Metrics

IdahoVandals

Season
Current

Big West

Big West, 2000

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2000Idaho560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#43 (of 116 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 321 points) (— allowed · —)#105 (of 116 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#81 (of 116 teams · -5.1 /g · -56 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 6 Big West teams in 20000 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#50 (Scoring offense: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range #1–#111. 1 of 6 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#93 (Scoring defense: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range #47–#111. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#82 (Point margin: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range #7–#104. 1 of 6 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2000Arkansas State1100 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#80 (of 116 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 247 points) (— allowed · —)#111 (of 116 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#104 (of 116 teams · -14.8 /g · -163 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000Boise State1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#1 — top 10 (of 116 teams · 44.3 pts/g · 532 points) (— allowed · —)#47 (of 116 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 274 points)#7 — top 10 (of 116 teams · +21.5 /g · +258 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000New Mexico State380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#50 (of 116 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 295 points) (— allowed · —)#94 (of 116 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#82 (of 116 teams · -5.6 /g · -62 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000North Texas380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#111 (of 116 teams · 14.7 pts/g · 162 points) (— allowed · —)#74 (of 116 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#98 (of 116 teams · -12.6 /g · -138 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000Utah State560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 Big West teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#54 (of 116 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 292 points) (— allowed · —)#93 (of 116 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#83 (of 116 teams · -5.8 /g · -64 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big West, 20002000 IdahoBig West medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #50
Scoring offense. Big West, 2000, best rank first: 2000 Boise State #1 of 116; 2000 New Mexico State #50 of 116; 2000 Utah State #54 of 116; 2000 Arkansas State #80 of 116; 2000 North Texas #111 of 116. Marked: 2000 Idaho, ranked 43 of 116. Big West median rank 50.
Total defense
Total defense. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #93
Scoring defense. Big West, 2000, best rank first: 2000 Boise State #47 of 116; 2000 North Texas #74 of 116; 2000 Utah State #93 of 116; 2000 New Mexico State #94 of 116; 2000 Arkansas State #111 of 116. Marked: 2000 Idaho, ranked 105 of 116. Big West median rank 93.
Point marginmedian #82
Point margin. Big West, 2000, best rank first: 2000 Boise State #7 of 116; 2000 New Mexico State #82 of 116; 2000 Utah State #83 of 116; 2000 North Texas #98 of 116; 2000 Arkansas State #104 of 116. Marked: 2000 Idaho, ranked 81 of 116. Big West median rank 82.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Big West, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.