Metrics

CaliforniaGolden Bears

Season
Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019California850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#117 (of 130 teams · 328.5 yds/g · 4,271 yards)#112 (of 130 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 276 points)#65 (of 130 teams · 389.1 yds/g allowed · 5,058 yards)#33 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#76 (of 130 teams · -0.7 /g · -9 on the season)#47 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.23 /g)#90 (of 130 teams · 29:01 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#74 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving production returning)#122 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#50 (of 130 teams · 611.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 130 teams · 0.132 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 130 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#69 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 130 teams · 1.270 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 130 teams · 1.107 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#58 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #7–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #11–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#77 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #2–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#78 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #6–#118. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #7–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #5–#120. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#73 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #3–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Returning passing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #1–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #4–#127. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #7–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#32 (Team talent: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #4–#70. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #12–#93. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#90 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #4–#128. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #6–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#98 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #7–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #20–#105. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range #3–#117. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2019Arizona480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#30 (of 130 teams · 440.1 yds/g · 5,281 yards)#77 (of 130 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 323 points)#119 (of 130 teams · 471.4 yds/g allowed · 5,657 yards)#118 (of 130 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 429 points)#111 (of 130 teams · -8.8 /g · -106 on the season)#90 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.25 /g)#115 (of 130 teams · 27:24 /g · 5h 29m on the season)#23 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning)#63 (of 130 teams · 570.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 130 teams · 0.244 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#128 (of 130 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 130 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 130 teams · 1.127 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Arizona State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)#94 (of 130 teams · 372.1 yds/g · 4,837 yards)#96 (of 130 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 322 points)#68 (of 130 teams · 393.5 yds/g allowed · 5,116 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#58 (of 130 teams · +2.4 /g · +31 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.08 /g)#85 (of 130 teams · 29:13 /g · 6h 20m on the season)#129 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#45 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 686.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 130 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 130 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#65 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 130 teams · 1.167 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 130 teams · 1.159 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Colorado570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#83 (of 130 teams · 388.5 yds/g · 4,662 yards)#100 (of 130 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 282 points)#105 (of 130 teams · 441.9 yds/g allowed · 5,303 yards)#96 (of 130 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#110 (of 130 teams · -8.3 /g · -100 on the season)#43 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.25 /g)#49 (of 130 teams · 30:36 /g · 6h 07m on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#38 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 614.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 130 teams · 0.173 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 130 teams · 0.260 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#125 (of 130 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 130 teams · 1.137 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 130 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Oregon1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Wisconsin)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 Utah, #22 USC · postseason: #8 Wisconsin)#39 (of 130 teams · 433.1 yds/g · 6,063 yards)#16 (of 130 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 495 points)#22 (of 130 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 4,607 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 231 points)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +264 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +16 on the season · 27 taken, 11 given · +1.14 /g)#104 (of 130 teams · 28:14 /g · 6h 35m on the season)#35 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 130 teams · 817.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 130 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#24 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 130 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Oregon State570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 130 teams · 411.8 yds/g · 4,942 yards)#48 (of 130 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 374 points)#108 (of 130 teams · 445.7 yds/g allowed · 5,348 yards)#105 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#81 (of 130 teams · -1.3 /g · -16 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 16 taken, 6 given · +0.83 /g)#100 (of 130 teams · 28:28 /g · 5h 42m on the season)#75 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing production returning)#19 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 595.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 130 teams · 0.245 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 130 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 130 teams · 1.282 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 130 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Stanford480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#97 (of 130 teams · 367.3 yds/g · 4,408 yards)#108 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#93 (of 130 teams · 430.3 yds/g allowed · 5,163 yards)#79 (of 130 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#108 (of 130 teams · -8.2 /g · -98 on the season)#74 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.08 /g)#19 (of 130 teams · 32:11 /g · 6h 26m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's receiving production returning)#85 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 787.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 130 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 130 teams · 0.222 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#122 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 130 teams · 1.168 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 130 teams · 1.205 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019UCLA480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 (of 130 teams · 405.7 yds/g · 4,868 yards)#80 (of 130 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 320 points)#113 (of 130 teams · 456.3 yds/g allowed · 5,475 yards)#116 (of 130 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#106 (of 130 teams · -8.1 /g · -97 on the season)#113 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.67 /g)#53 (of 130 teams · 30:22 /g · 6h 04m on the season)#82 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's passing production returning)#40 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 741.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#82 (of 130 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#128 (of 130 teams · 0.319 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#121 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 130 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 130 teams · 1.317 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019USC855 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Utah)#21 (of 130 teams · 454.2 yds/g · 5,905 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#77 (of 130 teams · 408.5 yds/g allowed · 5,310 yards)#78 (of 130 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#54 (of 130 teams · +3.1 /g · +40 on the season)#120 (of 130 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.77 /g)#94 (of 130 teams · 28:48 /g · 6h 14m on the season)#41 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#60 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 915.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 130 teams · 0.251 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 130 teams · 0.195 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful)#114 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 130 teams · 1.162 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Utah1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 130 teams · 429.0 yds/g · 6,006 yards)#38 (of 130 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 452 points)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 269.2 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points)#13 (of 130 teams · +17.3 /g · +242 on the season)#17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.64 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:19 /g · 8h 00m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#47 (of 130 teams · 620.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 130 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 130 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Washington850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #22 USC · postseason: #19 Boise State)#80 (of 130 teams · 391.2 yds/g · 5,086 yards)#41 (of 130 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 416 points)#35 (of 130 teams · 348.6 yds/g allowed · 4,532 yards)#15 (of 130 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 252 points)#23 (of 130 teams · +12.6 /g · +164 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#64 (of 130 teams · 30:07 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#128 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#19 (of 130 teams · 801.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 130 teams · 0.208 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#60 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 130 teams · 1.149 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.046 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Washington State670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 504.9 yds/g · 6,564 yards)#11 (of 130 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#111 (of 130 teams · 452.5 yds/g allowed · 5,882 yards)#93 (of 130 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#42 (of 130 teams · +6.4 /g · +83 on the season)#100 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 19 taken, 25 given · -0.46 /g)#73 (of 130 teams · 29:40 /g · 6h 26m on the season)#121 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#123 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's rushing production returning)#70 (of 130 teams · 556.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 130 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 130 teams · 0.236 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful)#109 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 130 teams · 1.155 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 130 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20192019 CaliforniaPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #58
Total offense. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Washington State #7 of 130; 2019 USC #21 of 130; 2019 Arizona #30 of 130; 2019 Oregon #39 of 130; 2019 Utah #48 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #58 of 130; 2019 UCLA #65 of 130; 2019 Washington #80 of 130; 2019 Colorado #83 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #94 of 130; 2019 Stanford #97 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 117 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 58.
Scoring offensemedian #48
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Washington State #11 of 130; 2019 Oregon #16 of 130; 2019 USC #35 of 130; 2019 Utah #38 of 130; 2019 Washington #41 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #48 of 130; 2019 Arizona #77 of 130; 2019 UCLA #80 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #96 of 130; 2019 Colorado #100 of 130; 2019 Stanford #108 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 112 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 48.
Total defensemedian #77
Total defense. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Utah #2 of 130; 2019 Oregon #22 of 130; 2019 Washington #35 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #68 of 130; 2019 USC #77 of 130; 2019 Stanford #93 of 130; 2019 Colorado #105 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #108 of 130; 2019 Washington State #111 of 130; 2019 UCLA #113 of 130; 2019 Arizona #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 65 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 77.
Scoring defensemedian #78
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Utah #6 of 130; 2019 Oregon #9 of 130; 2019 Washington #15 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #35 of 130; 2019 USC #78 of 130; 2019 Stanford #79 of 130; 2019 Washington State #93 of 130; 2019 Colorado #96 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #105 of 130; 2019 UCLA #116 of 130; 2019 Arizona #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 33 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 78.
Point marginmedian #58
Point margin. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Oregon #7 of 130; 2019 Utah #13 of 130; 2019 Washington #23 of 130; 2019 Washington State #42 of 130; 2019 USC #54 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #58 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #81 of 130; 2019 UCLA #106 of 130; 2019 Stanford #108 of 130; 2019 Colorado #110 of 130; 2019 Arizona #111 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 76 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 58.
Turnover marginmedian #43
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Oregon #5 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #6 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #10 of 130; 2019 Utah #17 of 130; 2019 Washington #19 of 130; 2019 Colorado #43 of 130; 2019 Stanford #74 of 130; 2019 Arizona #90 of 130; 2019 Washington State #100 of 130; 2019 UCLA #113 of 130; 2019 USC #120 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 47 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 43.
Possessionmedian #73
Possession. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Utah #3 of 130; 2019 Stanford #19 of 130; 2019 Colorado #49 of 130; 2019 UCLA #53 of 130; 2019 Washington #64 of 130; 2019 Washington State #73 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #85 of 130; 2019 USC #94 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #100 of 130; 2019 Oregon #104 of 130; 2019 Arizona #115 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 90 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 73.
Returning passingmedian #41
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Stanford #1 of 130; 2019 Utah #12 of 130; 2019 Colorado #19 of 130; 2019 Arizona #23 of 130; 2019 Oregon #35 of 130; 2019 USC #41 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #75 of 130; 2019 UCLA #82 of 130; 2019 Washington State #121 of 130; 2019 Washington #128 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 74 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 41.
Returning receivingmedian #40
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 USC #4 of 130; 2019 Utah #6 of 130; 2019 Washington #10 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #19 of 130; 2019 Colorado #38 of 130; 2019 UCLA #40 of 130; 2019 Washington State #48 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #55 of 130; 2019 Oregon #57 of 130; 2019 Stanford #115 of 130; 2019 Arizona #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 127 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 40.
Returning rushingmedian #45
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Arizona #7 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #14 of 130; 2019 Oregon #25 of 130; 2019 UCLA #28 of 130; 2019 Utah #43 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #45 of 130; 2019 USC #60 of 130; 2019 Stanford #85 of 130; 2019 Washington #107 of 130; 2019 Colorado #120 of 130; 2019 Washington State #123 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 122 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Team talentmedian #32
Team talent. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 USC #4 of 130; 2019 Oregon #17 of 130; 2019 Washington #19 of 130; 2019 Stanford #20 of 130; 2019 UCLA #22 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #32 of 130; 2019 Utah #47 of 130; 2019 Colorado #48 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #57 of 130; 2019 Arizona #63 of 130; 2019 Washington State #70 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 50 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 32.
Offensive EPAmedian #42
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Utah #12 of 130; 2019 Oregon #18 of 130; 2019 USC #22 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #25 of 130; 2019 Washington State #27 of 130; 2019 Arizona #42 of 130; 2019 Washington #46 of 130; 2019 Colorado #68 of 130; 2019 Stanford #76 of 130; 2019 UCLA #82 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #93 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 90 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 42.
Defensive EPAmedian #90
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Utah #4 of 130; 2019 Oregon #9 of 130; 2019 Washington #24 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #63 of 130; 2019 USC #90 of 130; 2019 Stanford #104 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #108 of 130; 2019 Washington State #110 of 130; 2019 Arizona #112 of 130; 2019 Colorado #116 of 130; 2019 UCLA #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 39 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 90.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Washington State #6 of 130; 2019 USC #10 of 130; 2019 Utah #14 of 130; 2019 Oregon #26 of 130; 2019 Washington #28 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #44 of 130; 2019 Colorado #62 of 130; 2019 Arizona #63 of 130; 2019 UCLA #68 of 130; 2019 Stanford #74 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #84 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 109 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #98
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Utah #7 of 130; 2019 Oregon #24 of 130; 2019 Washington #60 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #65 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #98 of 130; 2019 Washington State #109 of 130; 2019 USC #114 of 130; 2019 UCLA #121 of 130; 2019 Stanford #122 of 130; 2019 Colorado #125 of 130; 2019 Arizona #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 69 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 98.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #68
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Arizona #20 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #25 of 130; 2019 Oregon #57 of 130; 2019 UCLA #66 of 130; 2019 Utah #68 of 130; 2019 Stanford #87 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #88 of 130; 2019 USC #90 of 130; 2019 Washington State #98 of 130; 2019 Washington #101 of 130; 2019 Colorado #105 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 33 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #32
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Washington #3 of 130; 2019 Oregon #5 of 130; 2019 Arizona #25 of 130; 2019 USC #30 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #32 of 130; 2019 Colorado #49 of 130; 2019 Stanford #56 of 130; 2019 Washington State #71 of 130; 2019 Utah #85 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #106 of 130; 2019 UCLA #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 California, ranked 18 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 32.