Metrics

Colorado StateRams

Season
Current

Mountain West

Mountain West, 2001

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2001Colorado State750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#72 (of 117 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points) (— allowed · —)#37 (of 117 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 274 points)#55 (of 117 teams · +2.0 /g · +24 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 8 Mountain West teams in 20010 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#53 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range #2–#113. 1 of 8 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#53 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range #11–#100. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#55 (Point margin: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range #9–#100. 1 of 8 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2001Air Force660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#44 (of 117 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 337 points) (— allowed · —)#89 (of 117 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#81 (of 117 teams · -4.1 /g · -49 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001BYU1220 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#2 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 44.1 pts/g · 618 points) (— allowed · —)#85 (of 117 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 424 points)#9 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +13.9 /g · +194 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001New Mexico650 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#49 (of 117 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 304 points) (— allowed · —)#34 (of 117 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#43 (of 117 teams · +5.5 /g · +61 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001San Diego State380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#113 (of 117 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 184 points) (— allowed · —)#66 (of 117 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#93 (of 117 teams · -9.6 /g · -106 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001UNLV470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#65 (of 117 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 284 points) (— allowed · —)#53 (of 117 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#57 (of 117 teams · +1.3 /g · +14 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Utah840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#53 (of 117 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 329 points) (— allowed · —)#11 (of 117 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 210 points)#24 (of 117 teams · +9.9 /g · +119 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Wyoming290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#95 (of 117 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 229 points) (— allowed · —)#100 (of 117 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#100 (of 117 teams · -12.6 /g · -139 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mountain West, 20012001 Colorado StateMountain West medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #53
Scoring offense. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: 2001 BYU #2 of 117; 2001 Air Force #44 of 117; 2001 New Mexico #49 of 117; 2001 Utah #53 of 117; 2001 UNLV #65 of 117; 2001 Wyoming #95 of 117; 2001 San Diego State #113 of 117. Marked: 2001 Colorado State, ranked 72 of 117. Mountain West median rank 53.
Total defense
Total defense. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #53
Scoring defense. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Utah #11 of 117; 2001 New Mexico #34 of 117; 2001 UNLV #53 of 117; 2001 San Diego State #66 of 117; 2001 BYU #85 of 117; 2001 Air Force #89 of 117; 2001 Wyoming #100 of 117. Marked: 2001 Colorado State, ranked 37 of 117. Mountain West median rank 53.
Point marginmedian #55
Point margin. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: 2001 BYU #9 of 117; 2001 Utah #24 of 117; 2001 New Mexico #43 of 117; 2001 UNLV #57 of 117; 2001 Air Force #81 of 117; 2001 San Diego State #93 of 117; 2001 Wyoming #100 of 117. Marked: 2001 Colorado State, ranked 55 of 117. Mountain West median rank 55.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 Colorado State, which has no value for this metric.