THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

Central MichiganChippewas

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2014

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014Central Michigan7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 (of 128 teams · 398.1 yds/g · 5,175 yards)#82 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#30 (of 128 teams · 355.5 yds/g allowed · 4,621 yards)#46 (of 128 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 327 points)#70 (of 128 teams · +1.8 /g · +23 on the season)#98 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.38 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:16 /g · 7h 12m on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 128 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 128 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#37 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 128 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 128 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#70 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #15–#127. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #20–#126. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #30–#119. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#83 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #28–#125. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#76 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #33–#127. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#84 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #8–#127. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#68 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #6–#125. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning passing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #1–#119. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #7–#125. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#46 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #5–#118. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#71 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #12–#124. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#82 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #30–#125. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#76 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #9–#122. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#84 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #31–#112. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #4–#126. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#61 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #11–#127. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)
2014Akron5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#91 (of 128 teams · 373.3 yds/g · 4,479 yards)#104 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 271 points)#45 (of 128 teams · 371.1 yds/g allowed · 4,453 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#76 (of 128 teams · -0.5 /g · -6 on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 24 taken, 26 given · -0.17 /g)#94 (of 128 teams · 29:09 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 128 teams · 0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 128 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#53 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 128 teams · 1.078 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.177 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Ball State5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#95 (of 128 teams · 369.3 yds/g · 4,431 yards)#74 (of 128 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 332 points)#88 (of 128 teams · 428.8 yds/g allowed · 5,146 yards)#68 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#73 (of 128 teams · +0.5 /g · +6 on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 24 taken, 15 given · +0.75 /g)#75 (of 128 teams · 29:50 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#119 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#125 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's receiving production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 128 teams · 0.175 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#108 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 (of 128 teams · 1.064 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 128 teams · 1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Bowling Green8–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 128 teams · 432.9 yds/g · 6,061 yards)#59 (of 128 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 420 points)#119 (of 128 teams · 493.6 yds/g allowed · 6,910 yards)#108 (of 128 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 469 points)#87 (of 128 teams · -3.5 /g · -49 on the season)#16 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 33 taken, 23 given · +0.71 /g)#125 (of 128 teams · 26:15 /g · 6h 07m on the season)#81 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's passing production returning)#90 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#14 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 128 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 128 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#102 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 128 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 128 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Buffalo5–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 128 teams · 438.2 yds/g · 4,820 yards)#44 (of 128 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 355 points)#64 (of 128 teams · 397.7 yds/g allowed · 4,375 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#72 (of 128 teams · +0.7 /g · +8 on the season)#91 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.27 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:40 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#31 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#114 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 128 teams · 0.205 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#31 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.281 average PPA on successful plays)#127 (of 128 teams · 1.440 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Eastern Michigan2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#127 (of 128 teams · 257.0 yds/g · 3,084 yards)#126 (of 128 teams · 15.2 pts/g · 182 points)#113 (of 128 teams · 458.8 yds/g allowed · 5,506 yards)#125 (of 128 teams · 40.9 pts/g allowed · 491 points)#127 (of 128 teams · -25.8 /g · -309 on the season)#127 (of 128 teams · -19 on the season · 11 taken, 30 given · -1.58 /g)#124 (of 128 teams · 26:26 /g · 5h 17m on the season)#80 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's passing production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#124 (of 128 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#125 (of 128 teams · 0.294 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#122 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#112 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 128 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Kent State2–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#119 (of 128 teams · 315.4 yds/g · 3,470 yards)#123 (of 128 teams · 16.4 pts/g · 180 points)#90 (of 128 teams · 430.3 yds/g allowed · 4,733 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 319 points)#116 (of 128 teams · -12.6 /g · -139 on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.36 /g)#57 (of 128 teams · 30:19 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#47 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#40 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 128 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 128 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#101 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 128 teams · 1.189 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.061 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Massachusetts3–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 128 teams · 421.1 yds/g · 5,053 yards)#78 (of 128 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 328 points)#103 (of 128 teams · 447.5 yds/g allowed · 5,370 yards)#105 (of 128 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#92 (of 128 teams · -5.7 /g · -68 on the season)#106 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 17 taken, 23 given · -0.50 /g)#121 (of 128 teams · 27:16 /g · 5h 27m on the season)#56 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#56 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 128 teams · 0.150 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 128 teams · 0.182 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#97 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.384 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 128 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Miami (OH)2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#88 (of 128 teams · 375.3 yds/g · 4,504 yards)#106 (of 128 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 268 points)#96 (of 128 teams · 434.3 yds/g allowed · 5,211 yards)#100 (of 128 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#106 (of 128 teams · -9.5 /g · -114 on the season)#52 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.17 /g)#68 (of 128 teams · 30:01 /g · 6h 00m on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's passing production returning)#17 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 128 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 128 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#107 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.355 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 128 teams · 1.104 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Northern Illinois11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 128 teams · 441.2 yds/g · 6,177 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 441 points)#59 (of 128 teams · 391.6 yds/g allowed · 5,483 yards)#52 (of 128 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#48 (of 128 teams · +5.9 /g · +82 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +12 on the season · 24 taken, 12 given · +0.86 /g)#104 (of 128 teams · 28:38 /g · 6h 41m on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 128 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#75 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 128 teams · 1.121 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 128 teams · 1.177 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Ohio6–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#94 (of 128 teams · 370.3 yds/g · 4,443 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points)#61 (of 128 teams · 394.3 yds/g allowed · 4,732 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#90 (of 128 teams · -4.3 /g · -52 on the season)#95 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.33 /g)#54 (of 128 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 06m on the season)#98 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#116 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's receiving production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 128 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 128 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#84 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#126 (of 128 teams · 1.046 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 128 teams · 1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Toledo9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 128 teams · 491.2 yds/g · 6,386 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 476 points)#78 (of 128 teams · 407.9 yds/g allowed · 5,303 yards)#92 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#47 (of 128 teams · +6.2 /g · +80 on the season)#84 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 14 taken, 17 given · -0.23 /g)#23 (of 128 teams · 32:22 /g · 7h 01m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#70 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#75 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 128 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#72 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 128 teams · 1.107 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 128 teams · 1.246 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Western Michigan8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 128 teams · 438.1 yds/g · 5,696 yards)#34 (of 128 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 439 points)#46 (of 128 teams · 371.9 yds/g allowed · 4,834 yards)#43 (of 128 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 324 points)#33 (of 128 teams · +8.8 /g · +115 on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.23 /g)#12 (of 128 teams · 32:58 /g · 7h 09m on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 128 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#33 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 128 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 128 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20142014 Central MichiganMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #70
Total offense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Toledo #15 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #39 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #41 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #42 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #44 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #51 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #88 of 128; 2014 Akron #91 of 128; 2014 Ohio #94 of 128; 2014 Ball State #95 of 128; 2014 Kent State #119 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 70 of 128. Mid-American median rank 70.
Scoring offensemedian #78
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Toledo #20 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #34 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #44 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #50 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #59 of 128; 2014 Ball State #74 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #78 of 128; 2014 Akron #104 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #106 of 128; 2014 Ohio #114 of 128; 2014 Kent State #123 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 82 of 128. Mid-American median rank 78.
Total defensemedian #78
Total defense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Akron #45 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #46 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #59 of 128; 2014 Ohio #61 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #64 of 128; 2014 Toledo #78 of 128; 2014 Ball State #88 of 128; 2014 Kent State #90 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #96 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #103 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #113 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #119 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 30 of 128. Mid-American median rank 78.
Scoring defensemedian #83
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Akron #28 of 128; 2014 Ohio #41 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #43 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #52 of 128; 2014 Ball State #68 of 128; 2014 Kent State #83 of 128; 2014 Toledo #92 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #97 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #100 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #105 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #108 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 46 of 128. Mid-American median rank 83.
Point marginmedian #76
Point margin. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Western Michigan #33 of 128; 2014 Toledo #47 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #48 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #72 of 128; 2014 Ball State #73 of 128; 2014 Akron #76 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #87 of 128; 2014 Ohio #90 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #92 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #106 of 128; 2014 Kent State #116 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 70 of 128. Mid-American median rank 76.
Turnover marginmedian #84
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Northern Illinois #8 of 128; 2014 Ball State #15 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #16 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #49 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #52 of 128; 2014 Akron #78 of 128; 2014 Toledo #84 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #91 of 128; 2014 Ohio #95 of 128; 2014 Kent State #97 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #106 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 98 of 128. Mid-American median rank 84.
Possessionmedian #68
Possession. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Buffalo #6 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #12 of 128; 2014 Toledo #23 of 128; 2014 Ohio #54 of 128; 2014 Kent State #57 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #68 of 128; 2014 Ball State #75 of 128; 2014 Akron #94 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #104 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #121 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #124 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 9 of 128. Mid-American median rank 68.
Returning passingmedian #66
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Akron #1 of 128; 2014 Toledo #1 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #31 of 128; 2014 Kent State #47 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #56 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #66 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #78 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #80 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #81 of 128; 2014 Ohio #98 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #114 of 128; 2014 Ball State #119 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 41 of 128. Mid-American median rank 66.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Northern Illinois #7 of 128; 2014 Akron #15 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #17 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #18 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #44 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #48 of 128; 2014 Kent State #68 of 128; 2014 Toledo #70 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #90 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #114 of 128; 2014 Ohio #116 of 128; 2014 Ball State #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 8 of 128. Mid-American median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #46
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Akron #5 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #14 of 128; 2014 Ball State #21 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #24 of 128; 2014 Kent State #40 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #46 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #56 of 128; 2014 Toledo #75 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #82 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #82 of 128; 2014 Ohio #117 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #118 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 41 of 128. Mid-American median rank 46.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #71
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Toledo #12 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #18 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #29 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #34 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #66 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #71 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #76 of 128; 2014 Ball State #77 of 128; 2014 Ohio #102 of 128; 2014 Akron #112 of 128; 2014 Kent State #115 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 54 of 128. Mid-American median rank 71.
Defensive EPAmedian #82
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Western Michigan #30 of 128; 2014 Akron #48 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #71 of 128; 2014 Ohio #79 of 128; 2014 Kent State #81 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #82 of 128; 2014 Toledo #88 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #90 of 128; 2014 Ball State #91 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #96 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #104 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 59 of 128. Mid-American median rank 82.
Offensive success ratemedian #76
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Toledo #9 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #23 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #37 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #53 of 128; 2014 Ball State #65 of 128; 2014 Ohio #76 of 128; 2014 Akron #88 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #89 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #93 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #101 of 128; 2014 Kent State #116 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #122 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 24 of 128. Mid-American median rank 76.
Defensive success ratemedian #84
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Buffalo #31 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #33 of 128; 2014 Akron #53 of 128; 2014 Toledo #72 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #75 of 128; 2014 Ohio #84 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #97 of 128; 2014 Kent State #101 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #102 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #107 of 128; 2014 Ball State #108 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #112 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 37 of 128. Mid-American median rank 84.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #78
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #4 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #5 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #18 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #36 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #62 of 128; 2014 Kent State #63 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #78 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #97 of 128; 2014 Toledo #104 of 128; 2014 Akron #113 of 128; 2014 Ball State #121 of 128; 2014 Ohio #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 83 of 128. Mid-American median rank 78.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #61
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Kent State #11 of 128; 2014 Ball State #23 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #24 of 128; 2014 Akron #52 of 128; 2014 Northern Illinois #53 of 128; 2014 Ohio #54 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #61 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #69 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #87 of 128; 2014 Toledo #96 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #102 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 Central Michigan, ranked 113 of 128. Mid-American median rank 61.