Metrics

KansasJayhawks

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2012

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Kansas1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 124 teams · 360.3 yds/g · 4,324 yards)#118 (of 124 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 219 points)#116 (of 124 teams · 481.8 yds/g allowed · 5,782 yards)#112 (of 124 teams · 36.1 pts/g allowed · 433 points)#119 (of 124 teams · -17.8 /g · -214 on the season)#80 (of 124 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.25 /g)#29 (of 124 teams · 32:03 /g · 6h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 124 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 124 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#117 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 124 teams · 0.957 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Big 12 teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#13 (Total offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #2–#95. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #3–#118. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#69 (Total defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #17–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#64 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #28–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Point margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #8–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #3–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Possession: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #2–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#21 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #3–#103. 4 of 10 in the top 10.)#86 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #6–#114. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#18 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#110. 4 of 10 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #16–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #24–#111. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #9–#121. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2012Baylor850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 572.2 yds/g · 7,439 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 44.5 pts/g · 578 points)#123 (of 124 teams · 502.2 yds/g allowed · 6,529 yards)#113 (of 124 teams · 37.2 pts/g allowed · 484 points)#41 (of 124 teams · +7.2 /g · +94 on the season)#52 (of 124 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#115 (of 124 teams · 27:35 /g · 5h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 124 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 48% of plays successful)#108 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 124 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 124 teams · 0.918 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Iowa State670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 124 teams · 364.1 yds/g · 4,734 yards)#87 (of 124 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 319 points)#97 (of 124 teams · 442.1 yds/g allowed · 5,748 yards)#38 (of 124 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#69 (of 124 teams · +0.6 /g · +8 on the season)#60 (of 124 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#119 (of 124 teams · 27:02 /g · 5h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 124 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 124 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#84 (of 124 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 124 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 124 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Kansas State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 124 teams · 401.4 yds/g · 5,218 yards)#11 (of 124 teams · 38.9 pts/g · 505 points)#46 (of 124 teams · 375.3 yds/g allowed · 4,879 yards)#28 (of 124 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +16.7 /g · +217 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +19 on the season · 31 taken, 12 given · +1.46 /g)#23 (of 124 teams · 32:27 /g · 7h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 124 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#86 (of 124 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#110 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 124 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 124 teams · 0.871 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Oklahoma1033 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 124 teams · 497.9 yds/g · 6,472 yards)#15 (of 124 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#66 (of 124 teams · 398.3 yds/g allowed · 5,178 yards)#50 (of 124 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#23 (of 124 teams · +12.7 /g · +165 on the season)#82 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.31 /g)#14 (of 124 teams · 33:04 /g · 7h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 124 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 49% of plays successful)#28 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 124 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#121 (of 124 teams · 1.047 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Oklahoma State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 547.0 yds/g · 7,111 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 45.7 pts/g · 594 points)#82 (of 124 teams · 421.4 yds/g allowed · 5,478 yards)#64 (of 124 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 367 points)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +17.5 /g · +227 on the season)#60 (of 124 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#117 (of 124 teams · 27:13 /g · 5h 54m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 124 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 48% of plays successful)#59 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 124 teams · 0.915 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 124 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012TCU760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 124 teams · 388.6 yds/g · 5,052 yards)#68 (of 124 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 368 points)#17 (of 124 teams · 323.9 yds/g allowed · 4,211 yards)#30 (of 124 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#48 (of 124 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season)#49 (of 124 teams · +3 on the season · 32 taken, 29 given · +0.23 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34:42 /g · 7h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 124 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#16 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 124 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.836 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Texas945 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 124 teams · 434.6 yds/g · 5,650 yards)#23 (of 124 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#69 (of 124 teams · 404.1 yds/g allowed · 5,254 yards)#74 (of 124 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#45 (of 124 teams · +6.5 /g · +84 on the season)#41 (of 124 teams · +5 on the season · 21 taken, 16 given · +0.38 /g)#52 (of 124 teams · 30:59 /g · 6h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 124 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 124 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#69 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 124 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 124 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Texas Tech850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 124 teams · 495.9 yds/g · 6,446 yards)#20 (of 124 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 487 points)#40 (of 124 teams · 367.3 yds/g allowed · 4,775 yards)#92 (of 124 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#48 (of 124 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season)#110 (of 124 teams · -13 on the season · 11 taken, 24 given · -1.00 /g)#74 (of 124 teams · 30:05 /g · 6h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 124 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 50% of plays successful)#45 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 124 teams · 0.896 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012West Virginia760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 502.0 yds/g · 6,526 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 39.5 pts/g · 513 points)#112 (of 124 teams · 472.5 yds/g allowed · 6,142 yards)#117 (of 124 teams · 38.1 pts/g allowed · 495 points)#67 (of 124 teams · +1.4 /g · +18 on the season)#34 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.54 /g)#101 (of 124 teams · 28:33 /g · 6h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 124 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 124 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#63 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 124 teams · 0.977 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 124 teams · 1.039 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20122012 KansasBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #13
Total offense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Baylor #2 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #4 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #10 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #12 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #13 of 124; 2012 Texas #40 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #59 of 124; 2012 TCU #73 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #93 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 95 of 124. Big 12 median rank 13.
Scoring offensemedian #15
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oklahoma State #3 of 124; 2012 Baylor #4 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #9 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #11 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #15 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #20 of 124; 2012 Texas #23 of 124; 2012 TCU #68 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #87 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 118 of 124. Big 12 median rank 15.
Total defensemedian #69
Total defense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #17 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #40 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #46 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #66 of 124; 2012 Texas #69 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #82 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #97 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #112 of 124; 2012 Baylor #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 116 of 124. Big 12 median rank 69.
Scoring defensemedian #64
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Kansas State #28 of 124; 2012 TCU #30 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #38 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #50 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #64 of 124; 2012 Texas #74 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #92 of 124; 2012 Baylor #113 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #117 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 112 of 124. Big 12 median rank 64.
Point marginmedian #45
Point margin. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oklahoma State #8 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #9 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #23 of 124; 2012 Baylor #41 of 124; 2012 Texas #45 of 124; 2012 TCU #48 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #48 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #67 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #69 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 119 of 124. Big 12 median rank 45.
Turnover marginmedian #52
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Kansas State #3 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #34 of 124; 2012 Texas #41 of 124; 2012 TCU #49 of 124; 2012 Baylor #52 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #60 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #60 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #82 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 80 of 124. Big 12 median rank 52.
Possessionmedian #52
Possession. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #2 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #14 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #23 of 124; 2012 Texas #52 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #74 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #101 of 124; 2012 Baylor #115 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #117 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 29 of 124. Big 12 median rank 52.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #21
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Texas Tech #3 of 124; 2012 Baylor #6 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #8 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #9 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #21 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #27 of 124; 2012 Texas #31 of 124; 2012 TCU #68 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #102 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 103 of 124. Big 12 median rank 21.
Defensive EPAmedian #86
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #6 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #46 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #57 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #74 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #86 of 124; 2012 Baylor #90 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #92 of 124; 2012 Texas #97 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #98 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 114 of 124. Big 12 median rank 86.
Offensive success ratemedian #18
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Texas Tech #1 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #4 of 124; 2012 Baylor #8 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #9 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #18 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #22 of 124; 2012 Texas #38 of 124; 2012 TCU #80 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 102 of 124. Big 12 median rank 18.
Defensive success ratemedian #63
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #16 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #28 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #45 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #59 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #63 of 124; 2012 Texas #69 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #84 of 124; 2012 Baylor #108 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 117 of 124. Big 12 median rank 63.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 West Virginia #24 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #34 of 124; 2012 Baylor #36 of 124; 2012 Texas #38 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #73 of 124; 2012 TCU #80 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #89 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #107 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #111 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 67 of 124. Big 12 median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #76
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #9 of 124; 2012 Kansas State #21 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #47 of 124; 2012 Baylor #49 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #76 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #88 of 124; 2012 Texas #100 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #119 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas, ranked 83 of 124. Big 12 median rank 76.