Metrics

Georgia SouthernEagles

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Georgia Southern940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 128 teams · 426.4 yds/g · 5,543 yards)#25 (of 128 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 474 points)#21 (of 128 teams · 338.7 yds/g allowed · 4,403 yards)#38 (of 128 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#24 (of 128 teams · +12.9 /g · +168 on the season)#31 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 27 taken, 21 given · +0.46 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:59 /g · 7h 22m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#93 (of 128 teams · 391.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 128 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#59 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 128 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 128 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Sun Belt teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #26–#123. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#70 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #12–#111. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#89 (Total defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #11–#125. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#94 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #14–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#94 (Point margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #9–#119. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#75 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #23–#124. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#83 (Possession: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #4–#123. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning passing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #1–#114. 3 of 11 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning receiving: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #5–#117. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning rushing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #10–#119. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#111 (Team talent: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #79–#126. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #25–#110. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#78 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #4–#125. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#80 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #23–#123. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #18–#125. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#63 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #1–#128. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#87 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range #7–#124. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)
2015App State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 128 teams · 467.3 yds/g · 6,075 yards)#23 (of 128 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 477 points)#11 (of 128 teams · 314.5 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 248 points)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +17.6 /g · +229 on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#38 (of 128 teams · 31:17 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 312.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 128 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#18 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.064 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Arkansas State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 128 teams · 438.5 yds/g · 5,700 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 40.0 pts/g · 520 points)#89 (of 128 teams · 419.2 yds/g allowed · 5,450 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#33 (of 128 teams · +9.8 /g · +127 on the season)#23 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 34 taken, 26 given · +0.62 /g)#51 (of 128 teams · 30:27 /g · 6h 36m on the season)#37 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 408.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 128 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#22 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 128 teams · 1.203 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.403 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Georgia State670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 128 teams · 432.9 yds/g · 5,627 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#74 (of 128 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 5,273 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#82 (of 128 teams · -1.4 /g · -18 on the season)#75 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#83 (of 128 teams · 29:02 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#30 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 335.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 128 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 128 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.325 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.070 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Idaho480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 128 teams · 429.1 yds/g · 5,149 yards)#57 (of 128 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 364 points)#118 (of 128 teams · 485.8 yds/g allowed · 5,829 yards)#123 (of 128 teams · 42.1 pts/g allowed · 505 points)#109 (of 128 teams · -11.8 /g · -141 on the season)#104 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 17 taken, 23 given · -0.50 /g)#30 (of 128 teams · 31:38 /g · 6h 20m on the season)#62 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning)#115 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 262.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.132 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#125 (of 128 teams · 0.333 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#125 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#128 (of 128 teams · 1.004 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 128 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Louisiana480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#77 (of 128 teams · 380.4 yds/g · 4,565 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#90 (of 128 teams · 420.8 yds/g allowed · 5,050 yards)#94 (of 128 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#94 (of 128 teams · -5.4 /g · -65 on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · -9 on the season · 11 taken, 20 given · -0.75 /g)#58 (of 128 teams · 30:10 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#101 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 430.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 128 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 128 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#42 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 128 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.400 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015New Mexico State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 128 teams · 433.3 yds/g · 5,200 yards)#66 (of 128 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 343 points)#125 (of 128 teams · 522.4 yds/g allowed · 6,269 yards)#126 (of 128 teams · 45.0 pts/g allowed · 540 points)#119 (of 128 teams · -16.4 /g · -197 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#103 (of 128 teams · 28:04 /g · 5h 37m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#126 (of 128 teams · 251.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 128 teams · 0.291 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#113 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.467 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 128 teams · 1.304 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015South Alabama570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#101 (of 128 teams · 360.2 yds/g · 4,322 yards)#93 (of 128 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#84 (of 128 teams · 416.0 yds/g allowed · 4,992 yards)#115 (of 128 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 447 points)#110 (of 128 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#100 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.42 /g)#94 (of 128 teams · 28:25 /g · 5h 41m on the season)#90 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's passing production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 367.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 128 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 128 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#91 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 128 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Texas State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 128 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 4,977 yards)#80 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 323 points)#124 (of 128 teams · 521.8 yds/g allowed · 6,262 yards)#120 (of 128 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 470 points)#110 (of 128 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.58 /g)#85 (of 128 teams · 28:57 /g · 5h 47m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#60 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#47 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 360.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#121 (of 128 teams · 0.303 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#114 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 128 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 128 teams · 1.319 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Troy480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 128 teams · 359.9 yds/g · 4,319 yards)#70 (of 128 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 335 points)#57 (of 128 teams · 391.3 yds/g allowed · 4,695 yards)#78 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#76 (of 128 teams · -0.3 /g · -4 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#123 (of 128 teams · 26:17 /g · 5h 15m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 335.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 128 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 128 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 128 teams · 1.148 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.114 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UL Monroe2110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#123 (of 128 teams · 310.9 yds/g · 4,041 yards)#111 (of 128 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 273 points)#93 (of 128 teams · 422.8 yds/g allowed · 5,496 yards)#113 (of 128 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 475 points)#117 (of 128 teams · -15.5 /g · -202 on the season)#124 (of 128 teams · -16 on the season · 14 taken, 30 given · -1.23 /g)#106 (of 128 teams · 27:52 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's rushing production returning)#123 (of 128 teams · 292.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 128 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#123 (of 128 teams · 35% of plays successful)#53 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20152015 Georgia SouthernSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #26 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #37 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #42 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #43 of 128; 2015 Idaho #44 of 128; 2015 Texas State #54 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #77 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #101 of 128; 2015 Troy #102 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 46 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #70
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas State #12 of 128; 2015 App State #23 of 128; 2015 Idaho #57 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #66 of 128; 2015 Troy #70 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #79 of 128; 2015 Texas State #80 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #93 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #111 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 25 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Total defensemedian #89
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #11 of 128; 2015 Troy #57 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #74 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #84 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #89 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #90 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #93 of 128; 2015 Idaho #118 of 128; 2015 Texas State #124 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 21 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 89.
Scoring defensemedian #94
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #14 of 128; 2015 Troy #78 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #79 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #86 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #94 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #113 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #115 of 128; 2015 Texas State #120 of 128; 2015 Idaho #123 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 38 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 94.
Point marginmedian #94
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #9 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #33 of 128; 2015 Troy #76 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #82 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #94 of 128; 2015 Idaho #109 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #110 of 128; 2015 Texas State #110 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #117 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #119 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 24 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 94.
Turnover marginmedian #75
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas State #23 of 128; 2015 App State #51 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #58 of 128; 2015 Troy #66 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #75 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #100 of 128; 2015 Idaho #104 of 128; 2015 Texas State #105 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #110 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 31 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Possessionmedian #83
Possession. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Idaho #30 of 128; 2015 App State #38 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #51 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #58 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #83 of 128; 2015 Texas State #85 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #94 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #103 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #106 of 128; 2015 Troy #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 4 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 83.
Returning passingmedian #44
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 New Mexico State #1 of 128; 2015 Texas State #7 of 128; 2015 Troy #21 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #37 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #44 of 128; 2015 App State #61 of 128; 2015 Idaho #62 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #90 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #110 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 1 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 44.
Returning receivingmedian #64
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #5 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #6 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #30 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #53 of 128; 2015 Texas State #60 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #64 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #64 of 128; 2015 Troy #68 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #100 of 128; 2015 Idaho #115 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 117 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 64.
Returning rushingmedian #48
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas State #10 of 128; 2015 App State #11 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #31 of 128; 2015 Texas State #47 of 128; 2015 Troy #48 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #78 of 128; 2015 Idaho #90 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #101 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #104 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #119 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 41 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 48.
Team talentmedian #111
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Louisiana #79 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #84 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #102 of 128; 2015 Texas State #103 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #111 of 128; 2015 Troy #112 of 128; 2015 App State #120 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #123 of 128; 2015 Idaho #124 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 93 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 111.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #25 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #55 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #64 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #73 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #77 of 128; 2015 Idaho #78 of 128; 2015 Texas State #80 of 128; 2015 Troy #98 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #107 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #110 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 30 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #78
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #4 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #51 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #54 of 128; 2015 Troy #74 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #78 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #100 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #105 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #120 of 128; 2015 Texas State #121 of 128; 2015 Idaho #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 61 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 78.
Offensive success ratemedian #80
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #23 of 128; 2015 Idaho #24 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #46 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #75 of 128; 2015 Texas State #80 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #82 of 128; 2015 Troy #83 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #106 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #116 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 51 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 80.
Defensive success ratemedian #85
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #18 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #22 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #42 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #53 of 128; 2015 Troy #85 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #86 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #91 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #113 of 128; 2015 Texas State #114 of 128; 2015 Idaho #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 59 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 85.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #63
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 New Mexico State #1 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #6 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #26 of 128; 2015 App State #52 of 128; 2015 Texas State #63 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #66 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #79 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #83 of 128; 2015 Troy #89 of 128; 2015 Idaho #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 20 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 63.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #87
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2015, best rank first: 2015 App State #7 of 128; 2015 Georgia State #10 of 128; 2015 Troy #26 of 128; 2015 South Alabama #85 of 128; 2015 UL Monroe #87 of 128; 2015 Idaho #106 of 128; 2015 New Mexico State #108 of 128; 2015 Texas State #111 of 128; 2015 Louisiana #122 of 128; 2015 Arkansas State #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Georgia Southern, ranked 58 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 87.