THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

BuffaloBulls

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2017

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Buffalo6–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 130 teams · 431.9 yds/g · 5,183 yards)#63 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 342 points)#71 (of 130 teams · 398.6 yds/g allowed · 4,783 yards)#49 (of 130 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#60 (of 130 teams · +3.7 /g · +44 on the season)#59 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.08 /g)#69 (of 130 teams · 29:47 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#69 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#117 (of 130 teams · 294.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 130 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 130 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#93 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 130 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 130 teams · 1.091 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#82 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #14–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #9–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #26–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #32–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #13–#127. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #19–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #10–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #16–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #10–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #12–#107. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#98 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #83–#120. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#94 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #14–#129. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #5–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#88 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #10–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #7–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#66 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #21–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range #5–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2017Akron7–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#122 (of 130 teams · 316.4 yds/g · 4,429 yards)#108 (of 130 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 310 points)#104 (of 130 teams · 442.9 yds/g allowed · 6,200 yards)#73 (of 130 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 392 points)#99 (of 130 teams · -5.9 /g · -82 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 27 taken, 17 given · +0.71 /g)#90 (of 130 teams · 28:45 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#56 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#104 (of 130 teams · 337.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 130 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 130 teams · 0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#110 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 130 teams · 1.254 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 130 teams · 1.152 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Ball State2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 130 teams · 335.2 yds/g · 4,022 yards)#122 (of 130 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 215 points)#88 (of 130 teams · 421.6 yds/g allowed · 5,059 yards)#125 (of 130 teams · 40.7 pts/g allowed · 488 points)#127 (of 130 teams · -22.8 /g · -273 on the season)#116 (of 130 teams · -9 on the season · 12 taken, 21 given · -0.75 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:10 /g · 6h 38m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#113 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's rushing production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 318.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#125 (of 130 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 130 teams · 0.264 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#85 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 130 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#129 (of 130 teams · 1.445 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Bowling Green2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#85 (of 130 teams · 386.7 yds/g · 4,640 yards)#90 (of 130 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 304 points)#126 (of 130 teams · 506.6 yds/g allowed · 6,079 yards)#123 (of 130 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 456 points)#117 (of 130 teams · -12.7 /g · -152 on the season)#82 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.17 /g)#118 (of 130 teams · 27:13 /g · 5h 27m on the season)#74 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's passing production returning)#45 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#78 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 361.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 130 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#123 (of 130 teams · 0.277 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#125 (of 130 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 130 teams · 1.235 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 130 teams · 1.165 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Central Michigan8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#77 (of 130 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 5,067 yards)#64 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#49 (of 130 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 4,820 yards)#71 (of 130 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#72 (of 130 teams · +0.9 /g · +12 on the season)#64 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 31 taken, 31 given · +0.00 /g)#96 (of 130 teams · 28:31 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#117 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#17 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#89 (of 130 teams · 387.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 130 teams · 0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 130 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#38 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 130 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 130 teams · 1.095 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Eastern Michigan5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#82 (of 130 teams · 386.9 yds/g · 4,643 yards)#82 (of 130 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 313 points)#39 (of 130 teams · 363.6 yds/g allowed · 4,363 yards)#40 (of 130 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#65 (of 130 teams · +2.8 /g · +33 on the season)#93 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.33 /g)#68 (of 130 teams · 29:58 /g · 6h 00m on the season)#73 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's passing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 292.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 130 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 130 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#63 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 130 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.051 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Kent State2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#128 (of 130 teams · 275.2 yds/g · 3,302 yards)#129 (of 130 teams · 12.8 pts/g · 153 points)#77 (of 130 teams · 408.3 yds/g allowed · 4,900 yards)#112 (of 130 teams · 35.1 pts/g allowed · 421 points)#125 (of 130 teams · -22.3 /g · -268 on the season)#106 (of 130 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.58 /g)#28 (of 130 teams · 31:26 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#52 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#23 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 130 teams · 288.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#129 (of 130 teams · -0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 130 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#129 (of 130 teams · 34% of plays successful)#65 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 130 teams · 1.106 average PPA on successful plays)#121 (of 130 teams · 1.361 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Miami (OH)5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#90 (of 130 teams · 383.6 yds/g · 4,603 yards)#97 (of 130 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#45 (of 130 teams · 367.6 yds/g allowed · 4,411 yards)#43 (of 130 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#75 (of 130 teams · +0.3 /g · +4 on the season)#75 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.08 /g)#29 (of 130 teams · 31:26 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning)#16 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#27 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's rushing production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 413.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 130 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 130 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#43 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 130 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 130 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Northern Illinois8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#93 (of 130 teams · 377.8 yds/g · 4,911 yards)#60 (of 130 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#26 (of 130 teams · 338.5 yds/g allowed · 4,401 yards)#32 (of 130 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#40 (of 130 teams · +6.9 /g · +90 on the season)#80 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 22 taken, 24 given · -0.15 /g)#94 (of 130 teams · 28:35 /g · 6h 12m on the season)#88 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing production returning)#104 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 374.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 130 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 130 teams · 1.132 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 130 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Ohio9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 130 teams · 433.1 yds/g · 5,630 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 508 points)#50 (of 130 teams · 371.6 yds/g allowed · 4,831 yards)#44 (of 130 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#13 (of 130 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#90 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.31 /g)#42 (of 130 teams · 30:55 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#89 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's passing production returning)#100 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#56 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#113 (of 130 teams · 326.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 130 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 130 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#18 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 130 teams · 1.225 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 130 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Toledo11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#14 (of 130 teams · 483.9 yds/g · 6,775 yards)#16 (of 130 teams · 36.4 pts/g · 509 points)#59 (of 130 teams · 385.0 yds/g allowed · 5,390 yards)#61 (of 130 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 367 points)#25 (of 130 teams · +10.1 /g · +142 on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.07 /g)#25 (of 130 teams · 31:37 /g · 7h 23m on the season)#20 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#76 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#95 (of 130 teams · 366.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 130 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 130 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#69 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 130 teams · 1.245 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 130 teams · 1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Western Michigan6–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#78 (of 130 teams · 389.6 yds/g · 4,675 yards)#25 (of 130 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 407 points)#55 (of 130 teams · 378.5 yds/g allowed · 4,542 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 348 points)#53 (of 130 teams · +4.9 /g · +59 on the season)#20 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.67 /g)#49 (of 130 teams · 30:39 /g · 6h 08m on the season)#126 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's receiving production returning)#35 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#83 (of 130 teams · 414.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 130 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 130 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#41 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 130 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 130 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20172017 BuffaloMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #82
Total offense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Toledo #14 of 130; 2017 Ohio #34 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #77 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #78 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #82 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #85 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #90 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #93 of 130; 2017 Ball State #111 of 130; 2017 Akron #122 of 130; 2017 Kent State #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 36 of 130. Mid-American median rank 82.
Scoring offensemedian #64
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio #9 of 130; 2017 Toledo #16 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #25 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #60 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #64 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #82 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #90 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #97 of 130; 2017 Akron #108 of 130; 2017 Ball State #122 of 130; 2017 Kent State #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 63 of 130. Mid-American median rank 64.
Total defensemedian #55
Total defense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Northern Illinois #26 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #39 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #45 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #49 of 130; 2017 Ohio #50 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #55 of 130; 2017 Toledo #59 of 130; 2017 Kent State #77 of 130; 2017 Ball State #88 of 130; 2017 Akron #104 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 71 of 130. Mid-American median rank 55.
Scoring defensemedian #61
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Northern Illinois #32 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #40 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #43 of 130; 2017 Ohio #44 of 130; 2017 Toledo #61 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #71 of 130; 2017 Akron #73 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #81 of 130; 2017 Kent State #112 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #123 of 130; 2017 Ball State #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 49 of 130. Mid-American median rank 61.
Point marginmedian #65
Point margin. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio #13 of 130; 2017 Toledo #25 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #40 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #53 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #65 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #72 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #75 of 130; 2017 Akron #99 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #117 of 130; 2017 Kent State #125 of 130; 2017 Ball State #127 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 60 of 130. Mid-American median rank 65.
Turnover marginmedian #75
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Akron #19 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #20 of 130; 2017 Toledo #63 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #64 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #75 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #80 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #82 of 130; 2017 Ohio #90 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #93 of 130; 2017 Kent State #106 of 130; 2017 Ball State #116 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 59 of 130. Mid-American median rank 75.
Possessionmedian #49
Possession. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ball State #10 of 130; 2017 Toledo #25 of 130; 2017 Kent State #28 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #29 of 130; 2017 Ohio #42 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #49 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #68 of 130; 2017 Akron #90 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #94 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #96 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #118 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 69 of 130. Mid-American median rank 49.
Returning passingmedian #69
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ball State #16 of 130; 2017 Toledo #20 of 130; 2017 Kent State #52 of 130; 2017 Akron #56 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #63 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #73 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #74 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #88 of 130; 2017 Ohio #89 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #117 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 69 of 130. Mid-American median rank 69.
Returning receivingmedian #76
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Eastern Michigan #10 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #16 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #17 of 130; 2017 Kent State #23 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #45 of 130; 2017 Toledo #76 of 130; 2017 Akron #90 of 130; 2017 Ohio #100 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #104 of 130; 2017 Ball State #113 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 94 of 130. Mid-American median rank 76.
Returning rushingmedian #37
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Kent State #12 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #22 of 130; 2017 Ball State #25 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #27 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #35 of 130; 2017 Akron #37 of 130; 2017 Ohio #56 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #78 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #83 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #102 of 130; 2017 Toledo #107 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 94 of 130. Mid-American median rank 37.
Team talentmedian #98
Team talent. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Western Michigan #83 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #84 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #89 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #93 of 130; 2017 Toledo #95 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #98 of 130; 2017 Akron #104 of 130; 2017 Ohio #113 of 130; 2017 Ball State #114 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #118 of 130; 2017 Kent State #120 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 117 of 130. Mid-American median rank 98.
Offensive EPAmedian #94
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio #14 of 130; 2017 Toledo #17 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #71 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #91 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #94 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #103 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #106 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #108 of 130; 2017 Akron #111 of 130; 2017 Ball State #125 of 130; 2017 Kent State #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 35 of 130. Mid-American median rank 94.
Defensive EPAmedian #72
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Northern Illinois #5 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #25 of 130; 2017 Ohio #37 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #38 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #42 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #72 of 130; 2017 Toledo #74 of 130; 2017 Akron #76 of 130; 2017 Kent State #93 of 130; 2017 Ball State #120 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #123 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 81 of 130. Mid-American median rank 72.
Offensive success ratemedian #88
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio #10 of 130; 2017 Toledo #19 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #39 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #75 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #88 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #92 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #93 of 130; 2017 Ball State #101 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #117 of 130; 2017 Akron #118 of 130; 2017 Kent State #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 70 of 130. Mid-American median rank 88.
Defensive success ratemedian #63
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Northern Illinois #7 of 130; 2017 Ohio #18 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #38 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #41 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #43 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #63 of 130; 2017 Kent State #65 of 130; 2017 Toledo #69 of 130; 2017 Ball State #85 of 130; 2017 Akron #110 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 93 of 130. Mid-American median rank 63.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #66
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Central Michigan #21 of 130; 2017 Akron #40 of 130; 2017 Toledo #43 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #51 of 130; 2017 Ohio #55 of 130; 2017 Eastern Michigan #77 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #88 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #99 of 130; 2017 Kent State #113 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #114 of 130; 2017 Ball State #118 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 66 of 130. Mid-American median rank 66.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #53
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Eastern Michigan #5 of 130; 2017 Central Michigan #18 of 130; 2017 Akron #35 of 130; 2017 Bowling Green #43 of 130; 2017 Northern Illinois #53 of 130; 2017 Toledo #69 of 130; 2017 Ohio #75 of 130; 2017 Miami (OH) #90 of 130; 2017 Western Michigan #99 of 130; 2017 Kent State #121 of 130; 2017 Ball State #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Buffalo, ranked 17 of 130. Mid-American median rank 53.