THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

BYUCougars

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. BYU played 5 such games.

FBS Independents, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018BYU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 308.2 yds/g · 1,541 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 104 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 375.6 yds/g allowed · 1,878 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 135 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -6.2 /g · -31 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 6 taken, 4 given · +0.40 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 2h 35m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 565.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 74 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.096 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.124 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#11 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #11–#69. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#11 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #11–#56. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#11 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #11–#22. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#6 — top 10 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #6–#28. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#3 — top 10 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #3–#46. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#14 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #14–#25. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#25 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #25–#46. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning passing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #10–#100. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#84 (Returning receiving: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #17–#109. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning rushing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #2–#122. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#99 (Team talent: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #10–#130. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#10 — top 10 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #10–#50. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#9 — top 10 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #9–#50. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#23 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #23–#40. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#8 — top 10 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #8–#55. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#19 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #19–#73. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#5 — top 10 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range #5–#12. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)
2018Notre Dame12–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan, #20 Syracuse, #22 Northwestern)#11 (of 74 teams · 447.5 yds/g · 4,475 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 328.5 yds/g allowed · 3,285 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 169 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.8 /g · +168 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 847.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.171 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Massachusetts4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (352.5 yds/g · 705 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g · 48 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (661.5 yds/g allowed · 1,323 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (60.5 pts/g allowed · 121 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-36.5 /g · -73 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:11 /g · 0h 54m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 130 teams · 388.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.542 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Army11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (372.0 yds/g · 744 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.5 pts/g · 35 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (368.0 yds/g allowed · 736 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-13.5 /g · -27 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40:24 /g · 1h 21m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#90 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 230.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.408 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (58% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.192 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Liberty6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (244.0 yds/g · 488 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (12.0 pts/g · 24 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (460.0 yds/g allowed · 920 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49.0 pts/g allowed · 98 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-37.0 /g · -74 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-6 in these games · 1 taken, 7 given · -3.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:38 /g · 0h 51m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 94.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.292 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.137 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.024 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018New Mexico State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2018. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (271.0 yds/g · 271 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 10 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (522.0 yds/g allowed · 522 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48.0 pts/g allowed · 48 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-38.0 /g · -38 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:26 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#100 (of 130 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 249.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.173 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.352 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20182018 BYUFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #11
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 69 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 11.
Scoring offensemedian #11
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 56 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 11.
Total defensemedian #11
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 22 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 11.
Scoring defensemedian #6
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #6 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 28 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 6.
Point marginmedian #3
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #3 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 46 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 3.
Turnover marginmedian #14
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #14 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 25 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 14.
Possessionmedian #25
Possession. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #46 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 25 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 25.
Returning passingmedian #38
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Massachusetts #10 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #25 of 130; 2018 Army #90 of 130; 2018 New Mexico State #100 of 130. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 38 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning receivingmedian #84
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Massachusetts #31 of 130; 2018 Army #84 of 130; 2018 New Mexico State #88 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #109 of 130. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 17 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 84.
Returning rushingmedian #67
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Massachusetts #2 of 130; 2018 Army #67 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #97 of 130; 2018 New Mexico State #122 of 130. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 58 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 67.
Team talentmedian #99
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 130; 2018 Massachusetts #99 of 130; 2018 New Mexico State #127 of 130; 2018 Army #128 of 130; 2018 Liberty #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 56 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 99.
Offensive EPAmedian #10
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 50 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 10.
Defensive EPAmedian #9
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #9 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 50 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 9.
Offensive success ratemedian #23
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #23 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 40 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 23.
Defensive success ratemedian #8
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #8 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 55 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 8.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #19
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #19 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 73 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 19.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #5
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Notre Dame #12 of 74. Marked: 2018 BYU, ranked 5 of 74. FBS Independents median rank 5.