THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Florida StateSeminoles

Season
‹

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Florida State played 6 such games.

ACC, 2026

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Florida State3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 69 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 2,479 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 177 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 471.3 yds/g allowed · 2,828 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 207 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · -5.0 /g · -30 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 5 taken, 12 given · -1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 28:38 /g · 2h 52m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 138 teams · 800.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 69 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.421 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.359 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 17 ACC teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#62. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#65. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #13–#68. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Scoring defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #10–#69. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Point margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#29 (Turnover margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #8–#66. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#65. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#98 (Returning passing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #17–#127. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#91 (Returning receiving: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #17–#126. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#83 (Returning rushing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #11–#129. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Team talent: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #12–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#62. 5 of 17 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #12–#69. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #5–#65. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #8–#69. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#26 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#66. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 4 of 17 in the top 10.)
2026Louisville5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 471.7 yds/g · 3,302 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 37.7 pts/g · 264 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 433.9 yds/g allowed · 3,037 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · +8.7 /g · +61 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +6 in these games · 13 taken, 7 given · +0.86 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 28:42 /g · 3h 21m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 138 teams · 740.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.310 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.442 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Miami8–02 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 475.2 yds/g · 2,851 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 42.0 pts/g · 252 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 372.7 yds/g allowed · 2,236 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 132 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +20.0 /g · +120 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 7 taken, 3 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34:13 /g · 3h 25m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 138 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 138 teams · 885.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.369 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 1.306 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Wake Forest7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 442.9 yds/g · 3,100 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 275 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 326.1 yds/g allowed · 2,283 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 18.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +21.1 /g · +148 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 29:01 /g · 3h 23m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 (of 138 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 138 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 50% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Duke6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 69 teams · 391.0 yds/g · 2,346 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 177 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 315.7 yds/g allowed · 1,894 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 104 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +12.2 /g · +73 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 8 taken, 4 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 31:00 /g · 3h 06m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 668.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.268 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.376 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026North Carolina4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 69 teams · 332.9 yds/g · 2,330 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 171 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 395.7 yds/g allowed · 2,770 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · -1.4 /g · -10 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · -5 in these games · 6 taken, 11 given · -0.71 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 27:51 /g · 3h 15m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 767.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 1.148 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Syracuse4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 69 teams · 411.3 yds/g · 2,468 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 353.8 yds/g allowed · 2,123 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 167 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · -4.0 /g · -24 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -3 in these games · 5 taken, 8 given · -0.50 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:39 /g · 3h 16m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 138 teams · 20% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 138 teams · 745.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 69 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Clemson5–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 69 teams · 316.3 yds/g · 1,898 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 127 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 382.0 yds/g allowed · 2,292 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · -6.5 /g · -39 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 9 taken, 7 given · +0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 28:57 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 138 teams · 862.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 69 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026NC State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 69 teams · 345.5 yds/g · 2,073 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 406.7 yds/g allowed · 2,440 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 176 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · -5.5 /g · -33 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 30:17 /g · 3h 02m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 757.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 1.324 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026SMU6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 69 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 2,599 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 192 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 331.5 yds/g allowed · 1,989 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 144 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · +8.0 /g · +48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 3 taken, 9 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 29:26 /g · 2h 57m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 764.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.261 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Virginia Tech6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 69 teams · 393.0 yds/g · 2,358 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 163 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 349.7 yds/g allowed · 2,098 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 140 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · +3.8 /g · +23 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 2 taken, 6 given · -0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 31:49 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 769.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 69 teams · 0.191 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Pittsburgh6–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 69 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 2,603 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 169 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 351.9 yds/g allowed · 2,463 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 164 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0.7 /g · +5 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.29 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 30:39 /g · 3h 35m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 138 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 138 teams · 675.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 69 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.513 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Boston College4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 69 teams · 354.9 yds/g · 2,484 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 151 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 349.3 yds/g allowed · 2,445 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 196 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · -6.4 /g · -45 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:43 /g · 3h 07m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 8% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 138 teams · 660.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 69 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Virginia4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 314.4 yds/g · 2,201 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 132 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 395.4 yds/g allowed · 2,768 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · -10.0 /g · -70 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 31:11 /g · 3h 38m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 700.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 69 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 0.237 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.090 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Georgia Tech2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 69 teams · 354.9 yds/g · 2,484 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 154 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 3,024 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 235 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · -11.6 /g · -81 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 4 taken, 11 given · -1.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:19 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 138 teams · 751.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 69 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 0.248 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026California3–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 304.7 yds/g · 2,133 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 117 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 427.0 yds/g allowed · 2,989 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -17.3 /g · -121 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 30:15 /g · 3h 32m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 138 teams · 751.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Stanford4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 69 teams · 320.7 yds/g · 2,245 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 112 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 499.0 yds/g allowed · 3,493 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 43.1 pts/g allowed · 302 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -27.1 /g · -190 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 7 taken, 7 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:18 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 138 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 138 teams · 705.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 69 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.435 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 1.338 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20262026 Florida StateACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Louisville #3 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #9 of 69; 2026 SMU #15 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #22 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #26 of 69; 2026 Duke #27 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #33 of 69; 2026 Boston College #41 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 NC State #44 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #52 of 69; 2026 Stanford #56 of 69; 2026 Clemson #59 of 69; 2026 Virginia #60 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 21 of 69. ACC median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #37
Scoring offense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #4 of 69; 2026 Louisville #5 of 69; 2026 SMU #16 of 69; 2026 Duke #19 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #28 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #36 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #37 of 69; 2026 NC State #39 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #39 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #47 of 69; 2026 Boston College #49 of 69; 2026 Clemson #52 of 69; 2026 Virginia #58 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69; 2026 Stanford #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 19 of 69. ACC median rank 37.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Duke #13 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #16 of 69; 2026 SMU #17 of 69; 2026 Boston College #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #21 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #23 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #25 of 69; 2026 Miami #31 of 69; 2026 Clemson #34 of 69; 2026 Virginia #47 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #52 of 69; 2026 California #56 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #57 of 69; 2026 Louisville #58 of 69; 2026 Stanford #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 66 of 69. ACC median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #42
Scoring defense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Duke #10 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #12 of 69; 2026 Miami #22 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #26 of 69; 2026 SMU #27 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #34 of 69; 2026 Clemson #40 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #42 of 69; 2026 Boston College #43 of 69; 2026 Virginia #44 of 69; 2026 Louisville #45 of 69; 2026 NC State #47 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #60 of 69; 2026 California #61 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 63 of 69. ACC median rank 42.
Point marginmedian #42
Point margin. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #2 of 69; 2026 Miami #3 of 69; 2026 Duke #10 of 69; 2026 Louisville #18 of 69; 2026 SMU #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #29 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #36 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #42 of 69; 2026 NC State #46 of 69; 2026 Boston College #48 of 69; 2026 Clemson #49 of 69; 2026 Virginia #57 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #59 of 69; 2026 California #66 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 44 of 69. ACC median rank 42.
Turnover marginmedian #29
Turnover margin. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Louisville #8 of 69; 2026 Duke #12 of 69; 2026 Miami #12 of 69; 2026 Clemson #17 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #18 of 69; 2026 Boston College #25 of 69; 2026 California #25 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #25 of 69; 2026 Stanford #29 of 69; 2026 Virginia #29 of 69; 2026 NC State #40 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #52 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #56 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #60 of 69; 2026 SMU #60 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 66 of 69. ACC median rank 29.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #1 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #10 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #16 of 69; 2026 Virginia #21 of 69; 2026 Duke #24 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #26 of 69; 2026 NC State #30 of 69; 2026 California #31 of 69; 2026 SMU #40 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #42 of 69; 2026 Clemson #45 of 69; 2026 Louisville #49 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #63 of 69; 2026 Stanford #64 of 69; 2026 Boston College #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 50 of 69. ACC median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #98
Returning passing. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 SMU #17 of 138; 2026 NC State #29 of 138; 2026 California #30 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #59 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #63 of 138; 2026 Clemson #80 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #95 of 138; 2026 Miami #98 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #101 of 138; 2026 Stanford #103 of 138; 2026 Boston College #109 of 138; 2026 Duke #119 of 138; 2026 Virginia #119 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #127 of 138; 2026 Louisville #127 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #127 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 93 of 138. ACC median rank 98.
Returning receivingmedian #91
Returning receiving. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Clemson #17 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 Miami #32 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #53 of 138; 2026 SMU #69 of 138; 2026 Stanford #81 of 138; 2026 California #83 of 138; 2026 NC State #91 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #94 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #99 of 138; 2026 Louisville #103 of 138; 2026 Duke #106 of 138; 2026 Boston College #108 of 138; 2026 Virginia #109 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #121 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 29 of 138. ACC median rank 91.
Returning rushingmedian #83
Returning rushing. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #11 of 138; 2026 Stanford #34 of 138; 2026 Louisville #36 of 138; 2026 NC State #48 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #49 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #50 of 138; 2026 Duke #59 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #83 of 138; 2026 Clemson #87 of 138; 2026 SMU #88 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #93 of 138; 2026 Virginia #104 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #105 of 138; 2026 California #119 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #125 of 138; 2026 Boston College #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 82 of 138. ACC median rank 83.
Team talentmedian #34
Team talent. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #12 of 138; 2026 Clemson #16 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #28 of 138; 2026 SMU #31 of 138; 2026 NC State #32 of 138; 2026 California #33 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #34 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #35 of 138; 2026 Louisville #37 of 138; 2026 Stanford #50 of 138; 2026 Virginia #53 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #63 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #64 of 138; 2026 Duke #69 of 138; 2026 Boston College #71 of 138. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 21 of 138. ACC median rank 34.
Offensive EPAmedian #30
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #1 of 69; 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Louisville #6 of 69; 2026 Duke #9 of 69; 2026 SMU #10 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #21 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #29 of 69; 2026 NC State #30 of 69; 2026 Boston College #38 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Virginia #46 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #48 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #51 of 69; 2026 Stanford #55 of 69; 2026 Clemson #57 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 27 of 69. ACC median rank 30.
Defensive EPAmedian #39
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Duke #12 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #15 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #22 of 69; 2026 Boston College #30 of 69; 2026 Miami #31 of 69; 2026 Louisville #32 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #34 of 69; 2026 Clemson #35 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #39 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #45 of 69; 2026 SMU #51 of 69; 2026 Virginia #55 of 69; 2026 NC State #57 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #59 of 69; 2026 California #60 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 56 of 69. ACC median rank 39.
Offensive success ratemedian #34
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #5 of 69; 2026 Miami #7 of 69; 2026 Louisville #10 of 69; 2026 SMU #13 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #16 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #22 of 69; 2026 Duke #26 of 69; 2026 Boston College #33 of 69; 2026 NC State #35 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #39 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #44 of 69; 2026 Virginia #47 of 69; 2026 Clemson #61 of 69; 2026 California #63 of 69; 2026 Stanford #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 34 of 69. ACC median rank 34.
Defensive success ratemedian #41
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Pittsburgh #8 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #22 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 69; 2026 SMU #27 of 69; 2026 Louisville #28 of 69; 2026 Miami #30 of 69; 2026 Boston College #34 of 69; 2026 Duke #35 of 69; 2026 Virginia #41 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #44 of 69; 2026 Clemson #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #49 of 69; 2026 California #50 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #52 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #55 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 47 of 69. ACC median rank 41.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #26
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Louisville #2 of 69; 2026 Duke #9 of 69; 2026 Stanford #16 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #18 of 69; 2026 Miami #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #24 of 69; 2026 SMU #25 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #26 of 69; 2026 Boston College #27 of 69; 2026 Clemson #33 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #40 of 69; 2026 NC State #45 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 California #59 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #63 of 69; 2026 Virginia #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 4 of 69. ACC median rank 26.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #46
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #2 of 69; 2026 Duke #3 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #4 of 69; 2026 Clemson #9 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #22 of 69; 2026 Boston College #25 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #36 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 California #46 of 69; 2026 SMU #47 of 69; 2026 Virginia #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #53 of 69; 2026 Stanford #54 of 69; 2026 Louisville #56 of 69; 2026 Miami #58 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Florida State, ranked 64 of 69. ACC median rank 46.