THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Central MichiganChippewas

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 64 teams in 2015’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Central Michigan played 3 such games.

Power 5, 2015

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Central Michigan7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 75 teams · 401.0 yds/g · 1,203 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 50 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 356.3 yds/g allowed · 1,069 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -11.3 /g · -34 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:48 /g · 1h 44m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 376.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 75 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#36 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #2–#75. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#127. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#73 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #7–#127. 2 of 64 in the top 10.)#70 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#127. 4 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#69. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #2–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #2–#75. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)
2015North Carolina11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 4,917 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 401 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 416.3 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +18.0 /g · +180 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 25:23 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 683.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.353 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.375 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.116 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oklahoma11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU, #16 Oklahoma State, #17 Baylor, #23 Tennessee)#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 520.3 yds/g · 5,203 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 45.6 pts/g · 456 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 337.9 yds/g allowed · 3,379 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 208 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +24.8 /g · +248 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +13 in these games · 25 taken, 12 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 31:28 /g · 5h 15m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 775.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.288 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Clemson14–11 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 510.5 yds/g · 5,105 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 365 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 295.2 yds/g allowed · 2,952 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 206 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +15.9 /g · +159 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 807.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.280 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 1.257 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.577 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Florida10–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #23 Tennessee)#61 (of 75 teams · 332.4 yds/g · 2,992 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 285.7 yds/g allowed · 2,571 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 15.0 pts/g allowed · 135 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +6.2 /g · +56 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +8 in these games · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 32:58 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 789.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 75 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #13 Northwestern · postseason: #19 Florida)#40 (of 75 teams · 381.9 yds/g · 3,819 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 303.6 yds/g allowed · 3,036 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 199 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +10.9 /g · +109 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · -7 in these games · 8 taken, 15 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 32:46 /g · 5h 28m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 75 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Ohio State12–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Notre Dame)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan · postseason: #8 Notre Dame)#20 (of 75 teams · 441.7 yds/g · 3,975 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 324 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 327.7 yds/g allowed · 2,949 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 143 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +20.1 /g · +181 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 907.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 1.276 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #19 Florida, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)#23 (of 75 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 297.2 yds/g allowed · 2,675 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 156 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +14.6 /g · +131 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 15 taken, 13 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:12 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 981.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 75 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 1.236 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.461 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Baylor10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #16 Oklahoma State · postseason: #10 North Carolina)#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 550.4 yds/g · 4,954 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 42.7 pts/g · 384 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 412.6 yds/g allowed · 3,713 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +13.7 /g · +123 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 27:49 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.350 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Stanford12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame · postseason: #5 Iowa)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #25 USC, #25 USC · postseason: #5 Iowa)#21 (of 75 teams · 432.7 yds/g · 4,760 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 412 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 393.7 yds/g allowed · 4,331 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 271 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +12.8 /g · +141 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35:21 /g · 6h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 766.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.317 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 51% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 1.172 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Wisconsin10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 USC)#54 (of 75 teams · 351.6 yds/g · 3,164 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 282.0 yds/g allowed · 2,538 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 635.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 75 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 1.195 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Georgia10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 75 teams · 366.3 yds/g · 3,297 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 196 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 318.2 yds/g allowed · 2,864 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · +3.3 /g · +30 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 30:34 /g · 4h 35m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 128 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 877.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 75 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.103 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oregon9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford, #25 USC)#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 530.8 yds/g · 5,308 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 396 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 478.4 yds/g allowed · 4,784 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 37.1 pts/g allowed · 371 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · +2.5 /g · +25 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 27:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.421 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Iowa12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Northwestern)#34 (of 75 teams · 393.2 yds/g · 3,932 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 311 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 339.3 yds/g allowed · 3,393 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +11.7 /g · +117 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +14 in these games · 22 taken, 8 given · +1.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 32:15 /g · 5h 22m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 573.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 75 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 1.207 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Michigan State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State, #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#28 (of 75 teams · 410.3 yds/g · 3,693 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 337.7 yds/g allowed · 3,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +11.2 /g · +101 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:05 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 715.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 75 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Arkansas8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee)#22 (of 75 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 3,886 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 423.1 yds/g allowed · 3,808 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · +2.6 /g · +23 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 11 taken, 9 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:51 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 695.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.287 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.280 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 1.186 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015California8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 515.2 yds/g · 5,152 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 484.2 yds/g allowed · 4,842 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · -1.2 /g · -12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 626.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 75 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#32 (of 75 teams · 399.3 yds/g · 3,594 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 243 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 342.8 yds/g allowed · 3,085 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 146 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · +10.8 /g · +97 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 10 taken, 8 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 75 teams · 0.201 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 75 teams · 391.8 yds/g · 3,918 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 321.8 yds/g allowed · 3,218 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · +1.5 /g · +15 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 29:20 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 75 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.398 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Mississippi State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 75 teams · 444.0 yds/g · 3,552 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 210 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 415.5 yds/g allowed · 3,324 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 208 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · +0.3 /g · +2 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -6 in these games · 7 taken, 13 given · -0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 28:04 /g · 3h 45m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 680.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 75 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 0.156 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.126 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU)#11 (of 75 teams · 482.6 yds/g · 4,343 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 41.0 pts/g · 369 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 471.7 yds/g allowed · 4,245 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 313 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +6.2 /g · +56 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +7 in these games · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 29:40 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 651.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 75 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 0.185 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015TCU11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Baylor · postseason: #15 Oregon)#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 542.5 yds/g · 5,425 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 37.4 pts/g · 374 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 408.5 yds/g allowed · 4,085 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · +10.5 /g · +105 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 31:13 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 630.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 75 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 1.240 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Washington State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Oregon)#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 493.4 yds/g · 4,934 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 437.1 yds/g allowed · 4,371 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 30:31 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 540.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 75 teams · 0.202 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kentucky5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 75 teams · 344.6 yds/g · 3,101 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 164 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 406.1 yds/g allowed · 3,655 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 259 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · -10.6 /g · -95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · -5 in these games · 12 taken, 17 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 29:43 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 634.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 75 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015LSU9–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#29 (of 75 teams · 404.6 yds/g · 3,641 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 246 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 342.7 yds/g allowed · 3,084 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · +2.7 /g · +24 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 11 taken, 8 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 31:50 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 75 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Miami8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 75 teams · 387.2 yds/g · 3,485 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 440.8 yds/g allowed · 3,967 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 292 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · -6.3 /g · -57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 29:14 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 773.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 75 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.129 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 75 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 3,029 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 219 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 395.9 yds/g allowed · 3,167 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 237 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · -2.3 /g · -18 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 30:04 /g · 4h 01m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 610.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 75 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 183 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 322.9 yds/g allowed · 3,229 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 178 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · +0.5 /g · +5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 595.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 32% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015South Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 North Carolina)#55 (of 75 teams · 350.7 yds/g · 3,507 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 210 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 454.1 yds/g allowed · 4,541 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -8.3 /g · -83 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 28:03 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 725.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 75 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 0.256 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.395 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 1.253 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Northwestern)#30 (of 75 teams · 401.1 yds/g · 3,610 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 274 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 378.9 yds/g allowed · 3,410 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0 in these games · 11 taken, 11 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 810.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 75 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 0.143 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 1.349 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Texas A&M8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 75 teams · 383.9 yds/g · 3,455 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 199 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 376.0 yds/g allowed · 3,384 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · +0.8 /g · +7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:07 /g · 4h 04m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 830.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 75 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015USC8–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#24 (of 75 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 408.8 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · +3.7 /g · +37 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 31:12 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 926.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 75 teams · 0.236 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Auburn7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 75 teams · 356.1 yds/g · 3,205 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 208 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 415.4 yds/g allowed · 3,739 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 253 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · -5.0 /g · -45 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 75 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.134 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Colorado4–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 75 teams · 361.0 yds/g · 3,249 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 19.7 pts/g · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 450.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -12.7 /g · -114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 30:35 /g · 4h 35m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 542.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 75 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.142 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Nebraska6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)#27 (of 75 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 278 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 390.9 yds/g allowed · 3,518 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -13 in these games · 8 taken, 21 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 31:20 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 75 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 1.363 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Ole Miss10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Alabama, #20 LSU · postseason: #16 Oklahoma State)#14 (of 75 teams · 470.4 yds/g · 3,763 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 258 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 414.3 yds/g allowed · 3,314 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · +6.0 /g · +48 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 27:44 /g · 3h 42m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 764.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 75 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 45% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Penn State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 75 teams · 369.5 yds/g · 2,956 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 190 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 2,765 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0.8 /g · +6 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 29:27 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 732.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 75 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 1.331 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Texas5–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma, #17 Baylor)#43 (of 75 teams · 379.3 yds/g · 4,172 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 275 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 451.7 yds/g allowed · 4,969 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · -5.5 /g · -61 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · +7 in these games · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.64 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 28:08 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 821.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 75 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Texas Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 584.9 yds/g · 5,849 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 43.1 pts/g · 431 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 543.1 yds/g allowed · 5,431 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 44.6 pts/g allowed · 446 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1.5 /g · -15 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 641.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.302 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.354 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 1.319 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015UCLA8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#12 (of 75 teams · 474.1 yds/g · 4,741 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 408.0 yds/g allowed · 4,080 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +5.4 /g · +54 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 15 taken, 11 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 26:33 /g · 4h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 793.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 75 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.083 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Utah10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#41 (of 75 teams · 381.5 yds/g · 3,815 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 294 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 364.4 yds/g allowed · 3,644 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 24 taken, 18 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 75 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Virginia4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 75 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 3,950 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 260 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 412.0 yds/g allowed · 4,120 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -4.1 /g · -41 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:32 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 667.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 75 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 1.370 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Virginia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 75 teams · 338.6 yds/g · 3,386 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · +2.6 /g · +26 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 31:47 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 658.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 75 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.441 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Washington7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 USC)#37 (of 75 teams · 388.3 yds/g · 3,495 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 261 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 377.3 yds/g allowed · 3,396 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · +9.0 /g · +81 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 22 taken, 16 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 30:06 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 667.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 75 teams · 0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015West Virginia8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 75 teams · 453.1 yds/g · 4,531 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 314 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 403.8 yds/g allowed · 4,038 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · +5.3 /g · +53 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 26 taken, 20 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 29:57 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 625.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 75 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.419 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Arizona State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 75 teams · 470.6 yds/g · 4,706 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 339 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 472.8 yds/g allowed · 4,728 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 36.1 pts/g allowed · 361 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · -2.2 /g · -22 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 32:45 /g · 5h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 75 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.639 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Boston College3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 237.7 yds/g · 2,139 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 89 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 310.8 yds/g allowed · 2,797 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · -8.6 /g · -77 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 534.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 28% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 1.280 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 75 teams · 392.6 yds/g · 3,533 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 426.6 yds/g allowed · 3,839 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:04 /g · 4h 04m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 563.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 75 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 0.177 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 1.326 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Georgia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State)#58 (of 75 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 3,896 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -7.6 /g · -76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -10 in these games · 12 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 31:10 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 590.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 75 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 1.252 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Minnesota6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 75 teams · 346.2 yds/g · 3,116 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 383.0 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · -5.7 /g · -51 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:22 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 516.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 75 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 1.245 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 75 teams · 380.7 yds/g · 3,807 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 361.9 yds/g allowed · 3,619 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +1.9 /g · +19 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 32:43 /g · 5h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 611.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 75 teams · 0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.432 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 309.1 yds/g · 2,782 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 459.8 yds/g allowed · 4,138 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · -8.2 /g · -74 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 508.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 75 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Arizona7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#16 (of 75 teams · 464.0 yds/g · 4,176 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 278 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 484.6 yds/g allowed · 4,361 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 40.3 pts/g allowed · 363 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · -9.4 /g · -85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -9 in these games · 7 taken, 16 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 27:22 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 606.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 75 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Illinois5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 75 teams · 361.3 yds/g · 3,252 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 149 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 384.0 yds/g allowed · 3,456 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -11.3 /g · -102 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 28:53 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 531.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Iowa State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 75 teams · 410.9 yds/g · 4,109 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 483.0 yds/g allowed · 4,830 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 35.5 pts/g allowed · 355 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · -10.9 /g · -109 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -11 in these games · 10 taken, 21 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 31:20 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 529.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 75 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 0.261 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kansas State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 75 teams · 331.3 yds/g · 2,982 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 484.9 yds/g allowed · 4,364 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 36.4 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · -7.2 /g · -65 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:16 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 503.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 75 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.277 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 1.176 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Maryland3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 75 teams · 363.2 yds/g · 3,269 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 3,786 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -15.9 /g · -143 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -13 in these games · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 603.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.408 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Vanderbilt4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 299.1 yds/g · 2,393 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 13.3 pts/g · 106 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 390.6 yds/g allowed · 3,125 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · -9.8 /g · -78 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0 in these games · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 32:34 /g · 4h 21m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Purdue2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 75 teams · 333.7 yds/g · 3,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 467.8 yds/g allowed · 4,210 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.7 pts/g allowed · 348 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -16.0 /g · -144 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · -6 in these games · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 26:24 /g · 3h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 534.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 75 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 75 teams · 468.4 yds/g · 4,216 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 312 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 494.9 yds/g allowed · 4,454 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 37.9 pts/g allowed · 341 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · -3.2 /g · -29 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 12 taken, 9 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 27:56 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 559.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 75 teams · 0.201 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 1.304 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.445 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 75 teams · 362.6 yds/g · 3,626 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 494.7 yds/g allowed · 4,947 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 385 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -15.4 /g · -154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 31:38 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 602.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 75 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.261 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 1.216 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.406 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Wake Forest3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 307.0 yds/g · 3,070 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 15.1 pts/g · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 397.4 yds/g allowed · 3,974 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -12.7 /g · -127 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 497.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 1.293 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Missouri5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 245.3 yds/g · 1,962 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 9.1 pts/g · 73 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 335.4 yds/g allowed · 2,683 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 149 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · -9.5 /g · -76 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 8 taken, 9 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 24:56 /g · 3h 20m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 642.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.118 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oregon State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 (of 75 teams · 320.8 yds/g · 3,208 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 167 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 534.7 yds/g allowed · 5,347 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 41.6 pts/g allowed · 416 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -24.9 /g · -249 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 9 taken, 13 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 25:13 /g · 4h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 544.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 75 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.330 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 1.235 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.134 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kansas0–120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 304.3 yds/g · 3,043 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 12.2 pts/g · 122 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 561.6 yds/g allowed · 5,616 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 45.7 pts/g allowed · 457 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -33.5 /g · -335 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · -8 in these games · 15 taken, 23 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 500.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20152015 Central MichiganPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #36
Total offense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Texas Tech #2 of 75; 2015 Baylor #3 of 75; 2015 TCU #4 of 75; 2015 Oregon #5 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #6 of 75; 2015 California #7 of 75; 2015 Clemson #8 of 75; 2015 Washington State #9 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #10 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 75; 2015 UCLA #12 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #13 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #14 of 75; 2015 Indiana #15 of 75; 2015 Arizona #16 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #17 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #19 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #20 of 75; 2015 Stanford #21 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #22 of 75; 2015 Alabama #23 of 75; 2015 USC #24 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #26 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #27 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #28 of 75; 2015 LSU #29 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #30 of 75; 2015 Florida State #32 of 75; 2015 Virginia #33 of 75; 2015 Iowa #34 of 75; 2015 Duke #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #36 of 75; 2015 Washington #37 of 75; 2015 Miami #38 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #39 of 75; 2015 Michigan #40 of 75; 2015 Utah #41 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #42 of 75; 2015 Texas #43 of 75; 2015 NC State #44 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Georgia #48 of 75; 2015 Maryland #49 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #50 of 75; 2015 Illinois #51 of 75; 2015 Colorado #52 of 75; 2015 Auburn #53 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #54 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #55 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #56 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #57 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #58 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #59 of 75; 2015 Purdue #60 of 75; 2015 Florida #61 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #62 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #65 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #66 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #67 of 75; 2015 Kansas #68 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #69 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #70 of 75; 2015 Missouri #73 of 75; 2015 Boston College #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 31 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring offensemedian #34
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #2 of 75; 2015 Baylor #3 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #4 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Oregon #6 of 75; 2015 Stanford #8 of 75; 2015 TCU #9 of 75; 2015 Clemson #10 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Indiana #12 of 75; 2015 Washington State #13 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #14 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #15 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #15 of 75; 2015 California #17 of 75; 2015 UCLA #18 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 75; 2015 Alabama #21 of 75; 2015 USC #22 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #23 of 75; 2015 Iowa #24 of 75; 2015 Arizona #25 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #25 of 75; 2015 Michigan #27 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #28 of 75; 2015 Utah #29 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #30 of 75; 2015 Washington #31 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #32 of 75; 2015 NC State #33 of 75; 2015 LSU #34 of 75; 2015 Florida State #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #35 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #35 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #38 of 75; 2015 Miami #39 of 75; 2015 Virginia #40 of 75; 2015 Duke #41 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #43 of 75; 2015 Texas #44 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #45 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #47 of 75; 2015 Auburn #49 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #50 of 75; 2015 Purdue #52 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #53 of 75; 2015 Georgia #54 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #55 of 75; 2015 Florida #56 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #57 of 75; 2015 Maryland #58 of 75; 2015 Colorado #59 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #60 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #61 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #63 of 75; 2015 Illinois #65 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #68 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #72 of 75; 2015 Boston College #73 of 75; 2015 Missouri #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 64 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Total defensemedian #37
Total defense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #1 of 75; 2015 Florida #2 of 75; 2015 Clemson #3 of 75; 2015 Alabama #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan #5 of 75; 2015 Boston College #6 of 75; 2015 Georgia #7 of 75; 2015 Louisville #8 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #9 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #10 of 75; 2015 Missouri #11 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #12 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #13 of 75; 2015 Iowa #14 of 75; 2015 LSU #15 of 75; 2015 Florida State #16 of 75; 2015 Penn State #17 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #20 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #21 of 75; 2015 Utah #23 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #24 of 75; 2015 Washington #25 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #26 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #27 of 75; 2015 Illinois #28 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #30 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #31 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #32 of 75; 2015 Stanford #33 of 75; 2015 NC State #35 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #36 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #37 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #38 of 75; 2015 UCLA #39 of 75; 2015 TCU #40 of 75; 2015 USC #41 of 75; 2015 Virginia #42 of 75; 2015 Baylor #43 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #44 of 75; 2015 Auburn #45 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #46 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #48 of 75; 2015 Maryland #49 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #50 of 75; 2015 Duke #51 of 75; 2015 Washington State #53 of 75; 2015 Miami #54 of 75; 2015 Colorado #57 of 75; 2015 Texas #58 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #59 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #61 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #63 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #64 of 75; 2015 Oregon #65 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #66 of 75; 2015 California #67 of 75; 2015 Arizona #68 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #69 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #70 of 75; 2015 Indiana #71 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #73 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #74 of 75; 2015 Kansas #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 19 of 75. Power 5 median rank 37.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Florida #1 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 75; 2015 Florida State #3 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #4 of 75; 2015 Alabama #5 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #6 of 75; 2015 Boston College #7 of 75; 2015 Georgia #7 of 75; 2015 Missouri #9 of 75; 2015 Iowa #10 of 75; 2015 Michigan #11 of 75; 2015 Washington #12 of 75; 2015 Clemson #13 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #14 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #15 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #16 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #18 of 75; 2015 Utah #19 of 75; 2015 Penn State #20 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #20 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #22 of 75; 2015 Stanford #23 of 75; 2015 LSU #24 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Louisville #27 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #29 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #30 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 75; 2015 TCU #32 of 75; 2015 UCLA #34 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #35 of 75; 2015 Illinois #36 of 75; 2015 USC #39 of 75; 2015 Auburn #40 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #42 of 75; 2015 Baylor #43 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #44 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #45 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #46 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #46 of 75; 2015 NC State #48 of 75; 2015 Virginia #49 of 75; 2015 Texas #50 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #51 of 75; 2015 Washington State #52 of 75; 2015 Duke #53 of 75; 2015 Colorado #55 of 75; 2015 Miami #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #58 of 75; 2015 California #59 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #60 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #61 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #62 of 75; 2015 Maryland #63 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #64 of 75; 2015 Oregon #65 of 75; 2015 Indiana #66 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #68 of 75; 2015 Purdue #69 of 75; 2015 Arizona #70 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #72 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #73 of 75; 2015 Kansas #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 37 of 75. Power 5 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #3 of 75; 2015 Clemson #4 of 75; 2015 Alabama #5 of 75; 2015 Baylor #6 of 75; 2015 Stanford #7 of 75; 2015 Iowa #8 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #9 of 75; 2015 Michigan #10 of 75; 2015 Florida State #11 of 75; 2015 TCU #12 of 75; 2015 Washington #14 of 75; 2015 Utah #15 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #17 of 75; 2015 Florida #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #18 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #20 of 75; 2015 UCLA #21 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #22 of 75; 2015 USC #23 of 75; 2015 Georgia #24 of 75; 2015 Washington State #25 of 75; 2015 LSU #26 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #27 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #28 of 75; 2015 Oregon #29 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #30 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #31 of 75; 2015 Louisville #32 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 75; 2015 Penn State #34 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #35 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #36 of 75; 2015 California #38 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #39 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #40 of 75; 2015 NC State #41 of 75; 2015 Indiana #42 of 75; 2015 Virginia #43 of 75; 2015 Auburn #44 of 75; 2015 Duke #45 of 75; 2015 Texas #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Miami #49 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #50 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #51 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #53 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #54 of 75; 2015 Boston College #55 of 75; 2015 Arizona #56 of 75; 2015 Missouri #57 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #59 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #60 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #61 of 75; 2015 Illinois #63 of 75; 2015 Colorado #65 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #66 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #68 of 75; 2015 Maryland #69 of 75; 2015 Purdue #70 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #72 of 75; 2015 Kansas #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 63 of 75. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Iowa #1 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #2 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #3 of 75; 2015 USC #4 of 75; 2015 Florida #5 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #6 of 75; 2015 NC State #7 of 75; 2015 Miami #9 of 75; 2015 Washington #9 of 75; 2015 Texas #12 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #13 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 75; 2015 Utah #13 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #13 of 75; 2015 Georgia #17 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #18 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #18 of 75; 2015 UCLA #18 of 75; 2015 Indiana #21 of 75; 2015 LSU #21 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #21 of 75; 2015 Alabama #25 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #25 of 75; 2015 Florida State #25 of 75; 2015 Illinois #25 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #25 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #30 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #30 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #32 of 75; 2015 Oregon #33 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #34 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #34 of 75; 2015 California #37 of 75; 2015 TCU #37 of 75; 2015 Auburn #39 of 75; 2015 Baylor #39 of 75; 2015 Boston College #39 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #39 of 75; 2015 Missouri #43 of 75; 2015 Penn State #43 of 75; 2015 Louisville #45 of 75; 2015 Virginia #45 of 75; 2015 Washington State #45 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #48 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #48 of 75; 2015 Stanford #50 of 75; 2015 Clemson #51 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #51 of 75; 2015 Duke #53 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #54 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #54 of 75; 2015 Colorado #56 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #56 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #58 of 75; 2015 Purdue #59 of 75; 2015 Michigan #62 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #63 of 75; 2015 Kansas #64 of 75; 2015 Arizona #65 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #65 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #65 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #70 of 75; 2015 Maryland #72 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #72 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 65 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #2 of 75; 2015 Alabama #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #5 of 75; 2015 Virginia #6 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #7 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #8 of 75; 2015 Florida #9 of 75; 2015 Michigan #10 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #11 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #12 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #13 of 75; 2015 Iowa #14 of 75; 2015 Utah #15 of 75; 2015 LSU #16 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #17 of 75; 2015 Clemson #18 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #20 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #21 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #22 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #23 of 75; 2015 TCU #24 of 75; 2015 USC #25 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #28 of 75; 2015 Colorado #30 of 75; 2015 Georgia #31 of 75; 2015 Washington State #33 of 75; 2015 Washington #34 of 75; 2015 NC State #35 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #36 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #37 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #38 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #39 of 75; 2015 Penn State #40 of 75; 2015 Louisville #42 of 75; 2015 Florida State #43 of 75; 2015 Miami #44 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #45 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #46 of 75; 2015 California #47 of 75; 2015 Illinois #48 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #50 of 75; 2015 Auburn #51 of 75; 2015 Boston College #52 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Texas #55 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #56 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #57 of 75; 2015 Indiana #58 of 75; 2015 Baylor #59 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #60 of 75; 2015 Kansas #61 of 75; 2015 Maryland #62 of 75; 2015 Oregon #64 of 75; 2015 Arizona #65 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #66 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #67 of 75; 2015 Duke #68 of 75; 2015 UCLA #69 of 75; 2015 Purdue #70 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #72 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #73 of 75; 2015 Missouri #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 3 of 75. Power 5 median rank 37.
Returning passingmedian #54
Returning passing. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arizona #1 of 128; 2015 Colorado #7 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #7 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #7 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #15 of 128; 2015 Indiana #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 California #21 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #21 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #25 of 128; 2015 Kansas #26 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Missouri #30 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #32 of 128; 2015 USC #33 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #38 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #39 of 128; 2015 NC State #40 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #41 of 128; 2015 Penn State #41 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #43 of 128; 2015 Louisville #44 of 128; 2015 Miami #47 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #47 of 128; 2015 TCU #49 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #53 of 128; 2015 Stanford #54 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #54 of 128; 2015 Texas #58 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #72 of 128; 2015 Purdue #73 of 128; 2015 Illinois #78 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #79 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #80 of 128; 2015 Virginia #81 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Clemson #84 of 128; 2015 Washington State #85 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #87 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #91 of 128; 2015 Iowa #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #94 of 128; 2015 Georgia #96 of 128; 2015 Alabama #97 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 UCLA #99 of 128; 2015 Auburn #101 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #102 of 128; 2015 Florida State #103 of 128; 2015 Maryland #104 of 128; 2015 Oregon #106 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #108 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #109 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #115 of 128; 2015 Duke #116 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #116 of 128; 2015 Boston College #118 of 128; 2015 Washington #120 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 7 of 128. Power 5 median rank 54.
Returning receivingmedian #73
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tennessee #7 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #10 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Oregon #14 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #16 of 128; 2015 UCLA #17 of 128; 2015 California #18 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2015 Arizona #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #22 of 128; 2015 Penn State #24 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 128; 2015 TCU #28 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #31 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #32 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 128; 2015 Illinois #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #36 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #38 of 128; 2015 Washington #40 of 128; 2015 Colorado #41 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #43 of 128; 2015 Stanford #52 of 128; 2015 Baylor #55 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #56 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #58 of 128; 2015 Miami #66 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #67 of 128; 2015 Florida State #69 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #73 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #75 of 128; 2015 Virginia #77 of 128; 2015 Georgia #78 of 128; 2015 Utah #79 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #83 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #84 of 128; 2015 NC State #85 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #86 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #86 of 128; 2015 Washington State #88 of 128; 2015 Michigan #89 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #91 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #93 of 128; 2015 Iowa #94 of 128; 2015 Purdue #95 of 128; 2015 Duke #96 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #102 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #105 of 128; 2015 Boston College #108 of 128; 2015 Maryland #111 of 128; 2015 Texas #114 of 128; 2015 Louisville #116 of 128; 2015 Auburn #117 of 128; 2015 Indiana #119 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #120 of 128; 2015 Alabama #121 of 128; 2015 Missouri #122 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #123 of 128; 2015 USC #124 of 128; 2015 Kansas #126 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 106 of 128. Power 5 median rank 73.
Returning rushingmedian #70
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 128; 2015 Utah #6 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #7 of 128; 2015 California #9 of 128; 2015 Miami #12 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #15 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #15 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #20 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #21 of 128; 2015 Georgia #24 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #33 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Baylor #37 of 128; 2015 Washington State #37 of 128; 2015 NC State #39 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #43 of 128; 2015 TCU #45 of 128; 2015 Oregon #46 of 128; 2015 Colorado #49 of 128; 2015 Clemson #52 of 128; 2015 Arizona #53 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #54 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #55 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #56 of 128; 2015 UCLA #57 of 128; 2015 Stanford #58 of 128; 2015 Boston College #59 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #63 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #66 of 128; 2015 Michigan #67 of 128; 2015 Duke #70 of 128; 2015 LSU #71 of 128; 2015 Missouri #73 of 128; 2015 Washington #74 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #76 of 128; 2015 Maryland #80 of 128; 2015 Texas #81 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #83 of 128; 2015 Florida State #85 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #86 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #87 of 128; 2015 Penn State #88 of 128; 2015 Louisville #89 of 128; 2015 Kansas #96 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #97 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #99 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #100 of 128; 2015 Florida #103 of 128; 2015 Illinois #104 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #107 of 128; 2015 Iowa #108 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #109 of 128; 2015 USC #110 of 128; 2015 Alabama #111 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #114 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #115 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #118 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #120 of 128; 2015 Virginia #121 of 128; 2015 Indiana #122 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #124 of 128; 2015 Purdue #125 of 128; 2015 Auburn #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 113 of 128. Power 5 median rank 70.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #1 of 128; 2015 USC #2 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2015 Florida State #4 of 128; 2015 LSU #5 of 128; 2015 Georgia #6 of 128; 2015 Auburn #7 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #10 of 128; 2015 Texas #11 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 UCLA #14 of 128; 2015 Florida #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #16 of 128; 2015 Miami #17 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 128; 2015 Oregon #20 of 128; 2015 Penn State #21 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #22 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #23 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #24 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #25 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #26 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #27 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #28 of 128; 2015 Washington #29 of 128; 2015 Virginia #30 of 128; 2015 Baylor #31 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #32 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #33 of 128; 2015 Missouri #34 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #35 of 128; 2015 Louisville #36 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #38 of 128; 2015 TCU #39 of 128; 2015 California #40 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #41 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #42 of 128; 2015 NC State #43 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #44 of 128; 2015 Arizona #45 of 128; 2015 Maryland #46 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #47 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #49 of 128; 2015 Utah #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #51 of 128; 2015 Duke #53 of 128; 2015 Indiana #54 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #55 of 128; 2015 Colorado #56 of 128; 2015 Washington State #57 of 128; 2015 Boston College #58 of 128; 2015 Purdue #59 of 128; 2015 Illinois #60 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #62 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #64 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #66 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #67 of 128; 2015 Kansas #68 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #69 of 128. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 101 of 128. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #36
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 75; 2015 Stanford #2 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #3 of 75; 2015 Baylor #4 of 75; 2015 Oregon #5 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #7 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #8 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #9 of 75; 2015 Clemson #10 of 75; 2015 UCLA #11 of 75; 2015 California #13 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #14 of 75; 2015 LSU #15 of 75; 2015 TCU #16 of 75; 2015 USC #17 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #18 of 75; 2015 Washington State #19 of 75; 2015 Indiana #20 of 75; 2015 Florida State #21 of 75; 2015 Alabama #22 of 75; 2015 Iowa #23 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 75; 2015 Michigan #26 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #27 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #28 of 75; 2015 Virginia #29 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #30 of 75; 2015 Arizona #32 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #33 of 75; 2015 Auburn #34 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #35 of 75; 2015 Miami #36 of 75; 2015 Washington #37 of 75; 2015 Texas #38 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #40 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #41 of 75; 2015 Utah #43 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #44 of 75; 2015 Louisville #45 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #47 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #48 of 75; 2015 NC State #49 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #50 of 75; 2015 Florida #51 of 75; 2015 Georgia #52 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Colorado #54 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #55 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #56 of 75; 2015 Duke #60 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #61 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #63 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #64 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #65 of 75; 2015 Illinois #66 of 75; 2015 Maryland #68 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #69 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #71 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #72 of 75; 2015 Missouri #73 of 75; 2015 Boston College #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 39 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Boston College #1 of 75; 2015 Alabama #2 of 75; 2015 Clemson #3 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #4 of 75; 2015 Florida #5 of 75; 2015 Georgia #6 of 75; 2015 Michigan #7 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #8 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #9 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #10 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Utah #12 of 75; 2015 Iowa #13 of 75; 2015 Missouri #14 of 75; 2015 Washington #15 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #16 of 75; 2015 Penn State #17 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #18 of 75; 2015 Illinois #20 of 75; 2015 TCU #21 of 75; 2015 Louisville #22 of 75; 2015 Florida State #23 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #24 of 75; 2015 Baylor #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 75; 2015 UCLA #28 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #29 of 75; 2015 NC State #30 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #31 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #32 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #34 of 75; 2015 USC #35 of 75; 2015 Maryland #36 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #37 of 75; 2015 LSU #38 of 75; 2015 Washington State #39 of 75; 2015 Duke #41 of 75; 2015 Auburn #42 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #43 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #44 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #45 of 75; 2015 Texas #46 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #47 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #49 of 75; 2015 Virginia #51 of 75; 2015 Colorado #52 of 75; 2015 Oregon #53 of 75; 2015 Stanford #54 of 75; 2015 Miami #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #58 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #59 of 75; 2015 Indiana #60 of 75; 2015 Purdue #61 of 75; 2015 California #62 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #64 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #65 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #66 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #67 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #68 of 75; 2015 Arizona #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #71 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #74 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 69 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #36
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 75; 2015 Washington State #2 of 75; 2015 California #3 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #4 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #6 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #7 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #10 of 75; 2015 TCU #11 of 75; 2015 Clemson #12 of 75; 2015 Oregon #13 of 75; 2015 Baylor #14 of 75; 2015 UCLA #15 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #16 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #19 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #20 of 75; 2015 Michigan #22 of 75; 2015 Florida State #23 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #24 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #25 of 75; 2015 Arizona #26 of 75; 2015 Utah #27 of 75; 2015 USC #28 of 75; 2015 Iowa #29 of 75; 2015 LSU #30 of 75; 2015 Virginia #31 of 75; 2015 Alabama #32 of 75; 2015 Washington #33 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #34 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #35 of 75; 2015 Indiana #36 of 75; 2015 Auburn #37 of 75; 2015 Georgia #38 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #41 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #42 of 75; 2015 Colorado #43 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #44 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #46 of 75; 2015 Penn State #47 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #48 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #49 of 75; 2015 Duke #50 of 75; 2015 Louisville #51 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #52 of 75; 2015 Florida #53 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #55 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #56 of 75; 2015 Miami #57 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #58 of 75; 2015 NC State #59 of 75; 2015 Texas #60 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #61 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #63 of 75; 2015 Purdue #64 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #65 of 75; 2015 Illinois #66 of 75; 2015 Maryland #67 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #68 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #71 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #72 of 75; 2015 Missouri #73 of 75; 2015 Boston College #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 45 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive success ratemedian #34
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Clemson #1 of 75; 2015 Boston College #2 of 75; 2015 Alabama #3 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan #5 of 75; 2015 Florida #6 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #7 of 75; 2015 Georgia #8 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #9 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #10 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 TCU #12 of 75; 2015 Louisville #13 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #14 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #15 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #16 of 75; 2015 Florida State #17 of 75; 2015 Penn State #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #19 of 75; 2015 Utah #20 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #21 of 75; 2015 Iowa #22 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #23 of 75; 2015 Missouri #24 of 75; 2015 Baylor #25 of 75; 2015 NC State #26 of 75; 2015 LSU #27 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #28 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #31 of 75; 2015 Washington #32 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 75; 2015 Duke #34 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #36 of 75; 2015 Indiana #37 of 75; 2015 Illinois #38 of 75; 2015 Stanford #39 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #40 of 75; 2015 Maryland #41 of 75; 2015 Purdue #42 of 75; 2015 Washington State #43 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #44 of 75; 2015 UCLA #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 USC #48 of 75; 2015 Virginia #49 of 75; 2015 Oregon #53 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #54 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #55 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #56 of 75; 2015 Colorado #57 of 75; 2015 Texas #58 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #59 of 75; 2015 Auburn #60 of 75; 2015 California #61 of 75; 2015 Arizona #62 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #63 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #64 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #66 of 75; 2015 Miami #68 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #69 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #70 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #71 of 75; 2015 Kansas #72 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 50 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #2 of 75; 2015 Oregon #4 of 75; 2015 Maryland #5 of 75; 2015 Louisville #6 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #7 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #8 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #9 of 75; 2015 Baylor #10 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #11 of 75; 2015 NC State #12 of 75; 2015 Miami #13 of 75; 2015 UCLA #14 of 75; 2015 Penn State #15 of 75; 2015 Florida State #16 of 75; 2015 LSU #17 of 75; 2015 USC #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #19 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #20 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #21 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #22 of 75; 2015 Indiana #23 of 75; 2015 Arizona #24 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #25 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #27 of 75; 2015 Boston College #28 of 75; 2015 Illinois #29 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #30 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 75; 2015 Texas #32 of 75; 2015 Iowa #33 of 75; 2015 Kansas #34 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #36 of 75; 2015 Washington #37 of 75; 2015 Florida #38 of 75; 2015 California #39 of 75; 2015 Virginia #40 of 75; 2015 Clemson #41 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #42 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #44 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #45 of 75; 2015 TCU #46 of 75; 2015 Duke #47 of 75; 2015 Alabama #48 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #49 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #51 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #52 of 75; 2015 Michigan #53 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #54 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #55 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #56 of 75; 2015 Purdue #57 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #58 of 75; 2015 Washington State #59 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #60 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #61 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #63 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #64 of 75; 2015 Stanford #65 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #66 of 75; 2015 Colorado #68 of 75; 2015 Utah #69 of 75; 2015 Auburn #70 of 75; 2015 Missouri #72 of 75; 2015 Georgia #73 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 50 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #38
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UCLA #2 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #4 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #6 of 75; 2015 Miami #7 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #8 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #9 of 75; 2015 Auburn #10 of 75; 2015 Missouri #12 of 75; 2015 Washington #14 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #17 of 75; 2015 Texas #18 of 75; 2015 Illinois #19 of 75; 2015 Florida State #20 of 75; 2015 Iowa #21 of 75; 2015 Penn State #22 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #23 of 75; 2015 Kansas #24 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #25 of 75; 2015 Florida #26 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #27 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #28 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #29 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #30 of 75; 2015 California #31 of 75; 2015 Colorado #33 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #34 of 75; 2015 Georgia #35 of 75; 2015 Washington State #36 of 75; 2015 Oregon #37 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #38 of 75; 2015 Arizona #39 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #40 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #42 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #43 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #45 of 75; 2015 Stanford #46 of 75; 2015 Maryland #47 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #48 of 75; 2015 LSU #49 of 75; 2015 USC #50 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #51 of 75; 2015 TCU #52 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #54 of 75; 2015 Duke #55 of 75; 2015 Utah #56 of 75; 2015 Baylor #57 of 75; 2015 Michigan #60 of 75; 2015 Louisville #61 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 NC State #63 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #64 of 75; 2015 Virginia #65 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #66 of 75; 2015 Boston College #67 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #69 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #70 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #71 of 75; 2015 Indiana #72 of 75; 2015 Alabama #73 of 75; 2015 Clemson #74 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Central Michigan, ranked 32 of 75. Power 5 median rank 38.