Metrics

ColoradoBuffaloes

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008Colorado570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 120 teams · 318.5 yds/g · 3,822 yards)#100 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 242 points)#79 (of 120 teams · 381.6 yds/g allowed · 4,579 yards)#87 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#100 (of 120 teams · -9.1 /g · -109 on the season)#95 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 18 taken, 26 given · -0.67 /g)#87 (of 120 teams · 17:31 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#90 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.028 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.816 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#12 (Total offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #3–#94. 5 of 12 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #1–#100. 5 of 12 in the top 10.)#82 (Total defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #53–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#81 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #18–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#32 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #3–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #1–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Possession: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #1–#116. 2 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#15 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #1–#84. 4 of 12 in the top 10.)#88 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #41–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#13 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #1–#104. 5 of 12 in the top 10.)#86 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #28–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #1–#90. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range #9–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2008Baylor480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 120 teams · 376.4 yds/g · 4,517 yards)#42 (of 120 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 336 points)#87 (of 120 teams · 393.2 yds/g allowed · 4,718 yards)#88 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 352 points)#75 (of 120 teams · -1.3 /g · -16 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +18 on the season · 29 taken, 11 given · +1.50 /g)#101 (of 120 teams · 17:02 /g · 3h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#106 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.061 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.817 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Iowa State2100 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 386.8 yds/g · 4,642 yards)#59 (of 120 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 304 points)#113 (of 120 teams · 452.8 yds/g allowed · 5,434 yards)#111 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 430 points)#105 (of 120 teams · -10.5 /g · -126 on the season)#28 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 29 taken, 23 given · +0.50 /g)#35 (of 120 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 120 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#110 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Kansas850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 120 teams · 402.9 yds/g · 5,237 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 434 points)#82 (of 120 teams · 386.0 yds/g allowed · 5,018 yards)#83 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#44 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#50 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#46 (of 120 teams · 18:38 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#62 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.928 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.992 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Kansas State570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 120 teams · 402.1 yds/g · 4,825 yards)#19 (of 120 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 419 points)#118 (of 120 teams · 479.1 yds/g allowed · 5,749 yards)#111 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 430 points)#72 (of 120 teams · -0.9 /g · -11 on the season)#95 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 17 taken, 25 given · -0.67 /g)#103 (of 120 teams · 16:57 /g · 3h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#86 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.986 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Missouri1040 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 484.1 yds/g · 6,778 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#101 (of 120 teams · 411.5 yds/g allowed · 5,761 yards)#70 (of 120 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +15.0 /g · +210 on the season)#63 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.07 /g)#116 (of 120 teams · 16:03 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 51% of plays successful)#83 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.880 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Nebraska941 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 120 teams · 450.8 yds/g · 5,860 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 460 points)#59 (of 120 teams · 349.9 yds/g allowed · 4,548 yards)#81 (of 120 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#32 (of 120 teams · +6.8 /g · +89 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 17 taken, 29 given · -0.92 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:53 /g · 4h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#29 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.874 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oklahoma1223 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 547.9 yds/g · 7,670 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 51.1 pts/g · 716 points)#70 (of 120 teams · 367.6 yds/g allowed · 5,147 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +26.6 /g · +373 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +24 on the season · 35 taken, 11 given · +1.71 /g)#80 (of 120 teams · 17:43 /g · 4h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.150 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.924 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 120 teams · 1.079 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oklahoma State940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 487.7 yds/g · 6,340 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 40.8 pts/g · 530 points)#96 (of 120 teams · 405.5 yds/g allowed · 5,272 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#20 (of 120 teams · +12.7 /g · +165 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 27 taken, 21 given · +0.46 /g)#32 (of 120 teams · 18:56 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Texas1213 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 475.8 yds/g · 6,185 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.4 pts/g · 551 points)#53 (of 120 teams · 342.9 yds/g allowed · 4,458 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 244 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +23.6 /g · +307 on the season)#46 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 18 taken, 15 given · +0.23 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 19:50 /g · 4h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#46 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.925 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 120 teams · 1.058 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Texas A&M481 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 340.9 yds/g · 4,091 yards)#64 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#115 (of 120 teams · 461.9 yds/g allowed · 5,543 yards)#115 (of 120 teams · 37.4 pts/g allowed · 449 points)#109 (of 120 teams · -12.4 /g · -149 on the season)#109 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 20 taken, 32 given · -1.00 /g)#96 (of 120 teams · 17:07 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#114 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.015 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Texas Tech1120 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2008. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 531.0 yds/g · 6,903 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 43.8 pts/g · 569 points)#80 (of 120 teams · 382.6 yds/g allowed · 4,974 yards)#75 (of 120 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 362 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +15.9 /g · +207 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 30 taken, 25 given · +0.38 /g)#49 (of 120 teams · 18:36 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.232 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 52% of plays successful)#104 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.935 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.846 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20082008 ColoradoBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #12
Total offense. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #3 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #4 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #6 of 120; 2008 Missouri #8 of 120; 2008 Texas #9 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #12 of 120; 2008 Kansas #32 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #34 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #44 of 120; 2008 Baylor #46 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #75 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 94 of 120. Big 12 median rank 12.
Scoring offensemedian #17
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #1 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #3 of 120; 2008 Texas #5 of 120; 2008 Missouri #6 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #9 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #17 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #19 of 120; 2008 Kansas #22 of 120; 2008 Baylor #42 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #59 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #64 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 100 of 120. Big 12 median rank 17.
Total defensemedian #82
Total defense. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Texas #53 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #59 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #70 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #80 of 120; 2008 Kansas #82 of 120; 2008 Baylor #87 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #96 of 120; 2008 Missouri #101 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #113 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #115 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 79 of 120. Big 12 median rank 82.
Scoring defensemedian #81
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Texas #18 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #58 of 120; 2008 Missouri #70 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #75 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #77 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #81 of 120; 2008 Kansas #83 of 120; 2008 Baylor #88 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #111 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #111 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #115 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 87 of 120. Big 12 median rank 81.
Point marginmedian #32
Point margin. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #3 of 120; 2008 Texas #6 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #11 of 120; 2008 Missouri #14 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #20 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #32 of 120; 2008 Kansas #44 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #72 of 120; 2008 Baylor #75 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #105 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #109 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 100 of 120. Big 12 median rank 32.
Turnover marginmedian #46
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #1 of 120; 2008 Baylor #4 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #28 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #30 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #37 of 120; 2008 Texas #46 of 120; 2008 Kansas #50 of 120; 2008 Missouri #63 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #95 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #106 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #109 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 95 of 120. Big 12 median rank 46.
Possessionmedian #49
Possession. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nebraska #1 of 120; 2008 Texas #9 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #32 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #35 of 120; 2008 Kansas #46 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #49 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #80 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #96 of 120; 2008 Baylor #101 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #103 of 120; 2008 Missouri #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 87 of 120. Big 12 median rank 49.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Colorado, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Colorado, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Colorado, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Colorado, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #15
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Texas Tech #1 of 120; 2008 Texas #3 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #5 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #6 of 120; 2008 Missouri #13 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #15 of 120; 2008 Kansas #18 of 120; 2008 Baylor #22 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #42 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #44 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #46 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 84 of 120. Big 12 median rank 15.
Defensive EPAmedian #88
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nebraska #41 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #57 of 120; 2008 Texas #68 of 120; 2008 Kansas #79 of 120; 2008 Baylor #88 of 120; 2008 Missouri #92 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #95 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #103 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #104 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #118 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 83 of 120. Big 12 median rank 88.
Offensive success ratemedian #13
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Texas Tech #1 of 120; 2008 Missouri #2 of 120; 2008 Texas #5 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #8 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #9 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #13 of 120; 2008 Kansas #19 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #52 of 120; 2008 Baylor #76 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #77 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #84 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 104 of 120. Big 12 median rank 13.
Defensive success ratemedian #86
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oklahoma #28 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #29 of 120; 2008 Texas #46 of 120; 2008 Kansas #62 of 120; 2008 Missouri #83 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #86 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #89 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #104 of 120; 2008 Baylor #106 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #110 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #114 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 90 of 120. Big 12 median rank 86.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #44
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Baylor #1 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #7 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #19 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #43 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #44 of 120; 2008 Kansas #46 of 120; 2008 Texas #49 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #51 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #53 of 120; 2008 Missouri #82 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #90 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 5 of 120. Big 12 median rank 44.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #75
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Baylor #11 of 120; 2008 Texas Tech #22 of 120; 2008 Missouri #65 of 120; 2008 Texas A&M #73 of 120; 2008 Iowa State #75 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma State #91 of 120; 2008 Nebraska #94 of 120; 2008 Kansas State #101 of 120; 2008 Kansas #105 of 120; 2008 Texas #116 of 120; 2008 Oklahoma #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 Colorado, ranked 9 of 120. Big 12 median rank 75.