Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
Current

American Athletic

American Athletic, 2014

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014East Carolina850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 533.0 yds/g · 6,929 yards)#23 (of 128 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 466 points)#38 (of 128 teams · 367.3 yds/g allowed · 4,775 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#26 (of 128 teams · +10.0 /g · +130 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.31 /g)#82 (of 128 teams · 29:39 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#63 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#21 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 128 teams · 1.183 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 128 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 American Athletic teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#102 (Total offense: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #5–#126. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#94 (Scoring offense: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #22–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#50 (Total defense: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #5–#122. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#66 (Scoring defense: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #4–#127. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#50 (Point margin: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #9–#128. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#60 (Turnover margin: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #10–#123. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#69 (Possession: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #18–#116. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning passing: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #1–#112. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning receiving: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #6–#111. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning rushing: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #9–#124. 1 of 11 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#93 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #15–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #5–#124. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#82 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #15–#127. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #10–#124. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#66 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #19–#111. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range #2–#128. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)
2014Cincinnati940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 128 teams · 460.1 yds/g · 5,982 yards)#31 (of 128 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 442 points)#98 (of 128 teams · 439.1 yds/g allowed · 5,708 yards)#69 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#41 (of 128 teams · +6.8 /g · +88 on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#106 (of 128 teams · 28:34 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#99 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 128 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 128 teams · 0.177 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#106 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 128 teams · 1.251 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 128 teams · 1.182 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Houston850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 128 teams · 414.1 yds/g · 5,383 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 387 points)#20 (of 128 teams · 343.4 yds/g allowed · 4,464 yards)#15 (of 128 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#30 (of 128 teams · +9.2 /g · +119 on the season)#22 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 30 taken, 22 given · +0.62 /g)#41 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#43 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 128 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#49 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 128 teams · 1.221 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 128 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Memphis1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 128 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 5,552 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 36.2 pts/g · 471 points)#28 (of 128 teams · 349.5 yds/g allowed · 4,544 yards)#11 (of 128 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 253 points)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +16.8 /g · +218 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 31 taken, 20 given · +0.85 /g)#69 (of 128 teams · 29:57 /g · 6h 29m on the season)#30 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 128 teams · 1.136 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 128 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014SMU1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#126 (of 128 teams · 269.0 yds/g · 3,228 yards)#128 (of 128 teams · 11.1 pts/g · 133 points)#122 (of 128 teams · 499.4 yds/g allowed · 5,993 yards)#127 (of 128 teams · 41.3 pts/g allowed · 496 points)#128 (of 128 teams · -30.3 /g · -363 on the season)#123 (of 128 teams · -14 on the season · 16 taken, 30 given · -1.17 /g)#38 (of 128 teams · 31:26 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#91 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#88 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#125 (of 128 teams · -0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 128 teams · 0.284 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#127 (of 128 teams · 34% of plays successful)#124 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 128 teams · 1.119 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014South Florida480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#121 (of 128 teams · 304.7 yds/g · 3,656 yards)#119 (of 128 teams · 17.2 pts/g · 206 points)#71 (of 128 teams · 403.1 yds/g allowed · 4,837 yards)#66 (of 128 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 324 points)#107 (of 128 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#111 (of 128 teams · 28:08 /g · 5h 38m on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 128 teams · 0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 128 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#126 (of 128 teams · 34% of plays successful)#104 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 128 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Temple660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#120 (of 128 teams · 308.4 yds/g · 3,701 yards)#100 (of 128 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 277 points)#24 (of 128 teams · 347.1 yds/g allowed · 4,165 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 210 points)#50 (of 128 teams · +5.6 /g · +67 on the season)#46 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 30 taken, 27 given · +0.25 /g)#116 (of 128 teams · 27:46 /g · 5h 33m on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 (of 128 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#25 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 128 teams · 1.089 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 128 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Tulane390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#110 (of 128 teams · 346.8 yds/g · 4,161 yards)#124 (of 128 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 192 points)#56 (of 128 teams · 387.8 yds/g allowed · 4,654 yards)#81 (of 128 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 341 points)#115 (of 128 teams · -12.4 /g · -149 on the season)#46 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 28 taken, 25 given · +0.25 /g)#35 (of 128 teams · 31:31 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#16 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 128 teams · -0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 128 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#95 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 128 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Tulsa2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 128 teams · 412.5 yds/g · 4,950 yards)#94 (of 128 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#118 (of 128 teams · 486.8 yds/g allowed · 5,841 yards)#122 (of 128 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 471 points)#119 (of 128 teams · -14.6 /g · -175 on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · -8 on the season · 15 taken, 23 given · -0.67 /g)#30 (of 128 teams · 31:43 /g · 6h 21m on the season)#72 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's passing production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's receiving production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 128 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 128 teams · 0.270 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#80 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 128 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#128 (of 128 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014UCF940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 128 teams · 363.6 yds/g · 4,727 yards)#72 (of 128 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 365 points)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 298.5 yds/g allowed · 3,881 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 249 points)#32 (of 128 teams · +8.9 /g · +116 on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 28 taken, 29 given · -0.08 /g)#18 (of 128 teams · 32:35 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#112 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#108 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 128 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#29 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 128 teams · 1.100 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 128 teams · 1.084 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014UConn2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 American Athletic teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#125 (of 128 teams · 276.3 yds/g · 3,315 yards)#125 (of 128 teams · 15.5 pts/g · 186 points)#50 (of 128 teams · 378.6 yds/g allowed · 4,543 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#117 (of 128 teams · -14.3 /g · -172 on the season)#119 (of 128 teams · -13 on the season · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.08 /g)#95 (of 128 teams · 29:05 /g · 5h 49m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#126 (of 128 teams · -0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 128 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#124 (of 128 teams · 35% of plays successful)#68 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.211 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20142014 East CarolinaAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #102
Total offense. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Cincinnati #29 of 128; 2014 Memphis #49 of 128; 2014 Houston #58 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #59 of 128; 2014 UCF #102 of 128; 2014 Tulane #110 of 128; 2014 Temple #120 of 128; 2014 South Florida #121 of 128; 2014 UConn #125 of 128; 2014 SMU #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 5 of 128. American Athletic median rank 102.
Scoring offensemedian #94
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Memphis #22 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #31 of 128; 2014 Houston #60 of 128; 2014 UCF #72 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #94 of 128; 2014 Temple #100 of 128; 2014 South Florida #119 of 128; 2014 Tulane #124 of 128; 2014 UConn #125 of 128; 2014 SMU #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 23 of 128. American Athletic median rank 94.
Total defensemedian #50
Total defense. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 UCF #5 of 128; 2014 Houston #20 of 128; 2014 Temple #24 of 128; 2014 Memphis #28 of 128; 2014 UConn #50 of 128; 2014 Tulane #56 of 128; 2014 South Florida #71 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #98 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #118 of 128; 2014 SMU #122 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 38 of 128. American Athletic median rank 50.
Scoring defensemedian #66
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Temple #4 of 128; 2014 UCF #9 of 128; 2014 Memphis #11 of 128; 2014 Houston #15 of 128; 2014 South Florida #66 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #69 of 128; 2014 Tulane #81 of 128; 2014 UConn #86 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #122 of 128; 2014 SMU #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 54 of 128. American Athletic median rank 66.
Point marginmedian #50
Point margin. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Memphis #9 of 128; 2014 Houston #30 of 128; 2014 UCF #32 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #41 of 128; 2014 Temple #50 of 128; 2014 South Florida #107 of 128; 2014 Tulane #115 of 128; 2014 UConn #117 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #119 of 128; 2014 SMU #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 26 of 128. American Athletic median rank 50.
Turnover marginmedian #60
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Memphis #10 of 128; 2014 Houston #22 of 128; 2014 Temple #46 of 128; 2014 Tulane #46 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #54 of 128; 2014 South Florida #60 of 128; 2014 UCF #67 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #114 of 128; 2014 UConn #119 of 128; 2014 SMU #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 92 of 128. American Athletic median rank 60.
Possessionmedian #69
Possession. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 UCF #18 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #30 of 128; 2014 Tulane #35 of 128; 2014 SMU #38 of 128; 2014 Houston #41 of 128; 2014 Memphis #69 of 128; 2014 UConn #95 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #106 of 128; 2014 South Florida #111 of 128; 2014 Temple #116 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 82 of 128. American Athletic median rank 69.
Returning passingmedian #44
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 UConn #1 of 128; 2014 Tulane #16 of 128; 2014 Memphis #30 of 128; 2014 Houston #43 of 128; 2014 Temple #44 of 128; 2014 South Florida #61 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #72 of 128; 2014 SMU #91 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #99 of 128; 2014 UCF #112 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 1 of 128. American Athletic median rank 44.
Returning receivingmedian #54
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Memphis #6 of 128; 2014 UConn #22 of 128; 2014 Houston #28 of 128; 2014 UCF #34 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #53 of 128; 2014 South Florida #54 of 128; 2014 Temple #64 of 128; 2014 SMU #88 of 128; 2014 Tulane #95 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #111 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 63 of 128. American Athletic median rank 54.
Returning rushingmedian #80
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Temple #9 of 128; 2014 Houston #12 of 128; 2014 Memphis #32 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #55 of 128; 2014 SMU #67 of 128; 2014 Tulane #80 of 128; 2014 UConn #94 of 128; 2014 UCF #108 of 128; 2014 South Florida #121 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 89 of 128. American Athletic median rank 80.
Team talent
Team talent. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #93
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Cincinnati #15 of 128; 2014 Houston #46 of 128; 2014 Memphis #78 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #92 of 128; 2014 UCF #93 of 128; 2014 South Florida #118 of 128; 2014 Tulane #120 of 128; 2014 Temple #123 of 128; 2014 SMU #125 of 128; 2014 UConn #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 31 of 128. American Athletic median rank 93.
Defensive EPAmedian #55
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Temple #5 of 128; 2014 UCF #9 of 128; 2014 Memphis #13 of 128; 2014 Houston #23 of 128; 2014 Tulane #55 of 128; 2014 South Florida #60 of 128; 2014 UConn #66 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #95 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #118 of 128; 2014 SMU #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 47 of 128. American Athletic median rank 55.
Offensive success ratemedian #82
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Cincinnati #27 of 128; 2014 Houston #56 of 128; 2014 Memphis #67 of 128; 2014 UCF #73 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #82 of 128; 2014 Temple #115 of 128; 2014 Tulane #119 of 128; 2014 UConn #124 of 128; 2014 South Florida #126 of 128; 2014 SMU #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 15 of 128. American Athletic median rank 82.
Defensive success ratemedian #68
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Memphis #10 of 128; 2014 Temple #25 of 128; 2014 UCF #29 of 128; 2014 Houston #49 of 128; 2014 UConn #68 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #80 of 128; 2014 Tulane #95 of 128; 2014 South Florida #104 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #106 of 128; 2014 SMU #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 21 of 128. American Athletic median rank 68.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #66
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 South Florida #19 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #35 of 128; 2014 Houston #41 of 128; 2014 Tulane #42 of 128; 2014 UConn #52 of 128; 2014 SMU #77 of 128; 2014 Memphis #91 of 128; 2014 UCF #107 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #109 of 128; 2014 Temple #111 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 66 of 128. American Athletic median rank 66.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #28
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2014, best rank first: 2014 South Florida #2 of 128; 2014 Houston #12 of 128; 2014 Temple #13 of 128; 2014 UConn #15 of 128; 2014 UCF #17 of 128; 2014 SMU #28 of 128; 2014 Tulane #38 of 128; 2014 Cincinnati #56 of 128; 2014 Memphis #92 of 128; 2014 Tulsa #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 East Carolina, ranked 72 of 128. American Athletic median rank 28.