THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

IndianaHoosiers

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Indiana played 9 such games.

Big Ten, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Indiana16–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 455.2 yds/g · 4,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.8 pts/g · 376 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,359 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +29.8 /g · +268 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13 in these games · 19 taken, 6 given · +1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:55 /g · 4h 56m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 18 Big Ten teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#45 (Total offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#73. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#72. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#31 (Scoring defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#69. 5 of 18 in the top 10.)#38 (Point margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#70. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#71 (Returning passing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #9–#114. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#63 (Returning rushing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#120. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#72. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#72. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#26 (Offensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#71. 5 of 18 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #15–#74. 0 of 18 in the top 10.)#11 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#70. 8 of 18 in the top 10.)
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 4,491 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 358 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 264.5 yds/g allowed · 2,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +20.0 /g · +200 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 30:25 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.350 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#21 (of 74 teams · 404.4 yds/g · 4,044 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 208.9 yds/g allowed · 2,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 8.4 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +25.3 /g · +253 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:10 /g · 5h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.141 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.998 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Washington9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 74 teams · 375.7 yds/g · 3,381 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 238 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 327.7 yds/g allowed · 2,949 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 136 teams · 720.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#13 (of 74 teams · 430.3 yds/g · 4,303 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 298.9 yds/g · 2,989 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 300.0 yds/g allowed · 3,000 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.8 /g · +98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:48 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.074 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Penn State7–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 74 teams · 333.0 yds/g · 2,997 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 249 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 372.2 yds/g allowed · 3,350 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 240 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · +1.0 /g · +9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 6 taken, 9 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 29:12 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 910.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 74 teams · 0.235 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.210 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.192 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 74 teams · 324.2 yds/g · 2,918 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 349.3 yds/g allowed · 3,144 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.4 /g · -31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:43 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 136 teams · 678.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 74 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 0.254 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 3,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 334.2 yds/g allowed · 3,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +30 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:24 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Nebraska7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g · 3,217 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 343.3 yds/g allowed · 3,433 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -4.5 /g · -45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:33 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 821.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Illinois9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#43 (of 74 teams · 364.6 yds/g · 3,646 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 262 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 384.4 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · -1.4 /g · -14 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:11 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 662.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 74 teams · 354.0 yds/g · 3,186 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 19.9 pts/g · 179 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 3,923 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -106 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 25:44 /g · 3h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 136 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 699.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 74 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.337 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Michigan State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 74 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 400.3 yds/g allowed · 4,003 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · -9.8 /g · -98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 29:33 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 136 teams · 717.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Minnesota8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 263.5 yds/g · 2,635 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 190 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 392.2 yds/g allowed · 3,922 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 271 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 10 taken, 6 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 28:05 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 136 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 711.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 74 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 0.235 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.252 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025UCLA3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 74 teams · 308.4 yds/g · 3,084 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 185 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 3,843 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.1 /g · -151 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 8 taken, 10 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 136 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 136 teams · 766.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 74 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.161 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Rutgers5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 3,508 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 464.4 yds/g allowed · 4,180 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -13.2 /g · -119 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 8 taken, 11 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 31:30 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 689.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.406 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Wisconsin4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 224.8 yds/g · 2,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 9.5 pts/g · 95 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 352.5 yds/g allowed · 3,525 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.4 /g · -154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 3 taken, 14 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 29:46 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 136 teams · 763.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 0.226 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Purdue2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 74 teams · 330.6 yds/g · 3,306 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 160 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 460.1 yds/g allowed · 4,601 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 365 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.5 /g · -205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 9 taken, 20 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:20 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.240 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20252025 IndianaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #45
Total offense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 USC #13 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #29 of 74; 2025 Washington #35 of 74; 2025 Michigan #39 of 74; 2025 Illinois #43 of 74; 2025 Maryland #45 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #51 of 74; 2025 Penn State #52 of 74; 2025 Purdue #54 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #58 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #59 of 74; 2025 UCLA #64 of 74; 2025 Iowa #67 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #72 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 5 of 74. Big Ten median rank 45.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #8 of 74; 2025 USC #17 of 74; 2025 Penn State #29 of 74; 2025 Iowa #33 of 74; 2025 Washington #34 of 74; 2025 Illinois #35 of 74; 2025 Michigan #43 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #44 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #45 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #46 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2025 Maryland #57 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #59 of 74; 2025 UCLA #63 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 2 of 74. Big Ten median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Washington #15 of 74; 2025 Michigan #16 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #19 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #24 of 74; 2025 USC #27 of 74; 2025 Penn State #34 of 74; 2025 UCLA #41 of 74; 2025 Illinois #42 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #46 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #48 of 74; 2025 Maryland #62 of 74; 2025 Purdue #70 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 2 of 74. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #31
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Washington #9 of 74; 2025 Michigan #12 of 74; 2025 USC #24 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #31 of 74; 2025 Penn State #41 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #45 of 74; 2025 Illinois #47 of 74; 2025 Maryland #57 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #60 of 74; 2025 UCLA #61 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 3 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Point marginmedian #38
Point margin. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #12 of 74; 2025 USC #18 of 74; 2025 Washington #19 of 74; 2025 Michigan #29 of 74; 2025 Penn State #35 of 74; 2025 Illinois #38 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #43 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #47 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #53 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #55 of 74; 2025 Maryland #59 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #64 of 74; 2025 UCLA #67 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 1 of 74. Big Ten median rank 38.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Oregon #13 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #20 of 74; 2025 Illinois #22 of 74; 2025 Iowa #22 of 74; 2025 Maryland #31 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #31 of 74; 2025 Michigan #33 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #33 of 74; 2025 USC #33 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #45 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Penn State #50 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #50 of 74; 2025 Washington #50 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 3 of 74. Big Ten median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #10 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #19 of 74; 2025 Iowa #25 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #27 of 74; 2025 Oregon #30 of 74; 2025 Illinois #37 of 74; 2025 USC #40 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #41 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #44 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Michigan #49 of 74; 2025 Penn State #53 of 74; 2025 Washington #56 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #65 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Maryland #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 7 of 74. Big Ten median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #71
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Rutgers #1 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #9 of 136; 2025 Illinois #18 of 136; 2025 Penn State #30 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #31 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Washington #69 of 136; 2025 Purdue #71 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #102 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #113 of 136; 2025 Maryland #120 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #122 of 136; 2025 UCLA #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 117 of 136. Big Ten median rank 71.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #24 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #26 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #30 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 UCLA #36 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #45 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Illinois #48 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #52 of 136; 2025 Washington #53 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Penn State #62 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #91 of 136; 2025 Maryland #109 of 136; 2025 Purdue #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 63 of 136. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #63
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Penn State #5 of 136; 2025 Washington #10 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #19 of 136; 2025 Illinois #20 of 136; 2025 Purdue #28 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #35 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #55 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #63 of 136; 2025 UCLA #64 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #77 of 136; 2025 Maryland #93 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 111 of 136. Big Ten median rank 63.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 Penn State #10 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #20 of 136; 2025 UCLA #26 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #28 of 136; 2025 Washington #37 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #38 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #41 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Maryland #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #53 of 136; 2025 Purdue #54 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #57 of 136; 2025 Illinois #64 of 136. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 72 of 136. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #35
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #4 of 74; 2025 USC #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #16 of 74; 2025 Penn State #21 of 74; 2025 Illinois #26 of 74; 2025 Michigan #31 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #35 of 74; 2025 Iowa #41 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #42 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #45 of 74; 2025 Maryland #46 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #49 of 74; 2025 UCLA #50 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2025 Purdue #63 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 2 of 74. Big Ten median rank 35.
Defensive EPAmedian #50
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Washington #12 of 74; 2025 Iowa #13 of 74; 2025 Michigan #28 of 74; 2025 USC #31 of 74; 2025 Penn State #46 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #50 of 74; 2025 Maryland #51 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #53 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #55 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2025 Illinois #57 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #59 of 74; 2025 UCLA #64 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 4 of 74. Big Ten median rank 50.
Offensive success ratemedian #26
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #6 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Washington #8 of 74; 2025 Penn State #16 of 74; 2025 Illinois #17 of 74; 2025 Michigan #21 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2025 Iowa #36 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #37 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #44 of 74; 2025 Purdue #48 of 74; 2025 UCLA #52 of 74; 2025 Maryland #59 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 1 of 74. Big Ten median rank 26.
Defensive success ratemedian #57
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #20 of 74; 2025 Iowa #28 of 74; 2025 Michigan #41 of 74; 2025 Penn State #42 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #44 of 74; 2025 USC #57 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #61 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #63 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #64 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #65 of 74; 2025 Illinois #67 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Maryland #70 of 74; 2025 UCLA #72 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 3 of 74. Big Ten median rank 57.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #47
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Maryland #15 of 74; 2025 Oregon #20 of 74; 2025 USC #23 of 74; 2025 Purdue #38 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2025 Penn State #44 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Illinois #47 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #49 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #54 of 74; 2025 Washington #56 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #60 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #64 of 74; 2025 Michigan #65 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #66 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #73 of 74; 2025 Iowa #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 39 of 74. Big Ten median rank 47.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #11
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Iowa #2 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #3 of 74; 2025 Michigan #5 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #9 of 74; 2025 Maryland #10 of 74; 2025 Michigan State #11 of 74; 2025 UCLA #12 of 74; 2025 Illinois #14 of 74; 2025 Penn State #18 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #39 of 74; 2025 Purdue #49 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Indiana, ranked 53 of 74. Big Ten median rank 11.