THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

ColoradoBuffaloes

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2017

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Colorado5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 130 teams · 417.6 yds/g · 5,011 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#110 (of 130 teams · 450.6 yds/g allowed · 5,407 yards)#74 (of 130 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 338 points)#85 (of 130 teams · -1.8 /g · -21 on the season)#64 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g)#89 (of 130 teams · 28:51 /g · 5h 46m on the season)#94 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's passing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 568.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 130 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 130 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#101 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 130 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 130 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #12–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #5–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #8–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #5–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #5–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #4–#124. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #15–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning passing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #1–#121. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #2–#91. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #7–#90. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Team talent: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #3–#60. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #7–#83. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #14–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #6–#84. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#92 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #19–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #5–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range #11–#105. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2017Arizona7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#12 (of 130 teams · 489.5 yds/g · 6,364 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 537 points)#119 (of 130 teams · 471.1 yds/g allowed · 6,125 yards)#109 (of 130 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 447 points)#40 (of 130 teams · +6.9 /g · +90 on the season)#46 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 25 taken, 22 given · +0.23 /g)#95 (of 130 teams · 28:33 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#65 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#78 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#46 (of 130 teams · 607.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.298 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 130 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#99 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 130 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 130 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Arizona State7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Washington)#37 (of 130 teams · 430.8 yds/g · 5,600 yards)#42 (of 130 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points)#109 (of 130 teams · 449.7 yds/g allowed · 5,846 yards)#104 (of 130 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 427 points)#80 (of 130 teams · -1.0 /g · -13 on the season)#56 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 17 taken, 15 given · +0.15 /g)#31 (of 130 teams · 31:24 /g · 6h 48m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#60 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 130 teams · 720.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 130 teams · 0.189 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 130 teams · 0.208 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#96 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 130 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 130 teams · 1.227 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017California5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#89 (of 130 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,614 yards)#73 (of 130 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 333 points)#96 (of 130 teams · 429.9 yds/g allowed · 5,159 yards)#79 (of 130 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 341 points)#77 (of 130 teams · -0.7 /g · -8 on the season)#38 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.33 /g)#80 (of 130 teams · 29:29 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#121 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 603.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 130 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 130 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#112 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 130 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 130 teams · 1.080 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Oregon7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#30 (of 130 teams · 440.9 yds/g · 5,732 yards)#18 (of 130 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 468 points)#46 (of 130 teams · 368.8 yds/g allowed · 4,794 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#37 (of 130 teams · +7.0 /g · +91 on the season)#64 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 25 taken, 25 given · +0.00 /g)#102 (of 130 teams · 28:15 /g · 6h 07m on the season)#76 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing production returning)#91 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 720.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 130 teams · 0.191 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 130 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#19 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 130 teams · 1.160 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 130 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Oregon State1–110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#113 (of 130 teams · 333.8 yds/g · 4,005 yards)#114 (of 130 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 248 points)#121 (of 130 teams · 473.1 yds/g allowed · 5,677 yards)#128 (of 130 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 516 points)#125 (of 130 teams · -22.3 /g · -268 on the season)#124 (of 130 teams · -14 on the season · 14 taken, 28 given · -1.17 /g)#84 (of 130 teams · 29:12 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#80 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning)#58 (of 130 teams · 557.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 130 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#128 (of 130 teams · 0.317 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#126 (of 130 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 130 teams · 1.111 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 130 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Stanford9–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Washington, #14 Notre Dame)#79 (of 130 teams · 388.6 yds/g · 5,441 yards)#38 (of 130 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 453 points)#76 (of 130 teams · 405.1 yds/g allowed · 5,672 yards)#34 (of 130 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#26 (of 130 teams · +9.6 /g · +135 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +16 on the season · 28 taken, 12 given · +1.14 /g)#61 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#66 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 810.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 130 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 130 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#92 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.401 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 130 teams · 1.152 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017UCLA6–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#21 (of 130 teams · 457.9 yds/g · 5,952 yards)#37 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#123 (of 130 teams · 483.7 yds/g allowed · 6,288 yards)#117 (of 130 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 476 points)#91 (of 130 teams · -4.2 /g · -54 on the season)#115 (of 130 teams · -9 on the season · 13 taken, 22 given · -0.69 /g)#125 (of 130 teams · 26:29 /g · 5h 44m on the season)#84 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's passing production returning)#38 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#18 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 130 teams · 830.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 130 teams · 0.227 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 130 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#109 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 130 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 130 teams · 1.153 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017USC11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Stanford, #13 Stanford)#13 (of 130 teams · 484.1 yds/g · 6,777 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 32.6 pts/g · 456 points)#68 (of 130 teams · 395.6 yds/g allowed · 5,539 yards)#60 (of 130 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#45 (of 130 teams · +6.4 /g · +90 on the season)#79 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 25 taken, 27 given · -0.14 /g)#43 (of 130 teams · 30:55 /g · 7h 13m on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing production returning)#82 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#54 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 934.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 130 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 130 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#50 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 130 teams · 1.267 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 130 teams · 1.287 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Utah7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 130 teams · 413.4 yds/g · 5,374 yards)#52 (of 130 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#25 (of 130 teams · 338.4 yds/g allowed · 4,399 yards)#39 (of 130 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#46 (of 130 teams · +6.4 /g · +83 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 27 taken, 26 given · +0.08 /g)#15 (of 130 teams · 32:31 /g · 7h 03m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 130 teams · 631.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 130 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 130 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#44 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 130 teams · 1.038 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 130 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Washington10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#58 (of 130 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 5,271 yards)#17 (of 130 teams · 36.2 pts/g · 471 points)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 298.0 yds/g allowed · 3,874 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 209 points)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +20.1 /g · +262 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +13 on the season · 24 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g)#97 (of 130 teams · 28:31 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#24 (of 130 teams · 706.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 130 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 130 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#34 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 130 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 130 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Washington State9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC, #13 Stanford, #25 Boise State)#33 (of 130 teams · 434.9 yds/g · 5,653 yards)#50 (of 130 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 394 points)#16 (of 130 teams · 323.3 yds/g allowed · 4,203 yards)#58 (of 130 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 335 points)#56 (of 130 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#85 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 28 taken, 31 given · -0.23 /g)#18 (of 130 teams · 32:18 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#60 (of 130 teams · 549.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 130 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 130 teams · 0.051 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#33 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 130 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 130 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20172017 ColoradoPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Arizona #12 of 130; 2017 USC #13 of 130; 2017 UCLA #21 of 130; 2017 Oregon #30 of 130; 2017 Washington State #33 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #37 of 130; 2017 Utah #52 of 130; 2017 Washington #58 of 130; 2017 Stanford #79 of 130; 2017 California #89 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #113 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 48 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Arizona #5 of 130; 2017 Washington #17 of 130; 2017 Oregon #18 of 130; 2017 USC #35 of 130; 2017 UCLA #37 of 130; 2017 Stanford #38 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #42 of 130; 2017 Washington State #50 of 130; 2017 Utah #52 of 130; 2017 California #73 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #114 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 81 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #76
Total defense. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Washington #8 of 130; 2017 Washington State #16 of 130; 2017 Utah #25 of 130; 2017 Oregon #46 of 130; 2017 USC #68 of 130; 2017 Stanford #76 of 130; 2017 California #96 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #109 of 130; 2017 Arizona #119 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #121 of 130; 2017 UCLA #123 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 110 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 76.
Scoring defensemedian #74
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Washington #5 of 130; 2017 Stanford #34 of 130; 2017 Utah #39 of 130; 2017 Washington State #58 of 130; 2017 USC #60 of 130; 2017 California #79 of 130; 2017 Oregon #81 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #104 of 130; 2017 Arizona #109 of 130; 2017 UCLA #117 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 74 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 74.
Point marginmedian #46
Point margin. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Washington #5 of 130; 2017 Stanford #26 of 130; 2017 Oregon #37 of 130; 2017 Arizona #40 of 130; 2017 USC #45 of 130; 2017 Utah #46 of 130; 2017 Washington State #56 of 130; 2017 California #77 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #80 of 130; 2017 UCLA #91 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 85 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 46.
Turnover marginmedian #62
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Stanford #4 of 130; 2017 Washington #5 of 130; 2017 California #38 of 130; 2017 Arizona #46 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #56 of 130; 2017 Utah #62 of 130; 2017 Oregon #64 of 130; 2017 USC #79 of 130; 2017 Washington State #85 of 130; 2017 UCLA #115 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #124 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 64 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 62.
Possessionmedian #80
Possession. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Utah #15 of 130; 2017 Washington State #18 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #31 of 130; 2017 USC #43 of 130; 2017 Stanford #61 of 130; 2017 California #80 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #84 of 130; 2017 Arizona #95 of 130; 2017 Washington #97 of 130; 2017 Oregon #102 of 130; 2017 UCLA #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 89 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 80.
Returning passingmedian #65
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Stanford #1 of 130; 2017 Utah #1 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #16 of 130; 2017 Washington State #16 of 130; 2017 Washington #30 of 130; 2017 Arizona #65 of 130; 2017 USC #68 of 130; 2017 Oregon #76 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #80 of 130; 2017 UCLA #84 of 130; 2017 California #121 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 94 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 65.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 UCLA #38 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #48 of 130; 2017 California #52 of 130; 2017 Washington State #53 of 130; 2017 Washington #55 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #60 of 130; 2017 Stanford #66 of 130; 2017 Arizona #78 of 130; 2017 Utah #80 of 130; 2017 USC #82 of 130; 2017 Oregon #91 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 2 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #36
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Arizona State #7 of 130; 2017 Washington State #9 of 130; 2017 Washington #11 of 130; 2017 UCLA #18 of 130; 2017 Oregon #28 of 130; 2017 Arizona #36 of 130; 2017 USC #54 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #55 of 130; 2017 California #74 of 130; 2017 Utah #81 of 130; 2017 Stanford #90 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 52 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 36.
Team talentmedian #24
Team talent. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 USC #3 of 130; 2017 UCLA #11 of 130; 2017 Stanford #14 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #21 of 130; 2017 Oregon #22 of 130; 2017 Washington #24 of 130; 2017 Utah #39 of 130; 2017 Arizona #46 of 130; 2017 California #48 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #58 of 130; 2017 Washington State #60 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 55 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 24.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Arizona #7 of 130; 2017 Washington #15 of 130; 2017 Stanford #20 of 130; 2017 UCLA #25 of 130; 2017 USC #27 of 130; 2017 Oregon #45 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #46 of 130; 2017 Utah #54 of 130; 2017 Washington State #70 of 130; 2017 California #81 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #83 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 75 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #80
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Washington #14 of 130; 2017 Oregon #23 of 130; 2017 Washington State #24 of 130; 2017 Utah #41 of 130; 2017 USC #58 of 130; 2017 California #80 of 130; 2017 Stanford #83 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #98 of 130; 2017 Arizona #101 of 130; 2017 UCLA #108 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 91 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 80.
Offensive success ratemedian #32
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Washington #6 of 130; 2017 Utah #15 of 130; 2017 Arizona #17 of 130; 2017 UCLA #25 of 130; 2017 USC #26 of 130; 2017 Washington State #32 of 130; 2017 Oregon #36 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #55 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #58 of 130; 2017 California #64 of 130; 2017 Stanford #84 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 47 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 32.
Defensive success ratemedian #92
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oregon #19 of 130; 2017 Washington State #33 of 130; 2017 Washington #34 of 130; 2017 Utah #44 of 130; 2017 USC #50 of 130; 2017 Stanford #92 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #96 of 130; 2017 Arizona #99 of 130; 2017 UCLA #109 of 130; 2017 California #112 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 101 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 92.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #70
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Stanford #5 of 130; 2017 Arizona #16 of 130; 2017 USC #36 of 130; 2017 UCLA #44 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #62 of 130; 2017 California #70 of 130; 2017 Oregon #84 of 130; 2017 Washington #93 of 130; 2017 Washington State #108 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #110 of 130; 2017 Utah #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 82 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 70.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #44
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Washington #11 of 130; 2017 California #12 of 130; 2017 Utah #33 of 130; 2017 Stanford #36 of 130; 2017 UCLA #38 of 130; 2017 Washington State #44 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #77 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #85 of 130; 2017 Oregon #87 of 130; 2017 Arizona #92 of 130; 2017 USC #105 of 130. Marked: 2017 Colorado, ranked 60 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 44.