Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2001

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2001East Carolina660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#13 (of 117 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 421 points) (— allowed · —)#84 (of 117 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#49 (of 117 teams · +5.1 /g · +61 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Conference USA teams in 20010 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#54 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range #13–#112. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#47 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range #6–#115. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range #11–#115. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2001Army380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#94 (of 117 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 229 points) (— allowed · —)#97 (of 117 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#98 (of 117 teams · -12.4 /g · -136 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Cincinnati750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#46 (of 117 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 336 points) (— allowed · —)#47 (of 117 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#51 (of 117 teams · +3.8 /g · +46 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Houston0110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#112 (of 117 teams · 17.3 pts/g · 190 points) (— allowed · —)#114 (of 117 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 432 points)#115 (of 117 teams · -22.0 /g · -242 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Louisville1120 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#32 (of 117 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 394 points) (— allowed · —)#8 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 223 points)#11 (of 117 teams · +13.2 /g · +171 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Memphis560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#54 (of 117 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 294 points) (— allowed · —)#59 (of 117 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#60 (of 117 teams · +1.2 /g · +13 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Southern Miss650 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#69 (of 117 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 278 points) (— allowed · —)#6 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#32 (of 117 teams · +8.4 /g · +92 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001TCU660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#78 (of 117 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 289 points) (— allowed · —)#46 (of 117 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#66 (of 117 teams · +0.3 /g · +4 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Tulane390 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#40 (of 117 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points) (— allowed · —)#115 (of 117 teams · 41.3 pts/g allowed · 495 points)#99 (of 117 teams · -12.6 /g · -151 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001UAB650 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Conference USA teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#77 (of 117 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 265 points) (— allowed · —)#15 (of 117 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 206 points)#45 (of 117 teams · +5.4 /g · +59 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20012001 East CarolinaConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #54
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Louisville #32 of 117; 2001 Tulane #40 of 117; 2001 Cincinnati #46 of 117; 2001 Memphis #54 of 117; 2001 Southern Miss #69 of 117; 2001 UAB #77 of 117; 2001 TCU #78 of 117; 2001 Army #94 of 117; 2001 Houston #112 of 117. Marked: 2001 East Carolina, ranked 13 of 117. Conference USA median rank 54.
Total defense
Total defense. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #47
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Southern Miss #6 of 117; 2001 Louisville #8 of 117; 2001 UAB #15 of 117; 2001 TCU #46 of 117; 2001 Cincinnati #47 of 117; 2001 Memphis #59 of 117; 2001 Army #97 of 117; 2001 Houston #114 of 117; 2001 Tulane #115 of 117. Marked: 2001 East Carolina, ranked 84 of 117. Conference USA median rank 47.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Louisville #11 of 117; 2001 Southern Miss #32 of 117; 2001 UAB #45 of 117; 2001 Cincinnati #51 of 117; 2001 Memphis #60 of 117; 2001 TCU #66 of 117; 2001 Army #98 of 117; 2001 Tulane #99 of 117; 2001 Houston #115 of 117. Marked: 2001 East Carolina, ranked 49 of 117. Conference USA median rank 51.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.