| 2010 | Florida Atlantic4–8 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #108 (of 120 teams · 302.3 yds/g · 3,627 yds) | #113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16.8 pts/g · 202 points) | #85 (of 120 teams · 401.3 yds/g allowed · 4,816 yds) | #79 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 351 points) | #106 (of 120 teams · -12.4 /g · -149 on the season) | #109 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 17 taken, 27 given · -0.83 /g) | #85 (of 120 teams · 17:53 /g · 3h 35m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #107 (of 120 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #66 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #106 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful) | #92 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #69 (of 120 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays) | #37 (of 120 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #69 (Total offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #17–#108. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #87 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #20–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #77 (Total defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #61–#105. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #84 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #65–#112. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #87 (Point margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #53–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #70 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #36–#120. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #53 (Possession: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #9–#120. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | #78 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #34–#107. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #66 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #21–#111. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #78 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #32–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #68 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #22–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #74 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #2–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | #37 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #11–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) |
| 2010 | UL Monroe5–7 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #85 (of 120 teams · 347.0 yds/g · 4,164 yds) | #101 (of 120 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 250 points) | #68 (of 120 teams · 380.3 yds/g allowed · 4,564 yds) | #97 (of 120 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 389 points) | #102 (of 120 teams · -11.6 /g · -139 on the season) | #90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 19 taken, 25 given · -0.50 /g) | #9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:13 /g · 4h 03m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #79 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #21 (of 120 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #89 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #68 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #74 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays) | #11 (of 120 teams · 0.834 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | Florida International7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #46 (of 120 teams · 395.1 yds/g · 5,136 yds) | #51 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 374 points) | #61 (of 120 teams · 368.9 yds/g allowed · 4,796 yds) | #65 (of 120 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points) | #62 (of 120 teams · +1.5 /g · +19 on the season) | #38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.31 /g) | #27 (of 120 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #71 (of 120 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #22 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #72 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #22 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #92 (of 120 teams · 0.874 average PPA on successful plays) | #73 (of 120 teams · 0.942 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | North Texas3–9 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #64 (of 120 teams · 375.3 yds/g · 4,503 yds) | #87 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 287 points) | #77 (of 120 teams · 394.4 yds/g allowed · 4,733 yds) | #82 (of 120 teams · 29.7 pts/g allowed · 356 points) | #87 (of 120 teams · -5.8 /g · -69 on the season) | #70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.25 /g) | #38 (of 120 teams · 19:10 /g · 3h 50m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #78 (of 120 teams · 0.020 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #70 (of 120 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #78 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #29 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #56 (of 120 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays) | #91 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | Arkansas State4–8 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #40 (of 120 teams · 403.4 yds/g · 4,841 yds) | #42 (of 120 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 360 points) | #105 (of 120 teams · 437.1 yds/g allowed · 5,245 yds) | #91 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points) | #69 (of 120 teams · -0.8 /g · -9 on the season) | #51 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g) | #119 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:18 /g · 3h 16m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #34 (of 120 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #76 (of 120 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #33 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #101 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #80 (of 120 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays) | #21 (of 120 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | Louisiana3–9 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #83 (of 120 teams · 350.6 yds/g · 4,207 yds) | #92 (of 120 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 268 points) | #82 (of 120 teams · 399.4 yds/g allowed · 4,793 yds) | #112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 444 points) | #110 (of 120 teams · -14.7 /g · -176 on the season) | #70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.25 /g) | #53 (of 120 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #96 (of 120 teams · -0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #67 (of 120 teams · 0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful) | #95 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays) | #22 (of 120 teams · 0.865 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | Middle Tennessee6–7 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #69 (of 120 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,835 yds) | #62 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 344 points) | #72 (of 120 teams · 386.6 yds/g allowed · 5,026 yds) | #69 (of 120 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points) | #76 (of 120 teams · -1.6 /g · -21 on the season) | #120 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -19 on the season · 19 taken, 38 given · -1.46 /g) | #120 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 15:33 /g · 3h 22m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #85 (of 120 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #41 (of 120 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #54 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #30 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #104 (of 120 teams · 0.847 average PPA on successful plays) | #53 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | Troy8–5 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #17 (of 120 teams · 453.5 yds/g · 5,895 yds) | #20 (of 120 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 443 points) | #89 (of 120 teams · 409.9 yds/g allowed · 5,328 yds) | #84 (of 120 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 393 points) | #53 (of 120 teams · +3.9 /g · +50 on the season) | #55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 30 taken, 30 given · +0.00 /g) | #90 (of 120 teams · 17:43 /g · 3h 50m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #61 (of 120 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #64 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #32 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #25 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.812 average PPA on successful plays) | #119 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.082 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2010 | Western Kentucky2–10 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #98 (of 120 teams · 319.0 yds/g · 3,828 yds) | #90 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 274 points) | #67 (of 120 teams · 380.2 yds/g allowed · 4,562 yds) | #99 (of 120 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 398 points) | #100 (of 120 teams · -10.3 /g · -124 on the season) | #36 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.33 /g) | #16 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 3h 59m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #75 (of 120 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #101 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #60 (of 120 teams · 0.924 average PPA on successful plays) | #33 (of 120 teams · 0.877 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |