds/g · 5,184 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 424 points)#97 (of 120 teams · 408.2 yds/g allowed · 5,715 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 395 points)#57 (of 120 teams · +2.1 /g · +29 on the season)#11 (of 120 teams · +17 on the season · 34 taken, 17 given · +1.21 /g)#37 (of 120 teams · 18:48 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#119 (of 120 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.811 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#21 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #3–#93. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#74. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#101. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#79. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#51. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#37 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#90. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#44 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #2–#119. 4 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#20 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#94. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#103. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#89. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#31 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #1–#104. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #3–#120. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#77 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range #4–#119. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)
2008Alabama1220 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#61 (of 120 teams · 355.8 yds/g · 4,981 yards)#35 (of 120 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 422 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 263.5 yds/g allowed · 3,689 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 200 points)#12 (of 120 teams · +15.9 /g · +222 on the season)#35 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 26 taken, 20 given · +0.43 /g)#13 (of 120 teams · 19:28 /g · 4h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.051 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#12 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 120 teams · 0.786 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.899 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Florida1313 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 120 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 6,230 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 43.6 pts/g · 611 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 285.3 yds/g allowed · 3,994 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +30.7 /g · +430 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22 on the season · 36 taken, 14 given · +1.57 /g)#58 (of 120 teams · 18:21 /g · 4h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#45 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.793 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Texas1213 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 475.8 yds/g · 6,185 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.4 pts/g · 551 points)#53 (of 120 teams · 342.9 yds/g allowed · 4,458 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 244 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +23.6 /g · +307 on the season)#46 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 18 taken, 15 given · +0.23 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 19:50 /g · 4h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#46 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.925 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 120 teams · 1.058 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oklahoma1223 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 547.9 yds/g · 7,670 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 51.1 pts/g · 716 points)#70 (of 120 teams · 367.6 yds/g allowed · 5,147 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +26.6 /g · +373 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +24 on the season · 35 taken, 11 given · +1.71 /g)#80 (of 120 teams · 17:43 /g · 4h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.150 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.924 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 120 teams · 1.079 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008USC1214 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 120 teams · 454.7 yds/g · 5,911 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 488 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 221.8 yds/g allowed · 2,883 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 9.0 pts/g allowed · 117 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +28.5 /g · +371 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 31 taken, 24 given · +0.54 /g)#24 (of 120 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.827 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Penn State1121 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 120 teams · 414.9 yds/g · 5,394 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 38.9 pts/g · 506 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 266.2 yds/g allowed · 3,461 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 14.4 pts/g allowed · 187 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +24.5 /g · +319 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.54 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:17 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#26 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.908 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Utah1300 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 120 teams · 400.9 yds/g · 5,212 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 480 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 289.1 yds/g allowed · 3,759 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 17.2 pts/g allowed · 224 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19.7 /g · +256 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +14 on the season · 34 taken, 20 given · +1.08 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 19:43 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#30 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.846 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Texas Tech1120 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 531.0 yds/g · 6,903 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 43.8 pts/g · 569 points)#80 (of 120 teams · 382.6 yds/g allowed · 4,974 yards)#75 (of 120 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 362 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +15.9 /g · +207 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 30 taken, 25 given · +0.38 /g)#49 (of 120 teams · 18:36 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.232 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 52% of plays successful)#104 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.935 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.846 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Boise State1210 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 440.9 yds/g · 5,731 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 489 points)#21 (of 120 teams · 308.1 yds/g allowed · 4,006 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.0 /g · +325 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 35 taken, 26 given · +0.69 /g)#88 (of 120 teams · 17:30 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.001 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Ohio State1030 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 120 teams · 342.7 yds/g · 4,455 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 359 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 293.8 yds/g allowed · 3,819 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +18 on the season · 32 taken, 14 given · +1.38 /g)#17 (of 120 teams · 19:13 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#59 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.890 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008TCU1120 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 421.3 yds/g · 5,477 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 437 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 217.8 yds/g allowed · 2,831 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 11.3 pts/g allowed · 147 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.3 /g · +290 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21 on the season · 36 taken, 15 given · +1.62 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:36 /g · 4h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.828 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 120 teams · 1.086 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Ball State1220 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 120 teams · 442.5 yds/g · 6,195 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 489 points)#71 (of 120 teams · 368.2 yds/g allowed · 5,155 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +14.4 /g · +202 on the season)#44 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.29 /g)#57 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 4h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#81 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 120 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Cincinnati1130 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 120 teams · 370.6 yds/g · 5,189 yards)#55 (of 120 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 362 points)#32 (of 120 teams · 321.9 yds/g allowed · 4,507 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#38 (of 120 teams · +5.7 /g · +80 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 23 taken, 30 given · -0.50 /g)#85 (of 120 teams · 17:33 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#25 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oklahoma State940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 487.7 yds/g · 6,340 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 40.8 pts/g · 530 points)#96 (of 120 teams · 405.5 yds/g allowed · 5,272 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#20 (of 120 teams · +12.7 /g · +165 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 27 taken, 21 given · +0.46 /g)#32 (of 120 teams · 18:56 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Georgia Tech940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 120 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 317 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 313.5 yds/g allowed · 4,076 yards)#28 (of 120 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 264 points)#48 (of 120 teams · +4.1 /g · +53 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 32 taken, 27 given · +0.38 /g)#34 (of 120 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · -0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#41 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oregon1030 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 484.9 yds/g · 6,303 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.9 pts/g · 545 points)#84 (of 120 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 5,065 yards)#79 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 367 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 32 taken, 26 given · +0.46 /g)#119 (of 120 teams · 15:27 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 120 teams · -0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 120 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Georgia1034 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 120 teams · 426.0 yds/g · 5,538 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 312.0 yds/g allowed · 4,056 yards)#59 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 319 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +6.9 /g · +90 on the season)#75 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 16 taken, 19 given · -0.23 /g)#108 (of 120 teams · 16:47 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 120 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#31 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.034 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.913 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Boston College950 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 120 teams · 319.4 yds/g · 4,471 yards)#66 (of 120 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 346 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 268.1 yds/g allowed · 3,754 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#36 (of 120 teams · +6.4 /g · +89 on the season)#59 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 37 taken, 36 given · +0.07 /g)#40 (of 120 teams · 18:46 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 120 teams · -0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#13 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.818 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Missouri1040 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 484.1 yds/g · 6,778 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#101 (of 120 teams · 411.5 yds/g allowed · 5,761 yards)#70 (of 120 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +15.0 /g · +210 on the season)#63 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.07 /g)#116 (of 120 teams · 16:03 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 51% of plays successful)#83 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.880 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008BYU1030 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 444.1 yds/g · 5,773 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 445 points)#63 (of 120 teams · 355.9 yds/g allowed · 4,627 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#22 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 32 taken, 34 given · -0.15 /g)#56 (of 120 teams · 18:23 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 51% of plays successful)#77 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.798 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Michigan State940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#71 (of 120 teams · 343.5 yds/g · 4,465 yards)#62 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 326 points)#62 (of 120 teams · 355.9 yds/g allowed · 4,626 yards)#41 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#51 (of 120 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#50 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 26 taken, 24 given · +0.15 /g)#44 (of 120 teams · 18:43 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 120 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 120 teams · -0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#81 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#17 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.871 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.989 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Ole Miss940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 120 teams · 407.6 yds/g · 5,299 yards)#28 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#20 (of 120 teams · 307.2 yds/g allowed · 3,994 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 247 points)#19 (of 120 teams · +13.1 /g · +170 on the season)#75 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 23 taken, 26 given · -0.23 /g)#54 (of 120 teams · 18:25 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#39 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.874 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.964 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Pittsburgh940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 120 teams · 342.5 yds/g · 4,452 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 352 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 317.1 yds/g allowed · 4,123 yards)#35 (of 120 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#39 (of 120 teams · +5.6 /g · +73 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 26 taken, 31 given · -0.38 /g)#26 (of 120 teams · 19:07 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 120 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 120 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#34 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.876 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.891 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Northwestern940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 120 teams · 358.5 yds/g · 4,660 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 317 points)#51 (of 120 teams · 340.5 yds/g allowed · 4,427 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points)#47 (of 120 teams · +4.2 /g · +55 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 27 taken, 29 given · -0.15 /g)#86 (of 120 teams · 17:33 /g · 3h 48m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 120 teams · -0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#58 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 120 teams · 0.734 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.886 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oregon State940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2008's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 407.1 yds/g · 5,292 yards)#32 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 397 points)#24 (of 120 teams · 312.1 yds/g allowed · 4,058 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#30 (of 120 teams · +7.5 /g · +97 on the season)#54 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#14 (of 120 teams · 19:22 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#14 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.893 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20082008 BuffaloAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #21
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #3 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #4 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #6 of 120; 2008 Oregon #7 of 120; 2008 Missouri #8 of 120; 2008 Texas #9 of 120; 2008 USC #11 of 120; 2008 Florida #13 of 120; 2008 BYU #14 of 120; 2008 Ball State #15 of 120; 2008 Boise State #16 of 120; 2008 Georgia #19 of 120; 2008 TCU #21 of 120; 2008 Penn State #25 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #28 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #29 of 120; 2008 Utah #35 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #49 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #51 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #59 of 120; 2008 Alabama #61 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #71 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #73 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #74 of 120; 2008 Boston College #93 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 53 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 21.
Scoring offensemedian #20
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #1 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #3 of 120; 2008 Florida #4 of 120; 2008 Texas #5 of 120; 2008 Missouri #6 of 120; 2008 Oregon #7 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #9 of 120; 2008 Penn State #11 of 120; 2008 Boise State #12 of 120; 2008 USC #14 of 120; 2008 Utah #15 of 120; 2008 Ball State #18 of 120; 2008 BYU #20 of 120; 2008 TCU #21 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #28 of 120; 2008 Georgia #29 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #32 of 120; 2008 Alabama #35 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #45 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #50 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #55 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #62 of 120; 2008 Boston College #66 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #74 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #74 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 34 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 20.
Total defensemedian #26
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #1 of 120; 2008 USC #2 of 120; 2008 Alabama #3 of 120; 2008 Penn State #5 of 120; 2008 Boston College #6 of 120; 2008 Florida #9 of 120; 2008 Utah #11 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #14 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #20 of 120; 2008 Boise State #21 of 120; 2008 Georgia #23 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #24 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #26 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #28 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #32 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #51 of 120; 2008 Texas #53 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #62 of 120; 2008 BYU #63 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #70 of 120; 2008 Ball State #71 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #80 of 120; 2008 Oregon #84 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #96 of 120; 2008 Missouri #101 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 97 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 26.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #1 of 120; 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Boise State #3 of 120; 2008 Florida #4 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #6 of 120; 2008 Alabama #7 of 120; 2008 Penn State #8 of 120; 2008 Utah #12 of 120; 2008 Boston College #17 of 120; 2008 Texas #18 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #20 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #25 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #26 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #28 of 120; 2008 Ball State #29 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #35 of 120; 2008 BYU #39 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #41 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #47 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #58 of 120; 2008 Georgia #59 of 120; 2008 Missouri #70 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #75 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #77 of 120; 2008 Oregon #79 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 78 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #16
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Florida #1 of 120; 2008 USC #2 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #3 of 120; 2008 Boise State #4 of 120; 2008 Penn State #5 of 120; 2008 Texas #6 of 120; 2008 TCU #7 of 120; 2008 Utah #8 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #11 of 120; 2008 Alabama #12 of 120; 2008 Missouri #14 of 120; 2008 Ball State #15 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #16 of 120; 2008 Oregon #16 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #19 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #20 of 120; 2008 BYU #22 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #30 of 120; 2008 Georgia #31 of 120; 2008 Boston College #36 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #38 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #39 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #47 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #48 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #51 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 57 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 16.
Turnover marginmedian #37
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #1 of 120; 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Florida #3 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2008 Utah #15 of 120; 2008 Boise State #21 of 120; 2008 USC #24 of 120; 2008 Penn State #24 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #30 of 120; 2008 Oregon #30 of 120; 2008 Alabama #35 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #37 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #37 of 120; 2008 Ball State #44 of 120; 2008 Texas #46 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #50 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #54 of 120; 2008 Boston College #59 of 120; 2008 Missouri #63 of 120; 2008 BYU #71 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #71 of 120; 2008 Georgia #75 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #75 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #80 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #90 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 11 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Possessionmedian #44
Possession. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Penn State #5 of 120; 2008 Texas #9 of 120; 2008 Utah #10 of 120; 2008 Alabama #13 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #14 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #17 of 120; 2008 USC #24 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #26 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #32 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #34 of 120; 2008 Boston College #40 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #44 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #49 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #54 of 120; 2008 BYU #56 of 120; 2008 Ball State #57 of 120; 2008 Florida #58 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #80 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #85 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #86 of 120; 2008 Boise State #88 of 120; 2008 Georgia #108 of 120; 2008 Missouri #116 of 120; 2008 Oregon #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 37 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 44.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Buffalo, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Buffalo, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Buffalo, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Buffalo, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #20
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Texas Tech #1 of 120; 2008 Texas #3 of 120; 2008 Florida #4 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #5 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #6 of 120; 2008 Ball State #8 of 120; 2008 USC #9 of 120; 2008 BYU #10 of 120; 2008 Georgia #11 of 120; 2008 Penn State #12 of 120; 2008 Missouri #13 of 120; 2008 Boise State #16 of 120; 2008 Utah #20 of 120; 2008 TCU #21 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #31 of 120; 2008 Alabama #37 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #38 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #39 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #45 of 120; 2008 Oregon #60 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #73 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #81 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #83 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #92 of 120; 2008 Boston College #94 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 33 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive EPAmedian #30
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #1 of 120; 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Boston College #3 of 120; 2008 Florida #5 of 120; 2008 Boise State #6 of 120; 2008 Alabama #10 of 120; 2008 Georgia #12 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #22 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #24 of 120; 2008 Oregon #25 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #27 of 120; 2008 Penn State #29 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #30 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #31 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #35 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #40 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #47 of 120; 2008 Utah #56 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #57 of 120; 2008 Texas #68 of 120; 2008 BYU #84 of 120; 2008 Ball State #87 of 120; 2008 Missouri #92 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #95 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #103 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 98 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 30.
Offensive success ratemedian #24
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Texas Tech #1 of 120; 2008 Missouri #2 of 120; 2008 BYU #3 of 120; 2008 Texas #5 of 120; 2008 Ball State #6 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #8 of 120; 2008 USC #10 of 120; 2008 Penn State #11 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #13 of 120; 2008 Florida #16 of 120; 2008 TCU #17 of 120; 2008 Utah #20 of 120; 2008 Alabama #24 of 120; 2008 Boise State #26 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #28 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #31 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #36 of 120; 2008 Georgia #37 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #48 of 120; 2008 Oregon #62 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #70 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #71 of 120; 2008 Boston College #74 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #81 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #89 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 51 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Defensive success ratemedian #31
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #1 of 120; 2008 USC #2 of 120; 2008 Boise State #3 of 120; 2008 Alabama #12 of 120; 2008 Boston College #13 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #14 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #17 of 120; 2008 Oregon #18 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #25 of 120; 2008 Penn State #26 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #28 of 120; 2008 Utah #30 of 120; 2008 Georgia #31 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #34 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #39 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #41 of 120; 2008 Florida #45 of 120; 2008 Texas #46 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #58 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #59 of 120; 2008 BYU #77 of 120; 2008 Ball State #81 of 120; 2008 Missouri #83 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #89 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #104 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 119 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 31.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #68
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Georgia #3 of 120; 2008 Oregon #11 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #13 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #18 of 120; 2008 USC #27 of 120; 2008 Ball State #36 of 120; 2008 Florida #37 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #43 of 120; 2008 Boise State #47 of 120; 2008 Texas #49 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #51 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #53 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #68 of 120; 2008 Penn State #73 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #76 of 120; 2008 Missouri #82 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #86 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #88 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #91 of 120; 2008 Utah #100 of 120; 2008 TCU #104 of 120; 2008 Boston College #109 of 120; 2008 BYU #112 of 120; 2008 Alabama #115 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 69 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 68.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #77
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Florida #4 of 120; 2008 USC #13 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #22 of 120; 2008 Utah #43 of 120; 2008 Northwestern #44 of 120; 2008 Ohio State #45 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #47 of 120; 2008 Alabama #58 of 120; 2008 Boston College #61 of 120; 2008 Missouri #65 of 120; 2008 Penn State #66 of 120; 2008 Georgia #68 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #77 of 120; 2008 Oregon #87 of 120; 2008 Georgia Tech #88 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #90 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #91 of 120; 2008 BYU #92 of 120; 2008 Ole Miss #96 of 120; 2008 Michigan State #104 of 120; 2008 Boise State #108 of 120; 2008 Ball State #113 of 120; 2008 Texas #116 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #118 of 120; 2008 TCU #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 Buffalo, ranked 7 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 77.