THIRD AND DATA

East Texas A&M game log

2022: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 1vs Lincoln (CA)52–7 W564327.735–13114–21–301175–132–339–8724:3938%15%
Sep 10at Tennessee Tech25–26 L—————————————
Sep 17at Sam Houston17–27 L572233.932–5413–25–169145–141–227–6528:0328%45%
Sep 24vs North American63–3 W614878.033–24221–28–245247–123–405–4030:4857%—
Oct 8at SE Louisiana31–28 W694857.031–11126–38–374234–131–124–3232:2444%38%
Oct 15at McNeese40–15 W714606.536–19224–35–268226–120–037–6534:3445%36%
Oct 22vs Houston Christian31–3 W783754.847–16617–31–209226–180–0016–10737:3635%27%
Oct 29vs Incarnate Word7–35 L672724.140–11016–27–162207–160–036–3532:5039%51%
Nov 5vs Northwestern State14–41 L662433.731–9617–35–147153–141–2113–14027:2530%38%
Nov 12at Nicholls10–12 L692463.629–6722–40–179145–160–016–4528:0934%34%
Nov 19vs Tennessee State14–22 L734005.548–23216–25–168184–151–337–6031:5240%29%
Season11 games5–66673,6235.4362–1401186–305–2,22218952–1439–151880–6765:08:2039%35%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: East Texas A&M on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is East Texas A&M's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:East Texas A&M offense 39% (236 of 604)Opponent offense / East Texas A&M defense 35% (200 of 569)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Lincoln (CA): opponent offense 15% of 65Lincoln (CA): East Texas A&M offense 38% of 55Sam Houston: opponent offense 45% of 74Sam Houston: East Texas A&M offense 28% of 57North American: East Texas A&M offense 57% of 61SE Louisiana: opponent offense 38% of 48SE Louisiana: East Texas A&M offense 44% of 52McNeese: opponent offense 36% of 58McNeese: East Texas A&M offense 45% of 56Houston Christian: opponent offense 27% of 64Houston Christian: East Texas A&M offense 35% of 77Incarnate Word: opponent offense 51% of 70Incarnate Word: East Texas A&M offense 39% of 67Northwestern State: opponent offense 38% of 81Northwestern State: East Texas A&M offense 30% of 66Nicholls: opponent offense 34% of 50Nicholls: East Texas A&M offense 34% of 41Tennessee State: opponent offense 29% of 59Tennessee State: East Texas A&M offense 40% of 72
Lincoln (CA)@ Tennessee Tech@ Sam HoustonNorth American@ SE Louisiana@ McNeeseHouston ChristianIncarnate WordNorthwestern State@ NichollsTennessee State
East Texas A&M offenseOpponent offense (East Texas A&M defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Lincoln (CA)

52–7 W · 55 plays to 65
East Texas A&M offense 38% (21/55)Lincoln (CA) offense 15% (10/65)

at Sam Houston

17–27 L · 57 plays to 74
East Texas A&M offense 28% (16/57)Sam Houston offense 45% (33/74)

vs North American

63–3 W · 61 plays to 0
East Texas A&M offense 57% (35/61)North American offense — (0/0)

at SE Louisiana

31–28 W · 52 plays to 48
East Texas A&M offense 44% (23/52)SE Louisiana offense 38% (18/48)

at McNeese

40–15 W · 56 plays to 58
East Texas A&M offense 45% (25/56)McNeese offense 36% (21/58)

vs Houston Christian

31–3 W · 77 plays to 64
East Texas A&M offense 35% (27/77)HCU offense 27% (17/64)

vs Incarnate Word

7–35 L · 67 plays to 70
East Texas A&M offense 39% (26/67)Incarnate Word offense 51% (36/70)

vs Northwestern State

14–41 L · 66 plays to 81
East Texas A&M offense 30% (20/66)Northwestern St. offense 38% (31/81)

at Nicholls

10–12 L · 41 plays to 50
East Texas A&M offense 34% (14/41)Nicholls offense 34% (17/50)

vs Tennessee State

14–22 L · 72 plays to 59
East Texas A&M offense 40% (29/72)Tennessee State offense 29% (17/59)