Metrics

IdahoVandals

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009Idaho850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 451.1 yds/g · 5,864 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 425 points)#107 (of 120 teams · 433.2 yds/g allowed · 5,632 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 468 points)#85 (of 120 teams · -3.3 /g · -43 on the season)#107 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 14 taken, 23 given · -0.69 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:33 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#112 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.971 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20090 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#14 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #2–#120. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #1–#120. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#98 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #14–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#90 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #14–#114. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#85 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #2–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#83 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #3–#113. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#63 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #15–#85. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#27 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #1–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#102 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #6–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #2–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #9–#116. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #1–#98. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#96 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #16–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2009Boise State1400 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 450.2 yds/g · 6,303 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 300.2 yds/g allowed · 4,203 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.1 /g · +351 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#47 (of 120 teams · 18:53 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Fresno State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 120 teams · 430.5 yds/g · 5,597 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#98 (of 120 teams · 413.7 yds/g allowed · 5,378 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#44 (of 120 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 16 taken, 24 given · -0.62 /g)#22 (of 120 teams · 19:31 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.976 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 120 teams · 1.065 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Hawai'i670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 437.5 yds/g · 5,687 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 296 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 404.5 yds/g allowed · 5,259 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#95 (of 120 teams · -6.7 /g · -87 on the season)#113 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 22 taken, 33 given · -0.85 /g)#15 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 4h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#116 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.051 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Louisiana Tech480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 120 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 4,467 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 350 points)#60 (of 120 teams · 368.1 yds/g allowed · 4,417 yards)#61 (of 120 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +3.4 /g · +41 on the season)#18 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.58 /g)#79 (of 120 teams · 17:58 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.842 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Nevada850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 505.6 yds/g · 6,573 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.2 pts/g · 497 points)#96 (of 120 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 5,321 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#24 (of 120 teams · +9.7 /g · +126 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.31 /g)#27 (of 120 teams · 19:23 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#38 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 120 teams · 1.048 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009New Mexico State3100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#120 (of 120 teams · 229.3 yds/g · 2,981 yards)#120 (of 120 teams · 11.5 pts/g · 149 points)#103 (of 120 teams · 423.6 yds/g allowed · 5,507 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#115 (of 120 teams · -20.1 /g · -262 on the season)#110 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 18 taken, 28 given · -0.77 /g)#76 (of 120 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 120 teams · -0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 120 teams · 33% of plays successful)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 120 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009San José State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 120 teams · 284.0 yds/g · 3,408 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 165 points)#109 (of 120 teams · 442.9 yds/g allowed · 5,315 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 414 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -20.8 /g · -249 on the season)#83 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.33 /g)#80 (of 120 teams · 17:58 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 120 teams · -0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#115 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.043 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.973 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Utah State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 120 teams · 439.3 yds/g · 5,272 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 349 points)#113 (of 120 teams · 455.1 yds/g allowed · 5,461 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#88 (of 120 teams · -4.9 /g · -59 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.50 /g)#85 (of 120 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#78 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 120 teams · 1.019 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20092009 IdahoWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #14
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nevada #2 of 120; 2009 Boise State #10 of 120; 2009 Utah State #12 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #14 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #17 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #64 of 120; 2009 San José State #115 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 9 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 14.
Scoring offensemedian #46
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #1 of 120; 2009 Nevada #6 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #14 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #46 of 120; 2009 Utah State #47 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #89 of 120; 2009 San José State #118 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 20 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 46.
Total defensemedian #98
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #60 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #93 of 120; 2009 Nevada #96 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #98 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #103 of 120; 2009 San José State #109 of 120; 2009 Utah State #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 107 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 98.
Scoring defensemedian #90
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #61 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #84 of 120; 2009 Nevada #86 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #90 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #101 of 120; 2009 Utah State #107 of 120; 2009 San José State #109 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 114 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 90.
Point marginmedian #85
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #2 of 120; 2009 Nevada #24 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #44 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #55 of 120; 2009 Utah State #88 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #95 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #115 of 120; 2009 San José State #117 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 85 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 85.
Turnover marginmedian #83
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #3 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #18 of 120; 2009 Utah State #24 of 120; 2009 Nevada #80 of 120; 2009 San José State #83 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #106 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #110 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 107 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 83.
Possessionmedian #63
Possession. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Hawai'i #15 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #22 of 120; 2009 Nevada #27 of 120; 2009 Boise State #47 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #76 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #79 of 120; 2009 San José State #80 of 120; 2009 Utah State #85 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 63 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 63.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Idaho, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #27
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nevada #1 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #17 of 120; 2009 Boise State #22 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #27 of 120; 2009 Utah State #46 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #51 of 120; 2009 San José State #103 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 5 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 27.
Defensive EPAmedian #102
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #6 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #64 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #74 of 120; 2009 Nevada #75 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #102 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #112 of 120; 2009 Utah State #114 of 120; 2009 San José State #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 113 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 102.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nevada #2 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #13 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #44 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #85 of 120; 2009 Utah State #94 of 120; 2009 San José State #116 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 17 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #78
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #9 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #31 of 120; 2009 Nevada #38 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #66 of 120; 2009 Utah State #78 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #89 of 120; 2009 San José State #115 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #116 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 112 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 78.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #29
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Utah State #1 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #4 of 120; 2009 San José State #6 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #25 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #51 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #67 of 120; 2009 Nevada #71 of 120; 2009 Boise State #98 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 29 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 29.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #96
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Louisiana Tech #16 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #29 of 120; 2009 Boise State #41 of 120; 2009 San José State #96 of 120; 2009 Utah State #109 of 120; 2009 Nevada #114 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #117 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 Idaho, ranked 89 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 96.