THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Kansas StateWildcats

Season
‹
›Current

Big 12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big 12, 2010

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Kansas State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 120 teams · 378.8 yds/g · 4,924 yds)#22 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 437 points)#106 (of 120 teams · 445.7 yds/g allowed · 5,794 yds)#78 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#48 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.31 /g)#64 (of 120 teams · 18:40 /g · 4h 03m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#60 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#79 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 120 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#35 (Total offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #3–#113. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #3–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #6–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #6–#103. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #10–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #7–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Possession: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #17–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #7–#105. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #4–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #8–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #4–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #14–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #3–#118. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2010Oklahoma State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 520.2 yds/g · 6,763 yds)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 44.2 pts/g · 575 points)#88 (of 120 teams · 409.5 yds/g allowed · 5,324 yds)#61 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +17.9 /g · +232 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 34 taken, 22 given · +0.92 /g)#113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:56 /g · 3h 40m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#57 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.863 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.872 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Nebraska10–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 398.1 yds/g · 5,574 yds)#39 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 432 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 306.8 yds/g allowed · 4,295 yds)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +13.5 /g · +189 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.07 /g)#34 (of 120 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 30m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#15 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.960 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.795 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Texas5–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 120 teams · 382.5 yds/g · 4,590 yds)#88 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 285 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 300.2 yds/g allowed · 3,602 yds)#49 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#66 (of 120 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#116 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 18 taken, 30 given · -1.00 /g)#17 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 3h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#73 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.885 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.857 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Missouri10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 120 teams · 409.6 yds/g · 5,325 yds)#43 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#47 (of 120 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,633 yds)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 209 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +13.8 /g · +179 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +11 on the season · 29 taken, 18 given · +0.85 /g)#88 (of 120 teams · 17:48 /g · 3h 52m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#34 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#34 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.916 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Oklahoma12–24 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 481.4 yds/g · 6,739 yds)#14 (of 120 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 521 points)#53 (of 120 teams · 361.9 yds/g allowed · 5,066 yds)#33 (of 120 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#12 (of 120 teams · +15.4 /g · +216 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +14 on the season · 32 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#40 (of 120 teams · 19:02 /g · 4h 27m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#25 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.801 average PPA on successful plays)#118 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Texas A&M9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 120 teams · 441.9 yds/g · 5,744 yds)#34 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 406 points)#55 (of 120 teams · 364.3 yds/g allowed · 4,736 yds)#34 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#30 (of 120 teams · +9.3 /g · +121 on the season)#81 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.38 /g)#28 (of 120 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#20 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.853 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.875 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Baylor7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 120 teams · 475.3 yds/g · 6,179 yds)#36 (of 120 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 405 points)#104 (of 120 teams · 435.4 yds/g allowed · 5,660 yds)#89 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#65 (of 120 teams · +0.7 /g · +9 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#44 (of 120 teams · 18:58 /g · 4h 07m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#29 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#84 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.947 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Colorado5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 120 teams · 359.7 yds/g · 4,316 yds)#84 (of 120 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#83 (of 120 teams · 400.0 yds/g allowed · 4,800 yds)#91 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#88 (of 120 teams · -6.6 /g · -79 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#30 (of 120 teams · 19:22 /g · 3h 52m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#76 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#97 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.957 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Iowa State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 120 teams · 317.4 yds/g · 3,809 yds)#97 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#87 (of 120 teams · 408.3 yds/g allowed · 4,899 yds)#76 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#90 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 23 taken, 17 given · +0.50 /g)#104 (of 120 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 29m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#94 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Texas Tech8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 120 teams · 460.2 yds/g · 5,983 yds)#23 (of 120 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points)#114 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 456.3 yds/g allowed · 5,932 yds)#93 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g allowed · 402 points)#59 (of 120 teams · +2.1 /g · +28 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 23 taken, 27 given · -0.31 /g)#99 (of 120 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#36 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#71 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.932 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Kansas3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 296.4 yds/g · 3,557 yds)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 205 points)#98 (of 120 teams · 427.7 yds/g allowed · 5,132 yds)#103 (of 120 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -17.3 /g · -208 on the season)#103 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 12 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g)#97 (of 120 teams · 17:32 /g · 3h 30m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 120 teams · -0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#110 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.935 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.875 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20102010 Kansas StateBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #35
Total offense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma State #3 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #10 of 120; 2010 Baylor #13 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #15 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #23 of 120; 2010 Missouri #35 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #44 of 120; 2010 Texas #58 of 120; 2010 Colorado #79 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #99 of 120; 2010 Kansas #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 62 of 120. Big 12 median rank 35.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma State #3 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #14 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #23 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #34 of 120; 2010 Baylor #36 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #39 of 120; 2010 Missouri #43 of 120; 2010 Colorado #84 of 120; 2010 Texas #88 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #97 of 120; 2010 Kansas #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 22 of 120. Big 12 median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Texas #6 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #11 of 120; 2010 Missouri #47 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #53 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #55 of 120; 2010 Colorado #83 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #87 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #88 of 120; 2010 Kansas #98 of 120; 2010 Baylor #104 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #114 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 106 of 120. Big 12 median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #61
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Missouri #6 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #9 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #33 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #34 of 120; 2010 Texas #49 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #61 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #76 of 120; 2010 Baylor #89 of 120; 2010 Colorado #91 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #93 of 120; 2010 Kansas #103 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 78 of 120. Big 12 median rank 61.
Point marginmedian #48
Point margin. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma State #10 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #12 of 120; 2010 Missouri #15 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #16 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #30 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #59 of 120; 2010 Baylor #65 of 120; 2010 Texas #66 of 120; 2010 Colorado #88 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #90 of 120; 2010 Kansas #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 48 of 120. Big 12 median rank 48.
Turnover marginmedian #55
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #7 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #12 of 120; 2010 Missouri #15 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #30 of 120; 2010 Baylor #55 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #61 of 120; 2010 Colorado #64 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #74 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #81 of 120; 2010 Kansas #103 of 120; 2010 Texas #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 38 of 120. Big 12 median rank 55.
Possessionmedian #44
Possession. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Texas #17 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #28 of 120; 2010 Colorado #30 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #34 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #40 of 120; 2010 Baylor #44 of 120; 2010 Missouri #88 of 120; 2010 Kansas #97 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #99 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #104 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 64 of 120. Big 12 median rank 44.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma State #7 of 120; 2010 Baylor #15 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #29 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #43 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #45 of 120; 2010 Colorado #51 of 120; 2010 Missouri #58 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #59 of 120; 2010 Texas #68 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #87 of 120; 2010 Kansas #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 41 of 120. Big 12 median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #57
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Texas A&M #4 of 120; 2010 Texas #10 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #11 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #30 of 120; 2010 Missouri #33 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #57 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #84 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #86 of 120; 2010 Colorado #96 of 120; 2010 Baylor #108 of 120; 2010 Kansas #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 105 of 120. Big 12 median rank 57.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma State #8 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #25 of 120; 2010 Baylor #29 of 120; 2010 Missouri #34 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #36 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #37 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #64 of 120; 2010 Texas #73 of 120; 2010 Colorado #76 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #94 of 120; 2010 Kansas #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 60 of 120. Big 12 median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #57
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #4 of 120; 2010 Texas #9 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #15 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #20 of 120; 2010 Missouri #34 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #57 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #71 of 120; 2010 Baylor #84 of 120; 2010 Colorado #97 of 120; 2010 Kansas #110 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 79 of 120. Big 12 median rank 57.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Baylor #14 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #27 of 120; 2010 Kansas #49 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #65 of 120; 2010 Missouri #67 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #71 of 120; 2010 Colorado #72 of 120; 2010 Texas #87 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #98 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #102 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 37 of 120. Big 12 median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #29
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nebraska #3 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #9 of 120; 2010 Missouri #17 of 120; 2010 Texas #20 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma State #28 of 120; 2010 Kansas #29 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #30 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #64 of 120; 2010 Baylor #77 of 120; 2010 Colorado #84 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Kansas State, ranked 109 of 120. Big 12 median rank 29.