THIRD AND DATA

East Texas A&M game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 30at SMU13–42 L783514.535–10720–43–244176–203–3311–8038:5935%49%
Sep 6at Florida State3–77 L491974.036–1057–13–9293–120–127–5528:0129%61%
Sep 20at Grambling28–31 L733524.840–12323–33–229236–140–216–4736:2943%44%
Sep 27vs North Carolina Central42–50 L755106.824–5426–51–456225–121–525–5123:0340%47%
Oct 4at Northwestern State40–10 W735327.352–26115–21–271295–101–2112–11137:1553%26%
Oct 11vs Lamar23–33 L633295.232–11520–31–214195–151–1210–10529:0346%29%
Oct 18at Incarnate Word52–45 W815266.536–14129–45–385279–172–425–4029:3042%49%
Oct 25vs Stephen F. Austin21–31 L582604.520–1018–38–250151–111–315–5022:5233%43%
Nov 1at SE Louisiana14–59 L662914.432–3219–34–259155–141–314–3529:2928%54%
Nov 8vs McNeese20–35 L643836.028–14920–36–234192–100–146–6524:3440%44%
Nov 15vs Houston Christian37–32 W764115.444–17522–32–236269–150–027–6532:3550%44%
Nov 22at UT Rio Grande Valley14–33 L753144.235–12720–40–1872310–182–3310–11030:0743%61%
Season12 games3–98314,4565.4414–1399239–417–3,05724466–16812–282488–8146:01:5741%46%

Success rate

East Texas A&M on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game40.6% · 46.2%
35
49
29
61
43
44
40
47
53
26
46
29
42
49
33
43
28
54
40
44
50
44
43
61
@ SMU
@ Florida State
@ Grambling
North Carolina Central
@ Northwestern State
Lamar
@ Incarnate Word
Stephen F. Austin
@ SE Louisiana
McNeese
Houston Christian
@ UT Rio Grande Valley

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 32.3%, defense allows 55.2%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: East Texas A&M on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is East Texas A&M's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:East Texas A&M offense 41% (335 of 826)Opponent offense / East Texas A&M defense 46% (378 of 819)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%SMU: opponent offense 49% of 63SMU: East Texas A&M offense 35% of 78Florida State: opponent offense 61% of 71Florida State: East Texas A&M offense 29% of 49Grambling: opponent offense 44% of 54Grambling: East Texas A&M offense 43% of 74North Carolina Central: opponent offense 47% of 76North Carolina Central: East Texas A&M offense 40% of 73Northwestern State: opponent offense 26% of 53Northwestern State: East Texas A&M offense 53% of 72Lamar: opponent offense 29% of 65Lamar: East Texas A&M offense 46% of 63Incarnate Word: opponent offense 49% of 86Incarnate Word: East Texas A&M offense 42% of 83Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 43% of 88Stephen F. Austin: East Texas A&M offense 33% of 57SE Louisiana: opponent offense 54% of 61SE Louisiana: East Texas A&M offense 28% of 65McNeese: opponent offense 44% of 71McNeese: East Texas A&M offense 40% of 63Houston Christian: opponent offense 44% of 75Houston Christian: East Texas A&M offense 50% of 74UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 61% of 56UT Rio Grande Valley: East Texas A&M offense 43% of 75
@ SMU@ Florida State@ GramblingNorth Carolina Central@ Northwestern StateLamar@ Incarnate WordStephen F. Austin@ SE LouisianaMcNeeseHouston Christian@ UT Rio Grande Valley
East Texas A&M offenseOpponent offense (East Texas A&M defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at SMU

13–42 L · 78 plays to 63
East Texas A&M offense 35% (27/78)SMU offense 49% (31/63)

at Florida State

3–77 L · 49 plays to 71
East Texas A&M offense 29% (14/49)Florida State offense 61% (43/71)

at Grambling

28–31 L · 74 plays to 54
East Texas A&M offense 43% (32/74)Grambling offense 44% (24/54)

vs North Carolina Central

42–50 L · 73 plays to 76
East Texas A&M offense 40% (29/73)N.C. Central offense 47% (36/76)

at Northwestern State

40–10 W · 72 plays to 53
East Texas A&M offense 53% (38/72)Northwestern St. offense 26% (14/53)

vs Lamar

23–33 L · 63 plays to 65
East Texas A&M offense 46% (29/63)Lamar offense 29% (19/65)

at Incarnate Word

52–45 W · 83 plays to 86
East Texas A&M offense 42% (35/83)Incarnate Word offense 49% (42/86)

vs Stephen F. Austin

21–31 L · 57 plays to 88
East Texas A&M offense 33% (19/57)SFA offense 43% (38/88)

at SE Louisiana

14–59 L · 65 plays to 61
East Texas A&M offense 28% (18/65)SE Louisiana offense 54% (33/61)

vs McNeese

20–35 L · 63 plays to 71
East Texas A&M offense 40% (25/63)McNeese offense 44% (31/71)

vs Houston Christian

37–32 W · 74 plays to 75
East Texas A&M offense 50% (37/74)HCU offense 44% (33/75)

at UT Rio Grande Valley

14–33 L · 75 plays to 56
East Texas A&M offense 43% (32/75)UT Rio Grande offense 61% (34/56)