THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Fresno StateBulldogs

Season
‹
›Current

Mountain West

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2025, released in week 16.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Fresno State played 1 such game.

CFP Top 25, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Fresno State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (216.0 yds/g · 216 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 7 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (383.0 yds/g allowed · 383 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 31 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-24.0 /g · -24 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 0 taken, 3 given · -3.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:52 /g · 0h 27m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#107 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 136 teams · 586.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.342 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.386 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.105 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#21 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#67. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#50. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#14 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#39. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#41. 10 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#21 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #2–#72. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #9–#118. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #4–#130. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#122. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#64. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#57. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#74. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#74. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)
2025Indiana16–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 455.2 yds/g · 4,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.8 pts/g · 376 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,359 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +29.8 /g · +268 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13 in these games · 19 taken, 6 given · +1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:55 /g · 4h 56m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 4,491 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 358 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 264.5 yds/g allowed · 2,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +20.0 /g · +200 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 30:25 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.350 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#21 (of 74 teams · 404.4 yds/g · 4,044 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 208.9 yds/g allowed · 2,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 8.4 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +25.3 /g · +253 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:10 /g · 5h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.141 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.998 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Notre Dame10–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.0 yds/g · 4,620 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.7 pts/g · 427 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 321.4 yds/g allowed · 3,214 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +23.3 /g · +233 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 29:40 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 912.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.322 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.470 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas Tech12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 BYU, #12 BYU, #15 Utah, #21 Houston)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 451.3 yds/g · 4,062 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38.2 pts/g · 344 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.3 yds/g allowed · 2,415 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 11.1 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +27.1 /g · +244 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11 in these games · 22 taken, 11 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:07 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 136 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.184 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Vanderbilt10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 74 teams · 440.1 yds/g · 3,961 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.0 /g · +99 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:34 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 685.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.392 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.427 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#25 (of 74 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 281.1 yds/g allowed · 2,811 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.4 /g · +164 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:03 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas A&M11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Notre Dame)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 447.7 yds/g · 4,029 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 302 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +9.4 /g · +85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:48 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 917.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama, #13 Texas, #22 Georgia Tech)#22 (of 74 teams · 404.2 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 324.3 yds/g allowed · 2,919 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 8 taken, 9 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:04 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1003.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama, #18 Michigan)#61 (of 74 teams · 320.2 yds/g · 2,882 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 196 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g allowed · 2,895 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +3.9 /g · +35 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:35 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 882.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Alabama11–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)#38 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 321.0 yds/g allowed · 3,210 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +7.2 /g · +72 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:34 /g · 5h 26m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 993.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025BYU12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #15 Utah, #17 Arizona · postseason: #22 Georgia Tech)#27 (of 74 teams · 395.5 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 344.1 yds/g allowed · 3,441 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 200 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.5 /g · +105 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 19 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:16 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 136 teams · 649.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 74 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#13 (of 74 teams · 430.3 yds/g · 4,303 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Houston10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Arizona)#24 (of 74 teams · 400.7 yds/g · 3,606 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 3,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 229 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +2.4 /g · +22 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:46 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 136 teams · 656.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ole Miss13–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma · postseason: #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma, #20 Tulane · postseason: #3 Georgia, #20 Tulane)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.3 yds/g · 3,698 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 266 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 375.8 yds/g allowed · 3,006 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +7.9 /g · +63 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:38 /g · 4h 05m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 813.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Utah11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 468.7 yds/g · 4,687 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 39.9 pts/g · 399 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 385.8 yds/g allowed · 3,858 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 209 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +19.0 /g · +190 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:32 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 707.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.346 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.328 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.377 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Arizona9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 74 teams · 396.0 yds/g · 3,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 303 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 314.6 yds/g allowed · 3,146 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +8.5 /g · +85 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 31:14 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 136 teams · 651.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Tulane11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 North Texas)#34 (of 74 teams · 376.3 yds/g · 1,129 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 67 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 1,237 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 75 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -2.7 /g · -8 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 7 taken, 2 given · +1.67 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:02 /g · 1h 39m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 136 teams · 650.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 74 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.160 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.199 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 298.9 yds/g · 2,989 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 300.0 yds/g allowed · 3,000 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.8 /g · +98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:48 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.074 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #18 Michigan)#46 (of 74 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 3,177 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 376.3 yds/g allowed · 3,387 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 13 taken, 5 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:58 /g · 4h 03m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.390 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 3,747 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 323.7 yds/g allowed · 2,913 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +8.4 /g · +76 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 74 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 411.4 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 6 taken, 10 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 3,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 334.2 yds/g allowed · 3,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +30 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:24 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025James Madison12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (263.0 yds/g · 263 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (264.0 yds/g allowed · 264 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g allowed · 28 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-14.0 /g · -14 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 1 taken, 2 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37:12 /g · 0h 37m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#25 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 459.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.984 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.709 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2025North Texas12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#89 (of 136 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 136 teams · 569.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of plays successful · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— average PPA on successful plays · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20252025 Fresno StateCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #21
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Utah #1 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #2 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #5 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #6 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #9 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #12 of 74; 2025 USC #13 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 Houston #24 of 74; 2025 Miami #25 of 74; 2025 Arizona #26 of 74; 2025 BYU #27 of 74; 2025 Tulane #34 of 74; 2025 Alabama #38 of 74; 2025 Michigan #39 of 74; 2025 Texas #46 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2025 Iowa #67 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Scoring offensemedian #17
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Notre Dame #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Utah #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #8 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #10 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #11 of 74; 2025 Miami #14 of 74; 2025 Georgia #16 of 74; 2025 USC #17 of 74; 2025 BYU #18 of 74; 2025 Virginia #19 of 74; 2025 Arizona #20 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #24 of 74; 2025 Houston #27 of 74; 2025 Alabama #31 of 74; 2025 Iowa #33 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Michigan #43 of 74; 2025 Tulane #49 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #50 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Total defensemedian #14
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Miami #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Arizona #8 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #12 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Georgia #14 of 74; 2025 Michigan #16 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #17 of 74; 2025 BYU #20 of 74; 2025 USC #27 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #36 of 74; 2025 Texas #37 of 74; 2025 Houston #38 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #40 of 74; 2025 Utah #43 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Tulane #56 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 14.
Scoring defensemedian #13
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #7 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #8 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 BYU #11 of 74; 2025 Michigan #12 of 74; 2025 Georgia #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #14 of 74; 2025 Arizona #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #21 of 74; 2025 USC #24 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #27 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 Tulane #32 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #34 of 74; 2025 Houston #35 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Point marginmedian #13
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Utah #6 of 74; 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #8 of 74; 2025 Georgia #9 of 74; 2025 BYU #10 of 74; 2025 Iowa #12 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #13 of 74; 2025 Arizona #14 of 74; 2025 Virginia #15 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #16 of 74; 2025 Alabama #17 of 74; 2025 USC #18 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #25 of 74; 2025 Michigan #29 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #30 of 74; 2025 Houston #32 of 74; 2025 Texas #34 of 74; 2025 Tulane #41 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Turnover marginmedian #20
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Tulane #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 BYU #7 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #10 of 74; 2025 Arizona #10 of 74; 2025 Texas #12 of 74; 2025 Oregon #13 of 74; 2025 Miami #13 of 74; 2025 Alabama #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #20 of 74; 2025 Iowa #22 of 74; 2025 Utah #26 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #30 of 74; 2025 USC #33 of 74; 2025 Michigan #33 of 74; 2025 Houston #37 of 74; 2025 Georgia #41 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #41 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #41 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #53 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #56 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Possessionmedian #21
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Miami #3 of 74; 2025 BYU #4 of 74; 2025 Georgia #5 of 74; 2025 Tulane #6 of 74; 2025 Indiana #7 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 74; 2025 Houston #9 of 74; 2025 Alabama #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #17 of 74; 2025 Arizona #21 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #23 of 74; 2025 Iowa #25 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #26 of 74; 2025 Utah #28 of 74; 2025 Oregon #30 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 USC #40 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #43 of 74; 2025 Michigan #49 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Texas #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Returning passingmedian #80
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Arizona #13 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 James Madison #25 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #49 of 136; 2025 Utah #53 of 136; 2025 Houston #59 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #63 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Texas #76 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Georgia #83 of 136; 2025 Tulane #85 of 136; 2025 Alabama #88 of 136; 2025 North Texas #89 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #96 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 BYU #112 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #116 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, ranked 107 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 80.
Returning receivingmedian #51
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #4 of 136; 2025 Houston #6 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Alabama #12 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #27 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #33 of 136; 2025 Georgia #34 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #37 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Arizona #44 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 North Texas #51 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 BYU #56 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Texas #65 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #83 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #86 of 136; 2025 James Madison #92 of 136; 2025 Tulane #122 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136; 2025 Utah #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, ranked 72 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 51.
Returning rushingmedian #58
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #2 of 136; 2025 James Madison #4 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Houston #9 of 136; 2025 Texas #21 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #24 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #30 of 136; 2025 Georgia #41 of 136; 2025 Alabama #46 of 136; 2025 BYU #53 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Arizona #58 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 North Texas #72 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #82 of 136; 2025 Tulane #83 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Utah #119 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #122 of 136. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, ranked 27 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 58.
Team talentmedian #29
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #1 of 136; 2025 Alabama #2 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Texas #4 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #9 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #14 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #29 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Utah #44 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #55 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 Houston #66 of 136; 2025 Arizona #67 of 136; 2025 Tulane #68 of 136; 2025 BYU #70 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136; 2025 North Texas #96 of 136; 2025 James Madison #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, ranked 90 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Offensive EPAmedian #18
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #4 of 74; 2025 Utah #5 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2025 USC #8 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #11 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #12 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #13 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #17 of 74; 2025 Miami #18 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 BYU #23 of 74; 2025 Alabama #28 of 74; 2025 Michigan #31 of 74; 2025 Virginia #33 of 74; 2025 Arizona #40 of 74; 2025 Iowa #41 of 74; 2025 Texas #43 of 74; 2025 Houston #55 of 74; 2025 Tulane #60 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #64 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Defensive EPAmedian #20
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #4 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #5 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Virginia #10 of 74; 2025 Iowa #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #17 of 74; 2025 Alabama #18 of 74; 2025 Arizona #20 of 74; 2025 BYU #21 of 74; 2025 Michigan #28 of 74; 2025 Georgia #29 of 74; 2025 Houston #30 of 74; 2025 USC #31 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #32 of 74; 2025 Tulane #33 of 74; 2025 Texas #35 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #39 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #44 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #61 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Offensive success ratemedian #20
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Oregon #6 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Miami #9 of 74; 2025 Utah #11 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #12 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #14 of 74; 2025 Georgia #18 of 74; 2025 BYU #20 of 74; 2025 Michigan #21 of 74; 2025 Houston #25 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #29 of 74; 2025 Alabama #33 of 74; 2025 Arizona #34 of 74; 2025 Iowa #36 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #41 of 74; 2025 Tulane #46 of 74; 2025 Virginia #47 of 74; 2025 Texas #58 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive success ratemedian #19
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #1 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #5 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Virginia #12 of 74; 2025 Arizona #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #16 of 74; 2025 Alabama #19 of 74; 2025 BYU #24 of 74; 2025 Georgia #25 of 74; 2025 Iowa #28 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #30 of 74; 2025 Houston #36 of 74; 2025 Michigan #41 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #43 of 74; 2025 Tulane #47 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #49 of 74; 2025 USC #57 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #30
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Notre Dame #1 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #7 of 74; 2025 Texas #9 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #11 of 74; 2025 Utah #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #18 of 74; 2025 Oregon #20 of 74; 2025 USC #23 of 74; 2025 Alabama #25 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #28 of 74; 2025 Arizona #30 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #33 of 74; 2025 Indiana #39 of 74; 2025 Georgia #55 of 74; 2025 Tulane #59 of 74; 2025 BYU #61 of 74; 2025 Houston #63 of 74; 2025 Michigan #65 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #66 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #67 of 74; 2025 Miami #70 of 74; 2025 Iowa #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 30.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Iowa #2 of 74; 2025 Michigan #5 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #15 of 74; 2025 Houston #19 of 74; 2025 Georgia #20 of 74; 2025 Tulane #23 of 74; 2025 BYU #30 of 74; 2025 Arizona #31 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #37 of 74; 2025 Virginia #40 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #44 of 74; 2025 Alabama #45 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2025 Miami #51 of 74; 2025 Indiana #53 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #56 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Utah #68 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Fresno State, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 36.