THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

BYUCougars

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2015, released in week 15.

CFP Top 25, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015BYU9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 128 teams · 424.8 yds/g · 5,522 yards)#40 (of 128 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points)#23 (of 128 teams · 345.7 yds/g allowed · 4,494 yards)#34 (of 128 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#28 (of 128 teams · +10.8 /g · +141 on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.15 /g)#88 (of 128 teams · 28:41 /g · 6h 13m on the season)#89 (of 128 teams · 29% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#63 (of 128 teams · 521.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 128 teams · 0.197 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 128 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#24 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.289 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 128 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll1 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#40 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#116. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#114. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#39 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #3–#117. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#116. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#74. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#102. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#45 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#79 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #7–#110. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #7–#124. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#120. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#121. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#22 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #1–#117. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#102. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #3–#120. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #2–#109. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #3–#122. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#74 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range #13–#123. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)
2015Clemson14–11 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#11 (of 128 teams · 514.5 yds/g · 7,718 yards)#16 (of 128 teams · 38.5 pts/g · 577 points)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 313.0 yds/g allowed · 4,695 yards)#24 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +16.8 /g · +252 on the season)#83 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 25 taken, 27 given · -0.13 /g)#26 (of 128 teams · 31:56 /g · 7h 59m on the season)#84 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 807.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.268 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 128 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 128 teams · 1.401 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #19 Florida, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)#45 (of 128 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 6,406 yards)#30 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 526 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 276.3 yds/g allowed · 4,145 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 227 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.9 /g · +299 on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 27 taken, 17 given · +0.67 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:33 /g · 8h 23m on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 981.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 128 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Michigan State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State, #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#73 (of 128 teams · 385.5 yds/g · 5,397 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 417 points)#26 (of 128 teams · 349.9 yds/g allowed · 4,898 yards)#25 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#43 (of 128 teams · +8.1 /g · +113 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.00 /g)#14 (of 128 teams · 32:52 /g · 7h 40m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 715.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 128 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#56 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 128 teams · 1.255 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.219 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oklahoma11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU, #16 Oklahoma State, #17 Baylor, #23 Tennessee)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 530.2 yds/g · 6,893 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.5 pts/g · 566 points)#39 (of 128 teams · 364.5 yds/g allowed · 4,738 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21.5 /g · +280 on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.69 /g)#48 (of 128 teams · 30:42 /g · 6h 39m on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 128 teams · 775.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 128 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#36 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 128 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Iowa12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Northwestern)#72 (of 128 teams · 386.1 yds/g · 5,406 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 433 points)#22 (of 128 teams · 341.0 yds/g allowed · 4,774 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#31 (of 128 teams · +10.6 /g · +148 on the season)#11 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 27 taken, 16 given · +0.79 /g)#31 (of 128 teams · 31:38 /g · 7h 23m on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#108 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 573.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 128 teams · 0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 128 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#50 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 128 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 128 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Stanford12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame · postseason: #5 Iowa)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #25 USC, #25 USC · postseason: #5 Iowa)#40 (of 128 teams · 435.5 yds/g · 6,097 yards)#18 (of 128 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 529 points)#43 (of 128 teams · 368.3 yds/g allowed · 5,156 yards)#32 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#13 (of 128 teams · +15.2 /g · +213 on the season)#65 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.07 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34:48 /g · 8h 07m on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#52 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 766.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 128 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#66 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Ohio State12–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Notre Dame)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan · postseason: #8 Notre Dame)#41 (of 128 teams · 434.1 yds/g · 5,643 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 311.3 yds/g allowed · 4,047 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 196 points)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +20.6 /g · +268 on the season)#48 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 21 taken, 18 given · +0.23 /g)#77 (of 128 teams · 29:16 /g · 6h 20m on the season)#38 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 907.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.227 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 128 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 128 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 128 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Notre Dame10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Navy, #24 Temple, #25 USC)#27 (of 128 teams · 466.4 yds/g · 6,063 yards)#34 (of 128 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 445 points)#45 (of 128 teams · 372.7 yds/g allowed · 4,845 yards)#39 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points)#32 (of 128 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#102 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.46 /g)#67 (of 128 teams · 29:37 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#91 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 857.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 128 teams · 0.271 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 128 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#58 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 128 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 128 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#51 (of 128 teams · 424.0 yds/g · 5,512 yards)#47 (of 128 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points)#19 (of 128 teams · 336.9 yds/g allowed · 4,380 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 227 points)#20 (of 128 teams · +14.2 /g · +185 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g)#74 (of 128 teams · 29:25 /g · 6h 22m on the season)#103 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 128 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 128 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#23 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 128 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015North Carolina11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 128 teams · 486.9 yds/g · 6,817 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.7 pts/g · 570 points)#96 (of 128 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 6,103 yards)#42 (of 128 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#11 (of 128 teams · +16.2 /g · +227 on the season)#30 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g)#127 (of 128 teams · 25:16 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 683.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.341 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 128 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#109 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.313 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 128 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015TCU11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Baylor · postseason: #15 Oregon)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 562.9 yds/g · 7,317 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 547 points)#63 (of 128 teams · 398.4 yds/g allowed · 5,179 yards)#64 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#17 (of 128 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#35 (of 128 teams · 31:22 /g · 6h 48m on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving production returning)#45 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 128 teams · 630.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.270 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#17 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 128 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 128 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Ole Miss10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Alabama, #20 LSU · postseason: #16 Oklahoma State)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 517.8 yds/g · 6,731 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.9 pts/g · 531 points)#54 (of 128 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,016 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18.2 /g · +237 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 23 taken, 23 given · +0.00 /g)#120 (of 128 teams · 26:32 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#109 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#19 (of 128 teams · 764.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.299 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#31 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 128 teams · 1.225 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 128 teams · 1.138 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)#116 (of 128 teams · 327.1 yds/g · 4,252 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 19.5 pts/g · 254 points)#13 (of 128 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 4,146 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#74 (of 128 teams · +0.9 /g · +12 on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#64 (of 128 teams · 29:48 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#102 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 595.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#13 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 128 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #13 Northwestern · postseason: #19 Florida)#69 (of 128 teams · 395.9 yds/g · 5,147 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 408 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 280.7 yds/g allowed · 3,649 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#15 (of 128 teams · +15.0 /g · +195 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.31 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:28 /g · 7h 15m on the season)#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 128 teams · 1.138 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 128 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oregon9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford, #25 USC)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 538.2 yds/g · 6,997 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.0 pts/g · 559 points)#117 (of 128 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 6,309 yards)#116 (of 128 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 488 points)#51 (of 128 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#114 (of 128 teams · 27:15 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#106 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#20 (of 128 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.281 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 128 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#103 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU)#22 (of 128 teams · 480.0 yds/g · 6,240 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 39.5 pts/g · 514 points)#100 (of 128 teams · 439.1 yds/g allowed · 5,708 yards)#88 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#37 (of 128 teams · +9.1 /g · +118 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 28 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g)#72 (of 128 teams · 29:30 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#88 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning)#33 (of 128 teams · 651.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 128 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#63 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.346 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Baylor10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #16 Oklahoma State · postseason: #10 North Carolina)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 616.2 yds/g · 8,011 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 48.1 pts/g · 625 points)#62 (of 128 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,155 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.8 /g · +257 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#107 (of 128 teams · 27:52 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#94 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.360 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 128 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#48 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Houston13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #9 Florida State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #21 Navy, #24 Temple · postseason: #9 Florida State)#20 (of 128 teams · 484.1 yds/g · 6,778 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.4 pts/g · 566 points)#53 (of 128 teams · 383.6 yds/g allowed · 5,370 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.7 /g · +276 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#37 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 7h 19m on the season)#74 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's passing production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 511.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.249 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 128 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#32 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 128 teams · 1.265 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida10–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #23 Tennessee)#112 (of 128 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 4,676 yards)#100 (of 128 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 325 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 310.2 yds/g allowed · 4,343 yards)#11 (of 128 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#53 (of 128 teams · +4.9 /g · +69 on the season)#27 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.57 /g)#45 (of 128 teams · 30:58 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#82 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's passing production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 789.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 128 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#14 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 128 teams · 1.230 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015LSU9–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#39 (of 128 teams · 437.3 yds/g · 5,247 yards)#44 (of 128 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 394 points)#25 (of 128 teams · 347.2 yds/g allowed · 4,166 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#38 (of 128 teams · +8.6 /g · +103 on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 17 taken, 10 given · +0.58 /g)#36 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 6h 16m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.281 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#55 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Navy11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 128 teams · 425.1 yds/g · 5,527 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#40 (of 128 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 4,744 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#16 (of 128 teams · +14.9 /g · +194 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19 on the season · 27 taken, 8 given · +1.46 /g)#16 (of 128 teams · 32:48 /g · 7h 06m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 306.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.326 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 128 teams · 1.165 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Utah10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#97 (of 128 teams · 363.0 yds/g · 4,719 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#41 (of 128 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 4,768 yards)#31 (of 128 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#40 (of 128 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#17 (of 128 teams · 32:43 /g · 7h 05m on the season)#31 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#50 (of 128 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 128 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 128 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#46 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 128 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Northwestern)#52 (of 128 teams · 422.3 yds/g · 5,490 yards)#29 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 457 points)#36 (of 128 teams · 362.0 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yards)#16 (of 128 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#14 (of 128 teams · +15.2 /g · +197 on the season)#28 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.54 /g)#50 (of 128 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 810.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 128 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#16 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 128 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Temple10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#96 (of 128 teams · 366.7 yds/g · 5,134 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 417 points)#20 (of 128 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,718 yards)#17 (of 128 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#34 (of 128 teams · +9.7 /g · +136 on the season)#50 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 22 taken, 19 given · +0.21 /g)#12 (of 128 teams · 32:56 /g · 7h 41m on the season)#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 405.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 128 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 128 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 128 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015USC8–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2015's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#38 (of 128 teams · 437.9 yds/g · 6,131 yards)#37 (of 128 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 475 points)#65 (of 128 teams · 400.8 yds/g allowed · 5,611 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#42 (of 128 teams · +8.2 /g · +115 on the season)#11 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 23 taken, 12 given · +0.79 /g)#78 (of 128 teams · 29:13 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#33 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 926.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 128 teams · 0.240 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 128 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#81 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 128 teams · 1.221 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20152015 BYUCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #40
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 TCU #3 of 128; 2015 Oregon #5 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #7 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #10 of 128; 2015 Clemson #11 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #18 of 128; 2015 Houston #20 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #22 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #27 of 128; 2015 USC #38 of 128; 2015 LSU #39 of 128; 2015 Stanford #40 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #41 of 128; 2015 Alabama #45 of 128; 2015 Navy #48 of 128; 2015 Florida State #51 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #52 of 128; 2015 Michigan #69 of 128; 2015 Iowa #72 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #73 of 128; 2015 Temple #96 of 128; 2015 Utah #97 of 128; 2015 Florida #112 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 49 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 40.
Scoring offensemedian #29
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #4 of 128; 2015 Oregon #5 of 128; 2015 TCU #7 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #8 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #9 of 128; 2015 Houston #10 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #14 of 128; 2015 Clemson #16 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Navy #22 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #28 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #29 of 128; 2015 Alabama #30 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #34 of 128; 2015 USC #37 of 128; 2015 LSU #44 of 128; 2015 Florida State #47 of 128; 2015 Michigan #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #54 of 128; 2015 Utah #55 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #60 of 128; 2015 Temple #60 of 128; 2015 Florida #100 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 40 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Total defensemedian #39
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #4 of 128; 2015 Florida #8 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2015 Clemson #10 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 128; 2015 Florida State #19 of 128; 2015 Temple #20 of 128; 2015 Iowa #22 of 128; 2015 LSU #25 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #26 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #36 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #39 of 128; 2015 Navy #40 of 128; 2015 Utah #41 of 128; 2015 Stanford #43 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #45 of 128; 2015 Houston #53 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #54 of 128; 2015 Baylor #62 of 128; 2015 TCU #63 of 128; 2015 USC #65 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #96 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #100 of 128; 2015 Oregon #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 23 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 39.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #6 of 128; 2015 Florida State #9 of 128; 2015 Florida #11 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #12 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2015 Temple #17 of 128; 2015 Iowa #19 of 128; 2015 Houston #20 of 128; 2015 Clemson #24 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #25 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #28 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 Stanford #32 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #33 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #39 of 128; 2015 LSU #41 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #42 of 128; 2015 USC #50 of 128; 2015 TCU #64 of 128; 2015 Baylor #79 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 Oregon #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 34 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #17
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Baylor #4 of 128; 2015 Houston #5 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #8 of 128; 2015 Clemson #10 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #11 of 128; 2015 Stanford #13 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2015 Michigan #15 of 128; 2015 Navy #16 of 128; 2015 TCU #17 of 128; 2015 Florida State #20 of 128; 2015 Iowa #31 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #32 of 128; 2015 Temple #34 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #37 of 128; 2015 LSU #38 of 128; 2015 Utah #40 of 128; 2015 USC #42 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #43 of 128; 2015 Oregon #51 of 128; 2015 Florida #53 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #74 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 28 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Turnover marginmedian #30
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Houston #2 of 128; 2015 Navy #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #4 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #4 of 128; 2015 Utah #4 of 128; 2015 Iowa #11 of 128; 2015 USC #11 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 Alabama #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Florida #27 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #28 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #30 of 128; 2015 Oregon #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #48 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #61 of 128; 2015 Stanford #65 of 128; 2015 Florida State #66 of 128; 2015 TCU #66 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #66 of 128; 2015 Baylor #66 of 128; 2015 Clemson #83 of 128; 2015 Michigan #92 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #102 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 51 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 30.
Possessionmedian #45
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 128; 2015 Alabama #7 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Temple #12 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #14 of 128; 2015 Navy #16 of 128; 2015 Utah #17 of 128; 2015 Clemson #26 of 128; 2015 Iowa #31 of 128; 2015 TCU #35 of 128; 2015 LSU #36 of 128; 2015 Houston #37 of 128; 2015 Florida #45 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #48 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #64 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #67 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #72 of 128; 2015 Florida State #74 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #77 of 128; 2015 USC #78 of 128; 2015 Baylor #107 of 128; 2015 Oregon #114 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #120 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 88 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 45.
Returning passingmedian #79
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 USC #33 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #38 of 128; 2015 TCU #49 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Stanford #54 of 128; 2015 Houston #74 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #79 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Clemson #84 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 Iowa #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #94 of 128; 2015 Alabama #97 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #102 of 128; 2015 Florida State #103 of 128; 2015 Oregon #106 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #109 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #110 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 89 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 79.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tennessee #7 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Oregon #14 of 128; 2015 LSU #22 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #23 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 128; 2015 TCU #28 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #32 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #36 of 128; 2015 Stanford #52 of 128; 2015 Baylor #55 of 128; 2015 Florida State #69 of 128; 2015 Navy #74 of 128; 2015 Utah #79 of 128; 2015 Temple #80 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #84 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #86 of 128; 2015 Michigan #89 of 128; 2015 Iowa #94 of 128; 2015 Houston #103 of 128; 2015 Alabama #121 of 128; 2015 USC #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 61 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #68
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 128; 2015 Utah #6 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #15 of 128; 2015 Houston #26 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Baylor #37 of 128; 2015 TCU #45 of 128; 2015 Oregon #46 of 128; 2015 Clemson #52 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #55 of 128; 2015 Stanford #58 of 128; 2015 Michigan #67 of 128; 2015 Navy #68 of 128; 2015 LSU #71 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #76 of 128; 2015 Temple #84 of 128; 2015 Florida State #85 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #86 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #91 of 128; 2015 Florida #103 of 128; 2015 Iowa #108 of 128; 2015 USC #110 of 128; 2015 Alabama #111 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #118 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 61 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 68.
Team talentmedian #19
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #1 of 128; 2015 USC #2 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2015 Florida State #4 of 128; 2015 LSU #5 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #8 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Florida #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #16 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 128; 2015 Oregon #20 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #23 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #26 of 128; 2015 Baylor #31 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #33 of 128; 2015 TCU #39 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2015 Utah #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #51 of 128; 2015 Houston #65 of 128; 2015 Temple #85 of 128; 2015 Navy #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 63 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Offensive EPAmedian #22
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #3 of 128; 2015 Navy #5 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #9 of 128; 2015 Stanford #10 of 128; 2015 LSU #12 of 128; 2015 Oregon #13 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #15 of 128; 2015 TCU #16 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #17 of 128; 2015 Clemson #18 of 128; 2015 Houston #19 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #22 of 128; 2015 USC #24 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #31 of 128; 2015 Florida State #35 of 128; 2015 Iowa #40 of 128; 2015 Alabama #46 of 128; 2015 Michigan #47 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #52 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #72 of 128; 2015 Utah #90 of 128; 2015 Florida #91 of 128; 2015 Temple #99 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 38 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 22.
Defensive EPAmedian #33
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #2 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #3 of 128; 2015 Clemson #5 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Florida #13 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #14 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #18 of 128; 2015 Temple #19 of 128; 2015 Iowa #21 of 128; 2015 Utah #23 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #29 of 128; 2015 TCU #31 of 128; 2015 Houston #33 of 128; 2015 Florida State #34 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #43 of 128; 2015 USC #45 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #46 of 128; 2015 LSU #52 of 128; 2015 Baylor #53 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #67 of 128; 2015 Navy #69 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2015 Stanford #73 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #87 of 128; 2015 Oregon #102 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 24 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 33.
Offensive success ratemedian #32
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #3 of 128; 2015 Baylor #4 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #6 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 TCU #8 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2015 Navy #10 of 128; 2015 Oregon #14 of 128; 2015 Clemson #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #21 of 128; 2015 USC #27 of 128; 2015 LSU #32 of 128; 2015 Michigan #38 of 128; 2015 Florida State #39 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #41 of 128; 2015 Alabama #42 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #47 of 128; 2015 Houston #48 of 128; 2015 Iowa #52 of 128; 2015 Utah #59 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #74 of 128; 2015 Florida #100 of 128; 2015 Temple #102 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 58 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 32.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #2 of 128; 2015 Clemson #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #6 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #8 of 128; 2015 Temple #9 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 128; 2015 Florida #14 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2015 TCU #17 of 128; 2015 Florida State #23 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 128; 2015 Houston #32 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Utah #46 of 128; 2015 Baylor #48 of 128; 2015 Iowa #50 of 128; 2015 LSU #55 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #56 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #58 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #63 of 128; 2015 Stanford #66 of 128; 2015 USC #81 of 128; 2015 Navy #90 of 128; 2015 Oregon #103 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #109 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 24 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #53
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #3 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #8 of 128; 2015 Houston #9 of 128; 2015 Baylor #11 of 128; 2015 LSU #15 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #25 of 128; 2015 Temple #27 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #31 of 128; 2015 Florida State #34 of 128; 2015 Oregon #38 of 128; 2015 Florida #48 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #51 of 128; 2015 USC #53 of 128; 2015 Iowa #54 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #57 of 128; 2015 TCU #80 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #81 of 128; 2015 Navy #84 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #87 of 128; 2015 Stanford #90 of 128; 2015 Alabama #91 of 128; 2015 Clemson #95 of 128; 2015 Michigan #96 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #97 of 128; 2015 Utah #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 18 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 53.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #74
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #13 of 128; 2015 Florida #18 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #22 of 128; 2015 Iowa #25 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #34 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #36 of 128; 2015 USC #38 of 128; 2015 Florida State #40 of 128; 2015 Navy #45 of 128; 2015 Stanford #57 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #63 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #73 of 128; 2015 Temple #74 of 128; 2015 Oregon #77 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #79 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #84 of 128; 2015 LSU #88 of 128; 2015 TCU #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #93 of 128; 2015 Notre Dame #95 of 128; 2015 Utah #98 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Houston #103 of 128; 2015 Alabama #114 of 128; 2015 Clemson #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 BYU, ranked 76 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 74.