THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Florida InternationalPanthers

Season
‹

Conference USA

Peers are the 67 teams in 2026’s 4 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank to date.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Florida International played 0 such games.

Power 4, 2026

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Florida International3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#124 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 138 teams · 607.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of plays successful · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— average PPA on successful plays · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 67 Power 4 teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#35 (Total offense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring offense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#67. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Total defense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Point margin: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#29 (Turnover margin: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#73 (Returning passing: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#127. 4 of 67 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning receiving: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #5–#136. 1 of 67 in the top 10.)#56 (Returning rushing: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #4–#135. 3 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Team talent: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#77. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive EPA: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive success rate: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#68. 9 of 67 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range #1–#69. 10 of 67 in the top 10.)
2026LSU6–24 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 470.2 yds/g · 2,821 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 213 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 288.5 yds/g allowed · 1,731 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +18.8 /g · +113 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 5 taken, 6 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 32:07 /g · 3h 13m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 138 teams · 16% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 931.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.317 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 50% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026UCLA8–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 458.8 yds/g · 2,753 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 213 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 286.8 yds/g allowed · 1,721 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 97 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +19.3 /g · +116 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +11 in these games · 21 taken, 10 given · +1.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34:12 /g · 3h 25m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 138 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 774.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 69 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Northwestern6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 69 teams · 428.7 yds/g · 2,572 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 190 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 2,201 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · +12.0 /g · +72 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +8 in these games · 11 taken, 3 given · +1.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:43 /g · 3h 22m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 688.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Alabama6–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 69 teams · 401.1 yds/g · 2,808 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 258 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 354.4 yds/g allowed · 2,481 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 160 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +14.0 /g · +98 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +7 in these games · 18 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 29:34 /g · 3h 27m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 138 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 138 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.296 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 0.021 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 48% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.376 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 1.346 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Louisville5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 471.7 yds/g · 3,302 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 37.7 pts/g · 264 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 433.9 yds/g allowed · 3,037 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · +8.7 /g · +61 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +6 in these games · 13 taken, 7 given · +0.86 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 28:42 /g · 3h 21m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 138 teams · 740.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.310 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.442 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Miami8–02 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 475.2 yds/g · 2,851 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 42.0 pts/g · 252 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 372.7 yds/g allowed · 2,236 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 132 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +20.0 /g · +120 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 7 taken, 3 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34:13 /g · 3h 25m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 138 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 138 teams · 885.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.369 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 1.306 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Wake Forest7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 442.9 yds/g · 3,100 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 275 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 326.1 yds/g allowed · 2,283 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 18.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +21.1 /g · +148 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 29:01 /g · 3h 23m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 (of 138 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 138 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 50% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Baylor5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 69 teams · 418.0 yds/g · 2,508 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 165 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 365.0 yds/g allowed · 2,190 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · +10.8 /g · +65 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +6 in these games · 12 taken, 6 given · +1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 28:50 /g · 2h 53m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 138 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 138 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 138 teams · 723.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 69 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.161 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Duke6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 69 teams · 391.0 yds/g · 2,346 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 177 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 315.7 yds/g allowed · 1,894 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 104 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +12.2 /g · +73 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 8 taken, 4 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 31:00 /g · 3h 06m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 668.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.268 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.376 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Utah8–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 461.8 yds/g · 2,771 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 212 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 371.7 yds/g allowed · 2,230 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 113 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +16.5 /g · +99 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 9 taken, 9 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:58 /g · 3h 18m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 138 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 138 teams · 695.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 69 teams · 0.258 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 52% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.418 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Georgia7–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 69 teams · 409.0 yds/g · 2,454 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 195 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 308.8 yds/g allowed · 1,853 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 96 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +16.5 /g · +99 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 11 taken, 7 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 31:31 /g · 3h 09m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 1003.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 69 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 0.066 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Nebraska5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 69 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 1,836 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 120 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 1,489 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 90 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +6.0 /g · +30 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:55 /g · 2h 45m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 138 teams · 787.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 69 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 1.265 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026BYU7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 69 teams · 350.5 yds/g · 2,103 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 155 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 317.3 yds/g allowed · 1,904 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 120 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · +5.8 /g · +35 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 4 taken, 6 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 29:30 /g · 2h 57m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 689.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 69 teams · 0.192 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.128 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Tennessee6–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 69 teams · 345.3 yds/g · 2,072 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 160 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 299.3 yds/g allowed · 1,796 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 112 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · +8.0 /g · +48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +5 in these games · 13 taken, 8 given · +0.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 31:37 /g · 3h 10m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 138 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 138 teams · 885.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 69 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 43% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.131 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Texas6–24 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 69 teams · 325.2 yds/g · 1,951 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 157 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 282.3 yds/g allowed · 1,694 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 124 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · +5.5 /g · +33 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 5 taken, 11 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 28:59 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 138 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 138 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 985.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 69 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 1.177 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Arizona6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 447.4 yds/g · 2,237 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 168 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 361.4 yds/g allowed · 1,807 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 103 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +13.0 /g · +65 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 32:15 /g · 2h 41m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 138 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 138 teams · 699.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 69 teams · 0.259 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 1.332 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 1.338 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Florida5–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 69 teams · 378.3 yds/g · 2,270 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 167 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 390.3 yds/g allowed · 2,342 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · -5.7 /g · -34 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -3 in these games · 5 taken, 8 given · -0.50 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:20 /g · 3h 20m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 891.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 69 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Indiana8–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 69 teams · 398.8 yds/g · 2,393 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 147 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 287.0 yds/g allowed · 1,722 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 96 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +8.5 /g · +51 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 6 taken, 5 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 28:59 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 138 teams · 735.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 69 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 1.351 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.357 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Michigan5–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 304.0 yds/g · 1,824 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 17.5 pts/g · 105 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 271.5 yds/g allowed · 1,629 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 102 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · +0.5 /g · +3 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 8 taken, 8 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 31:50 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 138 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 138 teams · 890.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 69 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Missouri6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 69 teams · 435.0 yds/g · 2,610 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 171 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 346.8 yds/g allowed · 2,081 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 116 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · +9.2 /g · +55 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +7 in these games · 11 taken, 4 given · +1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 31:05 /g · 3h 06m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 138 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 138 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 138 teams · 808.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 69 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.421 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Ohio State6–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 69 teams · 433.3 yds/g · 2,600 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 178 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 314.8 yds/g allowed · 1,889 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · +10.0 /g · +60 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:43 /g · 3h 22m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 964.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 69 teams · 0.216 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Oklahoma State5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 534.5 yds/g · 3,207 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 43.3 pts/g · 260 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 434.7 yds/g allowed · 2,608 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +11.2 /g · +67 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 9 taken, 8 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 28:34 /g · 2h 51m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#136 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#135 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 138 teams · 672.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.316 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 52% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 1.254 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Ole Miss6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 442.4 yds/g · 3,097 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 256 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 392.7 yds/g allowed · 2,749 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 183 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · +10.4 /g · +73 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 11 taken, 11 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 28:06 /g · 3h 17m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 138 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 138 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 138 teams · 885.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 69 teams · 0.242 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 48% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026TCU4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 69 teams · 330.0 yds/g · 1,980 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 15.3 pts/g · 92 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 305.0 yds/g allowed · 1,830 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 99 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · -1.2 /g · -7 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 9 taken, 11 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 30:32 /g · 3h 03m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 138 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 138 teams · 730.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 1.183 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026North Carolina4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 69 teams · 332.9 yds/g · 2,330 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 171 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 395.7 yds/g allowed · 2,770 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · -1.4 /g · -10 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · -5 in these games · 6 taken, 11 given · -0.71 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 27:51 /g · 3h 15m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 767.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 1.148 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026South Carolina5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 69 teams · 427.7 yds/g · 2,566 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 193 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 390.3 yds/g allowed · 2,342 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · -5 in these games · 5 taken, 10 given · -0.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 29:51 /g · 2h 59m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 138 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 138 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 138 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 138 teams · 862.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.386 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 1.191 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Syracuse4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 69 teams · 411.3 yds/g · 2,468 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 353.8 yds/g allowed · 2,123 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 167 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · -4.0 /g · -24 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -3 in these games · 5 taken, 8 given · -0.50 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:39 /g · 3h 16m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 138 teams · 20% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 138 teams · 745.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 69 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Texas Tech7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 69 teams · 422.8 yds/g · 2,114 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 168 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 420.8 yds/g allowed · 2,104 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 121 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · +9.4 /g · +47 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 9 taken, 7 given · +0.40 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 28:01 /g · 2h 20m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 767.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 69 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026USC7–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 69 teams · 379.3 yds/g · 2,276 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 162 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 384.0 yds/g allowed · 2,304 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 162 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 5 taken, 5 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 28:04 /g · 2h 48m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 138 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 899.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 69 teams · 0.204 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 1.269 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Clemson5–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 69 teams · 316.3 yds/g · 1,898 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 127 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 382.0 yds/g allowed · 2,292 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · -6.5 /g · -39 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 9 taken, 7 given · +0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 28:57 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 138 teams · 862.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 69 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Houston6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 69 teams · 439.8 yds/g · 2,199 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 136 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 397.0 yds/g allowed · 1,985 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · +4.4 /g · +22 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 8 taken, 4 given · +0.80 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:24 /g · 2h 47m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 138 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 138 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 138 teams · 695.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 69 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.137 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Iowa6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 69 teams · 320.3 yds/g · 1,922 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 131 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 321.5 yds/g allowed · 1,929 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +5.2 /g · +31 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 5 taken, 7 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 28:50 /g · 2h 53m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#89 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 138 teams · 722.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 69 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Kentucky7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 69 teams · 336.3 yds/g · 2,018 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 173 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 373.7 yds/g allowed · 2,242 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 164 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · +1.5 /g · +9 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +12 in these games · 15 taken, 3 given · +2.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 29:40 /g · 2h 58m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 138 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 138 teams · 16% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 138 teams · 786.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 69 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.061 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Mississippi State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 69 teams · 357.6 yds/g · 2,503 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 151 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 392.3 yds/g allowed · 2,746 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 212 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · -8.7 /g · -61 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 7 taken, 11 given · -0.57 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 28:26 /g · 3h 19m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 138 teams · 20% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 138 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 138 teams · 804.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 69 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026NC State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 69 teams · 345.5 yds/g · 2,073 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 406.7 yds/g allowed · 2,440 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 176 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · -5.5 /g · -33 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 30:17 /g · 3h 02m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 757.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 1.324 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Oregon5–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 69 teams · 361.0 yds/g · 2,166 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 148 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 392.8 yds/g allowed · 2,357 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 144 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · +0.7 /g · +4 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 8 taken, 12 given · -0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:30 /g · 2h 39m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 138 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 69 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026SMU6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 69 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 2,599 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 192 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 331.5 yds/g allowed · 1,989 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 144 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · +8.0 /g · +48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 3 taken, 9 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 29:26 /g · 2h 57m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 764.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.261 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026UCF4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#57 (of 69 teams · 320.5 yds/g · 1,923 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 121 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 390.2 yds/g allowed · 2,341 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · -7.5 /g · -45 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 7 taken, 7 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 29:23 /g · 2h 56m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 138 teams · 672.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 69 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 1.174 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Virginia Tech6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 69 teams · 393.0 yds/g · 2,358 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 163 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 349.7 yds/g allowed · 2,098 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 140 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · +3.8 /g · +23 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 2 taken, 6 given · -0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 31:49 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 769.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 69 teams · 0.191 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Washington5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 69 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 1,670 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 124 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 382.4 yds/g allowed · 1,912 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 129 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · -1.0 /g · -5 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 27:51 /g · 2h 19m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 138 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 138 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 138 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 138 teams · 777.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 69 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 1.357 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Kansas3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 69 teams · 375.2 yds/g · 2,251 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 127 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 409.0 yds/g allowed · 2,454 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -9.5 /g · -57 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 6 taken, 12 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 29:43 /g · 2h 58m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#90 (of 138 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 138 teams · 684.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 69 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 0.182 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.423 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Oklahoma4–43 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 69 teams · 332.5 yds/g · 1,995 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 111 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 342.3 yds/g allowed · 2,054 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 160 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · -8.2 /g · -49 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 9 taken, 11 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 30:51 /g · 3h 05m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 138 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 138 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 69 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.402 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Pittsburgh6–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 69 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 2,603 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 169 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 351.9 yds/g allowed · 2,463 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 164 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0.7 /g · +5 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.29 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 30:39 /g · 3h 35m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 138 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 138 teams · 675.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 69 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.513 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Wisconsin5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 276.8 yds/g · 1,661 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 99 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 300.8 yds/g allowed · 1,805 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · -3.2 /g · -19 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 6 taken, 8 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 27:40 /g · 2h 46m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 138 teams · 52% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 767.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Boston College4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 69 teams · 354.9 yds/g · 2,484 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 151 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 349.3 yds/g allowed · 2,445 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 196 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · -6.4 /g · -45 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:43 /g · 3h 07m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 8% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 138 teams · 660.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 69 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Cincinnati5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 69 teams · 417.8 yds/g · 2,507 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 176 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 481.5 yds/g allowed · 2,889 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · -2.8 /g · -17 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:35 /g · 2h 45m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 138 teams · 634.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 69 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.488 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Illinois5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 69 teams · 386.5 yds/g · 2,319 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 142 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 382.5 yds/g allowed · 2,295 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · -3.2 /g · -19 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 4 taken, 5 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 31:07 /g · 3h 07m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 138 teams · 704.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 69 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.327 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 1.259 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Kansas State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 69 teams · 387.8 yds/g · 1,939 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 118 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 1,996 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 145 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -5.4 /g · -27 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 31:58 /g · 2h 40m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 138 teams · 63% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 138 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 138 teams · 718.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 69 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 43% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.087 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.458 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Penn State4–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 69 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 1,670 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 105 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 353.4 yds/g allowed · 1,767 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · -4.4 /g · -22 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 31:56 /g · 2h 40m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#131 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 138 teams · 774.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 69 teams · 0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.387 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Virginia4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 314.4 yds/g · 2,201 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 132 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 395.4 yds/g allowed · 2,768 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · -10.0 /g · -70 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 31:11 /g · 3h 38m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 700.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 69 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 0.237 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.090 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Arizona State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 69 teams · 343.2 yds/g · 2,059 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 136 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 382.7 yds/g allowed · 2,296 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -13.5 /g · -81 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -3 in these games · 7 taken, 10 given · -0.50 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 30:28 /g · 3h 03m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 138 teams · 722.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 1.296 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Auburn4–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 69 teams · 333.6 yds/g · 2,335 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 150 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 434.9 yds/g allowed · 3,044 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 206 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -8.0 /g · -56 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 10 taken, 10 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:02 /g · 3h 02m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 138 teams · 828.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 69 teams · 0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 1.352 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Florida State3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 69 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 2,479 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 177 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 471.3 yds/g allowed · 2,828 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 207 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · -5.0 /g · -30 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 5 taken, 12 given · -1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 28:38 /g · 2h 52m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 138 teams · 800.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 69 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.421 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.359 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Georgia Tech2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 69 teams · 354.9 yds/g · 2,484 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 154 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 3,024 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 235 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · -11.6 /g · -81 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 4 taken, 11 given · -1.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:19 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 138 teams · 751.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 69 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 0.248 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Minnesota5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 263.7 yds/g · 1,582 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 102 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 351.5 yds/g allowed · 2,109 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 150 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -8.0 /g · -48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +5 in these games · 12 taken, 7 given · +0.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 30:36 /g · 3h 04m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 138 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 138 teams · 728.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Colorado3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 69 teams · 370.4 yds/g · 2,593 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 116 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 2,717 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -14.0 /g · -98 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -10 in these games · 5 taken, 15 given · -1.43 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 28:35 /g · 3h 20m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 138 teams · 731.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 1.186 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Purdue3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 69 teams · 359.4 yds/g · 2,516 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 192 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 437.9 yds/g allowed · 3,065 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · -6.6 /g · -46 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 9 taken, 8 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 29:36 /g · 3h 27m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 138 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 138 teams · 698.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 69 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Texas A&M4–43 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 295.0 yds/g · 1,770 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 135 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 379.2 yds/g allowed · 2,275 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · -2.7 /g · -16 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 8 taken, 10 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 31:41 /g · 3h 10m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 138 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 138 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 933.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 37% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.114 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.358 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Vanderbilt3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 69 teams · 334.7 yds/g · 2,008 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 119 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 403.2 yds/g allowed · 2,419 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 207 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -14.7 /g · -88 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -8 in these games · 5 taken, 13 given · -1.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 29:40 /g · 2h 58m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 138 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 138 teams · 727.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 69 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.275 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 1.365 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.119 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026West Virginia5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 467.8 yds/g · 2,807 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 204 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 521.3 yds/g allowed · 3,128 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 37.8 pts/g allowed · 227 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · -3.8 /g · -23 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 6 taken, 6 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 27:40 /g · 2h 46m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#134 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 707.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 69 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.332 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.390 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.353 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Iowa State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 69 teams · 358.3 yds/g · 2,150 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 139 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 454.8 yds/g allowed · 2,729 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · -10.3 /g · -62 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 5 taken, 5 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 31:21 /g · 3h 08m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#133 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 138 teams · 669.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 69 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.296 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 1.308 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Arkansas3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 305.5 yds/g · 1,833 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 15.3 pts/g · 92 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 416.8 yds/g allowed · 2,501 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -18.2 /g · -109 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 28:43 /g · 2h 52m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 19% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 138 teams · 745.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 69 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.281 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Rutgers2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 69 teams · 355.5 yds/g · 2,133 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 460.5 yds/g allowed · 2,763 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -12.3 /g · -74 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 4 taken, 10 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 29:43 /g · 2h 58m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 138 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 709.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 69 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.378 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.405 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026California3–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 304.7 yds/g · 2,133 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 117 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 427.0 yds/g allowed · 2,989 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -17.3 /g · -121 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 30:15 /g · 3h 32m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 138 teams · 751.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Maryland2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 301.8 yds/g · 1,811 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 115 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 444.2 yds/g allowed · 2,665 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 239 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -20.7 /g · -124 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:11 /g · 2h 37m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 138 teams · 719.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 0.245 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Michigan State2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 243.7 yds/g · 1,462 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 94 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 391.5 yds/g allowed · 2,349 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 179 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -14.2 /g · -85 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 3 taken, 10 given · -1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:31 /g · 2h 39m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 138 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 685.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 0.180 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.033 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 1.173 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Stanford4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 67 Power 4 teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 69 teams · 320.7 yds/g · 2,245 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 112 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 499.0 yds/g allowed · 3,493 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 43.1 pts/g allowed · 302 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -27.1 /g · -190 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 7 taken, 7 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:18 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 138 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 138 teams · 705.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 69 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.435 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 1.338 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 4, 20262026 Florida InternationalPower 4 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #35
Total offense. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Oklahoma State #1 of 69; 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Louisville #3 of 69; 2026 LSU #4 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #5 of 69; 2026 Utah #6 of 69; 2026 UCLA #7 of 69; 2026 Arizona #8 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #9 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #10 of 69; 2026 Houston #11 of 69; 2026 Missouri #13 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #14 of 69; 2026 SMU #15 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #16 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #17 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #18 of 69; 2026 Baylor #19 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #20 of 69; 2026 Florida State #21 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #22 of 69; 2026 Georgia #23 of 69; 2026 Alabama #24 of 69; 2026 Indiana #25 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #26 of 69; 2026 Duke #27 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #28 of 69; 2026 Illinois #29 of 69; 2026 USC #30 of 69; 2026 Florida #31 of 69; 2026 Kansas #32 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #33 of 69; 2026 Colorado #34 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #35 of 69; 2026 Oregon #36 of 69; 2026 Purdue #37 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #38 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #39 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #40 of 69; 2026 Boston College #41 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 BYU #43 of 69; 2026 NC State #44 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #45 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #46 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #47 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #48 of 69; 2026 Penn State #49 of 69; 2026 Washington #49 of 69; 2026 Auburn #51 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #52 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #53 of 69; 2026 TCU #54 of 69; 2026 Texas #55 of 69; 2026 Stanford #56 of 69; 2026 UCF #57 of 69; 2026 Iowa #58 of 69; 2026 Clemson #59 of 69; 2026 Virginia #60 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #61 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69; 2026 Michigan #63 of 69; 2026 Maryland #64 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #65 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #66 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #67 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Scoring offensemedian #35
Scoring offense. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Oklahoma State #1 of 69; 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #4 of 69; 2026 Louisville #5 of 69; 2026 Alabama #6 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #7 of 69; 2026 LSU #8 of 69; 2026 UCLA #8 of 69; 2026 Utah #10 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #11 of 69; 2026 Arizona #12 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #12 of 69; 2026 Georgia #14 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #15 of 69; 2026 SMU #16 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #17 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #18 of 69; 2026 Duke #19 of 69; 2026 Florida State #19 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #21 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #22 of 69; 2026 Missouri #23 of 69; 2026 Florida #24 of 69; 2026 Baylor #25 of 69; 2026 Purdue #26 of 69; 2026 Houston #27 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #28 of 69; 2026 USC #29 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #30 of 69; 2026 Texas #31 of 69; 2026 BYU #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #33 of 69; 2026 Oregon #34 of 69; 2026 Indiana #35 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #36 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #37 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #38 of 69; 2026 NC State #39 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #39 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #39 of 69; 2026 Illinois #42 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #43 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #44 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #45 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #46 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #47 of 69; 2026 Iowa #48 of 69; 2026 Boston College #49 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #49 of 69; 2026 Auburn #51 of 69; 2026 Clemson #52 of 69; 2026 Kansas #52 of 69; 2026 Penn State #54 of 69; 2026 UCF #55 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #56 of 69; 2026 Maryland #57 of 69; 2026 Virginia #58 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #59 of 69; 2026 Michigan #60 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #61 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69; 2026 Colorado #63 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 69; 2026 Stanford #65 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #66 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #67 of 69; 2026 TCU #67 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Total defensemedian #35
Total defense. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Michigan #2 of 69; 2026 Texas #3 of 69; 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Indiana #5 of 69; 2026 LSU #6 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #7 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #8 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #9 of 69; 2026 TCU #10 of 69; 2026 Georgia #11 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #12 of 69; 2026 Duke #13 of 69; 2026 BYU #14 of 69; 2026 Iowa #15 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #16 of 69; 2026 SMU #17 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #18 of 69; 2026 Missouri #19 of 69; 2026 Boston College #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #21 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #22 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #23 of 69; 2026 Penn State #24 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #25 of 69; 2026 Alabama #26 of 69; 2026 Arizona #27 of 69; 2026 Baylor #28 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #29 of 69; 2026 Utah #30 of 69; 2026 Miami #31 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #32 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #33 of 69; 2026 Clemson #34 of 69; 2026 Washington #35 of 69; 2026 Illinois #36 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #37 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 Colorado #39 of 69; 2026 UCF #40 of 69; 2026 Florida #41 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #41 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #43 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #44 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #45 of 69; 2026 Oregon #46 of 69; 2026 Virginia #47 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #48 of 69; 2026 Houston #49 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #50 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #51 of 69; 2026 NC State #52 of 69; 2026 Kansas #53 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #54 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #55 of 69; 2026 California #56 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #57 of 69; 2026 Louisville #58 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #59 of 69; 2026 Auburn #60 of 69; 2026 Purdue #61 of 69; 2026 Maryland #62 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #64 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #65 of 69; 2026 Florida State #66 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #67 of 69; 2026 Stanford #68 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Georgia #2 of 69; 2026 Indiana #2 of 69; 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 TCU #5 of 69; 2026 Baylor #6 of 69; 2026 Iowa #6 of 69; 2026 LSU #6 of 69; 2026 Michigan #9 of 69; 2026 Duke #10 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #11 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #12 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #13 of 69; 2026 Utah #14 of 69; 2026 Missouri #15 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #16 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #16 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #16 of 69; 2026 BYU #19 of 69; 2026 Arizona #20 of 69; 2026 Texas #21 of 69; 2026 Miami #22 of 69; 2026 Houston #23 of 69; 2026 Alabama #24 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #26 of 69; 2026 Oregon #27 of 69; 2026 SMU #27 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #29 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #30 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #31 of 69; 2026 Penn State #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #33 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #34 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #35 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #36 of 69; 2026 Illinois #37 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #39 of 69; 2026 Clemson #40 of 69; 2026 UCF #40 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #42 of 69; 2026 Boston College #43 of 69; 2026 Virginia #44 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #45 of 69; 2026 Louisville #45 of 69; 2026 NC State #47 of 69; 2026 Auburn #48 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #49 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #50 of 69; 2026 Colorado #51 of 69; 2026 Kansas #52 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #54 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #54 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #54 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #57 of 69; 2026 Florida #57 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #57 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #60 of 69; 2026 California #61 of 69; 2026 Purdue #61 of 69; 2026 Florida State #63 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #63 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #65 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #65 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #67 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #35
Point margin. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #2 of 69; 2026 Miami #3 of 69; 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 LSU #5 of 69; 2026 Georgia #6 of 69; 2026 Utah #6 of 69; 2026 Alabama #8 of 69; 2026 Arizona #9 of 69; 2026 Duke #10 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #11 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #12 of 69; 2026 Baylor #13 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #14 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #15 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #16 of 69; 2026 Missouri #17 of 69; 2026 Louisville #18 of 69; 2026 Indiana #19 of 69; 2026 SMU #20 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #20 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 69; 2026 BYU #23 of 69; 2026 Texas #24 of 69; 2026 Iowa #25 of 69; 2026 Houston #26 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #28 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #29 of 69; 2026 Oregon #30 of 69; 2026 Michigan #31 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #32 of 69; 2026 USC #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #34 of 69; 2026 TCU #35 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #36 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #37 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #38 of 69; 2026 Illinois #39 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #39 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #41 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #42 of 69; 2026 Penn State #43 of 69; 2026 Florida State #44 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #45 of 69; 2026 NC State #46 of 69; 2026 Florida #47 of 69; 2026 Boston College #48 of 69; 2026 Clemson #49 of 69; 2026 Purdue #50 of 69; 2026 UCF #51 of 69; 2026 Auburn #52 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #52 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #54 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #55 of 69; 2026 Kansas #56 of 69; 2026 Virginia #57 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #58 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #59 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #61 of 69; 2026 Colorado #62 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #63 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #64 of 69; 2026 California #66 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #67 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Turnover marginmedian #29
Turnover margin. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Kentucky #1 of 69; 2026 UCLA #2 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #4 of 69; 2026 Missouri #5 of 69; 2026 Alabama #6 of 69; 2026 Baylor #6 of 69; 2026 Louisville #8 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #9 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #9 of 69; 2026 Houston #11 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #12 of 69; 2026 Duke #12 of 69; 2026 Georgia #12 of 69; 2026 Miami #12 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #16 of 69; 2026 Clemson #17 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #18 of 69; 2026 Arizona #19 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #19 of 69; 2026 Penn State #19 of 69; 2026 Indiana #22 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #22 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #22 of 69; 2026 Boston College #25 of 69; 2026 California #25 of 69; 2026 Purdue #25 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #25 of 69; 2026 Auburn #29 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #29 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #29 of 69; 2026 Michigan #29 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #29 of 69; 2026 Stanford #29 of 69; 2026 UCF #29 of 69; 2026 USC #29 of 69; 2026 Utah #29 of 69; 2026 Virginia #29 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #29 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #40 of 69; 2026 Illinois #40 of 69; 2026 LSU #40 of 69; 2026 NC State #40 of 69; 2026 Washington #44 of 69; 2026 BYU #45 of 69; 2026 Iowa #45 of 69; 2026 Maryland #45 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #45 of 69; 2026 TCU #45 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #45 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #45 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #52 of 69; 2026 Florida #52 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #52 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #55 of 69; 2026 Oregon #56 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #56 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #59 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #60 of 69; 2026 Kansas #60 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 SMU #60 of 69; 2026 Texas #60 of 69; 2026 Florida State #66 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #66 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #68 of 69; 2026 Colorado #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 29.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #1 of 69; 2026 UCLA #2 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #3 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #3 of 69; 2026 Houston #5 of 69; 2026 Florida #6 of 69; 2026 Utah #8 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #9 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #10 of 69; 2026 Arizona #11 of 69; 2026 LSU #12 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #13 of 69; 2026 Penn State #14 of 69; 2026 Michigan #15 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #16 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #17 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #18 of 69; 2026 Georgia #19 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia #21 of 69; 2026 Illinois #22 of 69; 2026 Missouri #23 of 69; 2026 Duke #24 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #25 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #26 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #27 of 69; 2026 TCU #28 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #29 of 69; 2026 NC State #30 of 69; 2026 California #31 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #32 of 69; 2026 Kansas #33 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #34 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #35 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #36 of 69; 2026 Purdue #37 of 69; 2026 Alabama #38 of 69; 2026 BYU #39 of 69; 2026 SMU #40 of 69; 2026 UCF #41 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #42 of 69; 2026 Indiana #43 of 69; 2026 Texas #44 of 69; 2026 Clemson #45 of 69; 2026 Baylor #46 of 69; 2026 Iowa #47 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #48 of 69; 2026 Louisville #49 of 69; 2026 Florida State #50 of 69; 2026 Colorado #51 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #52 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #53 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #54 of 69; 2026 USC #55 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #56 of 69; 2026 Washington #57 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #59 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #59 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #61 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #63 of 69; 2026 Stanford #64 of 69; 2026 Boston College #65 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #66 of 69; 2026 Oregon #67 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69; 2026 Auburn #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Returning passingmedian #73
Returning passing. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 BYU #1 of 138; 2026 Kansas State #1 of 138; 2026 Florida #8 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 SMU #17 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #20 of 138; 2026 Utah #20 of 138; 2026 Georgia #22 of 138; 2026 Michigan #24 of 138; 2026 Baylor #25 of 138; 2026 Oregon #26 of 138; 2026 Texas #28 of 138; 2026 NC State #29 of 138; 2026 California #30 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #33 of 138; 2026 Arizona #35 of 138; 2026 USC #36 of 138; 2026 Maryland #37 of 138; 2026 Washington #38 of 138; 2026 Texas A&M #39 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma #41 of 138; 2026 Houston #42 of 138; 2026 South Carolina #45 of 138; 2026 UCLA #45 of 138; 2026 Ole Miss #51 of 138; 2026 Purdue #53 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #59 of 138; 2026 West Virginia #62 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #63 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #65 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #69 of 138; 2026 Colorado #72 of 138; 2026 Missouri #73 of 138; 2026 Texas Tech #75 of 138; 2026 Mississippi State #78 of 138; 2026 Clemson #80 of 138; 2026 Arkansas #83 of 138; 2026 Alabama #88 of 138; 2026 Iowa #89 of 138; 2026 Kansas #90 of 138; 2026 Vanderbilt #92 of 138; 2026 Florida State #93 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #94 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #95 of 138; 2026 Tennessee #97 of 138; 2026 Miami #98 of 138; 2026 Cincinnati #99 of 138; 2026 Kentucky #100 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #101 of 138; 2026 Stanford #103 of 138; 2026 TCU #106 of 138; 2026 Boston College #109 of 138; 2026 Iowa State #109 of 138; 2026 Illinois #111 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 LSU #111 of 138; 2026 UCF #111 of 138; 2026 Duke #119 of 138; 2026 Virginia #119 of 138; 2026 Penn State #123 of 138; 2026 Arizona State #124 of 138; 2026 Auburn #127 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #127 of 138; 2026 Louisville #127 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma State #127 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #127 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida International, ranked 124 of 138. Power 4 median rank 73.
Returning receivingmedian #65
Returning receiving. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #5 of 138; 2026 Clemson #17 of 138; 2026 Kansas State #19 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #23 of 138; 2026 BYU #25 of 138; 2026 Tennessee #26 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 Texas A&M #28 of 138; 2026 Florida State #29 of 138; 2026 Oregon #30 of 138; 2026 Texas Tech #31 of 138; 2026 Miami #32 of 138; 2026 UCF #33 of 138; 2026 South Carolina #35 of 138; 2026 Iowa #39 of 138; 2026 Florida #40 of 138; 2026 Colorado #41 of 138; 2026 Houston #41 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 138; 2026 Mississippi State #45 of 138; 2026 Alabama #47 of 138; 2026 Illinois #48 of 138; 2026 Michigan #49 of 138; 2026 Vanderbilt #51 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #53 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #54 of 138; 2026 Missouri #55 of 138; 2026 Texas #56 of 138; 2026 Maryland #59 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma #60 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #61 of 138; 2026 Kentucky #62 of 138; 2026 Arizona #63 of 138; 2026 TCU #65 of 138; 2026 Washington #66 of 138; 2026 SMU #69 of 138; 2026 Kansas #70 of 138; 2026 Utah #77 of 138; 2026 Georgia #78 of 138; 2026 Baylor #79 of 138; 2026 Stanford #81 of 138; 2026 California #83 of 138; 2026 Ole Miss #89 of 138; 2026 NC State #91 of 138; 2026 Arizona State #93 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #94 of 138; 2026 UCLA #96 of 138; 2026 Arkansas #97 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #99 of 138; 2026 USC #101 of 138; 2026 Louisville #103 of 138; 2026 Purdue #105 of 138; 2026 Duke #106 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #106 of 138; 2026 Boston College #108 of 138; 2026 Virginia #109 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #112 of 138; 2026 LSU #115 of 138; 2026 Indiana #116 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #121 of 138; 2026 Penn State #126 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #126 of 138; 2026 Auburn #129 of 138; 2026 Cincinnati #130 of 138; 2026 Iowa State #133 of 138; 2026 West Virginia #134 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma State #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida International, ranked 41 of 138. Power 4 median rank 65.
Returning rushingmedian #56
Returning rushing. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 BYU #4 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Texas Tech #9 of 138; 2026 Miami #11 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma #14 of 138; 2026 Ole Miss #15 of 138; 2026 Florida #16 of 138; 2026 Illinois #17 of 138; 2026 Georgia #18 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #20 of 138; 2026 Utah #21 of 138; 2026 Missouri #22 of 138; 2026 Kansas State #23 of 138; 2026 USC #24 of 138; 2026 Maryland #25 of 138; 2026 LSU #27 of 138; 2026 UCLA #28 of 138; 2026 Michigan #29 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #31 of 138; 2026 Arizona #32 of 138; 2026 Stanford #34 of 138; 2026 Louisville #36 of 138; 2026 Texas A&M #37 of 138; 2026 Baylor #38 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #40 of 138; 2026 South Carolina #43 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #45 of 138; 2026 Iowa #46 of 138; 2026 NC State #48 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #49 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #50 of 138; 2026 Mississippi State #53 of 138; 2026 Tennessee #55 of 138; 2026 Vanderbilt #56 of 138; 2026 Duke #59 of 138; 2026 Oregon #60 of 138; 2026 Auburn #61 of 138; 2026 Houston #66 of 138; 2026 TCU #69 of 138; 2026 Alabama #73 of 138; 2026 Washington #77 of 138; 2026 Colorado #79 of 138; 2026 Purdue #81 of 138; 2026 Florida State #82 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #83 of 138; 2026 Clemson #87 of 138; 2026 SMU #88 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #90 of 138; 2026 Texas #91 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #93 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #96 of 138; 2026 Virginia #104 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #105 of 138; 2026 Arkansas #106 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Kentucky #113 of 138; 2026 West Virginia #115 of 138; 2026 Arizona State #117 of 138; 2026 California #119 of 138; 2026 Cincinnati #124 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #125 of 138; 2026 Kansas #126 of 138; 2026 UCF #127 of 138; 2026 Boston College #129 of 138; 2026 Iowa State #130 of 138; 2026 Penn State #131 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma State #135 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida International, ranked 80 of 138. Power 4 median rank 56.
Team talentmedian #35
Team talent. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Georgia #1 of 138; 2026 Texas #2 of 138; 2026 Oregon #3 of 138; 2026 Alabama #4 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #5 of 138; 2026 Texas A&M #7 of 138; 2026 LSU #8 of 138; 2026 USC #9 of 138; 2026 Florida #10 of 138; 2026 Michigan #11 of 138; 2026 Miami #12 of 138; 2026 Tennessee #13 of 138; 2026 Ole Miss #14 of 138; 2026 South Carolina #15 of 138; 2026 Clemson #16 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma #17 of 138; 2026 Auburn #18 of 138; 2026 Missouri #19 of 138; 2026 Mississippi State #20 of 138; 2026 Florida State #21 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 138; 2026 Kentucky #23 of 138; 2026 Washington #24 of 138; 2026 UCLA #25 of 138; 2026 Penn State #26 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #28 of 138; 2026 Texas Tech #28 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #30 of 138; 2026 SMU #31 of 138; 2026 NC State #32 of 138; 2026 California #33 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #34 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #35 of 138; 2026 Arkansas #36 of 138; 2026 Louisville #37 of 138; 2026 Indiana #38 of 138; 2026 Colorado #39 of 138; 2026 TCU #40 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #41 of 138; 2026 Vanderbilt #42 of 138; 2026 Baylor #43 of 138; 2026 Iowa #44 of 138; 2026 Arizona State #45 of 138; 2026 Maryland #46 of 138; 2026 Kansas State #47 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #48 of 138; 2026 West Virginia #49 of 138; 2026 Stanford #50 of 138; 2026 Illinois #51 of 138; 2026 Virginia #53 of 138; 2026 Arizona #54 of 138; 2026 Purdue #55 of 138; 2026 Houston #57 of 138; 2026 Utah #58 of 138; 2026 BYU #59 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #60 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #61 of 138; 2026 Kansas #62 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #63 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #64 of 138; 2026 Oklahoma State #65 of 138; 2026 UCF #66 of 138; 2026 Iowa State #68 of 138; 2026 Duke #69 of 138; 2026 Boston College #71 of 138; 2026 Cincinnati #77 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida International, ranked 90 of 138. Power 4 median rank 35.
Offensive EPAmedian #35
Offensive EPA. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #1 of 69; 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 LSU #4 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #5 of 69; 2026 Louisville #6 of 69; 2026 Alabama #7 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #8 of 69; 2026 Duke #9 of 69; 2026 SMU #10 of 69; 2026 Arizona #11 of 69; 2026 Utah #12 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #13 of 69; 2026 Houston #14 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #15 of 69; 2026 Georgia #16 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #17 of 69; 2026 Missouri #18 of 69; 2026 USC #19 of 69; 2026 BYU #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #21 of 69; 2026 UCLA #22 of 69; 2026 Indiana #23 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #24 of 69; 2026 Illinois #25 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #26 of 69; 2026 Florida State #27 of 69; 2026 Purdue #28 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #29 of 69; 2026 NC State #30 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #31 of 69; 2026 Florida #32 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #33 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #34 of 69; 2026 Washington #35 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #36 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #37 of 69; 2026 Boston College #38 of 69; 2026 Baylor #39 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #40 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Oregon #42 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #43 of 69; 2026 Texas #44 of 69; 2026 Auburn #45 of 69; 2026 Virginia #46 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #47 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #48 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #49 of 69; 2026 Iowa #50 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #51 of 69; 2026 UCF #52 of 69; 2026 Michigan #53 of 69; 2026 Penn State #54 of 69; 2026 Stanford #55 of 69; 2026 Kansas #56 of 69; 2026 Clemson #57 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #58 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #59 of 69; 2026 TCU #60 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #61 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #63 of 69; 2026 Colorado #64 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #65 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #66 of 69; 2026 Maryland #67 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #1 of 69; 2026 Baylor #2 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #3 of 69; 2026 Michigan #4 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #5 of 69; 2026 TCU #6 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #7 of 69; 2026 Texas #9 of 69; 2026 LSU #10 of 69; 2026 Indiana #11 of 69; 2026 Duke #12 of 69; 2026 Alabama #13 of 69; 2026 Utah #14 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #15 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #16 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #17 of 69; 2026 Arizona #18 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #19 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #20 of 69; 2026 Georgia #21 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #22 of 69; 2026 Washington #23 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #24 of 69; 2026 Missouri #25 of 69; 2026 Oregon #26 of 69; 2026 BYU #27 of 69; 2026 Iowa #28 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #29 of 69; 2026 Boston College #30 of 69; 2026 Miami #31 of 69; 2026 Louisville #32 of 69; 2026 Colorado #33 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #34 of 69; 2026 Clemson #35 of 69; 2026 UCF #36 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #37 of 69; 2026 Penn State #38 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #39 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #40 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #41 of 69; 2026 Florida #42 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #43 of 69; 2026 Auburn #44 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #45 of 69; 2026 USC #46 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #47 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #48 of 69; 2026 Kansas #49 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #50 of 69; 2026 SMU #51 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #52 of 69; 2026 Houston #54 of 69; 2026 Virginia #55 of 69; 2026 Florida State #56 of 69; 2026 NC State #57 of 69; 2026 Maryland #58 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #59 of 69; 2026 California #60 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #61 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #62 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #63 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #64 of 69; 2026 Purdue #65 of 69; 2026 Illinois #66 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #67 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #68 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #35
Offensive success rate. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Oklahoma State #1 of 69; 2026 Utah #2 of 69; 2026 LSU #4 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #5 of 69; 2026 Georgia #6 of 69; 2026 Miami #7 of 69; 2026 Houston #8 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #9 of 69; 2026 Louisville #10 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #11 of 69; 2026 Alabama #12 of 69; 2026 SMU #13 of 69; 2026 UCLA #14 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #15 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #16 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #17 of 69; 2026 USC #18 of 69; 2026 Arizona #19 of 69; 2026 Illinois #20 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #21 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #22 of 69; 2026 BYU #23 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #24 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #25 of 69; 2026 Duke #26 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #27 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #28 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #29 of 69; 2026 Purdue #30 of 69; 2026 Iowa #31 of 69; 2026 Florida #32 of 69; 2026 Boston College #33 of 69; 2026 Florida State #34 of 69; 2026 NC State #35 of 69; 2026 Indiana #36 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #37 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #38 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #39 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #40 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #42 of 69; 2026 Texas #43 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #44 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #45 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #46 of 69; 2026 Virginia #47 of 69; 2026 Washington #48 of 69; 2026 Missouri #49 of 69; 2026 Penn State #50 of 69; 2026 UCF #51 of 69; 2026 Colorado #52 of 69; 2026 Michigan #53 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #54 of 69; 2026 Oregon #55 of 69; 2026 Auburn #56 of 69; 2026 Baylor #57 of 69; 2026 TCU #58 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #59 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #60 of 69; 2026 Clemson #61 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #62 of 69; 2026 California #63 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #64 of 69; 2026 Stanford #65 of 69; 2026 Kansas #66 of 69; 2026 Maryland #67 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #1 of 69; 2026 Texas #2 of 69; 2026 Indiana #3 of 69; 2026 Michigan #4 of 69; 2026 TCU #5 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #6 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #7 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #8 of 69; 2026 Baylor #9 of 69; 2026 Utah #10 of 69; 2026 Iowa #11 of 69; 2026 Georgia #12 of 69; 2026 Alabama #14 of 69; 2026 Oregon #15 of 69; 2026 LSU #16 of 69; 2026 Arizona #17 of 69; 2026 Missouri #18 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #19 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #20 of 69; 2026 BYU #21 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #22 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #23 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #24 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #26 of 69; 2026 SMU #27 of 69; 2026 Louisville #28 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #29 of 69; 2026 Miami #30 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #31 of 69; 2026 Colorado #32 of 69; 2026 Kansas #33 of 69; 2026 Boston College #34 of 69; 2026 Duke #35 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #36 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #37 of 69; 2026 Penn State #38 of 69; 2026 Washington #39 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #40 of 69; 2026 Virginia #41 of 69; 2026 USC #42 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #43 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #44 of 69; 2026 UCF #45 of 69; 2026 Auburn #46 of 69; 2026 Florida State #47 of 69; 2026 Clemson #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #49 of 69; 2026 California #50 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #51 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #52 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #53 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #53 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #55 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #56 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #57 of 69; 2026 Maryland #59 of 69; 2026 Florida #60 of 69; 2026 Houston #61 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #62 of 69; 2026 Illinois #63 of 69; 2026 Purdue #64 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #65 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #66 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #67 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #68 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #34
Offensive explosiveness. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Cincinnati #1 of 69; 2026 Louisville #2 of 69; 2026 Kansas #3 of 69; 2026 Florida State #4 of 69; 2026 Missouri #5 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #6 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #7 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #8 of 69; 2026 Duke #9 of 69; 2026 Alabama #10 of 69; 2026 Baylor #11 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #12 of 69; 2026 Washington #13 of 69; 2026 Auburn #14 of 69; 2026 Indiana #15 of 69; 2026 Stanford #16 of 69; 2026 Arizona #17 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #18 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #19 of 69; 2026 Miami #20 of 69; 2026 Oregon #21 of 69; 2026 Illinois #22 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #23 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #24 of 69; 2026 SMU #25 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #26 of 69; 2026 Boston College #27 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #28 of 69; 2026 Purdue #29 of 69; 2026 USC #30 of 69; 2026 TCU #31 of 69; 2026 Maryland #32 of 69; 2026 Clemson #33 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #34 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #36 of 69; 2026 BYU #37 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #38 of 69; 2026 UCLA #39 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #40 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #41 of 69; 2026 Texas #42 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #43 of 69; 2026 Utah #44 of 69; 2026 NC State #45 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #46 of 69; 2026 LSU #47 of 69; 2026 Florida #48 of 69; 2026 UCF #49 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #50 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #51 of 69; 2026 Michigan #52 of 69; 2026 Colorado #53 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #54 of 69; 2026 Georgia #55 of 69; 2026 Penn State #56 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 California #59 of 69; 2026 Iowa #60 of 69; 2026 Houston #61 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #62 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #63 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #64 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #65 of 69; 2026 Virginia #66 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #67 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #68 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 34.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. Power 4, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wisconsin #1 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #2 of 69; 2026 Duke #3 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #4 of 69; 2026 Vanderbilt #5 of 69; 2026 BYU #6 of 69; 2026 Tennessee #7 of 69; 2026 LSU #8 of 69; 2026 Clemson #9 of 69; 2026 Baylor #10 of 69; 2026 Iowa #12 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #13 of 69; 2026 UCF #14 of 69; 2026 Mississippi State #15 of 69; 2026 Texas #16 of 69; 2026 TCU #17 of 69; 2026 South Carolina #18 of 69; 2026 Washington #19 of 69; 2026 Texas Tech #20 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #21 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #22 of 69; 2026 Colorado #23 of 69; 2026 Florida #24 of 69; 2026 Boston College #25 of 69; 2026 Kentucky #26 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #27 of 69; 2026 Auburn #28 of 69; 2026 Cincinnati #29 of 69; 2026 Michigan #30 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #31 of 69; 2026 Houston #32 of 69; 2026 Missouri #33 of 69; 2026 Illinois #35 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #36 of 69; 2026 Arkansas #37 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 UCLA #39 of 69; 2026 Iowa State #40 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Arizona State #42 of 69; 2026 Georgia #43 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 69; 2026 Maryland #45 of 69; 2026 California #46 of 69; 2026 SMU #47 of 69; 2026 Virginia #48 of 69; 2026 Ole Miss #49 of 69; 2026 Oregon #50 of 69; 2026 Purdue #51 of 69; 2026 Kansas #52 of 69; 2026 NC State #53 of 69; 2026 Stanford #54 of 69; 2026 Arizona #55 of 69; 2026 Louisville #56 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma State #57 of 69; 2026 Miami #58 of 69; 2026 Alabama #59 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 West Virginia #61 of 69; 2026 Indiana #62 of 69; 2026 Texas A&M #63 of 69; 2026 Florida State #64 of 69; 2026 Penn State #65 of 69; 2026 Oklahoma #66 of 69; 2026 Utah #67 of 69; 2026 Kansas State #68 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida International, which has no value for this metric. Power 4 median rank 36.