THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Florida AtlanticOwls

Season
‹
›Current

Conference USA

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Florida Atlantic played 1 such game.

Conference USA, 2019

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Florida Atlantic11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (228.0 yds/g · 228 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (469.0 yds/g allowed · 469 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45.0 pts/g allowed · 45 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-24.0 /g · -24 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:57 /g · 0h 28m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#58 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 524.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.301 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.155 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 14 Conference USA teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#67 (Total offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #67–#68. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#66 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #66–#68. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Total defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #62–#70. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #60–#71. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#67 (Point margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #67–#70. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #34–#34. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Possession: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #20–#69. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning passing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #1–#110. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#73 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #3–#129. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #13–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#88 (Team talent: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #73–#115. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #53–#63. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#69 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #69–#71. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #53–#63. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#70 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #70–#72. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #35–#53. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #20–#56. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2019Louisiana Tech10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (413.0 yds/g · 413 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (454.0 yds/g allowed · 454 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45.0 pts/g allowed · 45 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-31.0 /g · -31 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32:16 /g · 0h 32m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 501.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.340 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.176 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Southern Miss7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (285.0 yds/g · 570 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (11.0 pts/g · 22 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (450.0 yds/g allowed · 900 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43.5 pts/g allowed · 87 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-32.5 /g · -65 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-4 in these games · 1 taken, 5 given · -2.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:35 /g · 0h 59m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#22 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 130 teams · 456.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.422 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.373 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Charlotte7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (216.0 yds/g · 216 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 10 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (466.0 yds/g allowed · 466 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52.0 pts/g allowed · 52 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-42.0 /g · -42 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:27 /g · 0h 34m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#45 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 386.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.422 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.134 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Florida International6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (297.0 yds/g · 297 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30.0 pts/g · 30 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (413.0 yds/g allowed · 413 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+6.0 /g · +6 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 3 taken, 0 given · +3.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:13 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#54 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 532.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.337 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.194 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Marshall8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 130 teams · 489.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of plays successful · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— average PPA on successful plays · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019North Texas4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (329.0 yds/g · 329 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g · 17 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (278.0 yds/g allowed · 278 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.0 pts/g allowed · 23 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-6.0 /g · -6 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 0 taken, 2 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:59 /g · 0h 27m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#39 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 457.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.282 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.573 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019UTSA4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (248.5 yds/g · 497 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 28 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (525.5 yds/g allowed · 1,051 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (54.0 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-40.0 /g · -80 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 1 taken, 2 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:54 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#71 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 471.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.435 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.169 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.478 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Western Kentucky9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (383.0 yds/g · 766 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33.0 pts/g · 66 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (377.5 yds/g allowed · 755 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.5 pts/g allowed · 57 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+4.5 /g · +9 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32:53 /g · 1h 06m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#67 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 487.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Old Dominion1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (297.0 yds/g · 594 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g · 34 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (323.5 yds/g allowed · 647 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29.5 pts/g allowed · 59 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-12.5 /g · -25 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:18 /g · 1h 09m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#95 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 374.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.350 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019UAB9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (237.0 yds/g · 237 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 7 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (302.0 yds/g allowed · 302 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30.0 pts/g allowed · 30 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-23.0 /g · -23 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -3.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:05 /g · 0h 26m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#84 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 441.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.395 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019UTEP1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (131.0 yds/g · 131 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 3 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (424.0 yds/g allowed · 424 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.0 pts/g allowed · 38 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-35.0 /g · -35 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:09 /g · 0h 33m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#64 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 355.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.243 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.785 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Rice3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 276.3 yds/g · 829 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 47 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 483.0 yds/g allowed · 1,449 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 36.7 pts/g allowed · 110 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -21.0 /g · -63 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 31:34 /g · 1h 35m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 130 teams · 397.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 73 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.391 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 35% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 1.277 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Middle Tennessee4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 285.3 yds/g · 856 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 14.0 pts/g · 42 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 520.0 yds/g allowed · 1,560 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 129 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -29.0 /g · -87 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 25:33 /g · 1h 17m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 450.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 73 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.372 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 1.241 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20192019 Florida AtlanticConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #67
Total offense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Middle Tennessee #67 of 73; 2019 Rice #68 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 67.
Scoring offensemedian #66
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #66 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #68 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 66.
Total defensemedian #62
Total defense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #62 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #70 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 62.
Scoring defensemedian #60
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #60 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 60.
Point marginmedian #67
Point margin. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #67 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #70 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 67.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Middle Tennessee #34 of 73; 2019 Rice #34 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #20
Possession. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #20 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #69 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 20.
Returning passingmedian #58
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana Tech #1 of 130; 2019 Marshall #12 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #22 of 130; 2019 North Texas #39 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #45 of 130; 2019 Florida International #54 of 130; 2019 UTEP #64 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #67 of 130; 2019 UTSA #71 of 130; 2019 UAB #84 of 130; 2019 Rice #86 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #95 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #110 of 130. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, ranked 58 of 130. Conference USA median rank 58.
Returning receivingmedian #73
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Southern Miss #3 of 130; 2019 Florida International #12 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #15 of 130; 2019 North Texas #33 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #57 of 130; 2019 UTSA #73 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #78 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #87 of 130; 2019 Rice #90 of 130; 2019 Marshall #98 of 130; 2019 UAB #125 of 130; 2019 UTEP #128 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, ranked 61 of 130. Conference USA median rank 73.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 UTEP #13 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #15 of 130; 2019 North Texas #17 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #31 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #37 of 130; 2019 UAB #38 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #40 of 130; 2019 Florida International #49 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #71 of 130; 2019 UTSA #72 of 130; 2019 Marshall #74 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #83 of 130; 2019 Rice #114 of 130. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, ranked 127 of 130. Conference USA median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #88
Team talent. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida International #73 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #78 of 130; 2019 Marshall #79 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #82 of 130; 2019 UTSA #84 of 130; 2019 North Texas #88 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #89 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #92 of 130; 2019 UAB #94 of 130; 2019 Rice #107 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #109 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #111 of 130; 2019 UTEP #115 of 130. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, ranked 75 of 130. Conference USA median rank 88.
Offensive EPAmedian #53
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Middle Tennessee #53 of 73; 2019 Rice #63 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 53.
Defensive EPAmedian #69
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Middle Tennessee #69 of 73; 2019 Rice #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 69.
Offensive success ratemedian #53
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Middle Tennessee #53 of 73; 2019 Rice #63 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 53.
Defensive success ratemedian #70
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #70 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 70.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #35
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Rice #35 of 73; 2019 Middle Tennessee #53 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 35.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #20
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Middle Tennessee #20 of 73; 2019 Rice #56 of 73. Marked: 2019 Florida Atlantic, which has no value for this metric. Conference USA median rank 20.