Metrics

Hawai'iRainbow Warriors

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006Hawai'i1130 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 119 teams · 394.4 yds/g · 5,521 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 656 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 280.1 yds/g allowed · 3,921 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.8 /g · +319 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.21 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 10:51 /g · 2h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 55% of plays successful)#113 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.960 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #2–#114. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #14–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#97 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #20–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#49 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #8–#112. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #32–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#64 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#119. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#92 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #35–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#43 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #1–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #39–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #2–#119. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range #7–#116. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2006Boise State1300 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 420.6 yds/g · 5,468 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 516 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 284.0 yds/g allowed · 3,692 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.1 /g · +287 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#43 (of 119 teams · 18:34 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 119 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#39 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Fresno State480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 338.2 yds/g · 4,058 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#90 (of 119 teams · 362.9 yds/g allowed · 4,355 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#86 (of 119 teams · -5.3 /g · -63 on the season)#80 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.33 /g)#48 (of 119 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#72 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.152 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.985 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Idaho480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#103 (of 119 teams · 282.4 yds/g · 3,389 yards)#103 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g · 203 points)#75 (of 119 teams · 346.5 yds/g allowed · 4,158 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#114 (of 119 teams · -17.8 /g · -214 on the season)#49 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 27 taken, 25 given · +0.17 /g)#117 (of 119 teams · 16:05 /g · 3h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#93 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 119 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.892 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Louisiana Tech3100 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 119 teams · 344.5 yds/g · 4,479 yards)#95 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 242 points)#119 (of 119 teams · 483.2 yds/g allowed · 6,282 yards)#119 (of 119 teams · 41.7 pts/g allowed · 542 points)#117 (of 119 teams · -23.1 /g · -300 on the season)#106 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 29 taken, 40 given · -0.85 /g)#64 (of 119 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 119 teams · -0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 119 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#119 (of 119 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Nevada850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 119 teams · 321.6 yds/g · 4,181 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 391 points)#16 (of 119 teams · 280.9 yds/g allowed · 3,652 yards)#30 (of 119 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 249 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +10.9 /g · +142 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 36 taken, 24 given · +0.92 /g)#77 (of 119 teams · 17:51 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#57 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.782 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 119 teams · 1.025 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006New Mexico State480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 475.2 yds/g · 5,702 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 374 points)#101 (of 119 teams · 389.4 yds/g allowed · 4,673 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#63 (of 119 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#112 (of 119 teams · -13 on the season · 24 taken, 37 given · -1.08 /g)#32 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#95 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 119 teams · 1.089 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006San José State940 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 357.2 yds/g · 4,644 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 324 points)#83 (of 119 teams · 354.9 yds/g allowed · 4,614 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#46 (of 119 teams · +4.2 /g · +54 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 30 taken, 21 given · +0.69 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 17:56 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#89 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 119 teams · 0.859 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Utah State1110 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 119 teams · 246.3 yds/g · 2,955 yards)#117 (of 119 teams · 10.8 pts/g · 130 points)#110 (of 119 teams · 402.6 yds/g allowed · 4,831 yards)#117 (of 119 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 462 points)#118 (of 119 teams · -27.7 /g · -332 on the season)#69 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#98 (of 119 teams · 17:19 /g · 3h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 119 teams · -0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 119 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 119 teams · 29% of plays successful)#117 (of 119 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 119 teams · 0.531 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20062006 Hawai'iWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 New Mexico State #2 of 119; 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 San José State #44 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #56 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #59 of 119; 2006 Nevada #74 of 119; 2006 Idaho #103 of 119; 2006 Utah State #114 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 17 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #55
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #15 of 119; 2006 Nevada #20 of 119; 2006 San José State #55 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #64 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #95 of 119; 2006 Idaho #103 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 1 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 55.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Nevada #16 of 119; 2006 Boise State #18 of 119; 2006 Idaho #75 of 119; 2006 San José State #83 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #90 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #101 of 119; 2006 Utah State #110 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 14 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #97
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #20 of 119; 2006 Nevada #30 of 119; 2006 San José State #46 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #97 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #105 of 119; 2006 Idaho #115 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 69 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 97.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 Nevada #20 of 119; 2006 San José State #46 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #63 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2006 Idaho #114 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #117 of 119; 2006 Utah State #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 1 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #49
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 Nevada #9 of 119; 2006 San José State #20 of 119; 2006 Idaho #49 of 119; 2006 Utah State #69 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #80 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #106 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #112 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 48 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 49.
Possessionmedian #72
Possession. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 New Mexico State #32 of 119; 2006 Boise State #43 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #48 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #64 of 119; 2006 San José State #72 of 119; 2006 Nevada #77 of 119; 2006 Utah State #98 of 119; 2006 Idaho #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 119 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 72.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #64
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 New Mexico State #3 of 119; 2006 Boise State #11 of 119; 2006 San José State #43 of 119; 2006 Idaho #64 of 119; 2006 Nevada #88 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #99 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #117 of 119; 2006 Utah State #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 1 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 64.
Defensive EPAmedian #92
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #35 of 119; 2006 Nevada #78 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #90 of 119; 2006 San José State #91 of 119; 2006 Idaho #92 of 119; 2006 Utah State #115 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #117 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 116 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 92.
Offensive success ratemedian #43
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #9 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #17 of 119; 2006 San José State #35 of 119; 2006 Nevada #43 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #108 of 119; 2006 Idaho #109 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #110 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 1 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 43.
Defensive success ratemedian #93
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Boise State #39 of 119; 2006 Nevada #57 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #72 of 119; 2006 San José State #89 of 119; 2006 Idaho #93 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #95 of 119; 2006 Utah State #117 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 113 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 93.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #58
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Fresno State #2 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #5 of 119; 2006 Idaho #19 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #58 of 119; 2006 Boise State #87 of 119; 2006 San José State #101 of 119; 2006 Nevada #116 of 119; 2006 Utah State #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 50 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 58.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #40
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Utah State #7 of 119; 2006 Louisiana Tech #16 of 119; 2006 Idaho #37 of 119; 2006 San José State #39 of 119; 2006 Boise State #40 of 119; 2006 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2006 Nevada #104 of 119; 2006 New Mexico State #116 of 119. Marked: 2006 Hawai'i, ranked 73 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 40.