Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2007

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2007East Carolina850 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 119 teams · 385.5 yds/g · 5,011 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#98 (of 119 teams · 431.1 yds/g allowed · 5,605 yards)#83 (of 119 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 395 points)#61 (of 119 teams · +0.6 /g · +8 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20 on the season · 34 taken, 14 given · +1.54 /g)#83 (of 119 teams · 17:39 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 119 teams · -0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#86 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 119 teams · 0.854 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.971 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Conference USA teams in 20070 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#38 (Total offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #1–#102. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #6–#105. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#102 (Total defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #49–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#96 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #41–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Point margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #26–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #3–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Possession: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #15–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#49 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #7–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #27–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #17–#104. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#84 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #41–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#19 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #1–#116. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range #1–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2007Houston850 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 501.9 yds/g · 6,525 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 34.5 pts/g · 449 points)#49 (of 119 teams · 365.6 yds/g allowed · 4,753 yards)#74 (of 119 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 379 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +5.4 /g · +70 on the season)#93 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 25 taken, 31 given · -0.46 /g)#15 (of 119 teams · 19:36 /g · 4h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 119 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 119 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#60 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 0.994 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Marshall390 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 119 teams · 412.8 yds/g · 4,954 yards)#77 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#107 (of 119 teams · 450.8 yds/g allowed · 5,410 yards)#102 (of 119 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#99 (of 119 teams · -9.4 /g · -113 on the season)#104 (of 119 teams · -10 on the season · 7 taken, 17 given · -0.83 /g)#39 (of 119 teams · 18:49 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#103 (of 119 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.976 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.865 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Memphis760 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 443.6 yds/g · 5,767 yards)#51 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#102 (of 119 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 5,739 yards)#96 (of 119 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 419 points)#76 (of 119 teams · -3.0 /g · -39 on the season)#19 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 26 taken, 16 given · +0.77 /g)#40 (of 119 teams · 18:49 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 119 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#117 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Rice390 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 119 teams · 385.8 yds/g · 4,630 yards)#40 (of 119 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 377 points)#115 (of 119 teams · 487.4 yds/g allowed · 5,849 yards)#118 (of 119 teams · 42.9 pts/g allowed · 515 points)#105 (of 119 teams · -11.5 /g · -138 on the season)#52 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#116 (of 119 teams · 16:22 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 119 teams · -0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 119 teams · 0.195 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#111 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 119 teams · 0.850 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 119 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007SMU1110 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 119 teams · 423.4 yds/g · 5,081 yards)#54 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 340 points)#118 (of 119 teams · 498.7 yds/g allowed · 5,984 yards)#117 (of 119 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 477 points)#104 (of 119 teams · -11.4 /g · -137 on the season)#110 (of 119 teams · -13 on the season · 22 taken, 35 given · -1.08 /g)#77 (of 119 teams · 17:53 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 119 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#84 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 119 teams · 0.830 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 119 teams · 0.978 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Southern Miss760 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 389.7 yds/g · 5,066 yards)#61 (of 119 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 361 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 366.4 yds/g allowed · 4,763 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#51 (of 119 teams · +3.6 /g · +47 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 30 taken, 31 given · -0.08 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 18:10 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#75 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.895 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.926 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Tulane480 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 395.9 yds/g · 4,751 yards)#80 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#91 (of 119 teams · 420.3 yds/g allowed · 5,043 yards)#90 (of 119 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#90 (of 119 teams · -6.8 /g · -82 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.25 /g)#61 (of 119 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 119 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#80 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.024 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 119 teams · 0.967 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Tulsa1040 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 543.9 yds/g · 7,615 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 41.1 pts/g · 576 points)#108 (of 119 teams · 451.9 yds/g allowed · 6,326 yards)#100 (of 119 teams · 33.4 pts/g allowed · 467 points)#29 (of 119 teams · +7.8 /g · +109 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.36 /g)#97 (of 119 teams · 17:24 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#41 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.075 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.967 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007UAB2100 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#102 (of 119 teams · 325.6 yds/g · 3,907 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 235 points)#116 (of 119 teams · 487.6 yds/g allowed · 5,851 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 35.1 pts/g allowed · 421 points)#115 (of 119 teams · -15.5 /g · -186 on the season)#89 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.42 /g)#110 (of 119 teams · 16:44 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 119 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#113 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 119 teams · 1.010 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007UCF1040 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 119 teams · 411.6 yds/g · 5,763 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 502 points)#52 (of 119 teams · 366.4 yds/g allowed · 5,130 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 372 points)#26 (of 119 teams · +9.3 /g · +130 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 28 taken, 27 given · +0.07 /g)#41 (of 119 teams · 18:48 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#52 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.804 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007UTEP480 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2007. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 119 teams · 386.9 yds/g · 4,643 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 403 points)#109 (of 119 teams · 458.0 yds/g allowed · 5,496 yards)#113 (of 119 teams · 37.1 pts/g allowed · 445 points)#80 (of 119 teams · -3.5 /g · -42 on the season)#23 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.67 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 15:44 /g · 3h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#109 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.996 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.767 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20072007 East CarolinaConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #38
Total offense. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Tulsa #1 of 119; 2007 Houston #2 of 119; 2007 Memphis #18 of 119; 2007 SMU #29 of 119; 2007 Marshall #37 of 119; 2007 UCF #38 of 119; 2007 Tulane #51 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #54 of 119; 2007 UTEP #56 of 119; 2007 Rice #58 of 119; 2007 UAB #102 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 60 of 119. Conference USA median rank 38.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Tulsa #6 of 119; 2007 UCF #17 of 119; 2007 Houston #23 of 119; 2007 UTEP #26 of 119; 2007 Rice #40 of 119; 2007 Memphis #51 of 119; 2007 SMU #54 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #61 of 119; 2007 Marshall #77 of 119; 2007 Tulane #80 of 119; 2007 UAB #105 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 43 of 119. Conference USA median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #102
Total defense. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Houston #49 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #51 of 119; 2007 UCF #52 of 119; 2007 Tulane #91 of 119; 2007 Memphis #102 of 119; 2007 Marshall #107 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #108 of 119; 2007 UTEP #109 of 119; 2007 Rice #115 of 119; 2007 UAB #116 of 119; 2007 SMU #118 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 98 of 119. Conference USA median rank 102.
Scoring defensemedian #96
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Southern Miss #41 of 119; 2007 UCF #56 of 119; 2007 Houston #74 of 119; 2007 Tulane #90 of 119; 2007 Memphis #96 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #100 of 119; 2007 Marshall #102 of 119; 2007 UAB #105 of 119; 2007 UTEP #113 of 119; 2007 SMU #117 of 119; 2007 Rice #118 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 83 of 119. Conference USA median rank 96.
Point marginmedian #76
Point margin. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 UCF #26 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #29 of 119; 2007 Houston #42 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #51 of 119; 2007 Memphis #76 of 119; 2007 UTEP #80 of 119; 2007 Tulane #90 of 119; 2007 Marshall #99 of 119; 2007 SMU #104 of 119; 2007 Rice #105 of 119; 2007 UAB #115 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 61 of 119. Conference USA median rank 76.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Memphis #19 of 119; 2007 UTEP #23 of 119; 2007 UCF #51 of 119; 2007 Rice #52 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #61 of 119; 2007 Tulane #78 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #87 of 119; 2007 UAB #89 of 119; 2007 Houston #93 of 119; 2007 Marshall #104 of 119; 2007 SMU #110 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 3 of 119. Conference USA median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #72
Possession. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Houston #15 of 119; 2007 Marshall #39 of 119; 2007 Memphis #40 of 119; 2007 UCF #41 of 119; 2007 Tulane #61 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #72 of 119; 2007 SMU #77 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #97 of 119; 2007 UAB #110 of 119; 2007 Rice #116 of 119; 2007 UTEP #119 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 83 of 119. Conference USA median rank 72.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #49
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Tulsa #7 of 119; 2007 Houston #22 of 119; 2007 UTEP #23 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #29 of 119; 2007 UCF #43 of 119; 2007 Memphis #49 of 119; 2007 SMU #55 of 119; 2007 Marshall #57 of 119; 2007 UAB #79 of 119; 2007 Tulane #80 of 119; 2007 Rice #110 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 85 of 119. Conference USA median rank 49.
Defensive EPAmedian #93
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 UCF #27 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #41 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #52 of 119; 2007 UTEP #80 of 119; 2007 Marshall #92 of 119; 2007 Tulane #96 of 119; 2007 Houston #102 of 119; 2007 Memphis #103 of 119; 2007 SMU #106 of 119; 2007 UAB #118 of 119; 2007 Rice #119 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 93 of 119. Conference USA median rank 93.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 SMU #17 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #18 of 119; 2007 UCF #25 of 119; 2007 UTEP #41 of 119; 2007 Rice #43 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #44 of 119; 2007 Houston #45 of 119; 2007 Memphis #62 of 119; 2007 Marshall #66 of 119; 2007 Tulane #102 of 119; 2007 UAB #104 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 77 of 119. Conference USA median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #84
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Tulsa #41 of 119; 2007 UCF #52 of 119; 2007 Houston #60 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #75 of 119; 2007 Tulane #80 of 119; 2007 SMU #84 of 119; 2007 Marshall #103 of 119; 2007 UTEP #109 of 119; 2007 Rice #111 of 119; 2007 UAB #113 of 119; 2007 Memphis #117 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 86 of 119. Conference USA median rank 84.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #19
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Houston #1 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #2 of 119; 2007 Tulane #8 of 119; 2007 UAB #13 of 119; 2007 UTEP #16 of 119; 2007 Marshall #19 of 119; 2007 Memphis #26 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #77 of 119; 2007 Rice #102 of 119; 2007 SMU #109 of 119; 2007 UCF #116 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 98 of 119. Conference USA median rank 19.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #76
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2007, best rank first: 2007 UTEP #1 of 119; 2007 Memphis #23 of 119; 2007 Marshall #28 of 119; 2007 UCF #47 of 119; 2007 Southern Miss #58 of 119; 2007 UAB #76 of 119; 2007 Tulane #85 of 119; 2007 Tulsa #86 of 119; 2007 SMU #98 of 119; 2007 Houston #100 of 119; 2007 Rice #118 of 119. Marked: 2007 East Carolina, ranked 91 of 119. Conference USA median rank 76.