Florida International game log

2010: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 11vs Rutgers14–19 L———————————32%26%
Sep 18at #19 Texas A&M20–27 L———————————27%39%
Sep 25at #23 Maryland28–42 L———————————47%31%
Oct 2at Pittsburgh17–44 L———————————38%48%
Oct 9vs Western Kentucky28–21 W———————————62%33%
Oct 16at North Texas34–10 W—————————————
Oct 30at Florida Atlantic9–21 L—————————————
Nov 6vs UL Monroe42–35 W———————————51%44%
Nov 13at Troy52–35 W———————————44%43%
Nov 20at Louisiana38–17 W———————————46%37%
Nov 27vs Arkansas State31–24 W—————————————
Dec 4vs Middle Tennessee27–28 L———————————42%35%
Dec 26vs Toledo34–32 W———————————36%51%
Season13 games7–6—————–—–———————42%39%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: FIU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is FIU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:FIU offense 42% (288 of 682)Opponent offense / FIU defense 39% (258 of 658)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Rutgers: opponent offense 26% of 53Rutgers: FIU offense 32% of 65#19 Texas A&M: opponent offense 39% of 72#19 Texas A&M: FIU offense 27% of 73#23 Maryland: opponent offense 31% of 55#23 Maryland: FIU offense 47% of 96Pittsburgh: opponent offense 48% of 61Pittsburgh: FIU offense 38% of 71Western Kentucky: opponent offense 33% of 72Western Kentucky: FIU offense 62% of 52UL Monroe: opponent offense 44% of 80UL Monroe: FIU offense 51% of 68Troy: opponent offense 43% of 76Troy: FIU offense 44% of 68Louisiana: opponent offense 37% of 65Louisiana: FIU offense 46% of 59Middle Tennessee: opponent offense 35% of 57Middle Tennessee: FIU offense 42% of 66Toledo: opponent offense 51% of 67Toledo: FIU offense 36% of 64
FIU offenseOpponent offense (FIU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Rutgers

14–19 L · 65 plays to 53
FIU offense 32% (21/65)Rutgers offense 26% (14/53)

at #19 Texas A&M

20–27 L · 73 plays to 72
FIU offense 27% (20/73)Texas A&M offense 39% (28/72)

at #23 Maryland

28–42 L · 96 plays to 55
FIU offense 47% (45/96)Maryland offense 31% (17/55)

at Pittsburgh

17–44 L · 71 plays to 61
FIU offense 38% (27/71)Pittsburgh offense 48% (29/61)

vs Western Kentucky

28–21 W · 52 plays to 72
FIU offense 62% (32/52)Western Kentucky offense 33% (24/72)

vs UL Monroe

42–35 W · 68 plays to 80
FIU offense 51% (35/68)UL Monroe offense 44% (35/80)

at Troy

52–35 W · 68 plays to 76
FIU offense 44% (30/68)Troy offense 43% (33/76)

at Louisiana

38–17 W · 59 plays to 65
FIU offense 46% (27/59)Louisiana offense 37% (24/65)

vs Middle Tennessee

27–28 L · 66 plays to 57
FIU offense 42% (28/66)Middle Tennessee offense 35% (20/57)

vs Toledo

34–32 W · 64 plays to 67
FIU offense 36% (23/64)Toledo offense 51% (34/67)