Metrics

IdahoVandals

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005Idaho290 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 119 teams · 335.6 yds/g · 3,692 yards)#85 (of 119 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 243 points)#102 (of 119 teams · 421.0 yds/g allowed · 4,631 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 38.1 pts/g allowed · 419 points)#110 (of 119 teams · -16.0 /g · -176 on the season)#92 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 22 taken, 29 given · -0.64 /g)#31 (of 119 teams · 18:46 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 119 teams · -0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 119 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#50 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.831 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #9–#99. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #6–#109. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#93 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #19–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#104 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #32–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#85 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #9–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#74 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #6–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#48 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #5–#107. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#98 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #7–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#99 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #18–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #6–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#89 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #23–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #10–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range #3–#93. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2005Boise State940 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 119 teams · 424.9 yds/g · 5,524 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.1 pts/g · 469 points)#59 (of 119 teams · 369.7 yds/g allowed · 4,806 yards)#51 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +11.7 /g · +152 on the season)#90 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 29 taken, 35 given · -0.46 /g)#48 (of 119 teams · 18:14 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 119 teams · 1.035 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Fresno State850 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 119 teams · 384.1 yds/g · 4,994 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#19 (of 119 teams · 309.1 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#86 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.38 /g)#96 (of 119 teams · 16:28 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#51 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 119 teams · 1.063 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Hawai'i570 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 476.2 yds/g · 5,714 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 368 points)#106 (of 119 teams · 438.4 yds/g allowed · 5,261 yards)#112 (of 119 teams · 35.7 pts/g allowed · 428 points)#85 (of 119 teams · -5.0 /g · -60 on the season)#47 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.17 /g)#44 (of 119 teams · 18:17 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#116 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 119 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 119 teams · 0.983 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Louisiana Tech740 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 119 teams · 366.6 yds/g · 4,033 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 316 points)#72 (of 119 teams · 381.3 yds/g allowed · 4,194 yards)#58 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#49 (of 119 teams · +3.2 /g · +35 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 33 taken, 18 given · +1.36 /g)#19 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 119 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#46 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 119 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Nevada930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 119 teams · 449.3 yds/g · 5,392 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 410 points)#93 (of 119 teams · 410.6 yds/g allowed · 4,927 yards)#103 (of 119 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#52 (of 119 teams · +2.3 /g · +27 on the season)#56 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:56 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.164 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#101 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.992 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 119 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005New Mexico State0120 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 119 teams · 344.4 yds/g · 4,133 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 198 points)#118 (of 119 teams · 480.3 yds/g allowed · 5,764 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 38.8 pts/g allowed · 465 points)#117 (of 119 teams · -22.3 /g · -267 on the season)#119 (of 119 teams · -27 on the season · 14 taken, 41 given · -2.25 /g)#107 (of 119 teams · 15:59 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 119 teams · 0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#110 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005San José State380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 119 teams · 345.4 yds/g · 3,800 yards)#82 (of 119 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 248 points)#109 (of 119 teams · 441.4 yds/g allowed · 4,855 yards)#104 (of 119 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#99 (of 119 teams · -9.9 /g · -109 on the season)#50 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.09 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 16:32 /g · 3h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 119 teams · -0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 119 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 119 teams · 28% of plays successful)#89 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Utah State380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 119 teams · 317.0 yds/g · 3,487 yards)#100 (of 119 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 208 points)#86 (of 119 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,462 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#107 (of 119 teams · -13.8 /g · -152 on the season)#74 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.27 /g)#52 (of 119 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 119 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#93 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.992 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20052005 IdahoWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Hawai'i #9 of 119; 2005 Nevada #13 of 119; 2005 Boise State #24 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #56 of 119; 2005 San José State #77 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #78 of 119; 2005 Utah State #99 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 83 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #46
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #6 of 119; 2005 Boise State #9 of 119; 2005 Nevada #15 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #35 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #46 of 119; 2005 San José State #82 of 119; 2005 Utah State #100 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #109 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 85 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 46.
Total defensemedian #93
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 Boise State #59 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #72 of 119; 2005 Utah State #86 of 119; 2005 Nevada #93 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #106 of 119; 2005 San José State #109 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #118 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 102 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 93.
Scoring defensemedian #104
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #32 of 119; 2005 Boise State #51 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #58 of 119; 2005 Nevada #103 of 119; 2005 San José State #104 of 119; 2005 Utah State #105 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #112 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 115 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 104.
Point marginmedian #85
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #9 of 119; 2005 Boise State #18 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #49 of 119; 2005 Nevada #52 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #85 of 119; 2005 San José State #99 of 119; 2005 Utah State #107 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 110 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 85.
Turnover marginmedian #74
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Louisiana Tech #6 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #47 of 119; 2005 San José State #50 of 119; 2005 Nevada #56 of 119; 2005 Utah State #74 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2005 Boise State #90 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #119 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 92 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 74.
Possessionmedian #48
Possession. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Nevada #5 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #19 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #44 of 119; 2005 Boise State #48 of 119; 2005 Utah State #52 of 119; 2005 San José State #95 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #96 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #107 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 31 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 48.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #98
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Hawai'i #7 of 119; 2005 Nevada #8 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 Boise State #51 of 119; 2005 Utah State #98 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #99 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #100 of 119; 2005 San José State #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 113 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 98.
Defensive EPAmedian #99
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Boise State #18 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #71 of 119; 2005 Utah State #99 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #107 of 119; 2005 San José State #110 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #113 of 119; 2005 Nevada #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 68 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 99.
Offensive success ratemedian #73
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Nevada #6 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #12 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #39 of 119; 2005 Boise State #48 of 119; 2005 Utah State #73 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #83 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #104 of 119; 2005 San José State #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 100 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 73.
Defensive success ratemedian #89
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Boise State #23 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #46 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #51 of 119; 2005 San José State #89 of 119; 2005 Utah State #93 of 119; 2005 Nevada #101 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #110 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 50 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 89.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 San José State #10 of 119; 2005 New Mexico State #17 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #23 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #24 of 119; 2005 Boise State #38 of 119; 2005 Nevada #66 of 119; 2005 Utah State #76 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #104 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 117 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #56
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2005, best rank first: 2005 New Mexico State #3 of 119; 2005 Boise State #39 of 119; 2005 Hawai'i #46 of 119; 2005 Utah State #52 of 119; 2005 San José State #64 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #67 of 119; 2005 Nevada #75 of 119; 2005 Louisiana Tech #93 of 119. Marked: 2005 Idaho, ranked 56 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 56.