Metrics

Georgia SouthernEagles

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Georgia Southern760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 App State)#114 (of 130 teams · 330.1 yds/g · 4,291 yards)#70 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 366 points)#56 (of 130 teams · 378.5 yds/g allowed · 4,920 yards)#70 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#70 (of 130 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 19 taken, 11 given · +0.62 /g)#16 (of 130 teams · 32:35 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#89 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 411.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 130 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 130 teams · 0.175 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#55 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 130 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 130 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Sun Belt teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#32 (Total offense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #8–#121. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #9–#121. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#79 (Total defense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #26–#128. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#88 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #18–#127. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#75 (Point margin: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #9–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#63 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #7–#117. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#74 (Possession: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #10–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Returning passing: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #1–#111. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning receiving: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #14–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#56 (Returning rushing: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #16–#115. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#108 (Team talent: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #93–#125. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #7–#124. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #23–#125. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#61 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #5–#126. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#94 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #12–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#74 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #6–#114. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#81 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range #6–#128. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2019App State1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 130 teams · 432.5 yds/g · 6,055 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 38.8 pts/g · 543 points)#26 (of 130 teams · 336.1 yds/g allowed · 4,705 yards)#21 (of 130 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.8 /g · +263 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15 on the season · 24 taken, 9 given · +1.07 /g)#46 (of 130 teams · 30:38 /g · 7h 09m on the season)#43 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 412.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 130 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#12 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.347 average PPA on successful plays)#128 (of 130 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Arkansas State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 130 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 5,719 yards)#26 (of 130 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points)#124 (of 130 teams · 478.3 yds/g allowed · 6,218 yards)#114 (of 130 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 444 points)#75 (of 130 teams · -0.5 /g · -6 on the season)#86 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.23 /g)#113 (of 130 teams · 27:39 /g · 6h 00m on the season)#111 (of 130 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 447.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 130 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 130 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#80 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.363 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 130 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Coastal Carolina570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 (of 130 teams · 393.8 yds/g · 4,725 yards)#55 (of 130 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 364 points)#62 (of 130 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yards)#85 (of 130 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#73 (of 130 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:25 /g · 6h 41m on the season)#80 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's passing production returning)#63 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning)#125 (of 130 teams · 305.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 130 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 130 teams · 0.232 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#111 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 130 teams · 1.121 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 130 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Georgia State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 130 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 5,718 yards)#47 (of 130 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 406 points)#112 (of 130 teams · 455.5 yds/g allowed · 5,922 yards)#121 (of 130 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 471 points)#99 (of 130 teams · -5.0 /g · -65 on the season)#60 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.08 /g)#74 (of 130 teams · 29:37 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#61 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#27 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 369.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 130 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#125 (of 130 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#106 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 130 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays)#121 (of 130 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Louisiana1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 494.1 yds/g · 6,918 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 531 points)#47 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g allowed · 5,206 yards)#18 (of 130 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 276 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.2 /g · +255 on the season)#38 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.36 /g)#51 (of 130 teams · 30:25 /g · 7h 06m on the season)#97 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#16 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's rushing production returning)#103 (of 130 teams · 406.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.316 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 130 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 52% of plays successful)#86 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 130 teams · 1.158 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.074 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019South Alabama2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#113 (of 130 teams · 330.3 yds/g · 3,964 yards)#121 (of 130 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 221 points)#79 (of 130 teams · 408.8 yds/g allowed · 4,905 yards)#88 (of 130 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#115 (of 130 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 16 taken, 22 given · -0.50 /g)#96 (of 130 teams · 28:33 /g · 5h 43m on the season)#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#113 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#110 (of 130 teams · 381.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 (of 130 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 130 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#100 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 130 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 130 teams · 1.112 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Texas State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#121 (of 130 teams · 317.8 yds/g · 3,814 yards)#121 (of 130 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 221 points)#84 (of 130 teams · 416.0 yds/g allowed · 4,992 yards)#107 (of 130 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 391 points)#119 (of 130 teams · -14.2 /g · -170 on the season)#117 (of 130 teams · -9 on the season · 15 taken, 24 given · -0.75 /g)#119 (of 130 teams · 26:44 /g · 5h 21m on the season)#76 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#56 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#116 (of 130 teams · 348.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#124 (of 130 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 130 teams · 0.206 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#126 (of 130 teams · 36% of plays successful)#104 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.337 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 130 teams · 1.095 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Troy570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 130 teams · 456.3 yds/g · 5,475 yards)#25 (of 130 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 406 points)#99 (of 130 teams · 434.2 yds/g allowed · 5,210 yards)#116 (of 130 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#78 (of 130 teams · -0.9 /g · -11 on the season)#81 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.17 /g)#95 (of 130 teams · 28:47 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#85 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's passing production returning)#117 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)#108 (of 130 teams · 388.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 130 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 130 teams · 0.214 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#94 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 130 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 130 teams · 1.287 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019UL Monroe570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 130 teams · 460.9 yds/g · 5,531 yards)#45 (of 130 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 379 points)#128 (of 130 teams · 482.8 yds/g allowed · 5,793 yards)#127 (of 130 teams · 38.7 pts/g allowed · 464 points)#102 (of 130 teams · -7.1 /g · -85 on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 18 taken, 18 given · +0.00 /g)#77 (of 130 teams · 29:25 /g · 5h 53m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#117 (of 130 teams · 346.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#122 (of 130 teams · 0.273 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#117 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 130 teams · 1.287 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 130 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20192019 Georgia SouthernSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #32
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana #8 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #17 of 130; 2019 Troy #19 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #31 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #32 of 130; 2019 App State #41 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #73 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #113 of 130; 2019 Texas State #121 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 114 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 32.
Scoring offensemedian #45
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #9 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #10 of 130; 2019 Troy #25 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #26 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #45 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #47 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #55 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #121 of 130; 2019 Texas State #121 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 70 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 45.
Total defensemedian #79
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #26 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #47 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #62 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #79 of 130; 2019 Texas State #84 of 130; 2019 Troy #99 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #112 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #124 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 56 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 79.
Scoring defensemedian #88
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana #18 of 130; 2019 App State #21 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #85 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #88 of 130; 2019 Texas State #107 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #114 of 130; 2019 Troy #116 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #121 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 70 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 88.
Point marginmedian #75
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #9 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #10 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #73 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #75 of 130; 2019 Troy #78 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #99 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #102 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #115 of 130; 2019 Texas State #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 70 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Turnover marginmedian #63
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #7 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #38 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #60 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #63 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #63 of 130; 2019 Troy #81 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #86 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #103 of 130; 2019 Texas State #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 19 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 63.
Possessionmedian #74
Possession. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Coastal Carolina #10 of 130; 2019 App State #46 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #51 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #74 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #77 of 130; 2019 Troy #95 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #96 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #113 of 130; 2019 Texas State #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 16 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 74.
Returning passingmedian #76
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 UL Monroe #1 of 130; 2019 App State #43 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #61 of 130; 2019 Texas State #76 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #80 of 130; 2019 Troy #85 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #97 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #106 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #111 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 26 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 76.
Returning receivingmedian #68
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #14 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #53 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #54 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #63 of 130; 2019 Texas State #68 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #69 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #107 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #113 of 130; 2019 Troy #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 101 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 68.
Returning rushingmedian #56
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana #16 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #27 of 130; 2019 App State #34 of 130; 2019 Troy #36 of 130; 2019 Texas State #56 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #69 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #74 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #110 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #115 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 89 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 56.
Team talentmedian #108
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Arkansas State #93 of 130; 2019 App State #101 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #103 of 130; 2019 Troy #108 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #110 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #112 of 130; 2019 Texas State #116 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #117 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 102 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 108.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana #7 of 130; 2019 App State #16 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #40 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #44 of 130; 2019 Troy #45 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #49 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #50 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #123 of 130; 2019 Texas State #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 94 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #79
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #23 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #46 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #75 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #79 of 130; 2019 Texas State #94 of 130; 2019 Troy #100 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #109 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #122 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 77 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 79.
Offensive success ratemedian #61
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana #5 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #20 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #21 of 130; 2019 Troy #23 of 130; 2019 App State #61 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #66 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #83 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #116 of 130; 2019 Texas State #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 100 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 61.
Defensive success ratemedian #94
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 App State #12 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #80 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #86 of 130; 2019 Troy #94 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #100 of 130; 2019 Texas State #104 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #106 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #111 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 55 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 94.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #74
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Arkansas State #6 of 130; 2019 App State #8 of 130; 2019 Texas State #9 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #23 of 130; 2019 Troy #74 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #86 of 130; 2019 Louisiana #93 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #99 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #114 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 81 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 74.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #81
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana #6 of 130; 2019 Texas State #11 of 130; 2019 South Alabama #20 of 130; 2019 Coastal Carolina #69 of 130; 2019 Arkansas State #81 of 130; 2019 UL Monroe #95 of 130; 2019 Troy #105 of 130; 2019 Georgia State #121 of 130; 2019 App State #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Georgia Southern, ranked 88 of 130. Sun Belt median rank 81.