Metrics

Fresno StateBulldogs

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Fresno State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 120 teams · 370.6 yds/g · 4,818 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#59 (of 120 teams · 367.2 yds/g allowed · 4,774 yards)#83 (of 120 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#71 (of 120 teams · -1.0 /g · -13 on the season)#110 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.85 /g)#26 (of 120 teams · 19:28 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#38 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.013 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 120 teams · 1.053 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#55 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#112. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#59 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#117. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#95 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#83 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #1–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #14–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#45 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #6–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#48 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#109. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #1–#112. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #3–#115. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#118. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#24 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #7–#96. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#90 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #25–#117. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2010Boise State1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 521.3 yds/g · 6,777 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 45.1 pts/g · 586 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 254.7 yds/g allowed · 3,311 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +32.3 /g · +420 on the season)#22 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.62 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 18:58 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.868 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 120 teams · 1.044 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Hawai'i1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 500.6 yds/g · 7,009 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 554 points)#51 (of 120 teams · 357.6 yds/g allowed · 5,006 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +14.1 /g · +197 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 38 taken, 26 given · +0.86 /g)#82 (of 120 teams · 17:59 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#77 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.001 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Idaho670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 120 teams · 386.8 yds/g · 5,028 yards)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 346 points)#95 (of 120 teams · 420.3 yds/g allowed · 5,464 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#78 (of 120 teams · -1.7 /g · -22 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 30 taken, 28 given · +0.15 /g)#39 (of 120 teams · 19:07 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#98 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.019 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.947 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Louisiana Tech570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 120 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 4,678 yards)#59 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 321 points)#116 (of 120 teams · 462.1 yds/g allowed · 5,545 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#83 (of 120 teams · -3.9 /g · -47 on the season)#70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 24 taken, 27 given · -0.25 /g)#117 (of 120 teams · 16:25 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#106 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Nevada1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 519.1 yds/g · 7,268 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.0 pts/g · 574 points)#54 (of 120 teams · 363.6 yds/g allowed · 5,090 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19.6 /g · +274 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.36 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:16 /g · 4h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#51 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.988 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010New Mexico State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 296.5 yds/g · 3,558 yards)#117 (of 120 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 188 points)#112 (of 120 teams · 453.3 yds/g allowed · 5,440 yards)#115 (of 120 teams · 39.5 pts/g allowed · 474 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -23.8 /g · -286 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 12 taken, 18 given · -0.50 /g)#13 (of 120 teams · 19:59 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 120 teams · -0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 120 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#90 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010San José State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 120 teams · 315.1 yds/g · 4,096 yards)#115 (of 120 teams · 16.1 pts/g · 209 points)#117 (of 120 teams · 463.7 yds/g allowed · 6,028 yards)#105 (of 120 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 451 points)#114 (of 120 teams · -18.6 /g · -242 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 17 taken, 26 given · -0.69 /g)#107 (of 120 teams · 17:19 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#118 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Utah State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#84 (of 120 teams · 347.3 yds/g · 4,168 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 264 points)#100 (of 120 teams · 428.8 yds/g allowed · 5,146 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 33.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#103 (of 120 teams · -11.8 /g · -141 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#87 (of 120 teams · 17:49 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#76 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20102010 Fresno StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #55
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #4 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #6 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #49 of 120; 2010 Idaho #55 of 120; 2010 Utah State #84 of 120; 2010 San José State #101 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 70 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 55.
Scoring offensemedian #59
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #8 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #10 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #59 of 120; 2010 Idaho #60 of 120; 2010 Utah State #94 of 120; 2010 San José State #115 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 48 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 59.
Total defensemedian #95
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #51 of 120; 2010 Nevada #54 of 120; 2010 Idaho #95 of 120; 2010 Utah State #100 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #112 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #116 of 120; 2010 San José State #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 59 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 95.
Scoring defensemedian #83
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #31 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #58 of 120; 2010 Idaho #71 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #90 of 120; 2010 Utah State #101 of 120; 2010 San José State #105 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 83 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 83.
Point marginmedian #78
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #1 of 120; 2010 Nevada #8 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #14 of 120; 2010 Idaho #78 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #83 of 120; 2010 Utah State #103 of 120; 2010 San José State #114 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 71 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 78.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Hawai'i #14 of 120; 2010 Boise State #22 of 120; 2010 Nevada #34 of 120; 2010 Idaho #47 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #70 of 120; 2010 Utah State #84 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #90 of 120; 2010 San José State #106 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 110 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #45
Possession. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nevada #6 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #13 of 120; 2010 Idaho #39 of 120; 2010 Boise State #45 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #82 of 120; 2010 Utah State #87 of 120; 2010 San José State #107 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 26 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 45.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #48
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nevada #2 of 120; 2010 Boise State #6 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #8 of 120; 2010 Idaho #36 of 120; 2010 Utah State #66 of 120; 2010 San José State #88 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #91 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 48 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 48.
Defensive EPAmedian #80
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #1 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #53 of 120; 2010 Nevada #74 of 120; 2010 Utah State #80 of 120; 2010 Idaho #83 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #97 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #110 of 120; 2010 San José State #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 55 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 80.
Offensive success ratemedian #77
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nevada #3 of 120; 2010 Boise State #5 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #9 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #67 of 120; 2010 Idaho #77 of 120; 2010 San José State #91 of 120; 2010 Utah State #92 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 84 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Defensive success ratemedian #77
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #51 of 120; 2010 Utah State #76 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #77 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #90 of 120; 2010 Idaho #98 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #106 of 120; 2010 San José State #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 38 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #24
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Idaho #7 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #10 of 120; 2010 Utah State #23 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #24 of 120; 2010 San José State #40 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #68 of 120; 2010 Nevada #77 of 120; 2010 Boise State #96 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 9 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 24.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #90
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Hawai'i #25 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #39 of 120; 2010 San José State #40 of 120; 2010 Idaho #76 of 120; 2010 Utah State #90 of 120; 2010 New Mexico State #96 of 120; 2010 Nevada #104 of 120; 2010 Boise State #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 Fresno State, ranked 117 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 90.