THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

IllinoisFighting Illini

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2025, released in week 16.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Illinois played 10 such games.

CFP Top 25, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Illinois9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#43 (of 74 teams · 364.6 yds/g · 3,646 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 262 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 384.4 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · -1.4 /g · -14 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:11 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 662.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#21 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#67. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#50. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#14 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#39. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#41. 10 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#21 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #2–#72. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #9–#118. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #4–#130. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#122. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#64. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#57. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#74. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#74. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)
2025Indiana16–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 455.2 yds/g · 4,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.8 pts/g · 376 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,359 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +29.8 /g · +268 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13 in these games · 19 taken, 6 given · +1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:55 /g · 4h 56m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 4,491 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 358 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 264.5 yds/g allowed · 2,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +20.0 /g · +200 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 30:25 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.350 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#21 (of 74 teams · 404.4 yds/g · 4,044 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 208.9 yds/g allowed · 2,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 8.4 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +25.3 /g · +253 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:10 /g · 5h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.141 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.998 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Notre Dame10–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.0 yds/g · 4,620 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.7 pts/g · 427 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 321.4 yds/g allowed · 3,214 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +23.3 /g · +233 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 29:40 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 912.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.322 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.470 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas Tech12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 BYU, #12 BYU, #15 Utah, #21 Houston)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 451.3 yds/g · 4,062 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38.2 pts/g · 344 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.3 yds/g allowed · 2,415 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 11.1 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +27.1 /g · +244 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11 in these games · 22 taken, 11 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:07 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 136 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.184 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Vanderbilt10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 74 teams · 440.1 yds/g · 3,961 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.0 /g · +99 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:34 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 685.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.392 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.427 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#25 (of 74 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 281.1 yds/g allowed · 2,811 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.4 /g · +164 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:03 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas A&M11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Notre Dame)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 447.7 yds/g · 4,029 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 302 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +9.4 /g · +85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:48 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 917.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama, #13 Texas, #22 Georgia Tech)#22 (of 74 teams · 404.2 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 324.3 yds/g allowed · 2,919 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 8 taken, 9 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:04 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1003.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama, #18 Michigan)#61 (of 74 teams · 320.2 yds/g · 2,882 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 196 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g allowed · 2,895 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +3.9 /g · +35 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:35 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 882.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Alabama11–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)#38 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 321.0 yds/g allowed · 3,210 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +7.2 /g · +72 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:34 /g · 5h 26m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 993.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025BYU12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #15 Utah, #17 Arizona · postseason: #22 Georgia Tech)#27 (of 74 teams · 395.5 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 344.1 yds/g allowed · 3,441 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 200 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.5 /g · +105 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 19 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:16 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 136 teams · 649.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 74 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#13 (of 74 teams · 430.3 yds/g · 4,303 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Houston10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Arizona)#24 (of 74 teams · 400.7 yds/g · 3,606 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 3,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 229 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +2.4 /g · +22 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:46 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 136 teams · 656.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ole Miss13–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma · postseason: #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma, #20 Tulane · postseason: #3 Georgia, #20 Tulane)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.3 yds/g · 3,698 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 266 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 375.8 yds/g allowed · 3,006 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +7.9 /g · +63 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:38 /g · 4h 05m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 813.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Utah11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 468.7 yds/g · 4,687 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 39.9 pts/g · 399 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 385.8 yds/g allowed · 3,858 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 209 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +19.0 /g · +190 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:32 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 707.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.346 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.328 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.377 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Arizona9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 74 teams · 396.0 yds/g · 3,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 303 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 314.6 yds/g allowed · 3,146 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +8.5 /g · +85 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 31:14 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 136 teams · 651.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Tulane11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 North Texas)#34 (of 74 teams · 376.3 yds/g · 1,129 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 67 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 1,237 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 75 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -2.7 /g · -8 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 7 taken, 2 given · +1.67 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:02 /g · 1h 39m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 136 teams · 650.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 74 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.160 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.199 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 298.9 yds/g · 2,989 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 300.0 yds/g allowed · 3,000 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.8 /g · +98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:48 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.074 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #18 Michigan)#46 (of 74 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 3,177 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 376.3 yds/g allowed · 3,387 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 13 taken, 5 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:58 /g · 4h 03m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.390 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 3,747 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 323.7 yds/g allowed · 2,913 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +8.4 /g · +76 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 74 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 411.4 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 6 taken, 10 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 3,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 334.2 yds/g allowed · 3,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +30 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:24 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025James Madison12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (263.0 yds/g · 263 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (264.0 yds/g allowed · 264 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g allowed · 28 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-14.0 /g · -14 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 1 taken, 2 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37:12 /g · 0h 37m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#25 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 459.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.984 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.709 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2025North Texas12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed · — · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— /g · — in these games · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#89 (of 136 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 136 teams · 569.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of plays successful · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— average PPA on successful plays · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 0 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20252025 IllinoisCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #21
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Utah #1 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #2 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #5 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #6 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #9 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #12 of 74; 2025 USC #13 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 Houston #24 of 74; 2025 Miami #25 of 74; 2025 Arizona #26 of 74; 2025 BYU #27 of 74; 2025 Tulane #34 of 74; 2025 Alabama #38 of 74; 2025 Michigan #39 of 74; 2025 Texas #46 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2025 Iowa #67 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 43 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Scoring offensemedian #17
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Notre Dame #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Utah #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #8 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #10 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #11 of 74; 2025 Miami #14 of 74; 2025 Georgia #16 of 74; 2025 USC #17 of 74; 2025 BYU #18 of 74; 2025 Virginia #19 of 74; 2025 Arizona #20 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #24 of 74; 2025 Houston #27 of 74; 2025 Alabama #31 of 74; 2025 Iowa #33 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Michigan #43 of 74; 2025 Tulane #49 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #50 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 35 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Total defensemedian #14
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 Miami #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Arizona #8 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #12 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Georgia #14 of 74; 2025 Michigan #16 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #17 of 74; 2025 BYU #20 of 74; 2025 USC #27 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #36 of 74; 2025 Texas #37 of 74; 2025 Houston #38 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #40 of 74; 2025 Utah #43 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Tulane #56 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 42 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 14.
Scoring defensemedian #13
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #7 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #8 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 BYU #11 of 74; 2025 Michigan #12 of 74; 2025 Georgia #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #14 of 74; 2025 Arizona #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #21 of 74; 2025 USC #24 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #27 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 Tulane #32 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #34 of 74; 2025 Houston #35 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 47 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Point marginmedian #13
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #4 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Utah #6 of 74; 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #8 of 74; 2025 Georgia #9 of 74; 2025 BYU #10 of 74; 2025 Iowa #12 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #13 of 74; 2025 Arizona #14 of 74; 2025 Virginia #15 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #16 of 74; 2025 Alabama #17 of 74; 2025 USC #18 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #25 of 74; 2025 Michigan #29 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #30 of 74; 2025 Houston #32 of 74; 2025 Texas #34 of 74; 2025 Tulane #41 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 38 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Turnover marginmedian #20
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Tulane #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #4 of 74; 2025 BYU #7 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #10 of 74; 2025 Arizona #10 of 74; 2025 Texas #12 of 74; 2025 Oregon #13 of 74; 2025 Miami #13 of 74; 2025 Alabama #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #20 of 74; 2025 Iowa #22 of 74; 2025 Utah #26 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #30 of 74; 2025 USC #33 of 74; 2025 Michigan #33 of 74; 2025 Houston #37 of 74; 2025 Georgia #41 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #41 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #41 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #53 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #56 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 22 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Possessionmedian #21
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Miami #3 of 74; 2025 BYU #4 of 74; 2025 Georgia #5 of 74; 2025 Tulane #6 of 74; 2025 Indiana #7 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 74; 2025 Houston #9 of 74; 2025 Alabama #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #17 of 74; 2025 Arizona #21 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #23 of 74; 2025 Iowa #25 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #26 of 74; 2025 Utah #28 of 74; 2025 Oregon #30 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 USC #40 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #43 of 74; 2025 Michigan #49 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Texas #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 37 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Returning passingmedian #80
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Arizona #13 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 James Madison #25 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #49 of 136; 2025 Utah #53 of 136; 2025 Houston #59 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #63 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Texas #76 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Georgia #83 of 136; 2025 Tulane #85 of 136; 2025 Alabama #88 of 136; 2025 North Texas #89 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #96 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 BYU #112 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #116 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 18 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 80.
Returning receivingmedian #51
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #4 of 136; 2025 Houston #6 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Alabama #12 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #27 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #33 of 136; 2025 Georgia #34 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #37 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Arizona #44 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 North Texas #51 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 BYU #56 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Texas #65 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #83 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #86 of 136; 2025 James Madison #92 of 136; 2025 Tulane #122 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136; 2025 Utah #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 48 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 51.
Returning rushingmedian #58
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #2 of 136; 2025 James Madison #4 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Houston #9 of 136; 2025 Texas #21 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #24 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #30 of 136; 2025 Georgia #41 of 136; 2025 Alabama #46 of 136; 2025 BYU #53 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Arizona #58 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 North Texas #72 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #82 of 136; 2025 Tulane #83 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Utah #119 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #122 of 136. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 20 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 58.
Team talentmedian #29
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #1 of 136; 2025 Alabama #2 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Texas #4 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #9 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #14 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #29 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Utah #44 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #55 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 Houston #66 of 136; 2025 Arizona #67 of 136; 2025 Tulane #68 of 136; 2025 BYU #70 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136; 2025 North Texas #96 of 136; 2025 James Madison #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 64 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Offensive EPAmedian #18
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #4 of 74; 2025 Utah #5 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2025 USC #8 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #11 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #12 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #13 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #17 of 74; 2025 Miami #18 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 BYU #23 of 74; 2025 Alabama #28 of 74; 2025 Michigan #31 of 74; 2025 Virginia #33 of 74; 2025 Arizona #40 of 74; 2025 Iowa #41 of 74; 2025 Texas #43 of 74; 2025 Houston #55 of 74; 2025 Tulane #60 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #64 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 26 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Defensive EPAmedian #20
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #4 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #5 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Virginia #10 of 74; 2025 Iowa #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #17 of 74; 2025 Alabama #18 of 74; 2025 Arizona #20 of 74; 2025 BYU #21 of 74; 2025 Michigan #28 of 74; 2025 Georgia #29 of 74; 2025 Houston #30 of 74; 2025 USC #31 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #32 of 74; 2025 Tulane #33 of 74; 2025 Texas #35 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #39 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #44 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #61 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 57 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Offensive success ratemedian #20
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Oregon #6 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Miami #9 of 74; 2025 Utah #11 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #12 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #14 of 74; 2025 Georgia #18 of 74; 2025 BYU #20 of 74; 2025 Michigan #21 of 74; 2025 Houston #25 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #29 of 74; 2025 Alabama #33 of 74; 2025 Arizona #34 of 74; 2025 Iowa #36 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #41 of 74; 2025 Tulane #46 of 74; 2025 Virginia #47 of 74; 2025 Texas #58 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 17 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive success ratemedian #19
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #1 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #5 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Virginia #12 of 74; 2025 Arizona #13 of 74; 2025 Utah #16 of 74; 2025 Alabama #19 of 74; 2025 BYU #24 of 74; 2025 Georgia #25 of 74; 2025 Iowa #28 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #30 of 74; 2025 Houston #36 of 74; 2025 Michigan #41 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #43 of 74; 2025 Tulane #47 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #49 of 74; 2025 USC #57 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 67 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #30
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Notre Dame #1 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #7 of 74; 2025 Texas #9 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #11 of 74; 2025 Utah #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #18 of 74; 2025 Oregon #20 of 74; 2025 USC #23 of 74; 2025 Alabama #25 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #28 of 74; 2025 Arizona #30 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #33 of 74; 2025 Indiana #39 of 74; 2025 Georgia #55 of 74; 2025 Tulane #59 of 74; 2025 BYU #61 of 74; 2025 Houston #63 of 74; 2025 Michigan #65 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #66 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #67 of 74; 2025 Miami #70 of 74; 2025 Iowa #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 47 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 30.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Iowa #2 of 74; 2025 Michigan #5 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Texas Tech #15 of 74; 2025 Houston #19 of 74; 2025 Georgia #20 of 74; 2025 Tulane #23 of 74; 2025 BYU #30 of 74; 2025 Arizona #31 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #37 of 74; 2025 Virginia #40 of 74; 2025 Notre Dame #44 of 74; 2025 Alabama #45 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2025 Miami #51 of 74; 2025 Indiana #53 of 74; 2025 Ole Miss #56 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Utah #68 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Illinois, ranked 14 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 36.