THIRD AND DATA

Charleston Southern game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 27at Lindenwood17–20 L633155.031–10718–32–208197–141–124–5027:3142%31%
Sep 5at Georgia Southern0–31 L601171.931–89–29–109105–181–124–3524:0417%45%
Sep 12at The Citadel26–20 W591883.243–1048–16–84144–131–112–2525:5041%38%
Sep 19vs Point University65–0 W5458210.834–34813–20–234215–80–218–6931:3155%—
Oct 3vs Gardner-Webb10–12 L521733.335–1409–17–33100–111–306–5926:2229%33%
Oct 10vs South Carolina State49–39 W553055.526–11117–29–194182–90–0112–11124:3139%34%
Oct 17at Clemson0–37 L45761.732–267–13–5060–110–218–5528:0420%45%
Oct 24at Tennessee State20–7 W642774.334–6722–30–210177–150–0112–10134:5844%32%
Oct 31vs Western Illinois35–42 L482244.729–14010–19–84120–100–127–6223:4628%38%
Season9 games4–55002,2574.5295–1051113–205–1,20612730–1094–111163–5674:06:3735%37%

Success rate

Charleston S. on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game35.4% · 37.5%
42
31
17
45
41
38
55
29
33
39
34
20
45
44
32
28
38
@ Lindenwood
@ Georgia Southern
@ The Citadel
Point University
Gardner-Webb
South Carolina State
@ Clemson
@ Tennessee State
Western Illinois
UT Martin
Southeast Missouri State
@ Eastern Illinois

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 20.0%, defense allows 45.3%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Charleston S. on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Charleston S.'s defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Charleston S. offense 35% (175 of 494)Opponent offense / Charleston S. defense 37% (221 of 590)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Lindenwood: opponent offense 31% of 59Lindenwood: Charleston S. offense 42% of 62Georgia Southern: opponent offense 45% of 80Georgia Southern: Charleston S. offense 17% of 60The Citadel: opponent offense 38% of 72The Citadel: Charleston S. offense 41% of 59Point University: Charleston S. offense 55% of 53Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 33% of 79Gardner-Webb: Charleston S. offense 29% of 51South Carolina State: opponent offense 34% of 90South Carolina State: Charleston S. offense 39% of 56Clemson: opponent offense 45% of 86Clemson: Charleston S. offense 20% of 45Tennessee State: opponent offense 32% of 53Tennessee State: Charleston S. offense 44% of 61Western Illinois: opponent offense 38% of 71Western Illinois: Charleston S. offense 28% of 47
Charleston S. offenseOpponent offense (Charleston S. defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Lindenwood

17–20 L · 62 plays to 59
Charleston S. offense 42% (26/62)Lindenwood offense 31% (18/59)

at Georgia Southern

0–31 L · 60 plays to 80
Charleston S. offense 17% (10/60)Georgia Southern offense 45% (36/80)

at The Citadel

26–20 W · 59 plays to 72
Charleston S. offense 41% (24/59)The Citadel offense 38% (27/72)

vs Point University

65–0 W · 53 plays to 0
Charleston S. offense 55% (29/53)Point University offense — (0/0)

vs Gardner-Webb

10–12 L · 51 plays to 79
Charleston S. offense 29% (15/51)Gardner-Webb offense 33% (26/79)

vs South Carolina State

49–39 W · 56 plays to 90
Charleston S. offense 39% (22/56)SC State offense 34% (31/90)

at Clemson

0–37 L · 45 plays to 86
Charleston S. offense 20% (9/45)Clemson offense 45% (39/86)

at Tennessee State

20–7 W · 61 plays to 53
Charleston S. offense 44% (27/61)Tennessee State offense 32% (17/53)

vs Western Illinois

35–42 L · 47 plays to 71
Charleston S. offense 28% (13/47)Western Illinois offense 38% (27/71)