THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

GeorgiaBulldogs

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 64 teams in 2018’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Georgia played 9 such games.

Power 5, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Georgia11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida, #14 Kentucky, #23 Missouri)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 453.0 yds/g · 4,077 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 312.4 yds/g allowed · 2,812 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 172 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.6 /g · +149 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:17 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 964.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.080 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#38 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#38 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #4–#129. 3 of 64 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)
2018Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State, #19 Texas A&M, #23 Missouri · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 520.7 yds/g · 4,686 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 425 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 270.1 yds/g allowed · 2,431 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +33.1 /g · +298 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:03 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 978.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.375 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Clemson15–01 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #19 Texas A&M, #20 Syracuse · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 534.2 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 46.2 pts/g · 462 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.1 yds/g allowed · 3,101 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +30.8 /g · +308 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 893.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.362 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#21 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.0 /g · +160 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:43 /g · 5h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Iowa State · postseason: #18 Mississippi State)#41 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,051 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.9 /g · +119 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:32 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 615.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018West Virginia8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 509.5 yds/g · 5,095 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 413 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 414.0 yds/g allowed · 4,140 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13.8 /g · +138 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:42 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 646.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.192 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Mississippi State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Texas A&M)#56 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,071 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 185 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.9 yds/g allowed · 2,420 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 125 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 730.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 74 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.099 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 539.9 yds/g · 5,939 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.8 pts/g · 471 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 411.9 yds/g allowed · 4,531 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.2 /g · +167 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 38m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oklahoma12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas, #16 West Virginia, #24 Iowa State)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 600.7 yds/g · 6,007 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51.3 pts/g · 513 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 468.9 yds/g allowed · 4,689 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.4 /g · +154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 7 taken, 10 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 843.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.516 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.322 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 54% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Purdue6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 457.4 yds/g · 5,032 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 364 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 447.8 yds/g allowed · 4,926 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 307 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.2 /g · +57 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:56 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 520.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.142 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Miami7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 74 teams · 336.1 yds/g · 3,025 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 290.1 yds/g allowed · 2,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +4.1 /g · +37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 18 taken, 17 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 28:38 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 753.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.403 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State, #17 Utah, #17 Utah)#35 (of 74 teams · 396.3 yds/g · 3,963 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 256 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 327.9 yds/g allowed · 3,279 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:41 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 772.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 74 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Utah · postseason: #24 Iowa State)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 448.8 yds/g · 4,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g allowed · 3,429 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 14 taken, 9 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:03 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 554.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.286 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.340 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018California7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)#63 (of 74 teams · 330.0 yds/g · 3,300 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 321.5 yds/g allowed · 3,215 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · -0.7 /g · -7 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 30:17 /g · 5h 03m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 596.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kansas3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 74 teams · 358.3 yds/g · 3,583 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 232 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 441.2 yds/g allowed · 4,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -9.5 /g · -95 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 20 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 29:15 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 517.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 74 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.371 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.237 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kansas State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 74 teams · 327.9 yds/g · 3,279 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 202 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -6.2 /g · -62 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 18 taken, 11 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 31:55 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 547.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 74 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.191 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kentucky10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Florida, #18 Mississippi State, #23 Missouri · postseason: #12 Penn State)#55 (of 74 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 3,104 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 330.9 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 142 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 670.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Maryland5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#45 (of 74 teams · 369.7 yds/g · 3,697 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 283 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 409.8 yds/g allowed · 4,098 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 29:07 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 725.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.579 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Pittsburgh7–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 Syracuse)#34 (of 74 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 3,971 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 390.7 yds/g allowed · 3,907 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +0.8 /g · +8 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:05 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 638.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 74 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.433 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.317 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Stanford9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 74 teams · 399.3 yds/g · 3,993 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 294 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 30:00 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 786.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 0.216 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Syracuse10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #16 West Virginia)#15 (of 74 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 3,962 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 570.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Arizona5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 74 teams · 445.4 yds/g · 4,009 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 419.8 yds/g allowed · 3,778 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · -1.6 /g · -14 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 14 taken, 16 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 28:49 /g · 3h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 580.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 74 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018LSU10–35 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #8 UCF)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #8 UCF)#40 (of 74 teams · 375.1 yds/g · 3,376 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 270 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 3,284 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +5.6 /g · +50 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31:52 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 74 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State)#62 (of 74 teams · 331.9 yds/g · 3,319 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 315.1 yds/g allowed · 3,151 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 165 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +0.3 /g · +3 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 658.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g · 3,048 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 267 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 427.6 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · +4.8 /g · +38 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:27 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 629.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 464.2 yds/g · 4,642 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 296 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 459.5 yds/g allowed · 4,595 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 27:34 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 711.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oklahoma State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #15 Texas, #16 West Virginia, #25 Boise State · postseason: #23 Missouri)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 468.6 yds/g · 4,217 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 304 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 484.1 yds/g allowed · 4,357 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 338 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.8 /g · -34 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 8 taken, 14 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:12 /g · 4h 05m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 645.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.265 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.353 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Penn State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 74 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 4,012 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.5 /g · +115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas10–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma · postseason: #5 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma, #24 Iowa State · postseason: #5 Georgia)#30 (of 74 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 4,481 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 352 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 396.6 yds/g allowed · 4,362 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +6.5 /g · +71 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.55 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:58 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 861.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018USC5–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State)#43 (of 74 teams · 371.8 yds/g · 4,090 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 270 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 386.2 yds/g allowed · 4,248 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 303 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -3.0 /g · -33 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 9 taken, 19 given · -0.91 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 28:33 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 933.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 74 teams · 0.147 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Virginia8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 74 teams · 350.4 yds/g · 3,154 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 345.1 yds/g allowed · 3,106 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +1.9 /g · +17 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:09 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 542.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 74 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.168 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Wisconsin8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 74 teams · 421.2 yds/g · 3,791 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 653.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Arizona State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Utah)#20 (of 74 teams · 424.3 yds/g · 4,243 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 299 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 416.1 yds/g allowed · 4,161 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 14 taken, 9 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 30:03 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 74 teams · 0.243 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.237 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Auburn8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington, #19 Texas A&M)#60 (of 74 teams · 338.2 yds/g · 3,044 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 199 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 417.6 yds/g allowed · 3,758 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 213 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · -1.6 /g · -14 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 9 taken, 8 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:05 /g · 3h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 827.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 74 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.186 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Baylor7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 74 teams · 419.7 yds/g · 4,197 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 421.5 yds/g allowed · 4,215 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 6 taken, 16 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:27 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 668.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 74 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 0.267 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.438 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Colorado5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 74 teams · 362.5 yds/g · 3,625 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 235 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 400.9 yds/g allowed · 4,009 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 10 taken, 15 given · -0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 31:09 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 575.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 74 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.435 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Florida10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Michigan)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #7 Michigan)#26 (of 74 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 3,733 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 367.2 yds/g allowed · 3,305 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +3.4 /g · +31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 31:08 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 831.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 74 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.167 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Florida State5–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 190 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 424.9 yds/g allowed · 4,249 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -14.3 /g · -143 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 10 taken, 21 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:09 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 888.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 74 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 0.131 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.513 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Georgia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 74 teams · 372.7 yds/g · 3,354 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 285 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 383.1 yds/g allowed · 3,448 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +0.4 /g · +4 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 18 taken, 10 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:38 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 583.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 0.283 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 74 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 4,055 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 241 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:02 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 West Virginia)#47 (of 74 teams · 363.8 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 367.5 yds/g allowed · 3,675 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:00 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 575.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018North Carolina2–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 74 teams · 424.8 yds/g · 3,823 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 442.3 yds/g allowed · 3,981 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 313 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -8.9 /g · -80 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 28:07 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 688.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 74 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.286 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northwestern9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#59 (of 74 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,730 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 250 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2.6 /g · +29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oregon9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)#17 (of 74 teams · 426.7 yds/g · 3,840 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 291 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 419.7 yds/g allowed · 3,777 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 29:00 /g · 4h 21m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 695.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 74 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.229 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018TCU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Iowa State)#49 (of 74 teams · 360.2 yds/g · 3,602 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 19.9 pts/g · 199 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 370.6 yds/g allowed · 3,706 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 274 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · -7.5 /g · -75 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -8 in these games · 12 taken, 20 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 29:18 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 671.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 74 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018UCLA3–91 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#28 (of 74 teams · 413.0 yds/g · 4,130 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 458.4 yds/g allowed · 4,584 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 27:42 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 754.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 74 teams · 0.203 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 0.259 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Utah9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 74 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 3,719 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 277 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 350.7 yds/g allowed · 3,156 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.9 /g · +89 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 594.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Vanderbilt6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 378.4 yds/g · 3,406 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 225 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 457.9 yds/g allowed · 4,121 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 257 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · -3.6 /g · -32 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 31:18 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 612.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 74 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.275 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Northwestern)#44 (of 74 teams · 370.2 yds/g · 3,702 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 237 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 448.1 yds/g allowed · 4,481 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 302 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:00 /g · 4h 30m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 635.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Minnesota7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)#38 (of 74 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 3,423 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 247 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 440.3 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 308 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -6.8 /g · -61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:11 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 589.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.294 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)#19 (of 74 teams · 424.6 yds/g · 3,821 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 401.4 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +6.0 /g · +54 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 595.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.088 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.388 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018South Carolina7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Missouri)#25 (of 74 teams · 416.2 yds/g · 3,746 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 265 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 473.2 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.8 /g · -34 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 24:44 /g · 3h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 750.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 0.262 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.103 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Tennessee5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Kentucky)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 309.7 yds/g · 2,787 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 176 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 439.7 yds/g allowed · 3,957 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -17.0 /g · -153 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 11 taken, 14 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 28:47 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 827.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 74 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.394 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas A&M9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 LSU, #14 Kentucky)#16 (of 74 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 3,856 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,260 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -11 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 5 taken, 14 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:20 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 805.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 0.208 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Virginia Tech6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 74 teams · 387.0 yds/g · 3,483 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 432.6 yds/g allowed · 3,893 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · -7.0 /g · -63 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 30:05 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 675.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 74 teams · 0.132 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.466 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 74 teams · 421.1 yds/g · 3,790 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 4,368 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 338 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -8.7 /g · -78 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 9 taken, 11 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 525.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Boston College7–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 74 teams · 357.1 yds/g · 3,214 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 419.8 yds/g allowed · 3,778 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -1.8 /g · -16 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:55 /g · 4h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.359 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas Tech5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#14 (of 74 teams · 443.5 yds/g · 4,435 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 4,564 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · -1.6 /g · -16 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 29:25 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 561.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 74 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ole Miss5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 74 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 4,005 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 483.8 yds/g allowed · 4,354 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 39.4 pts/g allowed · 355 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -14.7 /g · -132 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:30 /g · 3h 59m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 734.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Arkansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 311.0 yds/g · 2,488 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.3 pts/g · 138 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 442.3 yds/g allowed · 3,538 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 39.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -22.6 /g · -181 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 6 taken, 16 given · -1.25 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 3h 51m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 694.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 74 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.301 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Louisville2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 74 teams · 357.6 yds/g · 3,576 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 464.5 yds/g allowed · 4,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50.5 pts/g allowed · 505 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -31.9 /g · -319 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 12 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 632.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 74 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.399 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oregon State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 74 teams · 366.9 yds/g · 3,669 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 230 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 559.4 yds/g allowed · 5,594 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 48.6 pts/g allowed · 486 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -25.6 /g · -256 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 7 taken, 14 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 30:04 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 74 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.450 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.350 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Illinois4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 228 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 517.2 yds/g allowed · 4,655 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 45.6 pts/g allowed · 410 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.2 /g · -182 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 13 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 562.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.397 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Rutgers1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 248.8 yds/g · 2,488 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 11.4 pts/g · 114 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 418.4 yds/g allowed · 4,184 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -21.4 /g · -214 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15 in these games · 10 taken, 25 given · -1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 27:53 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 555.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20182018 GeorgiaPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Alabama #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #6 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #7 of 74; 2018 Purdue #8 of 74; 2018 Washington State #10 of 74; 2018 Arizona #12 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #13 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #14 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 Oregon #17 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Missouri #19 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #20 of 74; 2018 Michigan #21 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #22 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #23 of 74; 2018 Baylor #24 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #25 of 74; 2018 Florida #26 of 74; 2018 Utah #27 of 74; 2018 UCLA #28 of 74; 2018 Illinois #29 of 74; 2018 Texas #30 of 74; 2018 Indiana #31 of 74; 2018 Penn State #32 of 74; 2018 Stanford #33 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #34 of 74; 2018 Washington #35 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #36 of 74; 2018 NC State #37 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #39 of 74; 2018 LSU #40 of 74; 2018 Iowa #41 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #42 of 74; 2018 USC #43 of 74; 2018 Duke #44 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #46 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #47 of 74; 2018 Colorado #48 of 74; 2018 TCU #49 of 74; 2018 Kansas #50 of 74; 2018 Louisville #51 of 74; 2018 Boston College #52 of 74; 2018 Virginia #54 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #55 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #56 of 74; 2018 Florida State #57 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 74; 2018 Auburn #60 of 74; 2018 Miami #61 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #62 of 74; 2018 California #63 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #64 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #68 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 9 of 74. Power 5 median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #33
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #9 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #10 of 74; 2018 NC State #12 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Oregon #14 of 74; 2018 Texas #15 of 74; 2018 Missouri #16 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #17 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #18 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Iowa #20 of 74; 2018 Penn State #20 of 74; 2018 Arizona #22 of 74; 2018 LSU #23 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #24 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #25 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #27 of 74; 2018 Stanford #28 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #30 of 74; 2018 Maryland #31 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #32 of 74; 2018 Florida #33 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #35 of 74; 2018 UCLA #36 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Illinois #39 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #40 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #41 of 74; 2018 Baylor #42 of 74; 2018 Boston College #43 of 74; 2018 USC #44 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #45 of 74; 2018 Indiana #46 of 74; 2018 Miami #47 of 74; 2018 Duke #48 of 74; 2018 Colorado #49 of 74; 2018 Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Kansas #51 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #52 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #53 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #54 of 74; 2018 Auburn #55 of 74; 2018 California #57 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #58 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #59 of 74; 2018 TCU #60 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #61 of 74; 2018 Florida State #62 of 74; 2018 Louisville #64 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #69 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 7 of 74. Power 5 median rank 33.
Total defensemedian #38
Total defense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #3 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Iowa #5 of 74; 2018 Clemson #6 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #8 of 74; 2018 California #9 of 74; 2018 Washington #10 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #12 of 74; 2018 Virginia #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 Penn State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 LSU #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 TCU #20 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #21 of 74; 2018 Washington State #24 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #25 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #26 of 74; 2018 USC #28 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 Colorado #32 of 74; 2018 Missouri #33 of 74; 2018 Maryland #34 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #37 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #38 of 74; 2018 Auburn #39 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #40 of 74; 2018 Oregon #41 of 74; 2018 Arizona #42 of 74; 2018 Boston College #42 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #44 of 74; 2018 Baylor #45 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Florida State #47 of 74; 2018 NC State #48 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #49 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #50 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #51 of 74; 2018 Kansas #52 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 Stanford #53 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #55 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #56 of 74; 2018 Purdue #57 of 74; 2018 Duke #58 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #59 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #60 of 74; 2018 UCLA #62 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #63 of 74; 2018 Louisville #64 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #65 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #66 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #68 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #69 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #70 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 7 of 74. Power 5 median rank 38.
Scoring defensemedian #34
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #5 of 74; 2018 Iowa #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Washington #7 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Miami #12 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 California #15 of 74; 2018 Virginia #16 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 Auburn #18 of 74; 2018 Florida #19 of 74; 2018 LSU #20 of 74; 2018 Texas #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #22 of 74; 2018 Washington State #23 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #24 of 74; 2018 Boston College #25 of 74; 2018 Stanford #26 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #27 of 74; 2018 TCU #29 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #30 of 74; 2018 USC #31 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #32 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #33 of 74; 2018 Purdue #34 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #35 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #36 of 74; 2018 NC State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #38 of 74; 2018 Oregon #40 of 74; 2018 Maryland #42 of 74; 2018 Colorado #43 of 74; 2018 Duke #44 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #47 of 74; 2018 Arizona #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Baylor #52 of 74; 2018 Kansas #52 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #55 of 74; 2018 Florida State #56 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #57 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #58 of 74; 2018 UCLA #59 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #60 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #62 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #63 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #63 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #66 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #72 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 10 of 74. Power 5 median rank 34.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Michigan #5 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #8 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Penn State #10 of 74; 2018 Washington State #11 of 74; 2018 Utah #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #15 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas #17 of 74; 2018 Missouri #18 of 74; 2018 LSU #19 of 74; 2018 Purdue #20 of 74; 2018 NC State #21 of 74; 2018 Miami #22 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #23 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #25 of 74; 2018 Oregon #26 of 74; 2018 Stanford #27 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2018 Virginia #29 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #30 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #31 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #32 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #33 of 74; 2018 California #34 of 74; 2018 Maryland #35 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 74; 2018 Arizona #37 of 74; 2018 Auburn #37 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #39 of 74; 2018 Boston College #40 of 74; 2018 USC #41 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #42 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #43 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #43 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #45 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #46 of 74; 2018 Colorado #48 of 74; 2018 Duke #48 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #51 of 74; 2018 TCU #52 of 74; 2018 Baylor #53 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 UCLA #55 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #56 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #57 of 74; 2018 Kansas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida State #60 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #61 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #63 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #67 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #68 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #69 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 4 of 74. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Kansas #2 of 74; 2018 LSU #2 of 74; 2018 Maryland #2 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #7 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #10 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #11 of 74; 2018 Utah #11 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #11 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #14 of 74; 2018 Oregon #17 of 74; 2018 Washington State #17 of 74; 2018 Texas #19 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #20 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #20 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #22 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Stanford #26 of 74; 2018 Boston College #27 of 74; 2018 California #28 of 74; 2018 Indiana #28 of 74; 2018 Penn State #28 of 74; 2018 NC State #31 of 74; 2018 Auburn #32 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Miami #32 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #32 of 74; 2018 Clemson #37 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #37 of 74; 2018 UCLA #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #42 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Arizona #44 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #44 of 74; 2018 Purdue #46 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #47 of 74; 2018 Missouri #48 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #48 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #52 of 74; 2018 Colorado #53 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #54 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #54 of 74; 2018 Duke #56 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #56 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #58 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #61 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2018 TCU #63 of 74; 2018 USC #64 of 74; 2018 Baylor #65 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Louisville #65 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #65 of 74; 2018 Florida State #71 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #72 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 32 of 74. Power 5 median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #38
Possession. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #4 of 74; 2018 NC State #5 of 74; 2018 Virginia #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Baylor #10 of 74; 2018 Washington State #13 of 74; 2018 Texas #14 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #15 of 74; 2018 LSU #16 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #18 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #19 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2018 Colorado #21 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 Alabama #23 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #26 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #29 of 74; 2018 Utah #29 of 74; 2018 Missouri #32 of 74; 2018 Louisville #33 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #34 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #35 of 74; 2018 California #36 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #38 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #39 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #40 of 74; 2018 Stanford #41 of 74; 2018 Purdue #42 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #44 of 74; 2018 TCU #45 of 74; 2018 Kansas #47 of 74; 2018 Maryland #48 of 74; 2018 Clemson #49 of 74; 2018 Oregon #50 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #51 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #52 of 74; 2018 Arizona #53 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #54 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 74; 2018 Miami #56 of 74; 2018 USC #57 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Indiana #59 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #60 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #61 of 74; 2018 UCLA #62 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #64 of 74; 2018 Penn State #65 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #66 of 74; 2018 Duke #67 of 74; 2018 Boston College #68 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #70 of 74; 2018 Florida State #71 of 74; 2018 Auburn #72 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 11 of 74. Power 5 median rank 38.
Returning passingmedian #55
Returning passing. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 California #1 of 130; 2018 Kansas #1 of 130; 2018 Missouri #1 of 130; 2018 Purdue #1 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #1 of 130; 2018 Texas #14 of 130; 2018 Auburn #15 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #15 of 130; 2018 Duke #17 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #18 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #20 of 130; 2018 Colorado #21 of 130; 2018 Iowa #21 of 130; 2018 NC State #24 of 130; 2018 Alabama #26 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #27 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #29 of 130; 2018 Miami #33 of 130; 2018 Washington #35 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #37 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Florida State #40 of 130; 2018 Oregon #46 of 130; 2018 Clemson #49 of 130; 2018 Maryland #50 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #52 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #53 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 130; 2018 Utah #58 of 130; 2018 Florida #60 of 130; 2018 Boston College #61 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #66 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #67 of 130; 2018 Arizona #68 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #70 of 130; 2018 Stanford #72 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #75 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #82 of 130; 2018 Baylor #83 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #85 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #88 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #95 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 UCLA #97 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #99 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #102 of 130; 2018 LSU #103 of 130; 2018 TCU #104 of 130; 2018 Louisville #105 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #106 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #113 of 130; 2018 USC #116 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #119 of 130; 2018 Virginia #120 of 130; 2018 Washington State #123 of 130; 2018 Illinois #124 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #126 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 42 of 130. Power 5 median rank 55.
Returning receivingmedian #66
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Baylor #4 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #8 of 130; 2018 Auburn #10 of 130; 2018 Stanford #11 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #12 of 130; 2018 Duke #16 of 130; 2018 Arizona #18 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #20 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #20 of 130; 2018 Boston College #22 of 130; 2018 California #30 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #32 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 130; 2018 Kansas #35 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #36 of 130; 2018 Purdue #38 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Oregon #40 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 130; 2018 Washington State #45 of 130; 2018 Louisville #46 of 130; 2018 NC State #47 of 130; 2018 Illinois #48 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #51 of 130; 2018 Iowa #54 of 130; 2018 Florida State #57 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #59 of 130; 2018 Texas #63 of 130; 2018 Florida #65 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #66 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #67 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #69 of 130; 2018 Clemson #70 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #70 of 130; 2018 Virginia #72 of 130; 2018 Missouri #74 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #75 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #77 of 130; 2018 Washington #77 of 130; 2018 Miami #79 of 130; 2018 Indiana #81 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #82 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #84 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #91 of 130; 2018 TCU #94 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #94 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #96 of 130; 2018 Maryland #98 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #99 of 130; 2018 UCLA #99 of 130; 2018 USC #101 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #105 of 130; 2018 Alabama #108 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #110 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #111 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #114 of 130; 2018 LSU #115 of 130; 2018 Utah #116 of 130; 2018 Colorado #127 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 50 of 130. Power 5 median rank 66.
Returning rushingmedian #64
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #5 of 130; 2018 Florida State #8 of 130; 2018 Stanford #9 of 130; 2018 Purdue #10 of 130; 2018 Maryland #11 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #15 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #19 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #20 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #21 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #24 of 130; 2018 Utah #24 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #26 of 130; 2018 Clemson #27 of 130; 2018 Miami #30 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #31 of 130; 2018 Virginia #33 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2018 Texas #35 of 130; 2018 Florida #38 of 130; 2018 Washington #39 of 130; 2018 Alabama #42 of 130; 2018 UCLA #43 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #45 of 130; 2018 Kansas #47 of 130; 2018 Baylor #50 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #60 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #61 of 130; 2018 Duke #62 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #68 of 130; 2018 California #70 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #71 of 130; 2018 Boston College #72 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Missouri #77 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #78 of 130; 2018 Arizona #80 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #82 of 130; 2018 TCU #83 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Illinois #85 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #94 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #100 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #103 of 130; 2018 Auburn #106 of 130; 2018 Oregon #106 of 130; 2018 Washington State #109 of 130; 2018 NC State #110 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130; 2018 USC #114 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #118 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #119 of 130; 2018 Colorado #120 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #121 of 130; 2018 Iowa #124 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #125 of 130; 2018 Louisville #126 of 130; 2018 LSU #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 108 of 130. Power 5 median rank 64.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 USC #4 of 130; 2018 Clemson #5 of 130; 2018 LSU #6 of 130; 2018 Florida State #7 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Texas #9 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #11 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Florida #13 of 130; 2018 Auburn #14 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #15 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 130; 2018 Stanford #17 of 130; 2018 Washington #18 of 130; 2018 UCLA #19 of 130; 2018 Miami #20 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #21 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #22 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2018 Maryland #24 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #25 of 130; 2018 Oregon #26 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #27 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #28 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #29 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #30 of 130; 2018 TCU #31 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2018 Baylor #33 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #34 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #35 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #37 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #38 of 130; 2018 Duke #39 of 130; 2018 Louisville #40 of 130; 2018 NC State #41 of 130; 2018 Iowa #42 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #43 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 California #45 of 130; 2018 Missouri #46 of 130; 2018 Utah #47 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #48 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #49 of 130; 2018 Arizona #50 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #52 of 130; 2018 Colorado #53 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #54 of 130; 2018 Indiana #57 of 130; 2018 Illinois #58 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #59 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #60 of 130; 2018 Washington State #61 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #63 of 130; 2018 Virginia #66 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #68 of 130; 2018 Boston College #69 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #70 of 130; 2018 Purdue #71 of 130; 2018 Kansas #72 of 130. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 3 of 130. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #4 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #8 of 74; 2018 Stanford #9 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #11 of 74; 2018 NC State #12 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #14 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #15 of 74; 2018 Texas #16 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #17 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Michigan #19 of 74; 2018 Florida #20 of 74; 2018 Oregon #21 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #22 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #23 of 74; 2018 Utah #24 of 74; 2018 Washington #25 of 74; 2018 UCLA #26 of 74; 2018 Arizona #27 of 74; 2018 Maryland #28 of 74; 2018 Missouri #29 of 74; 2018 Baylor #30 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #31 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #32 of 74; 2018 Illinois #33 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #34 of 74; 2018 Iowa #35 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #36 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #38 of 74; 2018 USC #39 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #40 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #41 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #42 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #43 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #44 of 74; 2018 Kansas #45 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #46 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #47 of 74; 2018 Auburn #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #51 of 74; 2018 LSU #52 of 74; 2018 Duke #53 of 74; 2018 Miami #54 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #55 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #57 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida State #59 of 74; 2018 Colorado #61 of 74; 2018 TCU #62 of 74; 2018 Louisville #63 of 74; 2018 Boston College #64 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 74; 2018 California #67 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 5 of 74. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #36
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Clemson #5 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #6 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 California #8 of 74; 2018 Iowa #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 LSU #14 of 74; 2018 Utah #15 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #16 of 74; 2018 Boston College #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #23 of 74; 2018 Florida State #24 of 74; 2018 Virginia #25 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #26 of 74; 2018 Maryland #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #29 of 74; 2018 USC #30 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 TCU #32 of 74; 2018 Auburn #33 of 74; 2018 Arizona #34 of 74; 2018 Florida #35 of 74; 2018 Colorado #36 of 74; 2018 Duke #37 of 74; 2018 Washington State #38 of 74; 2018 Oregon #39 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #40 of 74; 2018 Purdue #41 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #44 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Stanford #46 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #47 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #48 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #49 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 NC State #53 of 74; 2018 Kansas #54 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #55 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #56 of 74; 2018 UCLA #57 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Baylor #59 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #60 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #61 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #62 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #63 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #64 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #65 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #67 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74; 2018 Louisville #71 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 12 of 74. Power 5 median rank 36.
Offensive success ratemedian #33
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #4 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #5 of 74; 2018 NC State #6 of 74; 2018 Clemson #7 of 74; 2018 Washington State #8 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #10 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #12 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #13 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Missouri #15 of 74; 2018 Washington #16 of 74; 2018 Florida #17 of 74; 2018 Stanford #18 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Texas #20 of 74; 2018 Baylor #21 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #22 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #24 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #25 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #26 of 74; 2018 UCLA #27 of 74; 2018 Purdue #28 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #29 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #31 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Oregon #33 of 74; 2018 Illinois #34 of 74; 2018 USC #35 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #36 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #38 of 74; 2018 Indiana #39 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #41 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #42 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #43 of 74; 2018 Auburn #45 of 74; 2018 Iowa #46 of 74; 2018 Arizona #47 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #48 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #49 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #50 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Duke #52 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #53 of 74; 2018 California #54 of 74; 2018 TCU #55 of 74; 2018 Louisville #56 of 74; 2018 Kansas #58 of 74; 2018 LSU #60 of 74; 2018 Maryland #61 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #63 of 74; 2018 Colorado #64 of 74; 2018 Miami #65 of 74; 2018 Boston College #66 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #67 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #68 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #71 of 74; 2018 Florida State #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 3 of 74. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Michigan #3 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #5 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #6 of 74; 2018 Utah #7 of 74; 2018 Penn State #9 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #10 of 74; 2018 Missouri #11 of 74; 2018 Virginia #12 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #13 of 74; 2018 California #14 of 74; 2018 USC #16 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Florida State #18 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #19 of 74; 2018 TCU #20 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 LSU #23 of 74; 2018 Boston College #24 of 74; 2018 Auburn #25 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #27 of 74; 2018 Arizona #28 of 74; 2018 Iowa #29 of 74; 2018 Duke #30 of 74; 2018 Washington State #31 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #32 of 74; 2018 Colorado #33 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #36 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #37 of 74; 2018 Baylor #38 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #39 of 74; 2018 NC State #40 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #41 of 74; 2018 Indiana #42 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #43 of 74; 2018 Texas #44 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Oregon #46 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #47 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #48 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #49 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Stanford #51 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #52 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #53 of 74; 2018 Purdue #54 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #56 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #57 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #58 of 74; 2018 UCLA #59 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #60 of 74; 2018 Kansas #62 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #64 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #66 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #68 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #69 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 35 of 74. Power 5 median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #34
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #1 of 74; 2018 Florida State #2 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #4 of 74; 2018 Colorado #5 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #6 of 74; 2018 Miami #7 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #8 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Arizona #10 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #11 of 74; 2018 Kansas #12 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Boston College #14 of 74; 2018 Clemson #15 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #16 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Louisville #20 of 74; 2018 Alabama #21 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #22 of 74; 2018 Stanford #23 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #24 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #25 of 74; 2018 Oregon #26 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #27 of 74; 2018 Illinois #28 of 74; 2018 Duke #29 of 74; 2018 Iowa #30 of 74; 2018 USC #31 of 74; 2018 UCLA #32 of 74; 2018 Washington State #33 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #34 of 74; 2018 LSU #35 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #36 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #39 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #40 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #42 of 74; 2018 Baylor #44 of 74; 2018 TCU #45 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #47 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #50 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #52 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #55 of 74; 2018 Auburn #57 of 74; 2018 Texas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida #59 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #60 of 74; 2018 Michigan #62 of 74; 2018 Virginia #63 of 74; 2018 Utah #64 of 74; 2018 California #65 of 74; 2018 NC State #66 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #68 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #69 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #70 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #72 of 74; 2018 Missouri #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 51 of 74. Power 5 median rank 34.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #3 of 74; 2018 Iowa #4 of 74; 2018 Washington #6 of 74; 2018 Purdue #7 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #8 of 74; 2018 California #9 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #10 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #11 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #13 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #14 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #15 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #16 of 74; 2018 LSU #17 of 74; 2018 Penn State #18 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #19 of 74; 2018 Maryland #20 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #21 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #22 of 74; 2018 Louisville #23 of 74; 2018 Oregon #24 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #25 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #28 of 74; 2018 Kansas #29 of 74; 2018 Florida #30 of 74; 2018 Boston College #32 of 74; 2018 Miami #33 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #34 of 74; 2018 Stanford #35 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 74; 2018 Colorado #37 of 74; 2018 Texas #38 of 74; 2018 Clemson #40 of 74; 2018 UCLA #41 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #42 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #45 of 74; 2018 Florida State #46 of 74; 2018 TCU #47 of 74; 2018 Auburn #48 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #49 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #51 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 Duke #53 of 74; 2018 NC State #54 of 74; 2018 Arizona #55 of 74; 2018 Washington State #56 of 74; 2018 Virginia #57 of 74; 2018 USC #58 of 74; 2018 Alabama #59 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #60 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #62 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #64 of 74; 2018 Missouri #65 of 74; 2018 Utah #66 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #69 of 74; 2018 Baylor #70 of 74; 2018 Michigan #71 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #72 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 Georgia, ranked 1 of 74. Power 5 median rank 36.