Metrics

Hawai'iRainbow Warriors

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2002

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2002Hawai'i1040 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#8 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 502 points) (— allowed · —)#75 (of 117 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 389 points)#28 (of 117 teams · +8.1 /g · +113 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Western Athletic teams in 20020 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#63 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range #1–#113. 2 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#87 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range #18–#116. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#77 (Point margin: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range #2–#116. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2002Boise State1210 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#1 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 45.6 pts/g · 593 points) (— allowed · —)#18 (of 117 teams · 18.5 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#2 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +27.1 /g · +353 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002Fresno State950 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#63 (of 117 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 378 points) (— allowed · —)#65 (of 117 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 379 points)#67 (of 117 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002Louisiana Tech480 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#65 (of 117 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 320 points) (— allowed · —)#104 (of 117 teams · 35.5 pts/g allowed · 426 points)#92 (of 117 teams · -8.8 /g · -106 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002Nevada570 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#57 (of 117 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 331 points) (— allowed · —)#87 (of 117 teams · 30.9 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#76 (of 117 teams · -3.3 /g · -40 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002Rice470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#85 (of 117 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 253 points) (— allowed · —)#63 (of 117 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 296 points)#77 (of 117 teams · -3.9 /g · -43 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002SMU390 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#113 (of 117 teams · 17.3 pts/g · 207 points) (— allowed · —)#90 (of 117 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#104 (of 117 teams · -14.3 /g · -171 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002San José State670 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#43 (of 117 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points) (— allowed · —)#106 (of 117 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 467 points)#88 (of 117 teams · -7.0 /g · -91 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002Tulsa1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#101 (of 117 teams · 19.4 pts/g · 233 points) (— allowed · —)#101 (of 117 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#105 (of 117 teams · -15.3 /g · -184 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2002UTEP2100 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2002. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#110 (of 117 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 220 points) (— allowed · —)#116 (of 117 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 511 points)#116 (of 117 teams · -24.3 /g · -291 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20022002 Hawai'iWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #63
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: 2002 Boise State #1 of 117; 2002 San José State #43 of 117; 2002 Nevada #57 of 117; 2002 Fresno State #63 of 117; 2002 Louisiana Tech #65 of 117; 2002 Rice #85 of 117; 2002 Tulsa #101 of 117; 2002 UTEP #110 of 117; 2002 SMU #113 of 117. Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, ranked 8 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 63.
Total defense
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #87
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: 2002 Boise State #18 of 117; 2002 Rice #63 of 117; 2002 Fresno State #65 of 117; 2002 Nevada #87 of 117; 2002 SMU #90 of 117; 2002 Tulsa #101 of 117; 2002 Louisiana Tech #104 of 117; 2002 San José State #106 of 117; 2002 UTEP #116 of 117. Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, ranked 75 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 87.
Point marginmedian #77
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: 2002 Boise State #2 of 117; 2002 Fresno State #67 of 117; 2002 Nevada #76 of 117; 2002 Rice #77 of 117; 2002 San José State #88 of 117; 2002 Louisiana Tech #92 of 117; 2002 SMU #104 of 117; 2002 Tulsa #105 of 117; 2002 UTEP #116 of 117. Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, ranked 28 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2002, best rank first: . Marked: 2002 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.